Josh Yun - Chess Virtuoso & Pawn Whisperer
Meet Josh Yun, also known in the digital chess realm as ChipanaK, a bullet and blitz aficionado whose rating history reads like a rollercoaster through the chess cosmos. Starting with bullet ratings hovering around the 1700s in the early 2010s, Josh has surged to a fearsome peak of 2522 in bullet chess by 2025 — that's a number that practically demands respect (and maybe a few sacrifices).
But Josh isn't all about lightning-fast bullet games; his blitz prowess is nothing to sneeze at either, cruising at a strong 2316 rating and boasting a blitz win record that many would envy. Rapid games? Josh dabbles there too, scoring wins with a nice blend of aggressive gambits and solid defense, showing he's got patience when the clock ticks slower.
Playing Style & Personality
Josh's chess style can best be described as a thrilling mix of aggressive openings and tactical fireworks. He's a big fan of the Old Benoni Defense, racking up victories over 57% of the time with this classic underdog defense — proving he's comfortable turning the tables on his opponents. The Nimzowitsch Larsen Attack also appears frequently in his repertoire, where he executes both classical and modern variations with good success.
Not one to hold grudges, Josh boasts a staggering 100% comeback rate after losing a piece, turning near-disasters into glorious triumphs. Talk about resilience! His longest winning streak reached an impressive 28 games — apparently, he's not just quick on the clock but also focused as a laser beam.
Quirks & Fun Facts
- Early Resignation Rate: A humble 0.92%. Josh respects opponents too much to throw in the towel prematurely – chess battles till the last pawn!
- Average Moves per Win: Around 71 moves, so don’t expect three-move checkmates here — Josh prefers to milk out every advantage.
- White Pieces Advantage: He wins a little more than half the time with White (55.18%), but with the Black pieces, he still holds a formidable 53.32% win rate.
- Time Matters: Apparently, Josh is at his sharpest playing around 1 AM with an impressive 60.67% win rate. Night owl tactics, anyone?
Whether you're facing Josh on the bullet battlefield or the rapid arena, expect a creatively stubborn opponent who plays chess not just as a game but as a high-speed art form. With a nickname like ChipanaK, you might think he's from some secret chess ninja clan — and honestly, watching his games, you might not be wrong.
In the words of Josh himself (probably), “A strong pawn structure and a killer instinct make for the perfect checkmate recipe.”
Quick overview — what I see at a glance
Nice run lately: +70 in the last month and a clear upward trend. Your strength‑adjusted win rate (~52.3%) and the mix of clean wins show you understand both practical blitz ideas and how to convert advantages. You also have a couple of openings that score very well for you (notably the Amazon Attack and Modern).
Recent games to review (short picks)
Here are a couple of recent games worth a quick post‑mortem. Open them, replay the critical moments and ask: “What did I miss? What was my plan?”
- Compact win vs rafiquzzatin — short, clean technical win. Replay:
- Loss vs joshing_around20 — time loss after getting into a sharp tactical melee. Good lesson for time control and simplification under pressure.
- Classic middlegame win with kingside play (see the Qe2# and king‑hunt patterns in your other wins) — reuse the attacking motifs that worked well.
What you're doing well
- Opening familiarity — you get playable positions quickly and steer the game into lines you know (lots of games in Nimzo-Larsen Attack / Modern / Amazon Attack).
- Converting advantages — many wins show you can trade into favorable endgames or finish with tactical shots instead of overshooting.
- Practical decision making in blitz — you pick clear, active plans rather than slow maneuvering that burns time.
- Good recent form — consistent positive slope and a +70 rating month shows improvements are sticking.
Biggest areas to improve (fast wins in strength)
Focus on these 3 first — they will give the biggest ROI in blitz:
- Time management: several games end with you flagged or in severe time trouble. Practice with increment (3+2 or 5+3) and force yourself to take an extra second on candidate moves. Tip: in messy positions trade when you’re low on time if the resulting endgame is easier to play.
- Back‑rank / king safety patterns: you have wins and losses where the king becomes target or gets mated quickly. Drill common back‑rank mates and make a habit of creating a luft (escape square) when you start attacking or when castled.
- Tactical sharpness in transitions: you often win by a tactical punch — keep sharpening pattern recognition (forks, pins, overloaded defenders). But also double‑check tactics before committing in time trouble.
Concrete drills & practice plan (weekly)
Short, repeatable routine that fits blitz players:
- Daily (10–20 minutes): 10 tactical puzzles focused on forks/pins/x‑ray tactics. Use puzzles that give you a 5–10 second timeout to simulate blitz pressure.
- 3× per week (30–45 minutes): Play three 3+2 blitz games and do a 5–10 minute post‑mortem after each — at least identify the single critical mistake per game.
- 2× per week (30 minutes): Endgame basics — rook vs rook, king+pawn vs king, simple queen+rook vs mate patterns. These pay off heavily in blitz conversions.
- Weekly (30–60 minutes): Opening review — pick 2–3 lines you play often (Nimzo-Larsen Attack, Scandinavian Defense, Modern). Prepare a short 2–3 move “refutation” plan for opponent sidelines and a typical middle‑game plan for each.
Practical blitz tips you can apply immediately
- When low on time, simplify if you can keep the evaluation roughly equal — fewer pieces = fewer tactics and fewer practical threats.
- Set a “2‑second rule”: if you don’t see a clear forcing tactic in 2 seconds, make a safe improving move (develop, protect, reduce opponent’s threats).
