Chess Player Profile: My Name Is Not Clemson
Meet My Name Is Not Clemson, a chess enthusiast whose game has evolved with the tenacity of a queen stalking the board and the patience of a bishop watching from afar. With a rating trajectory that tells a story of grit and grind, this player’s rapid rating blossomed from a modest 858 in 2019 to a peak of 1636 in 2024 — talk about a growth spurt more impressive than a pawn’s promotion!
A Career in Moves and Grooves
Delving into rapid games, My Name Is Not Clemson displays an adaptable style, favoring classical openings such as the Giuoco Piano and the Closed Sicilian Defense with win rates hovering around 56% to 61%. Like a well-adapted species, they navigate the complexities of these openings, balancing aggression and defense with the precision of a knight hop.
In the blitz arena, this player shows a penchant for unpredictability, boasting a solid win rate against aggressive openings like the Van t Kruijs Opening and the Scandinavian Defense — openings that can sometimes feel like sudden mutations in the chess genome.
Tactical DNA and Psychological Tendencies
My Name Is Not Clemson’s tactical awareness is truly something to muse about: a comeback rate over 71% and a staggering 97.89% win rate after losing a piece — a biomolecular resilience if ever there was one! This player’s endgame frequency sits near 59%, proving an affinity for the long game, where patience and precision breed victory.
With an early resignation rate of around 13%, they rarely abandon the battlefield prematurely—it’s all about survival of the fittest until the last move. Despite a tilt factor of 28, indicating occasional moments when the synapses misfire, their winning streaks (longest being 12 games) show a remarkable ability to bounce back, reprogramming mindset like a masterful genetic engineer rewriting their playbook.
Playing Time and Battlefield Rhythms
My Name Is Not Clemson appears most formidable around midday and early afternoon, with peak win rates at hours 11 (nearly 59%) and 14 (52.8%), suggesting prime cognitive efficiency akin to a circadian rhythm at its best. Interestingly, mornings (8-10 AM) seem less fruitful, proving that even chess players are subject to their own biological clocks.
Player Summary
- Rapid: Max rating 1636; resilient, patient, enjoys classical battles
- Blitz: Strategic and surprise-ready; solid win rates with aggressive responses
- Bullet: Tactical and quick-thinking, with a climbing peak rating of 1274
- Playing Style: Patient endgame lover with a proven killer instinct in comebacks
- Psychological Resilience: Rebounds from setbacks with scientific precision
In short, My Name Is Not Clemson is a chess player who embodies the evolutionary spirit of the game — continually adapting, learning, and striking back with the ferocity of a chess predator. Ready to corner the king? Watch out, because this player’s next move might just mutate the meta and rewrite the rules of engagement!
Positive Aspects in Your Bullet Games
You have demonstrated a solid understanding of various openings, with a strong performance in the Scandinavian Defense and Australian Defense. These openings show a higher than 50% win rate, reflecting your comfort and good preparation in these lines. Notably, your overall win rate adjusted for opponent strength is just over 54%, which indicates you perform well relative to your competition.
- You adapt well to different positions early, as seen in your opening choices such as Scandinavian and French Defense.
- Your tactic awareness and piece activity in some games set you up for favorable endgames.
- Your rating history over the past 6 to 12 months generally trends upwards, showing that your skill and understanding are improving despite short-term fluctuations.
- You display resilience — even with some setbacks, you maintain solid play and rarely lose by blunders.
Areas to Improve
While your overall progression is positive, your recent bullet games show opportunities for growth, particularly in maintaining focus and execution under rapid time pressure:
- Endgame Technique: Some games ended with missed opportunities in the late middlegame or transition to endgame. Concentrate studies on simplified positions to avoid losing winning chances.
- Opening Consistency: Although you play several openings, some lines such as the Caro-Kann and Barnes Opening have lower win rates. Reviewing key ideas and pitfalls in these lines can boost your confidence and results.
- Time Management: Blunders or lost material sometimes seem linked to rushing moves. Practice managing your clock better, focusing on quick but thoughtful moves early to save time for critical moments.
- Defensive Awareness: In some games, opponent attacks like a quick checkmate or material gain through tactical shots suggest defensive awareness can improve. Work on spotting threats quickly, especially against aggressive players.
- Draw Rate and Stamina: While not leaving many games drawn, consider how to convert more balanced positions into wins as well as how to consolidate and hold draws in tough spots.
