Martha Samadashvili - Woman FIDE Master
Martha Samadashvili, known in chess circles and online as chitogvritooo, is a formidable Woman FIDE Master whose journey on the 64 squares reads like a thrilling novel peppered with strategic brilliance and a pinch of humor.
Since stepping onto the online battlefield in 2014, Martha has dazzled opponents with her tactical flair and resilience, achieving a peak bullet rating of 2514, a blitz high of 2568, and a rapid peak of 2368—numbers that sound more like secret agent codes than chess ratings!
Not one to shy away from challenges, Martha’s playing style is a delicate dance of patience and precision. With an almost uncanny 81.35% comeback rate and an average game length exceeding 70 moves for wins, she proves that sometimes the tortoise really does win the race—only she keeps up a speedy, bulletproof defense that can flummox even the sharpest grandmasters.
Her battles often take place in the explosive realms of Bullet and Blitz, where nerves of steel and lightning-fast moves are mandatory. But don't let the swift pace fool you; Martha’s endgame frequency sits around a serious 75.58%, reminding everyone that she’s in it for the long haul, planning checkmates while others are still sipping their coffee.
Martha plays with a witty psychological edge too—her “tilt factor” is contained at a modest 18%, showing that even when the game gets intense, she keeps her cool better than a penguin in the Antarctic. And if you catch her playing around 11 AM, you’re likely to witness her at her very best, when the queen feels like dancing and the pawns are on a mission.
Recent Adventures
One of her latest triumphs was a well-fought victory in 2025, where playing the King's Indian Attack, she outmaneuvered her opponent with grace and grit, winning on time but clearly dominating positionally. With her favorite opening being a top-secret weapon (literally!), Martha keeps her rivals guessing, blending deep strategy with unpredictable flair.
While everyone has an off day (or even a losing streak—her longest was 18 games), Martha's resilience and optimism keep her coming back stronger. Her win rate against many opponents often approaches perfection, including a 100% winning record against a surprising number of usernames —a reminder that in chess, practice and persistence can turn pawns into kings.
When not conquering the chessboard, Martha enjoys reminding new players that losing is just a part of the grand game, and that every blunder is a new step toward the next brilliant fortress or sneaky fork.
Whether speeding through Blitz or calmly outplaying opponents in Rapid and Daily, Martha Samadashvili is a name to watch—proof that wit, wisdom, and a touch of whimsy make a champion's true heart.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sanjana Vittal | 350W / 190L / 45D | |
| Mohamed Anis Achour | 39W / 79L / 10D | |
| Evelyn Zhu | 28W / 10L / 4D | |
| mratticusfinch | 13W / 17L / 2D | |
| JohnsonXi | 9W / 16L / 3D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2409 | 2568 | ||
| 2024 | 2409 | 2287 | ||
| 2023 | 2409 | 2382 | 1731 | |
| 2022 | 2490 | 1731 | ||
| 2021 | 2490 | 2462 | ||
| 2020 | 2490 | 1774 | 2197 | 1731 |
| 2019 | 2057 | 2359 | 2156 | 1571 |
| 2018 | 1952 | 1660 | 1554 | |
| 2017 | 1797 | 1549 | ||
| 2016 | 1723 | 1669 | ||
| 2015 | 1621 | 1761 | 1669 | |
| 2014 | 1216 | 1392 | 1053 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 127W / 62L / 16D | 106W / 82L / 20D | 83.7 |
| 2024 | 27W / 17L / 3D | 23W / 20L / 5D | 76.4 |
| 2023 | 386W / 234L / 62D | 327W / 271L / 70D | 79.6 |
| 2022 | 25W / 20L / 3D | 26W / 19L / 2D | 65.1 |
| 2021 | 17W / 5L / 3D | 13W / 8L / 5D | 78.6 |
| 2020 | 405W / 299L / 80D | 358W / 340L / 83D | 80.0 |
| 2019 | 693W / 609L / 98D | 641W / 683L / 92D | 66.5 |
| 2018 | 474W / 408L / 54D | 430W / 438L / 60D | 66.5 |
| 2017 | 92W / 68L / 9D | 91W / 71L / 4D | 64.7 |
| 2016 | 55W / 50L / 3D | 51W / 54L / 5D | 70.7 |
| 2015 | 107W / 98L / 9D | 104W / 107L / 11D | 75.2 |
| 2014 | 50W / 53L / 2D | 44W / 55L / 2D | 66.7 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 356 | 179 | 160 | 17 | 50.3% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 328 | 182 | 130 | 16 | 55.5% |
| Amar Gambit | 318 | 160 | 139 | 19 | 50.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 281 | 140 | 117 | 24 | 49.8% |
| Barnes Defense | 258 | 141 | 103 | 14 | 54.6% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 235 | 108 | 102 | 25 | 46.0% |
| Czech Defense | 234 | 122 | 95 | 17 | 52.1% |
| Modern | 233 | 113 | 103 | 17 | 48.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 220 | 94 | 102 | 24 | 42.7% |
| Sicilian Defense | 193 | 100 | 81 | 12 | 51.8% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 634 | 272 | 360 | 2 | 42.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 78 | 44 | 21 | 13 | 56.4% |
| Giuoco Piano: Tarrasch Variation | 61 | 33 | 23 | 5 | 54.1% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 59 | 28 | 27 | 4 | 47.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 56 | 26 | 21 | 9 | 46.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 52 | 24 | 24 | 4 | 46.1% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 42 | 23 | 14 | 5 | 54.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation, English Attack | 42 | 20 | 19 | 3 | 47.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 41 | 22 | 18 | 1 | 53.7% |
| Czech Defense | 35 | 18 | 13 | 4 | 51.4% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 20.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Semi-Slav Defense: Accelerated Meran Variation | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Matulovic Variation | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 33.3% |
| Sicilian Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Philidor Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Haag Gambit | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Schlechter Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| King's Indian Attack: French Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Catalan Opening: Closed | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 15 | 0 |
| Losing | 18 | 1 |