Martha Samadashvili - Woman FIDE Master
Martha Samadashvili, known in chess circles and online as chitogvritooo, is a formidable Woman FIDE Master whose journey on the 64 squares reads like a thrilling novel peppered with strategic brilliance and a pinch of humor.
Since stepping onto the online battlefield in 2014, Martha has dazzled opponents with her tactical flair and resilience, achieving a peak bullet rating of 2514, a blitz high of 2568, and a rapid peak of 2368—numbers that sound more like secret agent codes than chess ratings!
Not one to shy away from challenges, Martha’s playing style is a delicate dance of patience and precision. With an almost uncanny 81.35% comeback rate and an average game length exceeding 70 moves for wins, she proves that sometimes the tortoise really does win the race—only she keeps up a speedy, bulletproof defense that can flummox even the sharpest grandmasters.
Her battles often take place in the explosive realms of Bullet and Blitz, where nerves of steel and lightning-fast moves are mandatory. But don't let the swift pace fool you; Martha’s endgame frequency sits around a serious 75.58%, reminding everyone that she’s in it for the long haul, planning checkmates while others are still sipping their coffee.
Martha plays with a witty psychological edge too—her “tilt factor” is contained at a modest 18%, showing that even when the game gets intense, she keeps her cool better than a penguin in the Antarctic. And if you catch her playing around 11 AM, you’re likely to witness her at her very best, when the queen feels like dancing and the pawns are on a mission.
Recent Adventures
One of her latest triumphs was a well-fought victory in 2025, where playing the King's Indian Attack, she outmaneuvered her opponent with grace and grit, winning on time but clearly dominating positionally. With her favorite opening being a top-secret weapon (literally!), Martha keeps her rivals guessing, blending deep strategy with unpredictable flair.
While everyone has an off day (or even a losing streak—her longest was 18 games), Martha's resilience and optimism keep her coming back stronger. Her win rate against many opponents often approaches perfection, including a 100% winning record against a surprising number of usernames —a reminder that in chess, practice and persistence can turn pawns into kings.
When not conquering the chessboard, Martha enjoys reminding new players that losing is just a part of the grand game, and that every blunder is a new step toward the next brilliant fortress or sneaky fork.
Whether speeding through Blitz or calmly outplaying opponents in Rapid and Daily, Martha Samadashvili is a name to watch—proof that wit, wisdom, and a touch of whimsy make a champion's true heart.
Quick recap for Martha Samadashvili
Nice momentum recently — your rating charts and trend slopes show a strong upward run (big gains over the last 1–6 months). In your recent blitz run you finish active games, create imbalances and convert practical chances (several wins on time and resignations). Keep using that energy while polishing a few recurring areas.
Highlight from a recent win (play-through)
Below is a compact replay of one of your clean wins — useful to step through and ask “what did I threaten, what did opponent miss?”
Interactive replay:
Opponent profile (for review / rematch): zipho_lunika
What you're doing well
- Building practical winning chances in messy positions — you convert advantages by creating targets and keeping pressure.
- Opening preparation pays off: your best win rates are in the Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation and several Sicilian lines. That shows focused preparation and good familiarity with typical plans.
- Endgame awareness: you often steer into endgames where active pieces and passed pawns decide the game. That is a very coachable strength.
- You handle imbalance and complications well — your strength-adjusted win rate (~48%) is solid for blitz and your long-term rating growth confirms improvement.
Recurring weaknesses to fix
- Time management in the last minute: several games finish with only a handful of seconds on the clock. You win some on time, but this is risky — errors and missed tactics creep in during time scrambles.
- Tactical simplifications: in complex middlegames you sometimes exchange into positions where the opponent gains counterplay (look for safe simplifications and avoid unnecessary piece trades that relieve the pressure).
- Move-order and opening nuance: even in openings you know well (Alapin / Closed Sicilian) there are occasional inaccuracies. Drill key pawn breaks and standard replies so you spend less clock in the opening.
- Rook vs. minor piece conversions: converting active rooks into a technical win needs precision — be methodical with king centralization and pawn majorities.
Practical, concrete training plan (weekly)
- Daily tactics: 12–20 puzzles/day focused on forks, pins, discovered attacks and mating patterns. Track which motifs you miss most and repeat them until they become automatic.
- Opening micro-sessions: 2×10-minute reviews for your top 3 lines (Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Scandinavian Defense, Giuoco Piano: Tarrasch Variation). For each line, memorize 3 typical middlegame plans and 2 tactical traps to avoid.
- Endgame practice: 3×15-minute sessions per week — rook endgames, king+pawn vs king, and basic passed pawn technique (Lucena, Philidor ideas). Use quick drills and 5 practical positions to play out against an engine at low depth.
- Blitz routine: play 6–10 blitz games in one batch but stop if you feel tilted. After each block, spend 10–12 minutes reviewing the worst loss and one instructive win (identify the turning point).
- Time-control drill: play 10 games at 5+3 focusing on opening economy — aim to reach move 10 with 2:30+ remaining. This builds better clock habits for 3|0/2|1 blitz games.
Concrete in-game habits to adopt
- Openings: when you know the theory, make a standard “book” move quickly — use the saved clock for the first critical decision (pawn breaks or piece placement).
- Every time you capture a piece ask: “Does this improve my piece activity or reduce opponent’s counterplay?” If not, double-check before taking.
