About DakaMtzz
In the vast ecosystem of online chess, DakaMtzz is a fascinating specimen whose rating evolution reads like a thrilling saga of survival and dominance. From humble beginnings in 2022 with blitz ratings starting at 468 and bullet hoverings as low as 300, this player has rapidly evolved into a formidable predator of the chessboard, reaching peak blitz ratings of 2721 and bullet ratings soaring to a blistering 2704 by 2025.
Evolution Through the Years
DakaMtzz’s adaptation is evident across multiple time controls. Blitz is their specialty, where the average rating has blossomed impressively from around 2190 in 2022 to nearly 2590 by 2025. Bullet play follows the same trend, showcasing a lethal precision with a flawless 2704 rating maintained in 2025, a testament to lightning-fast reflexes and sharp tactical genes.
Opening Repertoire - The Genetic Code of Victory
With a preference for classic defenses like the Queen's Gambit Declined and the aggressive King's Indian Defense Four Pawns Attack, DakaMtzz expresses a strategic versatility that would make any bioengineer marvel. Their win rates in these lines surpass the 50% mark consistently, with some openings boasting win percentages soaring close to 80% in rapid formats, proving that this player’s opening repertoire is evolutionarily optimized for success.
Playing Style & Psychological Traits
When dissecting DakaMtzz’s playing style under a metaphorical microscope, a few fascinating attributes emerge. A 91% comeback rate indicates an impressive resilience — a true survivor on the chess battlefield. The player’s early resignation rate is remarkably low (0.67%), suggesting endurance even when the position looks grim.
Moves per game average around 80, indicating a fondness for deep, strategic battles rather than quick skirmishes. Cognitive endurance must be off the charts!
Interestingly, this player is prone to a “tilt factor” of 14, a mild biological quirk showing some vulnerability when challenged, but with an overall psychological metabolism favoring mastery and recovery.
Achievement Highlights
- Longest winning streak: 66 games — a real queen march through the rating jungle.
- Win/Loss/Draw record in Blitz: 5727 wins, 5143 losses, 820 draws — a fierce competitor with a predator’s appetite for victory.
- Peak Rating Highlights: Blitz (2721), Bullet (2704), Rapid (2454), and steadily improving Daily games.
Final Thoughts
DakaMtzz’s growth echoes a natural selection where only the sharpest, quickest, and most adaptable survive. Like a chess grandmaster evolved from the primordial slime of 300 rating points, this user now stalks the boards with relentless skill and cunning.
Keep an eye on their moves — if chess were biology, DakaMtzz would be a chess predator at the top of its food chain.
Overview of your current trends
You have a balanced overall result in blitz with a strength-adjusted win rate around 50%. In the recent period, your longer-term trend is positive (6 months and 12 months), while the shorter 3-month trend shows some volatility. Your month-to-month rating changes suggest a steadier rise in the near term, but with jumps and dips over shorter windows.
- 1 month rating change: up by 12 points.
- 3 month rating change: up by 32 points.
- 6 month rating change: up by 34 points.
- 12 month rating change: up by 6 points.
- Rating trend slopes indicate: a small positive slope over 1 and 6/12 months, but a negative slope over the 3-month window, signaling some recent fluctuations.
Opening performance snapshot
Your openings show a mix of solid results and room for refinement. The best-performing lines in your data are listed below with practical takeaways:
- King’s Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack — about 55% win rate across your games. This indicates you handle aggressive, dynamic positions well. Focus on reinforcing your typical middlegame plans after the early pawn storm, and practice common responses from White so you can convert more of these opportunities into wins.
- Australian Defense — about 56% win rate. This is a solid domain for you. Lean into the standard development and endgame plans, and keep a short list of quick, safe replies to the most common White setups to reduce errors under time pressure.
- Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG) — about 52% win rate. This is an aggressive weapon with many games in the sample. Use it as a surprise option when you’re comfortable with the tactical arc, but consider pairing it with a more solid alternative for consistency.
Other openings show lower win rates in your data, which can point to strategic overextension or unfamiliarity with typical middlegame plans. If you choose to continue these lines, pair them with targeted study on common middlegame ideas and typical counterplays so you have clear plans when the position diverges from your expectations.
Learning from the most recent games
In blitz, short time pressure can make exact calculations harder. Your recent losses and draws highlight a few recurring themes to focus on:
- Time management and planning: aim to form a simple plan within the first few moves of a new position and check it against a couple of plausible opponent responses.
- Tactical vigilance: in dynamic openings, set a mental check for forks, pins, and over-extended pawn structures. Regular tactical practice can help you spot the critical lines more quickly.
- Endgame readiness: many blitz games reach endgames with still-material imbalance. Strengthen king-and-pawn endgames and basic rook endings so you can convert small advantages into points.
Action plan to boost your results
Below is a practical, target-based plan you can try over the next weeks. It balances opening work, tactics, and endgames, with a focus on reducing volatility in short time controls.
- Weekly repertoire focus:
- Maintain a reliable White opening (for example, a solid Queen's Gambit family approach) to reduce early uncertainty in blitz.
