Pavle Dimic - FIDE Master
Meet Pavle Dimic, a chess warrior whose chessboard battles have earned him the prestigious title of FIDE Master. Known in the chess circles and online as dimke2802, Pavle has demonstrated not just skill but also a flair for the dramatic—his comeback rate stands impressively at over 91%, reminding everyone that giving up is never an option, no matter how dire the position looks.
Pavle's blitz journey is nothing short of a thrilling roller coaster. Starting with a modest rating of 1564 back in 2012, he skyrocketed to a blazing 2606 at his peak in 2019! That's a lot of pawns sacrificed but also a lot of victories savored. Whether playing under the bright lights of rapid or the lightning-fast bullet format, Pavle consistently shows that speed and precision are his middle names.
His strategic style is a fascinating combo: with an average endgame frequency nearing 80%, Pavle clearly loves wrestling in the late game as much as delivering tactical punches early on. And don’t be fooled by his sometimes casual early resignations—only about 1.17% of his games end that way, proving he’s as stubborn as a knight stuck on the rim, refusing to quit without a fight.
When it comes to psychological toughness, Pavle's tilt factor may clock in at 14, but his resilience shines through his near-perfect win rate after losing a piece (99.33%). The guy’s basically the Houdini of chess—losing material? No problem, he’ll turn that seemingly lost cause into a dazzling victory.
Off the board, Pavle is a friendly rival who has racked up wins against a variety of opponents, boasting perfect records against some and tastes of bitter defeat against others. His longest winning streak? An impressive 25 games. His current streak? Fresh at 1, ready to grow as he continues to stalk the 64 squares.
In essence, Pavle Dimic is the embodiment of the game's thrill and complexity—a player who proves that chess is as much about resilience and psychology as it is about pure calculation. Watch out future grandmasters: dimke2802’s next move is always lurking, and it’s usually a good one.
Positive Aspects of Your Recent Games
Pavle, you have demonstrated excellent tactical awareness and sharp attacking play in your recent blitz games. Some key highlights include:
- Strong opening preparation, particularly in the King's Indian Defense (Fianchetto Variation) and Caro-Kann Defense, allowing you to achieve comfortable positions early.
- Effective use of pressure plays and piece coordination, notably seen in several games where you leveraged control of key squares to mount decisive attacks.
- Good endgame technique, with precise execution leading to checkmate or forcing resignations.
- Overall balanced approach maintaining a solid rating around 2500+ with a strength adjusted win rate close to 50%, which is very respectable at your level.
Areas to Focus for Improvement
While you have been performing consistently, here are some targeted points to enhance your play further in blitz:
- Time Management: Some losses and wins by time suggest a need to balance speed and accuracy. Practice increment time control games to improve making strong moves quickly.
- Opening Diversity: Although you have depth in openings like Slav Defense and Caro-Kann, try broadening your repertoire slightly to avoid opponents preparing against your preferred lines.
- Positional Understanding: Several games showed you navigating complicated middlegames well, but occasional slips in evaluating critical positions allowed opponents counterplay. Consider working on strategic concepts like pawn structure, weak squares, and piece activity.
- Blitz-Specific Pattern Recognition: Improve your tactical vision by regularly solving puzzles under time constraints to sharpen instinctive play.
- Reducing Blunders in Critical Moments: A few key moments in recent losses involved hanging pieces or missing tactical shots. Slower training games focusing on calculation depth can help mitigate these mistakes under pressure.
Performance Trends and Recommendations
Your rating trend shows positive growth over the past 3 to 6 months, with a 48 point gain and positive slopes. However, note the slight recent decline in the last month. This suggests:
- Maintain consistent training while addressing the areas mentioned to stabilize and enhance performance.
- Integrate more deliberate practice—such as analyzing lost games in detail—to understand where improvements can be made.
- Fun and confidence are crucial in blitz. Ensure you balance training with casual play to stay motivated and enjoy the games.
Suggested Study Plan
- Review and deepen your understanding of key openings like the King's Indian Defense (Fianchetto Variation) and the Caro-Kann, focusing on main ideas and common tactical motifs.
- Play training games with classical or rapid time controls focusing on positional decisions and strategic planning rather than only speed.
- Regularly solve timed tactical puzzles aimed at pattern recognition and calculation skills.
- Analyze your losses to identify recurring positional weaknesses or tactical oversights.
- Consider incorporating endgame study to convert advantageous positions more reliably during blitz.
