FIDE Master Sigurbjorn Bjornsson: The Chess Enigma
Meet Sigurbjorn Bjornsson, a chess player who doesn’t just play the game — he practically lives it. Bearing the respected title of FIDE Master, Sigurbjorn has carved out a reputation on the 64 squares as a formidable tactician with a dash of Icelandic grit and some well-timed wizardry.
Known online as the master of “Top Secret” openings (and no, he won’t reveal his tricks, not even under intense interrogation), Sigurbjorn boasts a blistering peak bullet rating of 2583 in 2025 and an electrifying blitz max rating crossing the 2600 mark. His games often last around 80 moves when victorious — because why rush perfection? — and if he loses, expect a beautifully drawn-out battle with an average of 85 moves. Endgames are his playground, featuring in nearly 85% of his matches, where his tactical foresight shines brightest.
With an astonishing comeback rate of nearly 92%, and an unyielding perfect streak of 100% win rate after losing a piece, Sigurbjorn is like that annoying mosquito you just can’t swat away. He wins, loses, and sometimes draws with such flair it’s impossible not to admire.
Psychologically speaking, the guy has a tilt factor of 7 out of 10 — so yes, he gets annoyed when things go south, but it only fuels the fire to bounce back stronger. He shines brightest in the early evening (7pm battles boast a 56% win rate), but if you’re a morning person, don’t worry — he’s also got an 80% win rate at midnight. Chess at all hours, anyone?
His record against rivals? Mixed bag. He’s 100% merciless against players like “amazemove” and “bebechesstr,” but don’t let him off easy — against some others, victory requires a stern fight.
With a playing style that respects patience, skill, and a splash of psychological warfare, Sigurbjorn Bjornsson is not just a chess player — he’s the kind of opponent who will make you swear you saw your queen blink before disappearing.
What you’re doing well
You show a willingness to enter sharp, tactical lines in your blitz play. When you lock into aggressive setups like the Dragon variant, you keep the position dynamic and create concrete king-side threats. You also demonstrate good piece activity in complex positions, which helps you convert tricky middlegames into winning chances.
- Your pressure in double-edged middlegames often forces the opponent to defend accurately, which suits a blitz format where quick, practical decisions matter.
- In recent wins, you were able to coordinate queen and rook activity effectively, creating decisive threats that the opponent found hard to parry under time pressure.
- When you castle opposite your opponent’s king side, you keep the game in a chaotic, tactical domain where your initiative can carry you to a clean finish.
- You maintain resilience in defense, staying calm in confrontations that develop quickly and keeping lines open for counterplay.
Areas to improve
- Time management in blitz. Plan where you want to spend your most precise calculation time and where you can rely on general principles. A good rule is to allocate more time to critical turning points and reduce time on routine exchanges.
- Plan before tactics. In complex middlegames, try to articulate a concrete, simple plan first (e.g., target a specific pawn structure, open a key file, or improve the worst-placed piece) before chasing tactical shots.
- Endgame technique. Blitz endgames often decide games you’re otherwise in, so practice rook endings and king activity in simplified positions to convert small advantages reliably.
- Defensive awareness against king-side pawn storms. When your opponent pushes on the h- and g-files, ensure you have a clear plan to neutralize the attack and avoid overextension that weakens your king’s safety.
- Opening discipline and repertoire refinement. Your aggression is a strength; pair it with solid, well-understood ideas from your preferred lines. Prepare a few solid responses to the main anti-dragon and dragon ideas so you don’t drift into unfamiliar setups under time pressure.
- Post-game analysis habit. After each blitz session, identify 1-2 critical decision points and write down alternative options. This makes quick learning stick and improves future decision-making under time pressure.
Two-week practical plan
Use these steps to build consistent improvement without slowing your blitz pace:
- Week 1: Opening familiarity and tactics
- Choose 1-2 openings you enjoy (for example, Dragon-based lines and a flexible English/ Nimzo-Larsen approach) and study the main ideas rather than memorizing long move sequences.
