Profile Summary: Catrihino Pestano (a.k.a. cickings)
Meet Catrihino Pestano, who goes by the dreadfully cool username cickings in the chess cosmos. A player with a rollercoaster rating saga spanning over a decade, Catrihino’s chess journey is nothing short of an epic saga—part thriller, part comedy, and full chessboard drama.
From Humble Beginnings to Blitz Wizardry
Starting off in 2013 with a modest Bullet rating barely making it past 1080 (and losing that first game—rookies, am I right?), Catrihino’s Bullet games took a meteoric rise reaching a peak rating of 2474 in May 2017. Not one to settle for just bullet, this chess aficionado has seriously dominated Blitz, hitting a peak performance of 2730 in May 2025—faster than you can say "checkmate" and more precise than a laser-guided knight!
Style and Strategy: The Good, the Tactical, and the Resigned
Boasting a daunting comeback rate of 86.93%, Catrihino plays with tenacity, proving that losing a piece is just a minor plot twist in a thrilling chess novel. Though prone to early resignations just 1.21% of the time (who wants to give up easily, right?), the endgame is where the real magic happens, with over 82% games reaching this stage. The average game meanders over 70 moves for wins and even longer (about 78) for losses—talk about endurance!
White pieces favor Catrihino with a healthy 55.24% win rate, while Black proves challenging but manageable at 48.87%.
Opening Gambits and Choices
Curious minds will be interested to learn that infamous “Unknown Opening” holds a special place in Catrihino’s archives, battling through thousands of games with a steady win rate north of 50%. Defensive specialists beware, as Catrihino has a penchant for sharp and sometimes secretive openings, including the Top Secret variations that keep opponents guessing.
Game Highlights & Recent Battles
In an impressive recent game, playing White against "ioncopac," Catrihino executed a stunning Pirc Defense demo, culminating in a graceful resignation defeat for the opponent. Earlier, despite suffering losses by checkmate to strong contenders like Anar_Aliakbarov and JavierRuizVazquez, Catrihino’s resilience is unwavering, bouncing right back to keep the ladder climbing.
Psychological Quirks and Peak Performance
Known for a tilt factor of 17 (no, that’s not a golf score, but it’s a measure of emotional resilience), Catrihino thrives best early in the day, with 6 AM marking the “golden hour” for peak play. Whether battling through bullet or blitz, this player’s mind is as sharp as their opening preparation.
Fun Fact
With a longest winning streak of 19 games and a current winning streak of 1 (always room for more), Catrihino keeps fans and foes alike on their toes. On the downside, the hardest losing streak was a brutal 17 games in a row—proving that even the best endure tough days, but hey, that’s chess life!
In summary, Catrihino Pestano aka cickings is a chess gladiator who blends patience, tactical cunning, and a dash of mystery. Whether pounding out bullet games or crafting endgame masterpieces, every move echoes experience and passion. And who knows? Next time you see the name cickings flash on your board, better be ready for a thrilling checkmate dance!
Game on, Catrihino, game on!
What you’re doing well
You showed good courage in blitz by staying active and looking for chances. In your winning game, you pressed with forcing moves that helped you simplify into a favorable endgame and you kept your opponent under pressure, which paid off when the position opened up. Your willingness to trade when it benefits you and to keep moving the game forward is a valuable asset in fast time controls.
In the other recent games you kept fighting and maintained pressure, which is a solid mindset for blitz. Your resilience and ability to stay in the fight even when the position gets chaotic are strengths you can build on, especially by keeping a clear plan as the middlegame unfolds.
Areas to improve
- Opening plan and development: In quick games, it’s easy to get tangled after early queen activity. Aim for a safe, coherent setup by the tenth move and have a concrete middlegame plan rather than chasing quick tactical ideas that may leave you with development gaps.
- Coordination and restraint in tactics: Some losses come from overextending or allowing lines to open that favor your opponent. Focus on identifying a single target (a weak pawn, a weak square, or a back rank) and coordinating your pieces toward that goal instead of chasing multiple threats at once.
- Endgame technique under time pressure: Practice common rook-endings and simple pawn endings so you can convert small advantages when the position simplifies. Clear plans in endings help you avoid relying on last-minute tactical chances.
- Time management in blitz: Develop a routine to balance early development with timely decision-making. For example, aim to have a basic plan by move 12 and avoid spending too long on speculative lines early on.
- Pattern recognition: Strengthen quick recognition of typical tactics and motifs (pins, forks, skewers, discovered attacks) through regular puzzles to speed up decision-making in live games.
Training plan for the next 2 weeks
- Daily tactical puzzles for 15–20 minutes, focused on forks, pins, skewers, and discovered attacks to improve pattern recognition and speed.
- Endgame practice twice a week (rook endings and king-and-pawn endings) to build confidence in converting small advantages under pressure.
- Opening refinement: pick one simple White reply (for example 1 e4) and one Black reply to that (for example a solid defense like the Caro-Kann or the French) to build a compact, repeatable plan for the first 12 moves, then practice it in 6–8 blitz games.
- Post-game review: after each blitz session, note one turning point and one improvement. Identify where a better plan or a more precise exchange could have changed the result.
