Carsten Hecht - The FIDE Master with a Tactical Flair
Meet Carsten Hecht, better known in the chess world as edjo32, a formidable FIDE Master whose blitz games have more twists and turns than a rollercoaster. Starting from humble daily ratings back in 2016, Carsten has accelerated to a peak blitz rating nearing 2600 by 2023—a rating that demands respect and probably a few sighs from opponents.
Not just a speed demon in blitz, Carsten shows notable prowess in rapid games with a striking win rate above 90% in their preferred "Top Secret" openings—one wonders what secrets those moves hold! Their bullet and daily performances are no slouches either; they bring strategic depth and resilience to every time control.
Carsten is known for a comeback rate of 86.66%, proving that losing a piece is just a mild inconvenience—because when edjo32 is down, they come back swinging with a perfect 100% win rate after piece loss. Opponents beware: early resignation isn't cheap here, with Carsten keeping calm and clicking through long battles averaging over 70 moves per win.
Psychologically, Carsten keeps their tilt factor impressively low (a modest 10), but when it comes to casual games, they seem to miss the fun by a margin of 36.7% compared to rated play. Dedicated? Absolutely. Casual? Not so much.
Their longest winning streak is a staggering 30 games—imagine that streak on a Friday evening! Notably, Sunday and Wednesday seem to be their lucky days, both boasting win rates well above 56%, and playing around 10 AM or 5 PM might just earn you a loss if you face Carsten.
Whether blitz, bullet, or rapid, Carsten Hecht's consistency and fierce competitive spirit make edjo32 a player worth watching—and trying not to lose against. Keep an eye on this cunning strategist who’s always ready to spring a trap and turn the tables with a smile.
Hi Carsten, here is some tailored feedback on your recent Blitz games (3 | 0).
What you are already doing well
- Sharp tactical vision. In your wins you consistently spot tactics such as 19.Nxc7!! (vs Ispanec) and 27.Qxe5 (vs DerSchachPate), seizing the initiative at every opportunity.
- Opening breadth. You are comfortable with 1.e4 and 1.d4 as White and answer 1.e4 with both the Scandinavian and the French as Black, giving you practical flexibility.
- Practical instincts in time trouble. Several decisive games were finished with < 40 seconds on the clock—your ability to keep the game complicated often pays off.
Priority areas to improve
-
King safety when counter-attacking.
Loss vs AvatarRoku7 shows how quickly an exposed king can become the main target.
• Make castling a concrete goal in the opening (≤ move 10), especially in the French and QGD structures.
• When you launch …b5 or …g5, double-check that the resulting dark squares around your king are covered. -
Depth of calculation in forcing lines.
In the Alahambra123 game you overlooked 28…Qxd1+ and resigned immediately. Before entering a tactical sequence, force yourself to “see one more ply” beyond the obvious capture or check. A quick blunder-check habit will eliminate many of these swing games. blunder -
Conversion technique in better positions.
A couple of recent wins took longer than necessary because you repeated moves or chased “ghosts” instead of consolidating. Invest a few sessions each week on basic end-games (rook + pawn vs rook, opposite-coloured bishops, etc.) so that converting a two-pawn edge becomes routine rather than stressful. -
Time management pattern.
You often fall below 45 seconds around move 20, even in quiet positions. Add a simple self-check: “Am I still in the opening tabiya? If yes, move in ≤ 5 seconds.” This will keep more time for the inevitable scrambles.
Opening-specific notes
- Scandinavian as Black. After 4.d4 Nf6 5.Nf3 Bg4 your opponents score well with 6.Be2 and 7.d5. Study the …e6 & …Bb4+ sideline to meet this plan.
- French Tarrasch. You resigned versus 14.Bf4 in a position that was still playable (…Qb6!, …Rfd8). Build confidence by analysing these structures with a strong engine and trying thematic games vs bots.
