Player Profile: DkBeest
Since beginning competitive online play in 2015, DkBeest has evolved into a versatile chess enthusiast known for a wide range of exciting opening experiments. Early on, they explored Blitz and Rapid formats, but over the years they've also made notable progress in Bullet, occasionally pushing ratings beyond the 1900 mark.
Particularly fond of unconventional setups, DkBeest often employs the Nimzowitsch Larsen Attack and Owens Defense. These openings feature prominently in their repertoire, leading to a blend of creative piece play and dynamic pawn structures. Beyond those, DkBeest regularly experiments with Budapest Gambits and classical approaches, further showcasing a willingness to adapt and innovate.
In Blitz alone, the player has maintained competitive ratings year after year, topping out around the high 1700s. Bullet play saw an impressive peak of 1970, illustrating a knack for quick decision-making under time pressure. Meanwhile, in Rapid, DkBeest achieved a respectable apex rating of 1912—proof their strategic depth isn’t limited to fast-paced formats.
Notable strengths include a solid endgame focus—over sixty percent of their games proceed to deeper phases—and a tendency to mount comebacks in difficult positions. With a longest winning streak of 10 games and a strong preference for tactical creativity, DkBeest keeps opponents guessing at every stage of play. Their White pieces tend to triumph slightly more often than Black, but both sides remain a threat.
With a tournament history spanning morning and late-night battles, DkBeest’s flexible playing schedule pairs well with a consistently adventurous style. Off the board, they are known to keep an eye on personal trends such as tilt management, seeking to refine psychological resilience and maintain calm under pressure. Whether it’s chasing a new gambit line or perfecting established systems, DkBeest’s love for the game shines through in every move.
What you’re doing well
Your blitz results show solid consistency and a healthy willingness to take on tactical, sharp play. You’ve been comfortable with dynamic positions and creating practical chances under time pressure. The openings data highlights a strong performance with the Nimzo-Larsen Attack, suggesting you understand the typical middlegame ideas and piece activity this system invites. Your overall win count against a broad set of opponents indicates you’re able to convert initiative into wins fairly often.
- You handle complex tactical sequences well and can execute aggressive ideas when the position rewards activity.
- You maintain focus through the middlegame, often turning pressing moments into material or positional concessions for your opponent.
- Your opening choice, especially the Nimzo-Larsen Attack, aligns well with your strength in planning and calculation, and it tends to keep opponents out of their comfort zones.
- You show willingness to pursue imbalances and to keep chances alive even when the position becomes rough.
Focus areas to improve
- Time management in blitz: Several games show rapid transitions into tactical melees. Build a habit of setting a quick, safe plan for the next 2–3 moves in every critical moment and avoid over-calculating when the clock is low. Practice a lightweight, high-clarity approach for forced lines.
- Endgame conversion: With many wins coming from middlegame activity, reinforce clean endgames (knight and bishop endings, opposite-colored pawn endings, and simple king activity) to convert pressure into decisive results when the board simplifies.
- Diversify opening responses with a pragmatic, compact repertoire: Nimzo-Larsen Attack is strong for you, but some other tracked defenses (like certain Sicilian/Najdorf lines and Scandinavian/B3 setups) show lower win rates. Deepening 2–3 solid, well-understood lines across the common responses will reduce risk in blitz.
- Pattern recognition and quick calculation under time: Increase exposure to common tactical motifs (forks, pins, sacrifices, back-rank ideas) with short, timed drills to improve speed without sacrificing accuracy.
- Post-game reflection: After each blitz session, write down 2–3 concrete takeaways from both a win and a loss. This accelerates learning from practical play and reduces repetition of the same mistakes.
Actionable training plan
- Daily: 15 minutes of tactical puzzles focused on calculation under time pressure; aim to identify at least one winning tactic or forced line in each puzzle.
- 2–3 days per week: 20–30 minutes of opening study focused on 2–3 core lines you play most often (prioritize Nimzo-Larsen variants you’re comfortable with, plus a compact approach to a secondary opening you often face).
- Endgame practice: 2 short sessions per week (10–15 minutes) on basic endgames (king and pawn vs king, rook endgames with extra pawn, and simple minor-piece endings) to improve conversion chances in blitz.
- Post-game routine: For every session, pick 1 key moment for a quick self-review (what was the plan, what was the best move, and what would you do differently next time).
- Schedule sample: 1 focused tactical workout day, 1 opening study day, and 1 game-analysis day per week to build a balanced routine without burning out.
