Coralys Michelle Alvarado Pérez (Coraa29) - Woman Candidate Master
Meet Coralys Michelle Alvarado Pérez, affectionately known in the chess ecosystem as Coraa29 — a Woman Candidate Master whose rating evolution is as dynamic as the shifting positions across a chessboard. With a blitz max rating soaring close to 1930 in 2024 and a bullet peak breaching the 2080 barrier, Coralys has mastered the art of swiftly maneuvering through tactical jungles with precision and grace worthy of a true calcium-ion within the grand game’s cellular network.
From humble beginnings, with blitz rating oscillating from around 628 to well over 1800, Coralys has shown a remarkable ability to adapt and regenerate form — quite like a knight sneaking through the forest of opponents’ defenses with viral stamina. Their comeback rate is a whopping 84.03%, nearly resilient enough to rival a mitosis event, bouncing back from setbacks with an incredible 99.75% win rate after losing a piece. Truly, this is a player whose psychological tendons withstand the tilt-factor with impressive tenacity.
This bio-mindful tactician prefers the battlegrounds where endgames bloom, frequenting those complex middle-to-late phases with an endgame frequency of over 71%. Average moves per win hover around 69, demonstrating patience rivaling a coiled spring ready to pounce, while losses tend to be equally drawn-out affairs — no premature cell apoptosis here!
Coralys’ stellar opening repertoire, currently a well-kept Top Secret, challenges opponents like a genetic sequence that keeps evolving, surviving against a wide array of adversaries with nearly 47% blitz win rate overall and an impressive rapid win rate surpassing 53%. And if you wonder when she’s most active on her chessboard ecosystem, Saturday is her peak day with a 50.7% win rate, and the early morning hours appear to be when her neurons fire sharpest—63.41% win rate at 6 AM. Has biology met blitz chess?
Among her most formidable opponents, Coralys displays a nearly perfect 100% win record against several challengers, indicating an ability to metabolize complex strategic threats and convert them into victory energy. And beware opponents like "joshuamora" or "wakanda24", who have somewhat dented her external membrane with tricky openings.
In summary, Coralys Michelle Alvarado Pérez is a fiercely competitive and resilient chess player whose mind is as much a battlefield of biological inspiration as it is a battlefield on the 64 squares. With the spirit of a queen and the patience of an endoplasmic reticulum, she continues to weave through the patterns of chess, leaving both opponents and fans awe-struck. Beware! This player mates in more ways than one.
Hi Coralys Michelle Alvarado Pérez!
Great job keeping your blitz rating close to 1930 (2024-05-14) and scoring memorable wins such as your recent victory over ma_ja_s. Below is some individualized feedback based on your last batch of games.
What you are already doing well
- Consistent set-up: Your “g3 – Bg2 – Ne2 – O-O” King’s-Indian-Attack style gives you solid piece coordination and usually a safe king.
- Tactical eyesight: In many of your wins you spotted tactics under time pressure, e.g. 30.Rc7! in the first PGN below, switching from defence to attack in one move.
- Fighting spirit: Even when the position is equal you keep looking for practical chances, which converts to a lot of “won on time” results in your favour.
Key areas to improve
-
Clock management
• Seven of the last ten losses came by flag while the position was still playable.
• Try 3- or 5-second increment pools; the extra buffer will train you to make quick but solid moves.
• Internal goal: never drop under 15 seconds before move 20. -
Over-reliance on one structure
• The g3/KIA set-up works, but strong opponents prepare specifically for it.
• Add one main-line weapon versus 1…c5 (e.g. Open Sicilian) and 1…e5 (e.g. the Ruy López) so you can alternate. -
Early queen adventures
• In several losses the queen wandered (Qb3, Qa2) before minor pieces were developed, letting Black gain tempo with attacks.
• Principle: bring the queen out after your rooks are connected. -
Endgame conversion
• Positions like the Catalan loss vs. arlos12 reached a drawable rook endgame, yet pawn structure and king activity were neglected.
• Study the “Lucena” and “Philidor” rook-endgame techniques; they appear frequently in your games.
