Nikhil Dixit — International Master (Dixit_Nikhil)
Nikhil Dixit (username: Dixit_Nikhil) is an International Master of chess celebrated for razor-sharp Blitz play and a taste for daring opening ideas. A prolific online competitor, Nikhil mixes deep endgame endurance with explosive tactical bursts — the kind of player who will win on the clock or win by comedy of errors. This biography highlights his journey, style, and a few cheeky facts any fan of blitz, bullet and rapid should know.
Preferred time control: Blitz. Peak Blitz performance: 2748 (2024-10-08) (Oct 2024). For a quick visual of his trajectory:
.Career highlights
- Earned the FIDE title of International Master — a mark of serious over-the-board strength and tournament grit.
- Peak Blitz moments include a top performance in October 2024 (peak rating recorded that month) and sustained elite results across 2023–2024.
- Extensive online experience: thousands of fast games across Blitz, Bullet and Rapid with strong win totals (notably heavy Blitz activity).
- Notable streaks: a longest winning streak of 17 and the resilience to stage comebacks — an 83.6% comeback rate after difficult positions.
Playing style & openings
Nikhil’s chess is a blend of tactical opportunism and endgame patience. He plays long decisive games often (high average moves per decision) and frequently grinds in complex endgames.
- Style keywords: tactical, resilient, endgame-oriented, clock-savvy.
- Notable openings in Blitz: Four Knights Game, Caro-Kann Defense, French Defense, and a taste for the Modern — he mixes classical structure with surprise gambits.
- Rapid specialties include a very successful Caro-Kann and a sharp Two Knights Attack line — see Caro-Kann Defense.
- Bullet repertoire shows experimentation: Modern, Colle-system ideas, Amar Gambit and the Nimzo-Larsen family of setups.
Memorable games
A typical Nikhil blitz thriller features creative piece play, unexpected sacrifices, and a late switch to technique. Below is a compact replay placeholder of a tactical mini-combat to explore:
Rivalries & records
Online rivalries are part of the fun. Nikhil plays certain opponents very often and has excellent head-to-heads versus some regulars:
- Most-played opponent: LittleLionMan — extensive history (wins and long competitive runs).
- Other frequent rivals include chiinaldo and indianpowerkid — long series of tense fast games that helped sharpen his practical play.
Fun facts & training notes
- Best time of day (statistically): 02:00 — ideal for late-night blitz marathons or questionable snack choices.
- Psychology: has a measurable "tilt factor" but also one of the best comeback rates — expects to fight back even after losing material.
- Endgame frequency is high: expect longer, technical finishes — Nikhil converts small edges patiently.
- Practice tip from Nikhil (paraphrased): "Work on rook-and-pawn endgames, blitz the basics, and never underestimate a sneaky novelty on move 10."
Why follow Dixit_Nikhil?
For fans of energetic Blitz and instructive fights, Nikhil offers both entertainment and teaching moments: from spectacular tactical wins to patient, instructive endgame play. Whether you study his openings or simply enjoy the rollercoaster blitz games, he’s a name worth following in online and over-the-board circles.
Want to study his games or compare styles? Start with his blitz collection and the rapid Caro-Kann lines that have produced some of his sharpest victories.
Quick summary
Nice session — you converted multiple advantages and showed excellent endgame technique in your wins, while two losses highlight a recurring danger: allowing enemy passed pawns and promotion chances. Your short-term trend is very positive (strong rating gains last month/quarter). Below are targeted, practical suggestions to keep the momentum going in blitz.
What you're doing well
- Active piece play: you consistently bring rooks and bishops into the game and trade into favorable endgames instead of letting the opponent keep counterplay.
- Pawn play and passed-pawn creation: in several wins you pushed and fixed a passed pawn that decided the game — good recognition of when to convert a material/space edge.
- Simplification when it helps: you often swap down into endings you understand, then use king activity to win — that's a practical blitz skill.
- Opening breadth: you have a wide range of openings (Four Knights, Caro‑Kann, French etc.) and solid results in many of them — leverage that to steer games into types you like.
