Profile: ddded
ddded is an emerging chess talent whose career has been characterized by consistent improvement and a growing mastery over various formats. From his early days in 2021, where his Rapid rating hovered in the mid‐800s, he has steadily climbed the rating ladder—reaching nearly 2000 in Rapid play in recent years. His journey is also marked by fast-paced success in Blitz and Bullet formats, where impressive leaps from a Bullet rating of 320 to over 1500 vividly illustrate his dynamic tactical vision.
Not one to rely on a single approach, ddded has cultivated a versatile opening repertoire, experimenting with both classical lines and innovative strategies. His performance against numerous openings—bolstered by high win rates in many established systems—demonstrates a balance between solid positional understanding and aggressive counterplay. Whether facing traditional defenses or delving into lesser-known sideline variations, ddded shows a deep appreciation for the nuances of each system.
His playing style is marked by a blend of calculated strategy and combative tenacity. With average game lengths that reflect a smart transition from the opening into the endgame, he often capitalizes on even small advantages and is celebrated for his remarkable ability to remain resilient. His tactical foresight is further emphasized by an extraordinary win rate in difficult positions, such as situations where he rebounds after a material setback.
Beyond the numbers, ddded’s statistics also reveal his balanced prowess with both the white and black pieces and a consistent performance that holds up across varying time controls and play conditions. His peak performance in particular hours hints at a disciplined routine that optimizes concentration and decision-making during critical moments.
In summary, ddded is a highly dedicated chess competitor whose rapid evolution, diverse opening knowledge, and tactical precision make him a formidable adversary. As his ratings and understanding continue to grow, the chess world can expect even more creative and resilient displays from this promising player.
Quick overview
Nice work — your recent games show strong tactical vision and good rook activity, and your long-term rating trend is positive. You won a sharp Colle-style game against caba1888 with a forceful rook invasion; you lost a messy game vs zpifer where king safety was decisive. Your Strength Adjusted Win Rate is about 54% — solid for blitz — and the 6‑month trend is up.
What you're doing well
- Active rooks and file control — in your win vs caba1888 you doubled and invaded with Rf7/Re7 ideas, then sacrificed on e6 to open lines and finish with Rf8#. That's textbook rook coordination.
- Creating and converting tactical chances — you spot forks, captures and mating nets quickly in sharp positions.
- Opening variety — you handle multiple structures (Colle / English / modern setups) without getting lost early.
- Improving trend — your recent slope numbers and 6‑month gains show you're learning from games and climbing.
Main areas to improve
- King safety / back‑rank and mating threats — a couple of losses show opponents exploiting your king (checks, sacrifices on the kingside). Add simple air (pawn moves) or piece cover before launching risky pawn storms. See Back rank.
- Pawn pushes that expose the king — in the loss to zpifer you allowed Qxh3+ / R8f4 tactics after weakening squares. Before pushing pawns, ask: who gets checks? who opens lines toward my king?
- Time management in complicated positions — several games drop to very low clocks. In blitz you want to keep ~10–15s for critical moments; simplify when you’re below threshold (trade when ahead or choose safe developing moves).
- Transition choices — sometimes you exchange into positions where the opponent gets counterplay (active rooks, passed pawns). Before trades, evaluate resulting piece activity and king safety.
Concrete drills & short plan (2 weeks)
- Daily tactics: 15–25 quality puzzles focused on pins, forks and mating patterns (10 min/day). Emphasize short calculation and pattern recognition.
- Back‑rank and basic mate patterns: 5–10 examples per day for one week (back rank mates, smothered, rook lifts). Use the win vs caba1888 as a model — practice bringing rooks to the 7th / 8th ranks: Rook on the seventh.
- Endgame routine: 10 minutes, three times a week — king + rook vs rook basics, Lucena/Philidor ideas — helps convert advantages after tactical exchanges.
- Opening hygiene: pick 1–2 systems to play consistently for the month (keep a simple plan for the Colle and one English setup). Study 4 typical middlegame plans per opening and 2 tactical traps to avoid. See Colle System.
- Blitz checklist drill: play 10 blitz games with the specific rule — when below 20s on clock choose only safe developing moves for the next 5 moves (practice calm decision‑making under time pressure).
Examples from your recent games (quick notes)
- Win vs caba1888 — excellent exploitation of open files: you used Rf7+ and then Re7 to clear and win material, finishing with a back‑rank mate. Study that game with the viewer below to lock in the pattern:
- Loss vs zpifer — key moment: Qxh3+ and then R8f4 forced decisive material gains. Before castling or pushing g/pawns, check whether your kingside structure creates holes or allows queen checks.