- Do 15 minutes of daily tactical puzzles focused on common Dragon motifs (pawn storms, piece coordination on open files, and back-rank tactics).
- Play 2 blitz games focusing on developing pieces to natural squares in the first 8-10 moves; avoid moving the same piece multiple times early unless it creates a clear plan.
- Week 2: Endgames and post-game review
- Practice rook endings and simple knight vs. bishop endgames to improve conversion chances when material is equal or slightly favorable.
- Continue daily tactics, then review each blitz session afterward. Note one decisive moment and one alternative plan you could have tried.
- In prep games, simulate your typical opponents and rehearse a second plan if your main line stalls; this reduces unease when the clock is tight.
Openings and strategic notes you can lean on
Your openings show a penchant for sharp, forcing lines where you can gain initiative. Consider reinforcing your strengths by keeping a few "safe but ambitious" options ready, and pair them with clear middlegame plans. For example, when you explore Sicilian Dragon family ideas, reinforce both your pawn storm instincts and a solid back-up plan if the attack slows.
Tip: balance risk with plan A (king-side attack) and plan B (central control and piece trades) so you can switch gears quickly when the position changes.
Practice position (optional)
To reinforce the concepts above, you can review typical Dragon pawn-storm positions and practice with a focused exercise set. If you’d like, I can generate a representative training position you can load into a board to walk through the plan step-by-step.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| SheeepHippo2025 | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Vesna Bogdanovic | 15W / 6L / 1D | View |
| imperialfluff | 3W / 3L / 0D | View |
| jeruweru | 3W / 1L / 1D | View |
| kapinovo | 5W / 8L / 2D | View |
| hannibal4 | 15W / 14L / 2D | View |
| bobancio | 3W / 0L / 0D | View |
| CalmdownCalabreso | 0W / 0L / 1D | View |
| umanwdd | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Nemanja Zivkovic | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Anselm Wagner | 21W / 14L / 1D | View Games |
| cretsosa5 | 8W / 21L / 6D | View Games |
| hannibal4 | 15W / 14L / 2D | View Games |
| gmjjbyrd | 14W / 11L / 3D | View Games |
| Pavel Sevostianov | 13W / 12L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2605 | 2619 | ||
| 2024 | 2496 | 2487 | ||
| 2023 | 2411 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1983W / 1686L / 253D | 1772W / 1921L / 247D | 81.5 |
| 2024 | 20W / 19L / 1D | 18W / 18L / 5D | 81.3 |
| 2023 | 35W / 18L / 2D | 27W / 22L / 6D | 78.4 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 1005 | 498 | 443 | 64 | 49.5% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 995 | 505 | 429 | 61 | 50.8% |
| King's Indian Attack | 749 | 381 | 331 | 37 | 50.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 407 | 192 | 184 | 31 | 47.2% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 407 | 175 | 211 | 21 | 43.0% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 334 | 150 | 156 | 28 | 44.9% |
| Sicilian Defense | 265 | 124 | 122 | 19 | 46.8% |
| King's Indian Attack: French Variation | 199 | 115 | 75 | 9 | 57.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 185 | 79 | 94 | 12 | 42.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 143 | 64 | 73 | 6 | 44.8% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 39 | 19 | 17 | 3 | 48.7% |
| Döry Defense | 38 | 13 | 20 | 5 | 34.2% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 36 | 18 | 16 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 36 | 13 | 19 | 4 | 36.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Chekhover Variation | 35 | 14 | 20 | 1 | 40.0% |
| Queen's Pawn Game: Torre Attack | 30 | 14 | 16 | 0 | 46.7% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 28 | 15 | 11 | 2 | 53.6% |
| King's Indian Attack | 28 | 20 | 7 | 1 | 71.4% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 27 | 15 | 11 | 1 | 55.6% |
| Sicilian Defense | 26 | 14 | 11 | 1 | 53.9% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 10 | 1 |
| Losing | 12 | 0 |