Key weaknesses to fix (focused and actionable)
- Preventing opponent promotion — defend the b‑pawn (and other passer pushes). In your loss to %3Ckillerbishop888%3E the opponent’s pawn promotion became decisive. When the opponent has a remote passed pawn, immediately ask: can I blockade it or trade it off before it queens?
- Rook endgame technique — work on basics like Lucena and Philidor ideas and the most common defence patterns. A few games ended because of an avoidable rook/king/pawn breakdown.
- Opening-specific trouble vs Sicilians — your win/loss record shows lower return vs some Sicilian lines. Pick one or two reply lines to study and memorize typical pawn-structure plans so you don’t drift into uncomfortable middlegames.
- Avoid tactical oversights around exchanged queens/rooks — when simplifying, double-check for enemy pawn breaks or hidden checks that create passed pawns.
Concrete moments from your recent games
- Win vs %3Cboutikaki%3E — you advanced the queenside pawn aggressively, opened lines for your bishop and rooks, and transitioned to a winning king-and-pawn finish. Good judgment to simplify when ahead. (Replay: )
- Win vs %3Cdetimmerman%3E and %3Cdinosaurioyogurt%3E — both games show consistent technique in creating passed pawns and using king activity to convert. Keep following this plan.
- Loss vs %3Ckillerbishop888%3E — opponent’s passed pawn promotion on the b-file decided the game. Preventative play (blockade/trade) and king centralization earlier would have helped.
- Loss vs %3Coleksandr_bortnyk%3E — ending shows risk of getting outplayed in the pawn ending; aim to keep pieces when you can’t stop a passer, or else force a repetition if the passer is unstoppable.
Targeted 4‑week blitz plan (practical and short)
Do this 3–5 times per week; each session ~40–60 minutes.
- Endgame drills — 2 x 15 minutes per session: rook endgames (Lucena/Philidor), defending against a passed pawn, king + pawn races. Use quick drills — repeat the same positions until conversion/defence feels automatic.
- Tactics — 15 minutes: focus on motifs that appear in your games (forks, discovered attacks, back-rank and removing defenders). Use a tactics trainer and set target solve times.
- Opening focus — 15–20 minutes: choose one troubled opening (for example, the Sicilian) and learn 2 concrete plans for both sides: typical pawn breaks and piece routes. Use Sicilian Defense and Four Knights Game as study anchors.
- Blitz practice — 10–20 games with a clear goal per game (e.g., “if position is equal, exchange into rook endgame and defend”, or “avoid allowing b‑file pawns to advance”).
- Post‑game micro review — 5 minutes per lost/won game: find the single decisive inaccuracy and note what pattern to remember next time.
Short checklist — before each blitz game
- Pick an opening line and a fallback plan (don’t improvise too much in first 10 moves).
- Watch for early pawn pushes that create far‑advanced passers — stop them before they become unstoppable.
- If you simplify, double‑check whether the resulting pawn structure leaves you a target (passed pawn, weak squares).
- Use 2–3 seconds to scan for tactical shots after every capture or exchange.
Practice drills (short list)
- 10 position drills: defend vs a single connected passed pawn — play both sides until defense is automatic.
- 5 Lucena/Philidor positions until you can execute within 60 seconds each.
- Tactics sprint: 10 puzzles in a row, try to average < 1 minute per puzzle.
- Opening memory: write down 5 typical middlegame plans for your top two openings and review them before play.
Data-backed encouragement
- Your Strength Adjusted Win Rate ~0.497 — you’re essentially at a 50/50 baseline versus appropriately-rated opponents; small fixes in endgames/opening lines will convert many of those into wins.
- Short-term rating slopes are excellent: 1‑month gain of 137 and strong 3‑month surge. That means your training choices are working — keep the focused work on endgames and one opening problem area.
Useful links & next steps
- Replay one of the wins:
- Study the opening you played in the first win: Sicilian Defense
- Review the loss vs %3Ckillerbishop888%3E and set one micro‑goal: “stop the b‑pawn”, then play 5 training blitz games with that restriction.