- Queen’s Gambit Declined. In the AvatarRoku7 loss, the early …a6/…b5 allowed Nc3–e4–d6 tactics. Consider the more solid …Be7 and …c6 setups until you master the sharp lines.
Suggested training routine (6-week micro-cycle)
| Day | Focus | Tools |
|---|---|---|
| Mon / Thu | 30 min tactics (rated puzzles at 5 min each) | “Puzzle Rush Survival” + annotate wrong answers |
| Tue | Opening review (one line per week) | Replay model games; create a 15-move memory file |
| Wed | End-game drill | Chessable “100 Endgames” chapters 1-10 |
| Fri | Practice games (3|2 or 5|0) | Self-annotate, then verify with engine |
| Weekend | Play OTB or longer online games (15|10) to apply concepts calmly | — |
Motivational checkpoint
You reached 2596 (2023-10-16) recently—congratulations! Let’s aim to stabilise 50 points above that mark by the end of the cycle.Annotated snapshot
Below is the critical tactic from your last loss; rehearse it until you can “auto-spot” the mating pattern.See when you play best
Keep up the fighting spirit, and remember: consolidate first, then celebrate!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| vaino25 | 16W / 0L / 0D | |
| lushravioli | 15W / 0L / 0D | |
| dimitripf | 12W / 1L / 0D | |
| marinstrasni | 6W / 4L / 0D | |
| adi41champ | 5W / 4L / 0D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2502 | |||
| 2024 | 2505 | 2289 | 1657 | |
| 2023 | 2511 | 2291 | ||
| 2021 | 2450 | 2499 | 2290 | |
| 2020 | 2342 | |||
| 2019 | 2012 | 2401 | ||
| 2018 | 2233 | 2344 | ||
| 2017 | 2227 | |||
| 2016 | 2252 | 1200 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1W / 1L / 0D | 1W / 1L / 0D | 52.5 |
| 2024 | 63W / 36L / 11D | 52W / 53L / 4D | 71.8 |
| 2023 | 131W / 82L / 19D | 104W / 107L / 21D | 69.8 |
| 2021 | 30W / 11L / 4D | 36W / 9L / 2D | 59.2 |
| 2020 | 9W / 5L / 3D | 9W / 9L / 0D | 74.6 |
| 2019 | 5W / 7L / 0D | 5W / 5L / 1D | 62.0 |
| 2018 | 123W / 75L / 7D | 115W / 82L / 15D | 76.2 |
| 2017 | 64W / 37L / 7D | 58W / 43L / 7D | 72.5 |
| 2016 | 102W / 37L / 3D | 89W / 44L / 3D | 65.5 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ruy Lopez: Brix Variation | 52 | 28 | 22 | 2 | 53.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 37 | 16 | 17 | 4 | 43.2% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 36 | 21 | 12 | 3 | 58.3% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 34 | 16 | 17 | 1 | 47.1% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 30 | 16 | 10 | 4 | 53.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 28 | 22 | 6 | 0 | 78.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 24 | 10 | 13 | 1 | 41.7% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 22 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 50.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 22 | 12 | 8 | 2 | 54.5% |
| Gruenfeld: Exchange Variation | 22 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Fegatello Attack, Leonhardt Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Mikenas-Carls Variation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Grünfeld Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: King's English Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation, Early Deviations | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Old Steinitz Defense, Semi-Duras Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Rapport-Jobava System | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Gruenfeld: Russian, 7.e4 Nfd7 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Bird Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Grünfeld Defense: Counterthrust Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 15 | 6 | 9 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Alekhine Defense | 14 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 92.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 11 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 63.6% |
| Czech Defense | 9 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 55.6% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 9 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 55.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 8 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 87.5% |
| Amar Gambit | 8 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 37.5% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 62.5% |
| Gruenfeld: 5.Bf4 O-O 6.e3 c5 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 37.5% |
| Barnes Defense | 8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 75.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 30 | 2 |
| Losing | 10 | 0 |