Dale Haessel - FIDE Master Extraordinaire
Dale Haessel, also known by the username dhaessel, is a formidable FIDE Master whose chess journey is a blend of strategic brilliance, relentless improvement, and just a dash of quirky charm. Known for a tactical awareness that can only be described as "comeback specialist" level, Dale boasts an astonishing 100% win rate after losing a piece — a true phoenix rising from the ashes on the chessboard.
Starting their online chess journey with a respectable daily rating of about 2165 back in 2010, Dale’s rapid ratings have impressively climbed into the 2000+ range by 2022. Rapid? Check. Blitz? Check. Bullet? Well, sure — but with just a couple of games played, it seems Dale prefers to savor the slower burn of quality play or maybe just laughs at bullet players zooming past. The daily Games average around 2200+ as well, showing Dale's consistency over a more classical time control.
With a longest winning streak of 14 games, Dale can steamroll through opponents like a knight on a caffeine high. Their playing style is patient but deadly, averaging over 63 moves per win — clearly not one for quick checkmates but more for wearing down the opponent’s resolve (and their pieces).
Dale’s opponents should beware: with impressive win rates against a wide range of adversaries, and a tilt factor modest enough to keep cool under pressure, this FM shows nerves of steel coupled with the cunning mind of a chess ninja. White or Black, Dale brings almost equal prowess to the board, backing it up with an average win rate close to 60% with White and 58% with Black.
Their favorite opening remains a well-guarded "Top Secret," winning about 75.7% of rapid games with it — either a chess mystery Challenger-rated great or just a cheeky nickname to throw foes off. Whatever it is, it works wonders.
Off the board, Dale has proven to be a fierce competitor while maintaining a sense of humor about the game's quirks. Whether it's a late-night marathon or an early morning blitz, their win rates suggest they're just warming up for the real fun (and maybe their coffee). Here's to many more moves, miscalculations from opponents, and miraculous comebacks!
Hi Dale, here’s some focused feedback based on your recent games
What you’re already doing well
- Principled opening play with Black. In your Berlin-style win against pawngrubber you followed sound moves (…Nf6, …Bc5, …d6, …O-O) and timed the break
…d5perfectly to seize the initiative. Your feel for central breaks is a clear strength. - Piece activity & prophylaxis. Notice how often your bishops and rooks land on aggressive squares (e.g. Bd4, Rad8, Bg4). You frequently restrict counter-play before going for material.
- Endgame technique. In several longer-time-control wins you converted small advantages smoothly, showing good knowledge of rook endings and outside passed pawns.
Biggest improvement areas
-
Time management in Blitz (zeitnot)
Three of your July 6th losses (e.g. vs. Cambek64) occurred in equal or better positions that were lost on the clock. Try:- Making a “decision point” at 30 s: simplify or play a forcing sequence.
- Practising premoves in completely forced recaptures.
- Adding short 1-minute “burst” tactics sessions to train quick calculation.
-
Handling the Nimzo-Indian with White
In the games vs. Jenia84 and JoliyRoger you followed the 4.e3/5.Bd3 lines but faltered when Black hit the centre with…c5/d5. Study model games where White meets…cxd4withexd4and places rooks on c1 & e1. A quick repertoire refresh will prevent the middlegame drift that cost you material. -
Converting technical rook endings
Against Cambek64 the rook ending after 31…gxf5 is objectively drawn; you were pressing but spent precious seconds on non-forcing moves. Learn the key ideas:- Activate king before pushing pawns.
- Keep rooks behind passed pawns (Tarrasch rule).
- Use checks to gain time on the clock as well as the board.
Opening snapshot: your last win as Black
Suggested mini-plan for the next two weeks
- Daily 15-minute tactical drill; end every session with a 60-second “lightning round” to mimic blitz pressure.
- Review 5 master games in the Nimzo-Indian Hubner (4.e3/5.Bd3) and annotate key pawn breaks.
- Play three 10 + 5 games focusing solely on finishing with >30 s on the clock, even if it means choosing simpler moves.
Your performance at a glance
Peak Blitz rating: 2092 (2021-04-19)
When you win:
•Keep up the excellent work, Dale! Small tweaks to clock handling and targeted opening study will convert more of your already promising positions into points.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| drsheepenstein | 25W / 14L / 4D | View Games |
| rugoingtomatchmyfreak | 31W / 0L / 0D | View Games |
| chessplayer204 | 24W / 2L / 0D | View Games |
| cally-ntete | 20W / 3L / 2D | View Games |
| tamirbulga | 14W / 5L / 4D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2069 | |||
| 2021 | 2068 | 2034 | ||
| 2020 | 1854 | 1897 | 2003 | |
| 2019 | 2103 | |||
| 2018 | 1514 | |||
| 2017 | 1854 | |||
| 2016 | 1693 | 1922 | ||
| 2013 | 1965 | |||
| 2012 | 2225 | |||
| 2011 | 2207 | |||
| 2010 | 1434 | 2165 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 0W / 0L / 0D | 1W / 0L / 0D | 76.0 |
| 2021 | 114W / 74L / 7D | 115W / 73L / 11D | 68.7 |
| 2020 | 128W / 42L / 9D | 131W / 39L / 14D | 71.8 |
| 2019 | 3W / 0L / 1D | 5W / 2L / 0D | 61.3 |
| 2018 | 0W / 2L / 0D | 0W / 0L / 0D | 1.0 |
| 2017 | 0W / 1L / 0D | 0W / 0L / 0D | 2.0 |
| 2016 | 7W / 14L / 1D | 3W / 13L / 1D | 47.1 |
| 2013 | 18W / 19L / 7D | 16W / 20L / 3D | 46.6 |
| 2012 | 22W / 15L / 7D | 26W / 11L / 6D | 53.7 |
| 2011 | 35W / 14L / 6D | 25W / 21L / 10D | 50.4 |
| 2010 | 38W / 13L / 12D | 34W / 16L / 15D | 55.2 |
Openings: Most Played
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 19 | 16 | 3 | 0 | 84.2% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 18 | 14 | 2 | 2 | 77.8% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 17 | 15 | 1 | 1 | 88.2% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 15 | 13 | 0 | 2 | 86.7% |
| Gruenfeld: Exchange Variation | 13 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 61.5% |
| King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation | 12 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 58.3% |
| Slav Defense | 12 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 91.7% |
| Gruenfeld: 4.e3 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 91.7% |
| Sicilian Defense | 10 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 90.0% |
| KGA: Fischer, 4.Bc4 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gruenfeld: Exchange Variation | 23 | 8 | 13 | 2 | 34.8% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 15 | 6 | 8 | 1 | 40.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 15 | 11 | 4 | 0 | 73.3% |
| Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Berlin Wall | 13 | 2 | 10 | 1 | 15.4% |
| Modern | 12 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense | 11 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 18.2% |
| Petrov's Defense | 11 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 81.8% |
| Czech Defense | 11 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 54.5% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 11 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 54.5% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 10 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 30.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Petrov's Defense | 47 | 20 | 15 | 12 | 42.5% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation | 30 | 14 | 11 | 5 | 46.7% |
| Gruenfeld: Exchange Variation | 16 | 7 | 6 | 3 | 43.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 12 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 58.3% |
| Slav Defense | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 20.0% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Belyavsky Gambit | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 70.0% |
| Australian Defense | 9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 77.8% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation | 7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 28.6% |
| Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense | 7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 28.6% |
| Benko Gambit Accepted: Central Storming Variation | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 57.1% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 14 | 1 |
| Losing | 25 | 0 |