Darius Viškelis - The FIDE Master with a Blitz King’s Heart
Meet Darius Viškelis, known in the chess world as the cunning FIDE Master who plays at lightning speed but with strategic depth. Darius’ journey through the 64 squares is nothing short of epic, transforming impulsive opening moves into middlegame masterpieces and endgame wizardry.
Starting off with a blitz rating of 1329 back in 2018, Darius rapidly accelerated to a blistering peak rating of 2385 by 2024. This FIDE Master doesn't just dabble in blitz—Darius shines across formats, boasting impressive scores in daily and bullet chess. His rapid games even flirt with a near 1970 rating, proving he can outthink opponents whether the clock’s ticking loudly or quietly.
With over 5,000 blitz games played and a winning record edging just over 52%, Darius has built an ironclad reputation for tenacity and tactical awareness. Forget giving up easily—this player’s comeback rate after losing a piece is a flawless 100%! Losing a piece? Pfft. That’s just a warm-up move.
Darius’ style is a curious blend of patience and aggression: expecting an average of 65 moves per win, the games tend to be long, tactical battles rather than quick finishes. You’ll find them comfortable both playing white and black, winning more than half of their games with each color.
But what’s a champion without a bit of humor? Darius holds a longest winning streak of 15 games—imagine the pressure on opponents trying to be the one to break that chain! Using a secret (and apparently very effective) opening repertoire, Darius enjoys a win rate north of 50% across all time controls, proving that sneaking a few tricks up one's sleeve pays off.
When questioned about playing style, Darius quipped, "I like my chess like my coffee: strong, a bit bitter, but ultimately satisfying." With a tilt factor of 18 (a fancy chess term for how often frustration creeps in), Darius knows how to keep cool under fire, even when the chips are down.
Whether it’s blitz at odd hours, peak rapid sessions on weekends, or daily puzzles that test the mind, Darius Viškelis is a chess force to reckon with — clever, resilient, and just a touch mischievous.
Blitz game takeaways for Darius Viškelis
You play with a bold, fighting style in blitz and aren’t afraid to enter sharp tactical positions. Your games show you’re willing to press the initiative and look for active piece play, often generating practical chances even when the position is unclear. In several recent battles you demonstrated resourcefulness in attack and a readiness to sacrifice when the moment is right. To translate that energy into more consistent results, focus on strengthening time management, endgame technique, and decision discipline in long, complicated lines.
Strengths to build on
- Willingness to enter dynamic, tactical middlegames where you can impose activity and pressure.
- Active rooks and queens coordinating on open files and diagonals, often creating compelling attacking motifs.
- Resourcefulness in complex positions; you tend to search for practical chances even when the material balance is unclear.
Areas to improve (with concrete steps)
- Time management in blitz: set a clear plan for the early phase of a game (e.g., aim to reach a reasonable time margin after the first 15–20 moves). When you sense rising pressure, slow the pace slightly to check candidate moves rather than reflexively committing to the first forcing line.
- Endgame technique under pressure: practice common rook and pawn endings and learn 2–3 go-to conversion patterns. When you reach simplified endings with a material edge, follow a simple plan to convert rather than trading into uncertain king-and-pawn endgames.
- Positional judgment in the opening: balance ambition with solidity. In some games you enter highly tactical routes that require precise calculation; pairing such lines with established, solid middlegame plans can reduce missteps under time constraints.
- Decision quality in ambiguous positions: improve your ability to distinguish “grab for initiative” from “safe and steady improvement.” When unsure, look for a simpler continuation that keeps your king safe and your pieces coordinated.
Four-week training plan
- Week 1 — Repertoire consolidation: choose 1–2 solid blitz-friendly openings for White and Black. Practice a compact, familiar set of replies so you know the typical middlegame plans and endgames that arise.
- Week 2 — Time-management drills: play short blitz sessions (e.g., 3+1 or 4+1) focusing on finishing games with a clear plan. After every game, note your time distribution and identify the moment you started to rush.
- Week 3 — Endgame practice: devote 20–30 minutes daily to rook endings and simple pawn endings. Use a few standard conversion techniques (activate the king, activate the rook, fix the opponent's pawns) and apply them in practice positions.
- Week 4 — Post-game analysis habit: after each game, write down 3 concrete takeaways (one improvement and one alternative you could have played). Review 1–2 critical positions with a coach, engine-lite, or a trusted training partner.
