David Diego Ballesteros Gonzalez (aka davydbg)
FIDE Master & Tactical Virtuoso
Meet David Diego Ballesteros Gonzalez, or davydbg to those lucky enough to have tangled with him on the 64 squares. Awarded the prestigious title of FIDE Master, David’s chess journey is a thrilling rollercoaster packed with cunning strategies, epic comebacks, and perhaps a sprinkle of chess wizardry that borders on the magical.
Starting his competitive online antics back in 2015 with more bumps than triumphs (zero wins in his first 2 bullet games!), David quickly turned things around, spinning his Bullet rating from 1042 to a hearty 1727 by 2020, and maintained an impressive streak in the rapid and blitz formats. If blitz chess was a battlefield, David’s scorecard reads like a war hero’s tale, boasting a peak rating soaring as high as 2681 in 2020!
His playing style? A blend of patience and aggression, with an average of nearly 70 moves per win—clearly David enjoys a good chess drama before delivering the knockout punch. Not one to yield easily, his comeback rate stands tall at 87% and he even boasts a perfect 100% win rate after losing a piece. Somewhere there’s a chess coach screaming, “Take notes, people!”
Off the board, David likely enjoys a bit of psychological warfare, with a tilt factor of only 12 (after all, even masters get frustrated, but not often enough). He’s versatile, winning more often with White but still holding his ground with Black at near 51% win rates. And despite some early career hiccups, he’s carved out a remarkable career—his longest winning streak tallying up to a nail-biting 19 consecutive games.
Opponents beware! Recent foes like sindhucrick11 and morphy9999 have found themselves on the losing side, with a win rate of 100% against them. In short: David is the kind of player who doesn’t just play chess, he sometimes turns it into rocket science — with a wink and a smile.
Whether you’re jumping into bullet, blitz, or rapid, David Diego Ballesteros Gonzalez’s games are guaranteed to be an enthralling mix of tactical fireworks, enduring battles, and moments that leave spectators wondering if chess is part art, part magic.
Hi David Diego Ballesteros González (davydbg), here’s your personalized feedback!
1. Quick Snapshot
• Current form: solid 1650-1700 in 2 + 1 blitz.
• Best recorded peak: 2681 (2020-05-09).
• Activity trends:
2. Strengths to Keep Building On
- Opening variety – you comfortably switch between 1.d4/1.Nf3 systems and handle the Black side of Modern, Slav and Sicilian structures.
- Dynamic pawn play – the Kings-Indian win against sindhucrick11 shows good use of breaks (e4–d5, f4–f5) to open lines toward the king.
- Piece activity – when you mobilise quickly (e.g. 26.Bd4! in the same game) you often seize the initiative and force errors.
- Fighting spirit – many games are decided in equal endgames where you keep pressing until the opponent’s flag falls.
3. Recurrent Issues Holding You Back
- Time management – four of the last five losses were on time in still playable positions. Good chess moves are useless if they arrive after 0 : 00.
- Over-optimistic pawn storms as Black – in the Sicilian loss vs Sasa Micic you launched …b5/…a5 without completing development and got hit by Nxb5! / Nxd6!.
Critical fragment:
. - King safety in the centre – versus westcove and others you delayed castling, allowing late tactical shots. Even when it works, it burns clock.
- Conversion technique – won positions sometimes drift into long endgames (see the 120-move grind vs hullabulla). Faster, cleaner conversions would save clock and energy.
4. Targeted Improvement Plan
- Discipline the clock
- Adopt a speed budget: no move should take more than 10 s until move 15 unless theory ends.
- When up +2 material, switch to
bullet mode
: trade, push pawns, premove obvious recaptures.
- Patch the pawn-storm blind spot
- Before pushing a flank pawn ask: “Can my opponent hit the square I just weakened with tempo?” If yes, postpone.
- Re-analyse the Cicmis game; set up the position before 16…a5 and practise with “What would I play for White?”