- Use pre‑moves only when captures are forced and checks are impossible — saves time but can lose material in chaotic positions.
- If you spot a winning tactical sequence, pause and count checks/captures/promotions (1–2–3) before playing — that removes many mouse slips/oversights.
Opening advice (small actionable changes)
- Double down on what works: your Amazon Attack lines have high win rates — expand one reliable sub‑system and learn one typical pawn break and one plan against the main reply.
- Trim low‑return lines: the Australian Defense appears weaker for you — either study a concrete improvement or replace it with a line that leads to comfortable, familiar structures.
- Memorize 2–3 tactical motifs in your favorite openings (e.g., sacrifices for the open g‑file, typical knight forks in the centre) so you can execute them fast in blitz.
Sample 2‑week micro plan (what to do next)
- Week 1: Daily tactics + five 3+2 games with 10‑minute post‑mortems. Focus on not losing on time once.
- Week 2: Add two endgame sessions (rook endgames), and prepare one opponent reply to your main opening. Track how many wins you convert when you’ve more than a +1 advantage.
Final notes — motivation & checkpoints
You’re trending up — keep the discipline on post‑game review and time management. Small targeted practice (tactics + endgames + 3 opening plans) will likely push your blitz score consistently higher. Revisit your progress in two weeks: is time trouble improving? Are you converting more +1 positions?
Want, I can:
- Make a 2‑week personalized tactics list based on mistakes from the loss vs joshing_around20 and your recent wins.
- Produce a one‑page blitz cheat sheet for your top 3 openings (Nimzo-Larsen Attack, Modern, Scandinavian Defense).
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| mironchesswalker | 2W / 1L / 0D | View |
| musashi | 14W / 14L / 2D | View |
| garudu | 4W / 1L / 0D | View |
| kingcaloog | 6W / 4L / 1D | View |
| madmax9095 | 7W / 8L / 1D | View |
| ashishthomasalex | 5W / 5L / 0D | View |
| Nicholasbenedict2007 | 4W / 7L / 0D | View |
| pashaway | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| knightinshiningarmour16 | 2W / 3L / 0D | View |
| ambermushroom | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| zimbabweanmakeyoucry | 49W / 34L / 0D | View Games |
| Dragon84 | 27W / 26L / 1D | View Games |
| ljubija1958 | 35W / 18L / 0D | View Games |
| jopisces | 28W / 15L / 0D | View Games |
| neverletmedownagain | 18W / 24L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2476 | 2316 | 2330 | |
| 2024 | 2311 | 2246 | ||
| 2023 | 2405 | 2369 | 2015 | |
| 2022 | 2186 | 2343 | 1950 | |
| 2020 | 2317 | |||
| 2019 | 1802 | |||
| 2017 | 2032 | |||
| 2014 | 1962 | |||
| 2012 | 1880 | 1962 | 1780 | |
| 2011 | 1754 | 1374 | 1590 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2630W / 2048L / 159D | 2443W / 2196L / 161D | 71.1 |
| 2024 | 195W / 145L / 12D | 165W / 179L / 10D | 71.5 |
| 2023 | 783W / 630L / 61D | 779W / 629L / 58D | 73.2 |
| 2022 | 167W / 130L / 9D | 160W / 125L / 15D | 74.4 |
| 2020 | 10W / 4L / 1D | 13W / 4L / 0D | 68.6 |
| 2019 | 1W / 0L / 0D | 0W / 1L / 0D | 99.0 |
| 2017 | 1W / 0L / 0D | 0W / 0L / 0D | 85.0 |
| 2014 | 1W / 0L / 0D | 1W / 0L / 0D | 33.5 |
| 2012 | 331W / 172L / 9D | 305W / 199L / 10D | 69.1 |
| 2011 | 234W / 131L / 4D | 225W / 147L / 5D | 59.8 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 1823 | 995 | 760 | 68 | 54.6% |
| Australian Defense | 966 | 533 | 395 | 38 | 55.2% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 885 | 476 | 383 | 26 | 53.8% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 852 | 457 | 369 | 26 | 53.6% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 824 | 463 | 337 | 24 | 56.2% |
| Amar Gambit | 767 | 439 | 301 | 27 | 57.2% |
| Modern | 486 | 259 | 212 | 15 | 53.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 482 | 224 | 248 | 10 | 46.5% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 381 | 207 | 162 | 12 | 54.3% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 275 | 128 | 139 | 8 | 46.5% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 38 | 27 | 10 | 1 | 71.0% |
| Modern | 30 | 24 | 6 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Australian Defense | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 70.0% |
| Modern Defense: Averbakh System | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 16.7% |
| Amar Gambit | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Sicilian Defense | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Modern Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 123 | 63 | 55 | 5 | 51.2% |
| Australian Defense | 51 | 19 | 30 | 2 | 37.2% |
| Modern | 50 | 26 | 23 | 1 | 52.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 38 | 25 | 9 | 4 | 65.8% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 37 | 17 | 18 | 2 | 46.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 34 | 18 | 16 | 0 | 52.9% |
| Amazon Attack | 30 | 19 | 10 | 1 | 63.3% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 27 | 15 | 12 | 0 | 55.6% |
| Philidor Defense | 27 | 14 | 13 | 0 | 51.9% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 27 | 14 | 13 | 0 | 51.9% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 35 | 3 |
| Losing | 12 | 0 |