Profile
Cyril Felrod Telesforo, known to the chess world as CyrilFelrodTelesforo, is a titled player who has earned the National Master title from National. They are widely respected for their blitz prowess and their calm, humorous approach to the game both on and off the board.
Title & Background
As a National Master, Cyril Felrod Telesforo represents the higher echelons of national competition. They built a reputation as a fearless blitz tactician with a keen sense for timing and initiative.
Playing Style & Time Controls
Preferred time control: Blitz. They thrive in fast-paced battles where quick calculation and practical decisions shine. Their style blends sharp tactical ideas with solid endgame technique, often leaning on creative openings to unbalance the position.
- Playing style: dynamic, tactical, with strong endgame technique
- Approach: sportsmanlike, humorous at the board
Opening Repertoire
Across blitz and rapid formats, Cyril has demonstrated a broad and adaptable opening repertoire. Notable examples include:
- Scandinavian Defense
- Australian Defense
- Benoni and related structures
- Nimzo-Larsen Attack
- Kings Indian Defense
- Slav Defense
Notable Moments
Over the years, Cyril has delivered memorable blitz performances and shown resilience in longer events, earning respect from opponents for their fighting spirit and good humor.
See Also
For a quick profile, see Cyril Felrod Telesforo.
Quick overview
Nice run — five recent rapid wins and a stable rating sitting at 1976. Your recent games show consistent attacking instincts, good piece activity and a knack for turning small advantages into decisive mating nets. Strength-adjusted win rate ~0.52 indicates you’re converting practical chances against similarly-rated opponents.
What you’re doing well
- Active piece play — you often bring rooks and knights into enemy territory (examples: decisive rook lifts and knight forks).
- Tactical awareness — several wins end in clean mating patterns or decisive material gains from combinations.
- Opening consistency — you get comfortable positions from repeatable systems (good results with King's Indian Defense and several Slav lines).
- Finishing — you spot back-rank and mating nets quickly and convert without giving the opponent counterplay.
- Time management — generally you avoid severe time trouble in these rapid games, keeping practical control of the clock.
Concrete areas to improve
- Deepen calculation in sharp openings: when positions get tactical (Sicilian-type structures) you sometimes miss the strongest defensive resource — practice calculation drills for 3–5 moves deep.
- Targeted opening review: your best win rates are in Australian Attack, Alapin and some Slav lines — shore up weaker results in the broader Sicilian family and refine typical plans in the Slav Defense.
- Strategic planning: convert long-term advantages (pawn structure, better minor piece) more methodically — ask “which piece to improve?” and “how to create a decisive pawn break?” when ahead.
- Endgame fundamentals: while many games finish earlier, make sure basic king + pawn and rook endgames are automatic — this prevents slipping in longer games.
Highlights from recent wins
Here are two instructive miniatures from your recent rapid streak.
- Game vs frchessgod — clean tactical finish. You sacrificed a knight on move 13 to open lines and finished with a decisive rook check on move 15.
- Game vs vnd1014 — excellent use of back-rank pressure and decisive knight maneuvering (Nf6 mate). Shows good pattern recognition for mating nets.
Opening notes (practical)
- Keep the systems that are working: your win rates are excellent in Australian Defense, Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation and French Defense. Continue refining typical plans and move orders there.
- For the Slav Defense lines you play often: focus on typical pawn breaks and the moment to jump to c5 or e5 — a small timing error can flip equality into a passive game.
- When facing open Sicilian setups, prioritize reducing tactical risk: trade a tactical minor piece or simplify to a position you understand better rather than gambling on unclear complications.
Practical training plan (weekly)
- Daily tactics: 20–30 puzzles focusing on forks, pins and back-rank motifs (15–20 minutes).
- Opening study: 2 sessions/week (30 minutes) — pick one line to deep-dive (one of your high-percentage systems and one weaker system such as the Sicilian) and build model games.
- One slow game per week (15+10 or longer) to practice strategic planning and endgame conversion; review it afterward for 30 minutes.
- One focused endgame session/week (30 minutes) — rook and pawn basics, opposition, Lucena and simple king+pawn races.
Game review checklist (use after each game)
- What was my opening plan? Did I follow it or get sidetracked?
- Mark any hanging pieces or recurring tactical oversights.
- Could I improve move choice in the critical turning point? (Try calculating the top 3 candidate moves.)
- Was the clock a factor? If yes, practice faster calculation under time pressure.
