Avatar of Jelle Mathieu

Jelle Mathieu

Username: DkBeest

Playing Since: 2015-08-12 (Active)

Wow Factor: ♟♟♟♟

Chess.com

Rapid: 2058
197W / 128L / 9D
Blitz: 1621
967W / 843L / 65D
Bullet: 1750
356W / 314L / 24D

Player Profile: DkBeest

Since beginning competitive online play in 2015, DkBeest has evolved into a versatile chess enthusiast known for a wide range of exciting opening experiments. Early on, they explored Blitz and Rapid formats, but over the years they've also made notable progress in Bullet, occasionally pushing ratings beyond the 1900 mark.

Particularly fond of unconventional setups, DkBeest often employs the Nimzowitsch Larsen Attack and Owens Defense. These openings feature prominently in their repertoire, leading to a blend of creative piece play and dynamic pawn structures. Beyond those, DkBeest regularly experiments with Budapest Gambits and classical approaches, further showcasing a willingness to adapt and innovate.

In Blitz alone, the player has maintained competitive ratings year after year, topping out around the high 1700s. Bullet play saw an impressive peak of 1970, illustrating a knack for quick decision-making under time pressure. Meanwhile, in Rapid, DkBeest achieved a respectable apex rating of 1912—proof their strategic depth isn’t limited to fast-paced formats.

Notable strengths include a solid endgame focus—over sixty percent of their games proceed to deeper phases—and a tendency to mount comebacks in difficult positions. With a longest winning streak of 10 games and a strong preference for tactical creativity, DkBeest keeps opponents guessing at every stage of play. Their White pieces tend to triumph slightly more often than Black, but both sides remain a threat.

With a tournament history spanning morning and late-night battles, DkBeest’s flexible playing schedule pairs well with a consistently adventurous style. Off the board, they are known to keep an eye on personal trends such as tilt management, seeking to refine psychological resilience and maintain calm under pressure. Whether it’s chasing a new gambit line or perfecting established systems, DkBeest’s love for the game shines through in every move.


Coach's Avatar

What you’re doing well

Your blitz results show solid consistency and a healthy willingness to take on tactical, sharp play. You’ve been comfortable with dynamic positions and creating practical chances under time pressure. The openings data highlights a strong performance with the Nimzo-Larsen Attack, suggesting you understand the typical middlegame ideas and piece activity this system invites. Your overall win count against a broad set of opponents indicates you’re able to convert initiative into wins fairly often.

  • You handle complex tactical sequences well and can execute aggressive ideas when the position rewards activity.
  • You maintain focus through the middlegame, often turning pressing moments into material or positional concessions for your opponent.
  • Your opening choice, especially the Nimzo-Larsen Attack, aligns well with your strength in planning and calculation, and it tends to keep opponents out of their comfort zones.
  • You show willingness to pursue imbalances and to keep chances alive even when the position becomes rough.

Focus areas to improve

  • Time management in blitz: Several games show rapid transitions into tactical melees. Build a habit of setting a quick, safe plan for the next 2–3 moves in every critical moment and avoid over-calculating when the clock is low. Practice a lightweight, high-clarity approach for forced lines.
  • Endgame conversion: With many wins coming from middlegame activity, reinforce clean endgames (knight and bishop endings, opposite-colored pawn endings, and simple king activity) to convert pressure into decisive results when the board simplifies.
  • Diversify opening responses with a pragmatic, compact repertoire: Nimzo-Larsen Attack is strong for you, but some other tracked defenses (like certain Sicilian/Najdorf lines and Scandinavian/B3 setups) show lower win rates. Deepening 2–3 solid, well-understood lines across the common responses will reduce risk in blitz.
  • Pattern recognition and quick calculation under time: Increase exposure to common tactical motifs (forks, pins, sacrifices, back-rank ideas) with short, timed drills to improve speed without sacrificing accuracy.
  • Post-game reflection: After each blitz session, write down 2–3 concrete takeaways from both a win and a loss. This accelerates learning from practical play and reduces repetition of the same mistakes.

Actionable training plan

  • Daily: 15 minutes of tactical puzzles focused on calculation under time pressure; aim to identify at least one winning tactic or forced line in each puzzle.
  • 2–3 days per week: 20–30 minutes of opening study focused on 2–3 core lines you play most often (prioritize Nimzo-Larsen variants you’re comfortable with, plus a compact approach to a secondary opening you often face).
  • Endgame practice: 2 short sessions per week (10–15 minutes) on basic endgames (king and pawn vs king, rook endgames with extra pawn, and simple minor-piece endings) to improve conversion chances in blitz.
  • Post-game routine: For every session, pick 1 key moment for a quick self-review (what was the plan, what was the best move, and what would you do differently next time).
  • Schedule sample: 1 focused tactical workout day, 1 opening study day, and 1 game-analysis day per week to build a balanced routine without burning out.
  • When you’re under time pressure, lean on a concise plan: (1) secure king safety, (2) avoid unnecessary material grabs, (3) look for forcing moves that improve your position rather than chasing speculative ideas.