Summary
Pavle, your recent blitz games show that you have a solid foundation with strong tactical skills and good opening knowledge. To move forward, focus on enhancing your time management, reducing critical mistakes, and expanding your positional understanding. With your positive rating trends and dedication, consistent training will surely lead to higher performance and satisfaction in your games.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| ajedrez_clasico4all | 0W / 0L / 1D | View |
| Julio Paiz | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| sletrab20 | 0W / 0L / 1D | View |
| bananadates | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| dr-abohamed | 1W / 0L / 1D | View |
| GEOMAX5 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| mairos | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Henry Soto Hernandez | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| diadelamuertos | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Roderick Scarlett | 0W / 1L / 1D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| stanke89 | 74W / 7L / 6D | View Games |
| Mihai Ionescu | 17W / 8L / 5D | View Games |
| markostarcevicakosti | 21W / 4L / 3D | View Games |
| Mark Kotliar | 13W / 11L / 2D | View Games |
| milostb | 12W / 10L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2501 | 2589 | ||
| 2024 | 2461 | 2504 | 2439 | |
| 2023 | 2537 | 2529 | 2439 | |
| 2022 | 2505 | 2437 | ||
| 2021 | 2458 | 2446 | 2439 | 1941 |
| 2020 | 2254 | 2478 | ||
| 2019 | 2276 | 2417 | 2049 | |
| 2018 | 2368 | 2420 | 2036 | |
| 2017 | 2392 | 2303 | 1890 | |
| 2016 | 2392 | 2289 | 1863 | |
| 2015 | 1829 | 1346 | ||
| 2013 | 2005 | |||
| 2012 | 1984 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 106W / 73L / 15D | 84W / 90L / 11D | 71.9 |
| 2024 | 54W / 55L / 9D | 55W / 56L / 6D | 72.8 |
| 2023 | 116W / 85L / 12D | 100W / 100L / 13D | 76.5 |
| 2022 | 162W / 139L / 28D | 138W / 170L / 32D | 76.2 |
| 2021 | 214W / 171L / 35D | 213W / 189L / 29D | 76.3 |
| 2020 | 236W / 162L / 37D | 188W / 202L / 49D | 76.8 |
| 2019 | 247W / 192L / 43D | 213W / 225L / 47D | 77.0 |
| 2018 | 327W / 270L / 68D | 304W / 296L / 68D | 77.7 |
| 2017 | 327W / 272L / 52D | 297W / 305L / 52D | 77.8 |
| 2016 | 325W / 258L / 53D | 337W / 260L / 55D | 76.3 |
| 2015 | 1W / 1L / 0D | 0W / 0L / 0D | 4.5 |
| 2013 | 2W / 0L / 0D | 2W / 0L / 1D | 55.2 |
| 2012 | 14W / 4L / 3D | 12W / 6L / 1D | 65.8 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slav Defense | 258 | 134 | 95 | 29 | 51.9% |
| King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Delayed Fianchetto | 238 | 109 | 106 | 23 | 45.8% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 215 | 98 | 105 | 12 | 45.6% |
| Bogo-Indian Defense | 179 | 77 | 77 | 25 | 43.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation | 164 | 86 | 65 | 13 | 52.4% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 152 | 67 | 70 | 15 | 44.1% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 151 | 76 | 65 | 10 | 50.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 151 | 68 | 66 | 17 | 45.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation | 141 | 68 | 59 | 14 | 48.2% |
| Australian Defense | 134 | 62 | 60 | 12 | 46.3% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 86 | 52 | 31 | 3 | 60.5% |
| Australian Defense | 66 | 35 | 25 | 6 | 53.0% |
| King's Indian Defense | 49 | 23 | 24 | 2 | 46.9% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 44 | 18 | 25 | 1 | 40.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 41 | 20 | 19 | 2 | 48.8% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation | 40 | 15 | 21 | 4 | 37.5% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 37 | 24 | 11 | 2 | 64.9% |
| Sicilian Defense | 37 | 21 | 11 | 5 | 56.8% |
| King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Delayed Fianchetto | 36 | 22 | 14 | 0 | 61.1% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 34 | 19 | 13 | 2 | 55.9% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bogo-Indian Defense | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Sicilian Defense | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 80.0% |
| Slav Defense | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 40.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 50.0% |
| QGD: 2...Bf5 3.cxd5 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Variation | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 33.3% |
| King's Indian Defense | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Haag Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Grünfeld Defense: Counterthrust Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| King's Indian Defense | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 25 | 0 |
| Losing | 14 | 0 |