- Choose one Black system that suits your style (the King’s Indian or the Australian Defense are strong contenders from your data) and study 2-3 typical middlegame plans and the main counters you will face.
- Daily practice (15–25 minutes):
- 5–10 minutes of puzzles focusing on common tactics (forks, pins, discovered attacks) to sharpen quick calculation under pressure.
- 5–10 minutes of endgame basics (K+P vs K, rook endings basics) to improve conversion in blitz.
- Entrench one opening line with a short, clear plan in mind and review a model game to see how the middlegame plan typically unfolds.
- Game review routine:
- Review 1–2 blitz losses per week without engines first; identify where the plan broke down (early, middlegame, or endgame) and note concrete improvements you can apply next time.
- If you run into the same pattern in multiple games, add a targeted training item (example: “practice solving this motif in 3 moves” or “practice this endgame technique”).
- Time management strategy for blitz:
- Set a mental checkpoint every 5–6 moves for a quick plan and a backup plan. If the position looks complex, choose a simpler variation and aim for solid equality before trying sharp tactics.
Practical tips for your next games
- Stick to your strongest opening themes and avoid over-ambitious sidelines in blitz unless you’re confident with the resulting middlegame plans.
- Trade to simplify when ahead in material or when time is tight; avoid risky, multi-piece tactics if you’re low on time.
- Keep a short mental checklist for each phase: picture the key plan, spot a couple of opponent responses, and identify a safe continuation.
- Regularly practice endgames to improve conversion in close games, which are common in blitz.
Your next steps
Apply a steady, focused routine over the coming weeks: reinforce your best openings, tighten tactical recognition, and build solid endgame habits. With consistent practice, you should see more stable gains in the 1–3 month horizon and continued improvement over longer periods.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| pancakewithblueberry | 1W / 2L / 0D | View |
| Julian Estrada | 4W / 4L / 1D | View |
| julmiri Muhammad Zulfaqar Abu Bakar | 11W / 8L / 1D | View |
| Mandy2k8 | 3W / 2L / 0D | View |
| PremovePerry69420 | 3W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Michal Obrusnik | 3W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Jonny Quest | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| rupeshreddyy | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Miklos Halak | 2W / 1L / 1D | View |
| flame641990 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| diegomoop | 236W / 69L / 19D | View Games |
| carlitoslitros | 72W / 17L / 5D | View Games |
| ferrcgod | 78W / 4L / 4D | View Games |
| WarlordX | 27W / 42L / 3D | View Games |
| 7practice | 33W / 24L / 6D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2705 | 2675 | 2462 | 1368 |
| 2024 | 2704 | 2585 | 2454 | 1312 |
| 2023 | 2502 | 2412 | 2447 | |
| 2022 | 2310 | 2402 | 2202 | 929 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1753W / 1565L / 265D | 1443W / 1823L / 316D | 85.3 |
| 2024 | 2213W / 1755L / 322D | 1963W / 2042L / 288D | 84.6 |
| 2023 | 627W / 400L / 78D | 553W / 482L / 77D | 79.1 |
| 2022 | 1045W / 779L / 111D | 960W / 849L / 104D | 76.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 1290 | 664 | 529 | 97 | 51.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 962 | 421 | 478 | 63 | 43.8% |
| King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack | 889 | 486 | 341 | 62 | 54.7% |
| Queen's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation | 620 | 298 | 278 | 44 | 48.1% |
| Sicilian Defense | 601 | 276 | 278 | 47 | 45.9% |
| Bogo-Indian Defense | 417 | 216 | 171 | 30 | 51.8% |
| Döry Defense | 416 | 196 | 176 | 44 | 47.1% |
| Australian Defense | 387 | 216 | 146 | 25 | 55.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 374 | 136 | 220 | 18 | 36.4% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 372 | 166 | 175 | 31 | 44.6% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 422 | 206 | 186 | 30 | 48.8% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 368 | 187 | 150 | 31 | 50.8% |
| Australian Defense | 321 | 160 | 152 | 9 | 49.8% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 207 | 105 | 95 | 7 | 50.7% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 204 | 109 | 79 | 16 | 53.4% |
| King's Indian Defense | 158 | 85 | 67 | 6 | 53.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 155 | 64 | 80 | 11 | 41.3% |
| Amar Gambit | 150 | 67 | 75 | 8 | 44.7% |
| Döry Defense | 143 | 58 | 76 | 9 | 40.6% |
| Sicilian Defense | 134 | 75 | 52 | 7 | 56.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 52 | 29 | 20 | 3 | 55.8% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 51 | 31 | 14 | 6 | 60.8% |
| Sicilian Defense | 30 | 17 | 12 | 1 | 56.7% |
| King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack | 25 | 18 | 6 | 1 | 72.0% |
| Slav Defense | 24 | 18 | 5 | 1 | 75.0% |
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 21 | 10 | 9 | 2 | 47.6% |
| Australian Defense | 18 | 14 | 4 | 0 | 77.8% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 18 | 10 | 6 | 2 | 55.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 17 | 14 | 3 | 0 | 82.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation | 16 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Larsen Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Exchange Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Maróczy Bind | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 66 | 0 |
| Losing | 14 | 1 |