Next steps
- Pick one weak opening (Sicilian family) and study five thematic middlegames — save annotated model games for quick review.
- Track blunders for the next 20 games — if a specific motif repeats (back-rank, loose piece, missed fork), prioritize solving puzzles in that motif.
- Keep playing rapid but add a few longer games to improve strategic depth; your recent slope (rating trend) shows momentum — channel it into disciplined study.
Useful quick links / references
- Opponent games to review: frchessgod, vnd1014, lyann_daenerys, evzkie.
- Openings to prioritize: Slav Defense, Sicilian Defense, King's Indian Defense.
Final note
You have strong instincts for attack and finishing — that’s a huge asset. Balance it with a bit more structured opening study and endgame practice and you’ll convert many more of your practical edges into rating gains. If you want, I can create a 4-week study plan tailored to the Sicilian and Slav next.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| legacy_of_danya | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| mychesslevelis1 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Radoslav Genov | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| kuuhaku_blank_19 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| FunMaxi | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Juan Camilo Arango Arenas | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Hitmantotez | 1W / 3L / 0D | View |
| risingaa | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Volodymyr Yaniuk | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| m_e_l_o | 1W / 3L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| porrasfritz | 14W / 10L / 1D | View Games |
| cockroachdolly | 13W / 10L / 0D | View Games |
| Rogelio Jr Antonio | 9W / 12L / 1D | View Games |
| silvederione | 10W / 10L / 0D | View Games |
| Shivam Pant | 6W / 11L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2614 | 2524 | 1976 | |
| 2024 | 2442 | 2451 | ||
| 2023 | 2557 | 2640 | 1976 | |
| 2022 | 2543 | 2554 | ||
| 2021 | 2545 | 2558 | ||
| 2020 | 2404 | 2503 | 1976 | |
| 2019 | 2203 | 1992 | ||
| 2018 | 2232 | 2050 | ||
| 2017 | 1698 | 1948 | ||
| 2016 | 1853 | 1976 | ||
| 2015 | 1739 | 1873 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 153W / 205L / 12D | 165W / 184L / 16D | 86.8 |
| 2024 | 80W / 121L / 11D | 78W / 125L / 5D | 80.4 |
| 2023 | 57W / 64L / 5D | 53W / 65L / 6D | 80.2 |
| 2022 | 122W / 128L / 17D | 103W / 157L / 5D | 84.5 |
| 2021 | 27W / 23L / 5D | 23W / 24L / 5D | 81.5 |
| 2020 | 80W / 43L / 7D | 68W / 57L / 6D | 84.1 |
| 2019 | 16W / 28L / 2D | 18W / 27L / 0D | 81.8 |
| 2018 | 82W / 43L / 2D | 70W / 60L / 0D | 76.1 |
| 2017 | 21W / 21L / 1D | 16W / 24L / 2D | 71.1 |
| 2016 | 26W / 11L / 2D | 22W / 15L / 1D | 74.0 |
| 2015 | 125W / 115L / 8D | 112W / 122L / 12D | 74.7 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 89 | 38 | 49 | 2 | 42.7% |
| Australian Defense | 41 | 18 | 21 | 2 | 43.9% |
| King's Indian Defense | 40 | 21 | 16 | 3 | 52.5% |
| Slav Defense | 27 | 9 | 16 | 2 | 33.3% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 25 | 16 | 8 | 1 | 64.0% |
| Bogo-Indian Defense | 25 | 13 | 9 | 3 | 52.0% |
| Czech Defense | 24 | 13 | 11 | 0 | 54.2% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 19 | 9 | 10 | 0 | 47.4% |
| Modern | 18 | 7 | 11 | 0 | 38.9% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 18 | 11 | 7 | 0 | 61.1% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 134 | 64 | 68 | 2 | 47.8% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 119 | 58 | 55 | 6 | 48.7% |
| Australian Defense | 109 | 63 | 45 | 1 | 57.8% |
| Amar Gambit | 84 | 35 | 48 | 1 | 41.7% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 81 | 36 | 43 | 2 | 44.4% |
| King's Indian Defense | 74 | 34 | 37 | 3 | 46.0% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 71 | 37 | 30 | 4 | 52.1% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 60 | 27 | 32 | 1 | 45.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 59 | 22 | 35 | 2 | 37.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 58 | 26 | 29 | 3 | 44.8% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| King's Indian Defense | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Australian Defense | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Slav Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Slav Defense: Alekhine Variation | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 12 | 0 |
| Losing | 11 | 2 |