Quick notes from openings data

Your strongest tracked opening is the Nimzo-Larsen Attack, with a solid win rate across a large sample. That supports continuing with that system as a core part of your blitz repertoire. Some other popular responses show lower win rates; consider reinforcing a small, reliable set of lines against them so you don’t get thrown into unfamiliar positions under time pressure. If you want, I can propose a focused 6-week plan tailored to strengthening those weaker branches.

Next steps and check-in

If you’d like, share 1–2 recent blitz PGNs for targeted, line-by-line feedback on decision points and time usage. I can also prepare a short, personalized drill pack (puzzles and opening lines) based on your most recent games to accelerate improvement over the next couple of weeks.



🆚 Opponent Insights

Recent Opponents
pietermathieu 61W / 18L / 6D
Most Played Opponents
pietermathieu 61W / 18L / 6D
ador2124 7W / 5L / 0D
bigrocs 10W / 2L / 0D
mookc 8W / 3L / 0D
dixelaar 8W / 1L / 0D

Rating

Year Bullet Blitz Rapid Daily
2025 1750 1621 2058 400
2024 1560
2023 1522 1647
2022 1561 1878
2021 1728 1697 1877
2020 1642
2019 1303 1718
2018 1674
2017 1520 1669
2016 1691 1493
2015 1360 1538 1615
Rating by Year2015201620172018201920202021202220232024202520581303YearRatingBulletBlitzRapid

Stats by Year

Year White Black Moves
2025 175W / 135L / 12D 178W / 131L / 9D 62.0
2024 7W / 6L / 0D 8W / 5L / 0D 70.2
2023 16W / 11L / 2D 14W / 13L / 1D 64.6
2022 28W / 23L / 0D 26W / 23L / 2D 61.6
2021 72W / 40L / 0D 62W / 49L / 3D 64.3
2020 2W / 2L / 0D 4W / 1L / 0D 63.7
2019 38W / 27L / 1D 37W / 32L / 2D 61.1
2018 14W / 11L / 1D 12W / 11L / 1D 58.9
2017 120W / 92L / 5D 97W / 106L / 7D 62.6
2016 235W / 192L / 19D 221W / 198L / 15D 66.1
2015 122W / 74L / 15D 95W / 114L / 9D 70.1

Openings: Most Played

Blitz Opening Games Wins Losses Draws Win Rate
Nimzo-Larsen Attack 433 266 150 17 61.4%
Barnes Defense 239 120 110 9 50.2%
Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation 96 57 35 4 59.4%
Sicilian Defense 72 39 28 5 54.2%
Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation 48 23 22 3 47.9%
Australian Defense 48 24 23 1 50.0%
English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense 47 19 27 1 40.4%
QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 46 26 18 2 56.5%
Scandinavian Defense 38 23 14 1 60.5%
Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation 36 14 21 1 38.9%
Bullet Opening Games Wins Losses Draws Win Rate
Nimzo-Larsen Attack 230 131 91 8 57.0%
Barnes Defense 93 52 38 3 55.9%
Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation 48 27 21 0 56.2%
Amar Gambit 40 18 19 3 45.0%
English Opening: Agincourt Defense 38 20 14 4 52.6%
QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 29 13 16 0 44.8%
Amazon Attack 23 9 12 2 39.1%
English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense 21 10 11 0 47.6%
Australian Defense 18 9 8 1 50.0%
English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System 15 6 9 0 40.0%
Rapid Opening Games Wins Losses Draws Win Rate
Nimzo-Larsen Attack 50 29 21 0 58.0%
Sicilian Defense 36 22 13 1 61.1%
Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation 23 14 7 2 60.9%
Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation 15 8 7 0 53.3%
Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit 15 9 6 0 60.0%
Barnes Defense 14 10 3 1 71.4%
Amazon Attack 13 9 3 1 69.2%
Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense 13 6 6 1 46.1%
Caro-Kann Defense 13 4 8 1 30.8%
Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation 12 10 2 0 83.3%
Daily Opening Games Wins Losses Draws Win Rate
Barnes Opening: Walkerling 1 0 1 0 0.0%

🔥 Streaks

Streak Longest Current
Winning 13 6
Losing 9 0