David Lana (DLR7) - FIDE Master Extraordinaire
Meet David Lana, known in the chess world by the cryptic yet catchy handle DLR7. Awarded the prestigious title of FIDE Master, David is a fearless tactician who thrives in the chaos of rapid and blitz battles — and occasionally in bullet too, when the clock is ticking faster than your morning espresso kick.
Rating Rollercoaster & Style
David’s peak blitz rating rocketed to an impressive 2838 back in May 2020 — that's grandmaster territory knocking politely on the door. Bullet? No slouch there either, with a high watermark of 2575 in September 2020, enough to make opponents blink twice before making a move.
His opening repertoire is a closely guarded secret simply labeled as Top Secret — adding an aura of mystery possibly equal parts real strategy and psychological misdirection. With a bullet win rate just over 52% and competitive blitz battles under his belt, David plays a style mixing calculated patience (average 78 moves to win) and an uncanny knack for winning after losing pieces — with a comeback rate soaring above 85%!
Psychological Quirks
Famous for an 11-point tilt factor, David’s journey through rough patches is almost as dramatic as a season finale. But no worries — this master’s best time of day to strike? A genius-level 5:00 AM, proving that while most of us hit snooze, David hits checkmate.
Epic Streaks & Opponents
His chess battles have featured sizzling streaks — a longest winning run of 20 games and occasional skirmishes down (losing streak of 11, ouch!). His arch-nemesis list includes 'never_walk_alone' who takes a convincing 64% loss rate against David — a great reminder that even in a game with kings, it’s lonely at the top.
Recent Battle Highlight
On July 6, 2021, DLR7 dazzled spectators with a victory against a formidable opponent rated near 2900 in a tense Caro-Kann Defense. The game was a textbook display of solid opening strategy and relentless pressure, ending with a timely win on time — because when David runs out of seconds, so do his opponents.
In Summary
David Lana’s chess story is one of grit, speed, and just a pinch of mystery. A player not afraid to dance on the edge of chaos and strategy, he’s a FIDE Master who might just hit the GRANDMASTER button if he can keep his tilt factor in check — or, at minimum, keep you entertained watching the rollercoaster ride unfold.
Hi David! 👋 Here is your personalised post-tournament review
Quick Stats
Peak blitz rating: 2838 (2020-05-06)
When you score best:
| Best weekday:What you are already doing well
- Tactical alertness. In your win vs Rasmus Svane you spotted 22.Nxe4!!, liquidated Black’s centre and then wrapped things up with the neat sequence 27.Ne6 hxg4 28.Nxf4!
. - Opening variety. You handle both 1.e4 and 1.d4 positions and can switch between the Caro-Kann, French and Sicilian as Black, keeping opponents guessing.
- Willingness to fight on. Several wins came from holding slightly worse positions and turning the tables when the opponent came under time pressure.
Most common trouble spots
- Clock control. Four of your last five losses were decided by the clock or in ≤10 s. Even in wins you often dipped below 15 s with a complex position on the board.
➜ Fix: train “hand-speed” by playing a set of 20 bullet games only to practice premove patterns, then analyse the first 10 moves of each game for blunders. Add a 5-minute daily session ofWoodpecker
-style tactic reps to improve instant pattern recall. - Drifting in equal endgames. Loss vs Vignesh N.R shows a level, simplified position on move 30 but you were pushed back and lost after 60…Bd2+. Your rook-and-pawn technique is solid, yet you occasionally miss counter-play ideas such as activating the king early.
➜ Fix: solve three practical rook-endgame studies every training day and play “rook-endgame only” sparring positions vs an engine set to 2300. - In-game reflection. Two early-queen raids (e.g. 11.Qxa7 against the Caro-Kann) netted a pawn but cost you tempi and harmony. Against precise defence (see loss to Ido Gorshtein) the initiative evaporated.
➜ Fix: add a “sanity check” to your candidate-move routine: “Does this move improve my worst piece or create a new weakness?” Force yourself to reject at least one tempting but risky line each game to build discipline. - Opening depth vs. elite blitzers. In the Alapin loss Black equalised by move 12 thanks to …Qxd1. Your current lines are healthy but occasionally superficial.
➜ Fix: build one model game tree per opening this week. For each critical branch add: key ideas, common traps, typical endgame. Review the tree before each session until you can recite the main line without boards.
Concrete training plan (next 14 days)
| Focus | Daily workload |
|---|---|
| Tactics speed | 40 puzzles <30 s each (goal ≥85 % accuracy) |
| Endgame drill | 15 min rook-and-pawn sparring vs engine |
| Opening file | Re-play one annotated GM game in your chosen line; update tree |
| Self-review | Pick one loss, tag the exact move where the evaluation flipped and write a one-sentence lesson learned |
Key concepts to revisit
• Tempo
• Prophylaxis
• Zugzwang
Final thought
You are already playing at an impressive level; most of the remaining rating points lie in polishing time-management habits and deepening a few critical opening positions. See you at the next session—looking forward to celebrating your new peak!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Never_walk_alone | 16W / 5L / 4D | |
| maritevzadze | 10W / 9L / 1D | |
| Emre Can | 9W / 6L / 3D | |
| Ian Dzhumagaliev | 7W / 9L / 0D | |
| Tamas Banusz | 7W / 8L / 0D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2490 | 2634 | 2122 | |
| 2020 | 2531 | 2604 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 70W / 86L / 21D | 72W / 79L / 23D | 90.2 |
| 2020 | 177W / 164L / 35D | 157W / 177L / 33D | 84.4 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense | 65 | 34 | 26 | 5 | 52.3% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 40 | 21 | 14 | 5 | 52.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon | 32 | 14 | 13 | 5 | 43.8% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 30 | 15 | 13 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 27 | 13 | 11 | 3 | 48.1% |
| Sicilian Defense | 26 | 9 | 11 | 6 | 34.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 25 | 8 | 14 | 3 | 32.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation | 25 | 10 | 12 | 3 | 40.0% |
| Bogo-Indian Defense | 22 | 8 | 12 | 2 | 36.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation | 21 | 8 | 12 | 1 | 38.1% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catalan Opening: Closed | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Exchange Variation, Alapin Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense | 15 | 5 | 8 | 2 | 33.3% |
| Czech Defense | 11 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 54.5% |
| Barnes Defense | 9 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 42.9% |
| Philidor Defense | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 71.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Haag Gambit | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 71.4% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 20 | 0 |
| Losing | 11 | 1 |