Recommendations for Continued Improvement
- Review your recent losses by replaying the key moments, focusing especially on transitions from opening to middlegame and avoiding premature queen trades that weaken your position.
- Practice key tactical motifs that appear frequently in bullet time controls to sharpen calculation speed without blundering.
- Refine your repertoire by deepening your knowledge of the Scandinavian and French defenses where you have found success, and steadily work on weaker openings.
- In training, include some longer time control games to build strategic understanding, then apply those lessons in faster games for better overall play.
- Analyze your games with a coach or strong player to identify recurring patterns and psychological factors affecting your bullet performance.
Keep building on your strengths and be patient with your development. Your positive rating trend and stable win rate show you're on a good path. Small adjustments in time control mindset and opening study can help you rise steadily.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| aronnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| hairolla | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| xesiben | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| roberthouse1 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| samanthad2014 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| ggprodigy | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| ibrahim_usuf | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| yuhangwu | 45W / 30L / 3D | |
| ushalnotpass | 7W / 43L / 9D | |
| SCChessBoyJP | 18W / 11L / 5D | |
| tiger101125 | 6W / 16L / 3D | |
| michechess89 | 4W / 17L / 0D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1156 | 924 | 1428 | 1088 |
| 2024 | 1124 | 926 | 1350 | 1046 |
| 2023 | 812 | 844 | 1484 | 1037 |
| 2022 | 959 | 801 | 1435 | 939 |
| 2021 | 956 | 899 | 1294 | 902 |
| 2020 | 1060 | 1146 | 1251 | 1021 |
| 2019 | 826 | 623 | 858 | 800 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 44W / 47L / 11D | 44W / 46L / 6D | 63.1 |
| 2024 | 165W / 155L / 26D | 165W / 155L / 21D | 64.6 |
| 2023 | 57W / 49L / 12D | 68W / 47L / 5D | 60.9 |
| 2022 | 51W / 33L / 5D | 37W / 45L / 8D | 73.5 |
| 2021 | 139W / 161L / 20D | 128W / 192L / 14D | 54.0 |
| 2020 | 124W / 96L / 18D | 126W / 96L / 14D | 66.5 |
| 2019 | 60W / 79L / 17D | 58W / 78L / 20D | 59.1 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 84 | 49 | 33 | 2 | 58.3% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 74 | 36 | 33 | 5 | 48.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 60 | 28 | 31 | 1 | 46.7% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 35 | 12 | 22 | 1 | 34.3% |
| French Defense | 31 | 17 | 10 | 4 | 54.8% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 29 | 13 | 15 | 1 | 44.8% |
| Amazon Attack | 23 | 13 | 10 | 0 | 56.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 20 | 5 | 13 | 2 | 25.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 20 | 7 | 12 | 1 | 35.0% |
| Australian Defense | 19 | 12 | 6 | 1 | 63.2% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 25 | 21 | 0 | 54.4% |
| Barnes Defense | 31 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 32.3% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 14 | 4 | 10 | 0 | 28.6% |
| Unknown Opening* | 13 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 46.1% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 11 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 9.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 10 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 30.0% |
| Elephant Gambit | 9 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 11.1% |
| Queen's Pawn Game | 8 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 25.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 7 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 28.6% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 27 | 18 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 35 | 21 | 13 | 1 | 60.0% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 22 | 9 | 11 | 2 | 40.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 20 | 12 | 7 | 1 | 60.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 15 | 9 | 6 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 10 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 10 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 9 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 11.1% |
| Scotch Game | 8 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 25.0% |
| Center Game: Berger Variation | 8 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 37.5% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 219 | 117 | 84 | 18 | 53.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 102 | 56 | 37 | 9 | 54.9% |
| Scotch Game | 54 | 24 | 25 | 5 | 44.4% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 54 | 22 | 24 | 8 | 40.7% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 49 | 26 | 18 | 5 | 53.1% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 46 | 18 | 25 | 3 | 39.1% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 44 | 14 | 25 | 5 | 31.8% |
| Philidor Defense | 42 | 24 | 15 | 3 | 57.1% |
| Amazon Attack | 39 | 17 | 19 | 3 | 43.6% |
| Petrov's Defense | 34 | 17 | 11 | 6 | 50.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 12 | 0 |
| Losing | 28 | 1 |