Meet Dane-Leva: The Tactical Trickster of the Chessboard
Dane-Leva is not your average chess player – they're a whirlwind of strategic surprises and tactical brilliance, with a flair for making the unexpected happen on the board. Known for a curious mix of winning streaks and comebacks, Dane-Leva’s style keeps opponents guessing and viewers entertained.
Rating Rollercoaster & Playing Style
By 2025, Dane-Leva has bounced through ratings that paint quite the picture: peaking at 680 in blitz to a bullet high of 601. While their daily chess rating hovers impressively around the mid-600s, blitz and rapid have seen some seesaw action—a true chess thrill ride! Their average games are around 60 moves per win, showing they don’t shy away from a long tactical battle.
Ever the fighter, Dane-Leva has a stellar 73% comeback rate – meaning even if the chips are down, resigning is never on their to-do list.
Early resignation? Barely a blip at 3.2%, clearly preferring to play it out to the bitter end.
Favorite Openings (and Secret Weapons)
Dane-Leva specializes in some less conventional paths with notable results in the Van t Kruijs Opening, boasting nearly 49% win rate in blitz and an eye-catching 56% in bullet games. The French Defense variations and Queens Pawn Opening Horwitz Defense are other arenas where Dane-Leva shines, turning classic moves into clever traps.
Battle-Tested Against Humans & Time
Whether it's the crack of dawn or the late-night blitz sessions, Dane-Leva plays hands down best just past midnight (an impressive 53.6% win rate around 12 AM), but don’t schedule a game at 8 or 10 PM if you want to challenge them—the win rate rockets or plunges dramatically depending on the hour! Their mental toughness is undeniable with a tilt factor of 8, meaning frustration rarely gets the better of them.
Highlight Reel: Recent Glorious Victory
One for the books! On June 1st, 2025, in a swift and cheeky display, Dane-Leva put the French Defense to dazzling use to checkmate their opponent in just 7 moves. Quick, sharp, and merciless, it perfectly encapsulates their approach: keep calm, think two moves ahead, then deliver a knockout punch.
Final Check
With nearly equal wins and losses in blitz (1514 wins vs. 1512 losses) and a decent record in rapid and bullet play, Dane-Leva dances on the edge of chaos and control. Whether they're charming adversaries with their tricky openings or staging a comeback no one saw coming, this chess saga is far from over. Expect more surprises, wins (and the occasional dramatic loss) from this board-battling virtuoso.
Fun fact: Opponents like cavke23 and maniac2010 have seen nothing but the sharp end of Dane-Leva’s sword with a 100% loss record against them. Beware when you see that username pop up!
Quick summary
Nice blitz session — you converted clean tactical chances in recent wins and showed resilience when under pressure. Your most recent win finished with a mating net on g7; your most recent loss came from a combination that led to a passed pawn promotion and a mating net on the back rank. Overall your long-term trend is positive (6‑ and 12‑month slopes up) and your one‑month form is improving.
- Example win vs hoara_luks: decisive queenside/king‑side tactics and a final Qxg7 mate. See the game below.
- Example loss vs bahamain242: the game turned on an advanced passed pawn that promoted — watch promotion routes and king safety in the endgame.
What you are doing well (strengths)
- Finding tactical shots in blitz — you spotted mating ideas quickly and converted them (example: the Qxg7 finish).
- Good pattern recognition in the opening — your performance with French Defense and the many games in the Amar Gambit show you have recurring, comfortable lines.
- Tenacity under time pressure — you win on the clock sometimes and keep fighting in messy positions.
- Ability to punish opponents who weaken their king — you take advantage of open lines and exposed kings effectively.
Where to improve (weaknesses to target)
- King safety and premature king moves. In a couple of games you moved the king into the center early (Kd1/Kd2 lines) and got into tactical trouble. In blitz, avoid early king walks unless you’ve calculated the consequences.
- Handling advanced passed pawns and promotion races. The loss vs bahamain242 demonstrates how a passed pawn can decide the game — practice stopping passed pawns and creating counterplay before it becomes decisive.
- Endgame technique. When material is reduced you sometimes allow pawn breakthroughs or miss plans to block a pawn (control the promotion square, use the king actively, trade into a winning minor-piece endgame when possible).
- Blunder prevention checklist. You have the tactical eye, but occasional oversights (hanging pieces, back‑rank weaknesses) cost you. Slow down by a second or two for a quick safety scan before each move.
- Opening consistency. You do well in certain openings (French, Amar Gambit) but some lines (Barnes Defense etc.) have lower win rates — tighten up your main repertoire and drop sidelines that produce repeated bad structures.
Concrete next steps (actionable plan for the week)
- Daily tactics: 15–25 minutes of tactics puzzles focused on mates in 1–4 and fork/pin/skewer patterns. Blitz benefits most from quick pattern drills.