Illustrative moments
Below are two short critical fragments (tap to replay):
- Winning idea – exchange sacrifice & back-rank pressure
- Time-trouble miss – rook activity allowed counterplay
Action plan for the next two weeks
| Day | Focus | Resources / Exercises |
|---|---|---|
| Mon-Wed | Increment blitz (3 + 2) | Play 10 games; note every move made under 5 s. |
| Thu-Fri | Endgame drills | 50 rook-pawn vs. rook studies; aim for 90 % success. |
| Sat | Opening addition | Memorize first 10 moves of the Open Sicilian (Najdorf). |
| Sun | Review | Self-annotate 3 games; focus on lost time vs. thinking time. |
Your performance charts
Keep the passion and stay curious. Small, targeted tweaks will convert several of those time-forfeits into wins. I’m excited to see your progress!
Good luck and good calculation!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| wakanda24 | 73W / 88L / 4D | |
| eldelenrroquelargo | 92W / 13L / 6D | |
| joshuamora | 10W / 47L / 2D | |
| dario1234ws | 20W / 32L / 3D | |
| Joshua Cruz | 39W / 12L / 1D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1851 | 1797 | ||
| 2024 | 1884 | 1819 | 1760 | |
| 2023 | 1757 | 1856 | 1479 | |
| 2022 | 1853 | 1815 | ||
| 2021 | 2001 | 1903 | 1422 | |
| 2020 | 1598 | 626 | 1420 | 1520 |
| 2019 | 978 | 1163 | 966 | 1465 |
| 2018 | 707 | 821 | 1033 | 1036 |
| 2016 | 917 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 4W / 4L / 1D | 2W / 4L / 0D | 72.2 |
| 2024 | 321W / 285L / 39D | 288W / 324L / 24D | 74.5 |
| 2023 | 224W / 222L / 29D | 197W / 256L / 16D | 74.5 |
| 2022 | 175W / 167L / 6D | 135W / 202L / 12D | 72.5 |
| 2021 | 312W / 238L / 31D | 253W / 296L / 32D | 73.5 |
| 2020 | 382W / 350L / 38D | 354W / 379L / 30D | 66.2 |
| 2019 | 393W / 312L / 35D | 326W / 382L / 29D | 63.2 |
| 2018 | 97W / 109L / 4D | 79W / 127L / 10D | 50.1 |
| 2016 | 0W / 2L / 0D | 1W / 1L / 0D | 47.5 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 416 | 199 | 201 | 16 | 47.8% |
| Four Knights Game | 172 | 85 | 81 | 6 | 49.4% |
| Center Game: Berger Variation | 150 | 78 | 66 | 6 | 52.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 135 | 69 | 60 | 6 | 51.1% |
| Sicilian Defense | 131 | 62 | 56 | 13 | 47.3% |
| Barnes Defense | 118 | 55 | 58 | 5 | 46.6% |
| French Defense | 114 | 56 | 53 | 5 | 49.1% |
| Amazon Attack | 103 | 43 | 57 | 3 | 41.8% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 95 | 40 | 49 | 6 | 42.1% |
| Three Knights Opening | 90 | 44 | 44 | 2 | 48.9% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 930 | 403 | 494 | 33 | 43.3% |
| Sicilian Defense | 376 | 194 | 166 | 16 | 51.6% |
| French Defense | 311 | 141 | 150 | 20 | 45.3% |
| Amar Gambit | 254 | 127 | 112 | 15 | 50.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 224 | 123 | 95 | 6 | 54.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 181 | 103 | 71 | 7 | 56.9% |
| Czech Defense | 157 | 81 | 67 | 9 | 51.6% |
| Amazon Attack | 149 | 66 | 75 | 8 | 44.3% |
| Center Game: Berger Variation | 137 | 74 | 58 | 5 | 54.0% |
| Modern | 116 | 56 | 57 | 3 | 48.3% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 60.0% |
| Center Game: Berger Variation | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 70.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 60.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 25.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 25.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Four Knights Game | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Barnes Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Fegatello Attack, Leonhardt Variation | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD: Chigorin, 3.cxd5 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Center Game: Berger Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 15 | 0 |
| Losing | 10 | 3 |