- When you’re under time pressure, lean on a concise plan: (1) secure king safety, (2) avoid unnecessary material grabs, (3) look for forcing moves that improve your position rather than chasing speculative ideas.
Quick notes from openings data
Your strongest tracked opening is the Nimzo-Larsen Attack, with a solid win rate across a large sample. That supports continuing with that system as a core part of your blitz repertoire. Some other popular responses show lower win rates; consider reinforcing a small, reliable set of lines against them so you don’t get thrown into unfamiliar positions under time pressure. If you want, I can propose a focused 6-week plan tailored to strengthening those weaker branches.
Next steps and check-in
If you’d like, share 1–2 recent blitz PGNs for targeted, line-by-line feedback on decision points and time usage. I can also prepare a short, personalized drill pack (puzzles and opening lines) based on your most recent games to accelerate improvement over the next couple of weeks.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| pietermathieu | 61W / 18L / 6D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| pietermathieu | 61W / 18L / 6D | |
| ador2124 | 7W / 5L / 0D | |
| bigrocs | 10W / 2L / 0D | |
| mookc | 8W / 3L / 0D | |
| dixelaar | 8W / 1L / 0D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1750 | 1621 | 2058 | 400 |
| 2024 | 1560 | |||
| 2023 | 1522 | 1647 | ||
| 2022 | 1561 | 1878 | ||
| 2021 | 1728 | 1697 | 1877 | |
| 2020 | 1642 | |||
| 2019 | 1303 | 1718 | ||
| 2018 | 1674 | |||
| 2017 | 1520 | 1669 | ||
| 2016 | 1691 | 1493 | ||
| 2015 | 1360 | 1538 | 1615 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 175W / 135L / 12D | 178W / 131L / 9D | 62.0 |
| 2024 | 7W / 6L / 0D | 8W / 5L / 0D | 70.2 |
| 2023 | 16W / 11L / 2D | 14W / 13L / 1D | 64.6 |
| 2022 | 28W / 23L / 0D | 26W / 23L / 2D | 61.6 |
| 2021 | 72W / 40L / 0D | 62W / 49L / 3D | 64.3 |
| 2020 | 2W / 2L / 0D | 4W / 1L / 0D | 63.7 |
| 2019 | 38W / 27L / 1D | 37W / 32L / 2D | 61.1 |
| 2018 | 14W / 11L / 1D | 12W / 11L / 1D | 58.9 |
| 2017 | 120W / 92L / 5D | 97W / 106L / 7D | 62.6 |
| 2016 | 235W / 192L / 19D | 221W / 198L / 15D | 66.1 |
| 2015 | 122W / 74L / 15D | 95W / 114L / 9D | 70.1 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 433 | 266 | 150 | 17 | 61.4% |
| Barnes Defense | 239 | 120 | 110 | 9 | 50.2% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 96 | 57 | 35 | 4 | 59.4% |
| Sicilian Defense | 72 | 39 | 28 | 5 | 54.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 48 | 23 | 22 | 3 | 47.9% |
| Australian Defense | 48 | 24 | 23 | 1 | 50.0% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 47 | 19 | 27 | 1 | 40.4% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 46 | 26 | 18 | 2 | 56.5% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 38 | 23 | 14 | 1 | 60.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 36 | 14 | 21 | 1 | 38.9% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 230 | 131 | 91 | 8 | 57.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 93 | 52 | 38 | 3 | 55.9% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 48 | 27 | 21 | 0 | 56.2% |
| Amar Gambit | 40 | 18 | 19 | 3 | 45.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 38 | 20 | 14 | 4 | 52.6% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 29 | 13 | 16 | 0 | 44.8% |
| Amazon Attack | 23 | 9 | 12 | 2 | 39.1% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 21 | 10 | 11 | 0 | 47.6% |
| Australian Defense | 18 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 50.0% |
| English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System | 15 | 6 | 9 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 50 | 29 | 21 | 0 | 58.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 36 | 22 | 13 | 1 | 61.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 23 | 14 | 7 | 2 | 60.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 15 | 8 | 7 | 0 | 53.3% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 15 | 9 | 6 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 14 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 71.4% |
| Amazon Attack | 13 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 69.2% |
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 13 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 46.1% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 13 | 4 | 8 | 1 | 30.8% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 12 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 13 | 6 |
| Losing | 9 | 0 |