- Time management drill: practice with a timer and set a cap so you never spend more than a couple of minutes on the first 12 moves in a game. If you’re spending too long, switch to a simpler, safer plan.
Quick tips for your next sessions
- Adopt a simple, reliable opening plan to reach a playable middlegame without getting overwhelmed in the first dozen moves.
- Prioritize piece coordination over chasing every tactical idea; keep rooks and minor pieces aligned toward a clear plan.
- Protect the king early in the middlegame and decide on a safe development path that guarantees you a workable position.
- Use your time wisely: quick, initial candidate checks are fine, but avoid deep, multi-branch calculations unless they clearly pay off.
- Review your games with a friend or coach to gain a fresh perspective on critical positions and identify recurring mistakes.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| athu_1624 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Rafael Ventura dos Santos | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Hyoukami | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| fabritiusmacrinus | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| stronzo13 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| rijeka_trsat | 1W / 2L / 0D | View |
| lynus_kho | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| sibirjak85 | 5W / 2L / 1D | View |
| Oliver Wartiovaara | 3W / 1L / 1D | View |
| murdoczek | 2W / 2L / 1D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Mihai Ionescu | 33W / 24L / 4D | View Games |
| ImbaSpirit | 35W / 25L / 0D | View Games |
| Sudhanshu Ranjan | 24W / 30L / 5D | View Games |
| Michael Baron | 17W / 36L / 2D | View Games |
| Sanjeev Mishra | 34W / 17L / 2D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2017 | 2543 | 2469 | 1556 |
| 2024 | 2030 | 2601 | ||
| 2023 | 2084 | 2399 | ||
| 2022 | 2110 | 2358 | 2427 | |
| 2021 | 2273 | 2409 | 2597 | |
| 2020 | 2293 | 2471 | 2596 | |
| 2019 | 2507 | 2107 | ||
| 2018 | 2212 | 2405 | ||
| 2017 | 2230 | 2320 | 1327 | 1878 |
| 2016 | 2037 | 2181 | 1681 | 1784 |
| 2015 | 1845 | 1847 | 1716 | |
| 2014 | 1928 | 2105 | 1477 | |
| 2013 | 1081 | 1756 | 1366 | 1160 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1661W / 1190L / 173D | 1387W / 1466L / 162D | 82.1 |
| 2024 | 778W / 550L / 103D | 660W / 679L / 92D | 82.7 |
| 2023 | 94W / 23L / 3D | 83W / 31L / 4D | 60.6 |
| 2022 | 46W / 42L / 0D | 43W / 47L / 0D | 64.8 |
| 2021 | 887W / 600L / 63D | 716W / 776L / 46D | 74.8 |
| 2020 | 719W / 558L / 72D | 629W / 643L / 71D | 79.0 |
| 2019 | 656W / 507L / 50D | 619W / 558L / 52D | 75.2 |
| 2018 | 1208W / 889L / 90D | 1073W / 1030L / 83D | 76.2 |
| 2017 | 2684W / 1923L / 144D | 2338W / 2264L / 158D | 76.5 |
| 2016 | 1446W / 1321L / 30D | 1432W / 1339L / 53D | 67.4 |
| 2015 | 293W / 266L / 6D | 267W / 285L / 3D | 63.0 |
| 2014 | 865W / 627L / 37D | 768W / 729L / 24D | 68.7 |
| 2013 | 25W / 5L / 1D | 22W / 11L / 0D | 62.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Czech Defense | 1039 | 559 | 468 | 12 | 53.8% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 726 | 403 | 317 | 6 | 55.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 596 | 311 | 274 | 11 | 52.2% |
| Amar Gambit | 568 | 326 | 232 | 10 | 57.4% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 482 | 235 | 240 | 7 | 48.8% |
| Sicilian Defense | 474 | 250 | 221 | 3 | 52.7% |
| Australian Defense | 432 | 235 | 191 | 6 | 54.4% |
| Modern | 352 | 203 | 143 | 6 | 57.7% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 351 | 185 | 158 | 8 | 52.7% |
| Pirc Defense: Classical Variation | 325 | 165 | 150 | 10 | 50.8% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 3118 | 1644 | 1303 | 171 | 52.7% |
| Sicilian Defense | 1712 | 946 | 695 | 71 | 55.3% |
| Czech Defense | 969 | 524 | 407 | 38 | 54.1% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 721 | 375 | 320 | 26 | 52.0% |
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 717 | 370 | 318 | 29 | 51.6% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 704 | 403 | 270 | 31 | 57.2% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 698 | 368 | 300 | 30 | 52.7% |
| Bishop's Opening: Vienna Hybrid, Hromádka Variation | 662 | 359 | 260 | 43 | 54.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 645 | 303 | 320 | 22 | 47.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 544 | 278 | 239 | 27 | 51.1% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 36 | 34 | 1 | 1 | 94.4% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 75.0% |
| French Defense: Classical Variation, Svenonius Variation | 8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| King's Indian Defense: Kazakh Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Czech Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Scotch Game | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Döry Defense | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Milner-Barry Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown Opening* | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 25.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Amazon Attack | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| English Opening | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Scotch Game | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Pirc Defense: Classical Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Czech Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 19 | 1 |
| Losing | 17 | 0 |