Profile: EECS281
Meet EECS281, a relentless blitz battler and bullet bruiser known for tactical ingenuity and endurance. With a peak blitz rating approaching 2700 and a bullet peak just shy of 2670, EECS281 dances on the chessboard like a grandmaster in disguise—and occasionally a gladiator in a sweat-soaked arena.
Playing Style & Strengths
EECS281’s games often feature a deep understanding of complex middlegame positions, backed by an impressive come back rate of nearly 87%—meaning when the chips are down, this player fights back ferociously. The average game length clocks in around 79 moves, proving patience and strategic depth are their allies.
Early resignations are rare (a mere 16%), showing EECS281’s dogged spirit to fight until the final move. Endgames are a specialty, appearing in over 83% of games, a testament to their refined technique in the critical phases. The player has a slight edge when playing White, with a winning rate just shy of 50%, while Black win rate hovers around 46%.
Tactical Awareness & Psychological Edge
Known to withstand pressure, EECS281 maintains a 46% win rate even after losing material—a true hallmark of tactical resilience. Though sometimes prone to a tilt factor rated at 9, the player’s best hour is around 3 PM, making afternoons prime time for an epic victory (or legendary blunder).
Favorite Openings
- Blitz: French Defense variations (Classic Steinitz Boleslavsky and Exchange) are staples, along with Slav Defense Exchange and the French Defense mainline Alekhine-Chatard Attack. Win rates around or above 45% in these complex battlegrounds reflect a well-rounded repertoire.
- Bullet: Queen’s Pawn and French Defense Exchange Variation take a front seat, signifying sharp, quick opening play with an aggressive edge, boasting impressive win rates near 60-65%.
A Competitive Record to Brag About
With over 13,000 recorded blitz games and thousands of wins under their belt, EECS281 has amassed a lifetime blitz record of more wins than losses (6756 vs 6189), sprinkled with a thousand draws. In bullet chess, the fight is just as fierce, with a near-even win-loss tally that speaks volumes about the intensity of these lightning games.
Recent Glories & Challenges
In a recent thrilling blitz battle on June 3, 2025, EECS281 showcased cool nerves and precise calculation to win by resignation against Dragon-x16 in a Caro-Kann Defense Exchange Rubinstein Variation. Just earlier that day, checkmating CoachBucci in a Sicilian Canal Attack proved the sharpness is as alive as ever.
However, every chess hero faces setbacks: that very same day included a tough timed-out loss to Dragon-x16 and a tough positional defeat by L0qi. But as with all great players, EECS281 bounces back quickly, plotting the next crusade on the 64 squares.
In Summary
EECS281 is not your average club player—they are a tenacious chess warrior with a tactical flair and endgame expertise, who embraces the thrill of blitz and bullet with equal passion. Whether grinding out draws or hunting glorious wins, EECS281 ensures every game is a battle worthy of the history books—or at least a memorable Twitch stream highlight reel.
Quick summary
Nice work — your recent play shows the kind of piece activity, central control, and winning instincts that push games over the finish line in bullet. The 2023 win vs agm_nezil_merilles is a good example of steady piece play and clean simplification into a winning end. Your loss vs kamila_ashadewi highlights a recurring danger: allowing tactical shots around your king and missing mating nets. Below are focused, practical ways to keep the upsides and remove the recurring leaks.
Highlights — what you do well
- Active piece play and centralization — you repeatedly get knights and bishops to aggressive central squares (examples: Ne5, Bd2 in the win).
- Willingness to simplify when ahead — you trade into a clearer path to victory rather than complicating needlessly.
- Good opening variety — you score very well with some systems (Colle and French Exchange), showing reliable memorized plans and typical plans.
- Strong bullet instincts — you convert advantages quickly and don’t let opponents wriggle back in many short-time games.
Key weaknesses to fix (with concrete fixes)
-
Guard your king and watch mating patterns.
Case: in the loss vs kamila_ashadewi you allowed queen+knight penetration (…Qh4+, …Ndxf2 and then Qh1#). Fix: before any material grab or queen excursion, check mating threats against your king. Habit: after every opponent move, do a 3-second safety scan for checks and discovered attacks on your king.
-
Loose pieces and hanging tactics.
