Cormac Murray: A Chess Biography
Cormac Murray is not your average chess player; he's a fascinating specimen in the ecosystem of online chess, evolving his rating and style with the precision of a well-calibrated DNA sequence. Since first stamping his presence in 2021, Cormac has blitzed through thousands of games, showing a persistence as relentless as a mitosis cycle.
In the frenetic world of Blitz, Cormac’s rating blossomed from a modest 776 in 2021 to a peak of 1366 in 2024, proving that even the smallest pawns can evolve into queen-like powerhouses. His average Blitz win rate hovers around 50%, and his penchant for openings like the Three Knights and Scotch Game reveals a strategic mind always eager to experiment and adapt.
Not only does Cormac thrive in rapid bursts of thinking, but his Tactical Awareness stats are impressive — with a comeback rate of nearly 72% and a flawless 100% win rate after losing a piece. Talk about cellular regeneration in the middle of a battle! However, even a chameleon can have an off day, evidenced by a tilt factor of 13 — nothing a good mental reset can’t fix.
His Bullet chess performances have been a mixed bag — starting with a single game at 1052 rating in 2021 and peaking at 1135 in 2024, showing that speed and accuracy are traits still incubating. Meanwhile, Rapid games highlight his strategic DNA sequence in full bloom, climbing steadily to a rating near 1300.
Cormac’s psychological profile reveals that while he generally performs well, the difference between rated and casual match wins (-13.05%) suggests he occasionally experiences a mild form of “chess cell stress” when under pressure. But like any well-adapted organism, he pushes through, with a longest winning streak of 10 games to prove it.
When it comes to playing style, he’s patient and resilient — averaging 57 moves per win and 65 moves per loss, indicating deep endgame involvement (66% frequency). So if you ever play Cormac, be prepared: this player likes to battle through till the metabolic endgame.
Outside the board, you will find Cormac continually refining his openings repertoire, favoring biological patterns such as Vienna Game and Scandinavian Defense — as if he studies his opponents’ moves with the curiosity of a geneticist examining cellular mutations.
In summary, Cormac Murray is an organism of chess evolution: resilient, quick on tactical regeneration, and always hungry for the next gametic challenge. A chessboard is his Petri dish, and every game is an experiment in survival and dominance. Watch this space — his career growth is no mere fluke of nature!
Quick recap (recent games)
Nice little streak — you converted a clean tactical win (delivering mate as Black) and you also showed good attacking instincts in the resignation win. Your loss shows recurring endgame / passed-pawn handling that cost you. Below I break down what you did well, what to fix, and a practical plan to make more of your blitz time.
Replay: your most recent win (quick review)
Black (you) executed a short, brutal mating net after forcing the White king into the open with knight checks and a final queen mate. Solid conversion in a tactical middlegame — good vision for checks and forks.
Opponent: aji_aji
What you're doing well
- Good tactical radar in messy positions — you spot forks, checks and mating patterns quickly (see the knight checks that forced the king out).
- Comfortable navigating sharp middlegames and winning material from dynamic play.
- Willingness to simplify into winning endings when possible — you convert once ahead or with strong initiative.
- High game volume and consistent practice — that's why your longer-term trend is positive.
Recurring issues and what to fix
- Time trouble (zeitnot) and speed: in several games your clock usage becomes uneven. Blitz punishes long calculations late — make simpler practical decisions earlier.
- Endgame technique against passed pawns: your loss vs jjaxe19 shows a passed f-pawn that you couldn’t stop. Work on king + pawn races and basic pawn promotion defense patterns.
- Over-reliance on tactical complications versus methodical positional defense. When the position is equal, aim to improve piece activity instead of forcing complications that can backfire.
- Back-rank / mating net awareness: you both delivered and nearly fell into mating ideas. Always check for opponent counterchecks before grabbing material.
Opening & middlegame notes
You use a wide range of openings (Scotch, Sicilian lines, Indian setups). That versatility is good, but in blitz it helps to have a compact, reliable “go-to” repertoire for both colours so you waste less time in the opening.
- For positions from the Scotch Game, tighten your plan: exchange pieces when behind on space; push passed pawns when ahead. See Scotch Game for review points.
- If you play open, tactical openings often, keep pattern drills for knight forks, pins, skewers and classic mating nets — they repeat often in blitz.
Blitz-specific practical tips
- Make a 10-second test before each game: if an obvious tactic exists, take it; otherwise make a solid developing move. Avoid “thinking forever” on the opening moves.
- When ahead, simplify. Trade pieces (not pawns) and move to a won rook/vs pawn endgame — fewer tactics means fewer surprises.
- Watch for pre-move traps — don’t pre-move when your opponent has checks or captures available.
- Use the clock: if your opponent is in severe time trouble, keep the position complicated if you’re confident tactically; otherwise simplify if your own clock is low.