Quick pre‑game checklist (use this every blitz game)
- Before move 10: is my king safe? (If not, fix it.)
- Do my pawn moves create checks or open files vs my king?
- Who controls the open files? Can I place a rook there next turn?
- If I'm low on clock (<20s), simplify or make safe developing moves.
- Look for tactical shots twice: before and after opponent's candidate move.
Next steps & encouragement
Your overall trend and win rate show you're improving — small targeted work on king safety, time management and a focused opening plan will translate into more consistent results. Play a few training blitz sessions implementing the checklist and the drills above, then review 3 of your games (one win / one loss / one unclear) each week. Keep at it — you're on the right trajectory.
Want a short annotated review of any one of these games (move‑by‑move notes)? Tell me which game (opponent name) and I’ll mark the critical moments.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| mohammed_519 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| robertoplata | 0W / 0L / 1D | View |
| chesswithmisters | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| heretosmurfontom | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| billmcdoug | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| shivamchess15 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| ybbs | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| zuksi | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| once_futureking | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| 416chesscoach | 2W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| karma_vii | 192W / 74L / 9D | View Games |
| evanlew9 | 33W / 45L / 5D | View Games |
| gmjet | 33W / 30L / 4D | View Games |
| Ike Miller | 13W / 47L / 1D | View Games |
| nahteethan10a | 28W / 17L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1733 | 1902 | 1977 | 1248 |
| 2024 | 1624 | 1544 | 1988 | 1248 |
| 2023 | 1538 | 1248 | 1949 | 1181 |
| 2022 | 1112 | 457 | 1324 | 1019 |
| 2021 | 320 | 524 | 848 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 157W / 100L / 10D | 145W / 123L / 10D | 57.3 |
| 2024 | 490W / 398L / 33D | 431W / 449L / 31D | 53.8 |
| 2023 | 1244W / 864L / 62D | 1284W / 859L / 55D | 42.1 |
| 2022 | 264W / 166L / 21D | 263W / 156L / 23D | 48.8 |
| 2021 | 39W / 46L / 6D | 55W / 31L / 8D | 47.9 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 267 | 150 | 112 | 5 | 56.2% |
| Unknown | 198 | 128 | 69 | 1 | 64.7% |
| Australian Defense | 192 | 87 | 100 | 5 | 45.3% |
| French Defense | 175 | 90 | 80 | 5 | 51.4% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 166 | 85 | 77 | 4 | 51.2% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 144 | 72 | 67 | 5 | 50.0% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 128 | 59 | 60 | 9 | 46.1% |
| Amar Gambit | 128 | 62 | 62 | 4 | 48.4% |
| Scotch Game | 124 | 62 | 59 | 3 | 50.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 122 | 68 | 52 | 2 | 55.7% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 166 | 111 | 49 | 6 | 66.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 151 | 127 | 20 | 4 | 84.1% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 111 | 79 | 29 | 3 | 71.2% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 82 | 51 | 26 | 5 | 62.2% |
| Barnes Defense | 76 | 50 | 23 | 3 | 65.8% |
| Scotch Game | 72 | 40 | 28 | 4 | 55.6% |
| Australian Defense | 61 | 41 | 19 | 1 | 67.2% |
| Amazon Attack | 61 | 35 | 24 | 2 | 57.4% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 55 | 39 | 14 | 2 | 70.9% |
| Elephant Gambit | 51 | 27 | 23 | 1 | 52.9% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 8 | 10 | 0 | 44.4% |
| Australian Defense | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Amar Gambit | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Barnes Defense | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Classical Variation, Svenonius Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Anderssen Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 338 | 268 | 65 | 5 | 79.3% |
| Australian Defense | 176 | 124 | 47 | 5 | 70.5% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 140 | 72 | 61 | 7 | 51.4% |
| Barnes Defense | 127 | 91 | 35 | 1 | 71.7% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 99 | 50 | 45 | 4 | 50.5% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 97 | 49 | 43 | 5 | 50.5% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 84 | 49 | 33 | 2 | 58.3% |
| French Defense | 73 | 34 | 37 | 2 | 46.6% |
| Bishop's Opening | 65 | 41 | 24 | 0 | 63.1% |
| Scotch Game | 51 | 24 | 24 | 3 | 47.1% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 21 | 0 |
| Losing | 14 | 1 |