- When ahead in material, exchange to simplify only if you preserve winning elements (passed pawns, active king). Don’t trade into a passive rook vs active minor piece unless it’s clearly winning.
- In time trouble: prioritize safe, forcing moves (checks, captures) that limit opponent choice. Avoid long calculations with little time — opt for practical, principled moves.
Short checklist to use after each game (2–3 minutes)
- What was the turning point? (one move that changed evaluation)
- One tactic I missed (if any) and why I missed it.
- One opening move-order improvement I can make next time.
How to measure progress (next 6–12 weeks)
- Track average remaining clock on move 10 and move 20 — target +20–30 seconds by week 4.
- Increase daily tactics accuracy to 85%+ on motifs you previously missed.
- Pick one opening (your best) and aim to improve its win rate by 5% through deliberate study and post-game review.
- Review one long game per week (20–40 minutes) to practice converting advantages without time pressure.
Small adjustments that yield big wins
- Pre-move less in quick positions — avoid accidental blunders. Reserve pre-moves for obvious recaptures only.
- When you get a small edge, make a plan (improve worst piece, create a target, fix opponent pawn structure) — a plan reduces random moves and time waste.
- Use the last 10 seconds to check opponent threats only; this habit reduces blunders in endgame time scrambles.
Encouragement & next steps
Your recent rating slope and wins show you are in form — you just need to tighten time management and deepen a few technical areas. Follow the weekly plan for 6 weeks, track the small metrics above, and we should see another rating jump similar to your recent +137 (1 month) and +281 (3 month) gains.
Want a short follow-up? Tell me which specific opening you want to focus on next week and I’ll give a 2-week micro-repertoire plan.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sanjana Vittal | 355W / 192L / 45D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sanjana Vittal | 355W / 192L / 45D | View Games |
| nissou-ach | 39W / 79L / 10D | View Games |
| Evelyn Zhu | 28W / 10L / 4D | View Games |
| mratticusfinch | 13W / 17L / 2D | View Games |
| JohnsonXi | 9W / 16L / 3D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2409 | 2568 | ||
| 2024 | 2409 | 2287 | ||
| 2023 | 2409 | 2382 | 1731 | |
| 2022 | 2490 | 1731 | ||
| 2021 | 2490 | 2462 | ||
| 2020 | 2490 | 1774 | 2197 | 1731 |
| 2019 | 2057 | 2359 | 2156 | 1571 |
| 2018 | 1952 | 1660 | 1554 | |
| 2017 | 1797 | 1549 | ||
| 2016 | 1723 | 1669 | ||
| 2015 | 1621 | 1761 | 1669 | |
| 2014 | 1216 | 1392 | 1053 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 129W / 64L / 16D | 109W / 82L / 20D | 83.4 |
| 2024 | 27W / 17L / 3D | 23W / 20L / 5D | 76.4 |
| 2023 | 386W / 234L / 62D | 327W / 271L / 70D | 79.6 |
| 2022 | 25W / 20L / 3D | 26W / 19L / 2D | 65.1 |
| 2021 | 17W / 5L / 3D | 13W / 8L / 5D | 78.6 |
| 2020 | 405W / 299L / 80D | 358W / 340L / 83D | 80.0 |
| 2019 | 693W / 609L / 98D | 641W / 683L / 92D | 66.5 |
| 2018 | 474W / 408L / 54D | 430W / 438L / 60D | 66.5 |
| 2017 | 92W / 68L / 9D | 91W / 71L / 4D | 64.7 |
| 2016 | 55W / 50L / 3D | 51W / 54L / 5D | 70.7 |
| 2015 | 107W / 98L / 9D | 104W / 107L / 11D | 75.2 |
| 2014 | 50W / 53L / 2D | 44W / 55L / 2D | 66.7 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 356 | 179 | 160 | 17 | 50.3% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 328 | 182 | 130 | 16 | 55.5% |
| Amar Gambit | 318 | 160 | 139 | 19 | 50.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 281 | 140 | 117 | 24 | 49.8% |
| Barnes Defense | 260 | 143 | 103 | 14 | 55.0% |
| Czech Defense | 235 | 123 | 95 | 17 | 52.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 235 | 108 | 102 | 25 | 46.0% |
| Modern | 233 | 113 | 103 | 17 | 48.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 220 | 94 | 102 | 24 | 42.7% |
| Sicilian Defense | 193 | 100 | 81 | 12 | 51.8% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 634 | 272 | 360 | 2 | 42.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 78 | 44 | 21 | 13 | 56.4% |
| Giuoco Piano: Tarrasch Variation | 61 | 33 | 23 | 5 | 54.1% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 59 | 28 | 27 | 4 | 47.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 56 | 26 | 21 | 9 | 46.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 52 | 24 | 24 | 4 | 46.1% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 42 | 23 | 14 | 5 | 54.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation, English Attack | 42 | 20 | 19 | 3 | 47.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 41 | 22 | 18 | 1 | 53.7% |
| Czech Defense | 35 | 18 | 13 | 4 | 51.4% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 20.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Semi-Slav Defense: Accelerated Meran Variation | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Matulovic Variation | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 33.3% |
| Sicilian Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Philidor Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Haag Gambit | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Schlechter Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| King's Indian Attack: French Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Catalan Opening: Closed | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 15 | 1 |
| Losing | 18 | 0 |