One‑line takeaway
Keep doing what already works (active pieces, simplification into endings) and focus 20–30% of your study time on defending/neutralizing passed pawns and rook endgame technique — that alone will lift your blitz conversion rate noticeably.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| boutikaki | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| killerbishop888 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Oleksandr Bortnyk | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Mark Timmermans | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Alfredo Asaf Rivera Pérez | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Krikor Sevag Mekhitarian | 2W / 3L / 1D | View |
| Maciej Czopor | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Luis Fernández Siles | 2W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Alexandros Papasimakopoulos | 1W / 3L / 0D | View |
| rey_jacinto | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| LittleLionMan | 175W / 85L / 64D | View Games |
| chiinaldo | 138W / 106L / 27D | View Games |
| Shantanu Bhambure | 71W / 65L / 6D | View Games |
| Suyog Wagh | 40W / 68L / 9D | View Games |
| Raja Harshit | 21W / 58L / 8D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2607 | 2702 | 2415 | |
| 2024 | 2607 | 2597 | 2415 | |
| 2023 | 2637 | 2595 | 2409 | |
| 2022 | 2590 | 2578 | 2446 | 1827 |
| 2021 | 2537 | 2517 | 2500 | |
| 2020 | 2514 | 2521 | 2507 | |
| 2019 | 2407 | 2450 | 2424 | 1894 |
| 2018 | 2357 | 2481 | 1820 | 1912 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 80W / 99L / 17D | 92W / 77L / 17D | 54.3 |
| 2024 | 222W / 135L / 55D | 195W / 173L / 44D | 80.1 |
| 2023 | 109W / 69L / 34D | 100W / 100L / 23D | 85.1 |
| 2022 | 89W / 68L / 22D | 97W / 73L / 25D | 91.1 |
| 2021 | 97W / 54L / 11D | 90W / 64L / 14D | 87.2 |
| 2020 | 261W / 230L / 85D | 248W / 248L / 58D | 83.9 |
| 2019 | 764W / 745L / 183D | 700W / 860L / 147D | 82.1 |
| 2018 | 328W / 294L / 54D | 303W / 305L / 57D | 78.7 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 344 | 187 | 153 | 4 | 54.4% |
| Modern | 277 | 122 | 129 | 26 | 44.0% |
| Four Knights Game | 224 | 111 | 60 | 53 | 49.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 172 | 90 | 66 | 16 | 52.3% |
| French Defense | 120 | 60 | 46 | 14 | 50.0% |
| Czech Defense | 117 | 56 | 48 | 13 | 47.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 105 | 51 | 42 | 12 | 48.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation | 102 | 42 | 47 | 13 | 41.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 101 | 48 | 44 | 9 | 47.5% |
| Barnes Defense | 96 | 45 | 44 | 7 | 46.9% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 80 | 49 | 11 | 20 | 61.2% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 26 | 16 | 8 | 2 | 61.5% |
| King's Indian Defense: Accelerated Averbakh Variation | 23 | 14 | 5 | 4 | 60.9% |
| Pirc Defense: Classical Variation | 20 | 13 | 4 | 3 | 65.0% |
| Modern | 18 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 50.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation | 18 | 14 | 0 | 4 | 77.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Haag Gambit | 13 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 38.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 12 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 41.7% |
| Döry Defense | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 60.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 30.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern | 373 | 166 | 185 | 22 | 44.5% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 290 | 135 | 131 | 24 | 46.5% |
| Amar Gambit | 281 | 129 | 126 | 26 | 45.9% |
| King's Indian Attack | 186 | 85 | 83 | 18 | 45.7% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 185 | 74 | 95 | 16 | 40.0% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 150 | 78 | 59 | 13 | 52.0% |
| Czech Defense | 130 | 57 | 62 | 11 | 43.9% |
| French Defense | 122 | 63 | 53 | 6 | 51.6% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 120 | 53 | 55 | 12 | 44.2% |
| East Indian Defense | 113 | 48 | 55 | 10 | 42.5% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| French Defense: MacCutcheon Variation, Wolf Gambit | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| King's Indian Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Australian Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bishop's Opening: Horwitz Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 17 | 1 |
| Losing | 18 | 0 |