- Endgame practice: 3× per week, 10–15 minutes — king and pawn vs king, rook endgames basics, and defending/blocking passed pawns (practice the “blockade + king” idea).
- Opening focus: pick 2 preferred systems to deepen for blitz (keep the French if you play it well). Spend one session analyzing 5 recent model games in each opening and note typical plans.
- Blunder checklist (apply every move): 1) Is any of my pieces hanging? 2) Does my opponent have a check or capture? 3) Will this move create a back‑rank weakness or leave promotion squares open? 3 seconds checklist = many saved points.
- One weekly review: pick 3 blitz games (win/loss/draw) and spend 20–30 minutes annotating key turning points — this dramatically improves decision quality.
Blitz-specific practical tips
- When ahead in material, simplify — trade pieces but not pawns if it helps neutralize counterplay and promotion chances.
- In time trouble, prioritize safe, forcing moves (checks, captures, threats) over long maneuvers — they reduce opponent resources and lower error risk.
- Pre-moves: use them sparingly. Only pre-move in very safe captures or obvious recaptures to avoid "Fingerfehler".
- Quick habit: after each opponent move glance at their last move to see if it created a passed pawn or a new mating net — opponents often forget promotion threats in busy positions.
Short practice plan (two weeks)
- Week 1: Daily 20 min tactics + 2×15 min endgame + 1×30 min opening study (French and one Amar Gambit line).
- Week 2: Same routine but replace one opening study with a 30‑minute annotated review of your three most recent losses to find recurring mistakes.
- After two weeks: test progress by playing a 20‑game blitz batch and annotate 5 critical games.
Examples from your recent games (study these positions)
Win vs hoara_luks — tactical finishing pattern. Learn why the opponent’s kingside left gaps and how you exploited them:
Loss vs bahamain242 — promotion race and back‑rank tactics. Study how the pawn storm was allowed to run and where to interpose or trade earlier:
Small checklist to use mid‑game (paste into your notes)
- 1) Any immediate checks/captures/threats for me? For opponent?
- 2) Are my major pieces defended and not hanging?
- 3) If the queens come off, will my pawn structure (passed pawns) win or lose?
- 4) Do I have a safe square for my king? Can I create luft or simplify?
- 5) If under 30 seconds, prefer forcing moves (checks, captures, threats).
Final encouragement
Your overall win/loss numbers and the recent positive slope show real progress — you have the tactical instincts. Add a little structure: short daily tactics + focused endgame drills + a blunder‑checking habit, and you’ll convert more of those close games. Keep the momentum — small, consistent habits win blitz matches.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| hoara_luks | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| surfcuhh | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| bahamain242 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| sachin-kumar70 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| erentheexorcist | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| django_ina | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| raxxx223 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| moeinmesgarani | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| erdallbakkalll | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| eclove520 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| fraz75 | 8W / 5L / 0D | View Games |
| farfalou_lele | 4W / 4L / 0D | View Games |
| cdr131517 | 4W / 3L / 0D | View Games |
| allokay12 | 3W / 3L / 0D | View Games |
| priyam1500 | 4W / 1L / 1D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 681 | 425 | 373 | 635 |
| 2024 | 476 | 324 | 383 | 654 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1103W / 1082L / 112D | 1092W / 1082L / 109D | 58.8 |
| 2024 | 395W / 399L / 67D | 390W / 405L / 63D | 63.7 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 1726 | 835 | 778 | 113 | 48.4% |
| French Defense | 944 | 476 | 436 | 32 | 50.4% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 602 | 279 | 280 | 43 | 46.4% |
| Australian Defense | 300 | 143 | 136 | 21 | 47.7% |
| Barnes Defense | 240 | 94 | 130 | 16 | 39.2% |
| Elephant Gambit | 193 | 78 | 107 | 8 | 40.4% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 145 | 62 | 78 | 5 | 42.8% |
| Amazon Attack | 141 | 67 | 62 | 12 | 47.5% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 128 | 56 | 67 | 5 | 43.8% |
| Modern | 95 | 44 | 43 | 8 | 46.3% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense | 261 | 132 | 116 | 13 | 50.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 254 | 128 | 109 | 17 | 50.4% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 146 | 64 | 79 | 3 | 43.8% |
| Australian Defense | 63 | 27 | 35 | 1 | 42.9% |
| Barnes Defense | 34 | 10 | 20 | 4 | 29.4% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 33 | 17 | 14 | 2 | 51.5% |
| Alekhine Defense | 15 | 11 | 4 | 0 | 73.3% |
| Elephant Gambit | 12 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 11 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 18.2% |
| Sicilian Defense | 11 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 45.5% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 52 | 31 | 21 | 0 | 59.6% |
| French Defense | 27 | 14 | 11 | 2 | 51.9% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 77.8% |
| Australian Defense | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Modern | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Center Game | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Modern | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 11 | 2 |
| Losing | 10 | 0 |