Concrete drills (daily / weekly)
- Daily (10–15 min): Tactics — focus on forks, pins, and back-rank mates. 40 puzzles targeting pattern recognition.
- 3× a week (30 min): Endgames — king + pawn vs king, rook endings, opposition and promotion races. Practice 5 specific positions until you convert them reliably.
- Weekly (1–2 games): Play a short rapid (10+5) focusing on one opening system you want to master — practice plans rather than memorising moves.
- One session monthly: review 5 lost games (including the JJaxe19 game). Ask: Where did the pawn breakthrough start? Could the king be centralized earlier?
Sample 1-hour practice session
- 10 min warmup: 15 easy tactics to sharpen pattern recall.
- 20 min endgame training: king+pawn vs king and one rook endgame drill.
- 20 min rapid (10|5) — choose one opening (e.g., a Scotch line) and try to follow planned ideas.
- 10 min review: save the rapid game and annotate 3 turning points.
Short-term goals (next 30 days)
- Cut down time trouble: finish the first 10 moves with at least 30–40 seconds on the clock in blitz.
- Win the “passed-pawn defence” drill: practice 10 pawn-race or blocked-pawn endgames until you feel confident defending promotions.
- Maintain pattern training: 200 tactics this month focusing on forks and mating nets.
Helpful references & tracks
- Review the loss vs jjaxe19 carefully — identify the move where the pawn break became unstoppable.
- Revisit your resignation win vs mohammedoo1202910: note how you turned tactical chances into a resignation — replicate that thought process.
- Openings to tidy up: focus one week on the Scotch / Three Knights structures — small repertoire, big confidence gains.
Parting note
Your long-term trend is positive despite short-term fluctuation — that means your practice and volume are paying off. Keep the tactical drilling and add short, focused endgame work. If you want, send 3 of your recent losses and I’ll annotate the exact tactical/strategic mistakes move-by-move.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| aji_aji | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| mohammedoo1202910 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| jjaxe19 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| nazzaaz | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| rickhobbs | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| rafam2020 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| abramalas | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| bravo7926 | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| labrieskee | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| sravansravas | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| umadbro778 | 19W / 21L / 1D | View Games |
| dom_zeze | 18W / 5L / 4D | View Games |
| wirowirless | 10W / 15L / 0D | View Games |
| jacksbuns69 | 22W / 1L / 0D | View Games |
| suniladhate | 9W / 5L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1181 | 1258 | ||
| 2024 | 1087 | 1205 | 1257 | 923 |
| 2023 | 937 | 1134 | 1239 | 923 |
| 2022 | 819 | 1218 | 1070 | 923 |
| 2021 | 1052 | 776 | 932 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 342W / 302L / 8D | 309W / 332L / 13D | 62.6 |
| 2024 | 421W / 369L / 20D | 376W / 410L / 12D | 63.8 |
| 2023 | 525W / 493L / 30D | 504W / 525L / 33D | 64.7 |
| 2022 | 730W / 658L / 52D | 687W / 708L / 48D | 62.9 |
| 2021 | 364W / 346L / 22D | 334W / 373L / 20D | 58.1 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 808 | 405 | 374 | 29 | 50.1% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 595 | 289 | 296 | 10 | 48.6% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 508 | 249 | 247 | 12 | 49.0% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 402 | 194 | 197 | 11 | 48.3% |
| Amazon Attack | 381 | 174 | 196 | 11 | 45.7% |
| Barnes Defense | 369 | 182 | 183 | 4 | 49.3% |
| Three Knights Opening | 355 | 182 | 163 | 10 | 51.3% |
| Amar Gambit | 342 | 154 | 178 | 10 | 45.0% |
| Scotch Game | 307 | 150 | 147 | 10 | 48.9% |
| French Defense | 248 | 116 | 124 | 8 | 46.8% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 46 | 29 | 17 | 0 | 63.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 21 | 7 | 12 | 2 | 33.3% |
| Amar Gambit | 20 | 13 | 7 | 0 | 65.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 18 | 7 | 9 | 2 | 38.9% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 18 | 10 | 7 | 1 | 55.6% |
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 16 | 11 | 5 | 0 | 68.8% |
| Barnes Defense | 16 | 9 | 4 | 3 | 56.2% |
| Three Knights Opening | 15 | 7 | 6 | 2 | 46.7% |
| Elephant Gambit | 12 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 58.3% |
| Four Knights Game | 11 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 36.4% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 17 | 11 | 6 | 0 | 64.7% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 14 | 6 | 7 | 1 | 42.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 12 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 58.3% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 11 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 36.4% |
| Amar Gambit | 10 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 9 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 55.6% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 7 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 14.3% |
| Three Knights Opening | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 57.1% |
| Amazon Attack | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 85.7% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 85.7% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elephant Gambit | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Bird Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 11 | 2 |
| Losing | 13 | 0 |