- Opening housekeeping
- Modern/Philidor: prepare a simple …c6–d5 equalising scheme so you aren’t stuck defending cramped lines.
- Sicilian: swap the O’Kelly (…a6) for Kan / Taimanov lines; they’re sounder and easier to learn.
- Endgame finishing drills
- Spend 10 min/day on rook-and-pawn technique. Positions like R+f-pawn vs R are frequent in your games.
- Practise side-to-side checks & the Lucena/Philidor methods – search them here: Lucena position, Philidor position.
5. Next Steps
• Review each session with a 5-minute self-quiz: “Why did I spend >20 s on this move?”
• Replace two blitz games a day with 10 | 5 rapid to train deeper calculation without clock panic.
• Keep a mini-database of personal opening traps (both sides) so the same tactical shots don’t surprise you twice.
Stay focused, manage your time, and you’ll break 1800 soon. Good luck and enjoy the journey!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pablo Ollier | 7W / 4L / 0D | View Games |
| rudchenkoa | 7W / 4L / 0D | View Games |
| andreystarkon | 10W / 0L / 1D | View Games |
| calito1969 | 10W / 0L / 0D | View Games |
| u15947712 | 4W / 5L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 1673 | |||
| 2021 | 1726 | 2614 | ||
| 2020 | 1727 | 2627 | 1904 | |
| 2019 | 2495 | |||
| 2018 | 2541 | |||
| 2017 | 1858 | 2017 | ||
| 2016 | 1916 | |||
| 2015 | 1042 | 1753 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 114W / 84L / 13D | 98W / 99L / 10D | 70.2 |
| 2021 | 315W / 268L / 35D | 307W / 280L / 24D | 69.0 |
| 2020 | 148W / 96L / 14D | 139W / 107L / 12D | 67.8 |
| 2019 | 5W / 9L / 0D | 5W / 9L / 0D | 71.2 |
| 2018 | 141W / 54L / 11D | 123W / 70L / 11D | 68.8 |
| 2017 | 144W / 89L / 15D | 104W / 133L / 12D | 71.8 |
| 2016 | 145W / 127L / 13D | 153W / 116L / 13D | 73.4 |
| 2015 | 49W / 37L / 4D | 44W / 38L / 8D | 75.8 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern | 150 | 83 | 58 | 9 | 55.3% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 123 | 60 | 55 | 8 | 48.8% |
| Czech Defense | 117 | 49 | 63 | 5 | 41.9% |
| Amazon Attack | 58 | 27 | 26 | 5 | 46.5% |
| Sicilian Defense | 55 | 27 | 26 | 2 | 49.1% |
| Amar Gambit | 48 | 31 | 16 | 1 | 64.6% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 46 | 15 | 26 | 5 | 32.6% |
| Australian Defense | 41 | 23 | 17 | 1 | 56.1% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 39 | 25 | 14 | 0 | 64.1% |
| Slav Defense | 31 | 15 | 15 | 1 | 48.4% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern | 101 | 52 | 45 | 4 | 51.5% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 81 | 44 | 34 | 3 | 54.3% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 67 | 42 | 23 | 2 | 62.7% |
| Czech Defense | 59 | 23 | 30 | 6 | 39.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 54 | 30 | 22 | 2 | 55.6% |
| Australian Defense | 43 | 19 | 22 | 2 | 44.2% |
| Amar Gambit | 30 | 15 | 11 | 4 | 50.0% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 27 | 16 | 10 | 1 | 59.3% |
| Sicilian Defense | 26 | 12 | 12 | 2 | 46.1% |
| Alekhine Defense | 25 | 17 | 5 | 3 | 68.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Modern | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Exchange Variation | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Amazon Attack | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| French Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Kazakh Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Pirc Defense: Classical Variation | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Benoni Defense: Old Benoni | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 19 | 0 |
| Losing | 12 | 1 |