Opening repertoire suggestions
Your openings show you’re comfortable in dynamic channels (for both sides). Consider leaning into a compact, repeatable setup to reduce decision fatigue in blitz. Potential focuses include a solid French Defense-based approach as Black or a straightforward Sicilian Alapin/Anti-Sicilian setup as White, which tend to yield clear middlegame ideas without heavy theoretical burdens.
Useful internal references to study could include:
- French Defense: Advance Variation
- Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation
- Modern defenses that keep lines flexible and reduce early forcing lines
Post-game review routine
Adopt a quick, structured post-game routine after every blitz session:
- Identify 2 critical moments where a different move could have changed the evaluation.
- Note one positive decision you want to repeat and one mistake to avoid in the future.
- If possible, review the game with a coach or mate it with a quick engine-lite check to confirm the evaluation of key transitions.
Optional study resources
To deepen your focused work, you can explore these internal references:
- Opening study: French Defense: Advance Variation
- Opening study: Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| taglit | 0W / 0L / 1D | View |
| Olga Yushko | 0W / 0L / 1D | View |
| robert_sava | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| milenak_09 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Ruslan Kurayan | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| futurechamp1907 | 0W / 0L / 1D | View |
| Dawid Czerw | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| chessmatist53 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Sanket Chakravarty | 0W / 0L / 1D | View |
| Andrés Blanco Rodríguez | 2W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Martynas Limontas | 2W / 10L / 4D | View Games |
| failas77 | 11W / 3L / 0D | View Games |
| andriuszv | 4W / 5L / 4D | View Games |
| eroras | 11W / 1L / 1D | View Games |
| hesas | 4W / 7L / 2D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2429 | 2082 | ||
| 2024 | 2311 | 2100 | ||
| 2023 | 2384 | 2097 | ||
| 2022 | 2301 | 2089 | ||
| 2021 | 2044 | 2285 | 1968 | 2119 |
| 2020 | 2091 | 2244 | 1840 | 2090 |
| 2019 | 1918 | 2128 | 1531 | |
| 2018 | 2204 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 47W / 30L / 7D | 41W / 34L / 3D | 75.2 |
| 2024 | 35W / 23L / 14D | 33W / 28L / 7D | 72.4 |
| 2023 | 59W / 21L / 13D | 46W / 27L / 8D | 73.9 |
| 2022 | 29W / 39L / 8D | 31W / 42L / 5D | 64.3 |
| 2021 | 201W / 113L / 30D | 208W / 126L / 32D | 75.0 |
| 2020 | 457W / 242L / 47D | 406W / 280L / 64D | 73.5 |
| 2019 | 767W / 557L / 80D | 693W / 632L / 65D | 73.2 |
| 2018 | 168W / 125L / 13D | 163W / 126L / 17D | 73.4 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 345 | 199 | 131 | 15 | 57.7% |
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 266 | 121 | 129 | 16 | 45.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 209 | 116 | 79 | 14 | 55.5% |
| QGD Tarrasch: 4.cxd5 | 196 | 109 | 73 | 14 | 55.6% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 172 | 94 | 64 | 14 | 54.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation | 167 | 85 | 75 | 7 | 50.9% |
| Modern | 159 | 92 | 60 | 7 | 57.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Haag Gambit | 158 | 90 | 55 | 13 | 57.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 142 | 66 | 65 | 11 | 46.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Panov Attack | 136 | 78 | 50 | 8 | 57.4% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 22 | 14 | 3 | 5 | 63.6% |
| Barnes Defense | 18 | 14 | 2 | 2 | 77.8% |
| Unknown Opening* | 18 | 5 | 11 | 2 | 27.8% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 15 | 9 | 6 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 13 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 84.6% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 11 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 72.7% |
| Amazon Attack | 11 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 63.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 70.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 10 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 22 | 14 | 7 | 1 | 63.6% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 21 | 17 | 3 | 1 | 81.0% |
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 13 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 61.5% |
| Modern | 12 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 58.3% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 11 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 63.6% |
| Amazon Attack | 9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 77.8% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 9 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 77.8% |
| Barnes Defense | 8 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 87.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 57.1% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD Tarrasch: 4.cxd5 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Haag Gambit | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Döry Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 15 | 0 |
| Losing | 18 | 0 |