Problem: capturing in the center or grabbing pawns while leaving pieces undefended (you had moments where an exchanged piece or pawn grab allowed counter-tactics). Fix: add a one-move “safety check” into every capture — ask “Who gains tempo on my piece if I capture?”
-
Time-management vs accuracy trade-offs in bullet.
In bullet you pre-move and play fast — that’s necessary — but avoid auto-premove captures that can be refuted tactically. Fix: on critical captures or moves that expose your king, slow down for a single second to verify tactics.
-
Structural and pawn-break timing.
Often your pieces are active but pawn breaks (b vs c, f vs e) are sometimes late or give the opponent counterplay. Fix: study typical pawn breaks for your main openings and practice one template break per opening in training games.
Concrete training plan (next 2–4 weeks)
-
Tactical warmup — 15 minutes a day, focused tactics trainer.
Targets: forks, discovered attacks, back-rank mates and removing the defender motifs. Do 20–30 quick puzzles in bullet/fast mode; aim for accuracy over speed after the first week.
-
3 classic pattern drills — back rank mates, knight forks, mating nets with queen+knight.
Spend 10 minutes per pattern, set up random positions and solve. Search for these motifs in your last 20 games and annotate them.
-
Opening consolidation — pick 2 openings to deepen.
Keep the lines that are already working (e.g., Colle, French Exchange). For weaker lines (Amar Gambit, London Poisoned Pawn), either patch the main traps or replace them with simpler systems you know well. Use one short checklist per opening: typical plans, one pawn break, two common tactics.
-
Post-game rapid review — 1–2 minutes per game.
After each session, quickly mark the single decisive mistake and the single best decision. Over time this builds pattern recognition for your recurring mistakes.
Practical bullet tips (in-game)
- Before you grab material: one safety check for opponent checks, forks, and discovered attacks.
- Prefer forcing moves when ahead — checks, captures, threats — they reduce opponent counterplay and time spent calculating.
- Use pre-moves only when there’s no tactical risk (e.g., forced recapture or obvious move).
- If you’re low on time, simplify with trades that keep king safety intact — avoid speculative queen moves in time trouble.
Example: short breakdown from your recent win
You played a calm game vs agm_nezil_merilles: quick development, knight outposts (Ne5), then exchanged into a favorable simplified structure. You turned a small activity edge into a clean queen-and-rook exchange and won without giving counterplay. Review that game in analysis mode and mark the pivotal exchange that removed the opponent’s counter-chances.
Replay key sequence:
Short checklist to use immediately
- 3-second king safety scan after every opponent move.
- One-step capture safety check before any pawn or piece grab.
- Prefer simplification when ahead and in time trouble.
- Drill 10 back-rank mate positions this week.
Next-session goals (pick 2)
- Complete 20 tactics with 90% accuracy under 5s per puzzle.
- Play 30 bullet games but pause for 1–2 seconds on every capture.
- Study and annotate 5 recent losses to extract recurring tactical oversights.
Useful study links (quick)
- Back-rank mates & patterns: back rank
- Common tactical motifs: double attack and discovered attack
- Openings you play: review your main systems and one pawn-break per opening (e.g., French Defense).
Wrap-up
You have great instincts and the results show it — keep the habits that convert advantages and tighten up the safety checks that prevent tactical refutations. Small, focused drills (back-rank + tactical scans + 1-opening consolidation) will add a lot of practical value to your bullet play.
Want a 7–day micro-plan I can auto-generate (tactics schedule + specific opening drills + exact timed sessions)? Reply “Yes — 7-day plan” and I’ll make it.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| secretchessplayer2014 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Maciej Sroczyński | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| res128 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| patronzito | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| gajardo | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| shantia-s | 6W / 2L / 1D | View |
| hima-laya | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| dantsev | 4W / 2L / 1D | View |
| premierchess64 | 0W / 3L / 0D | View |
| raugintabulba | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| lostabet95 | 30W / 51L / 11D | View Games |
| Mark Kotliar | 36W / 31L / 6D | View Games |
| Warrick Rolfe | 33W / 18L / 4D | View Games |
| Alan Stein | 19W / 32L / 0D | View Games |
| phonysallly | 21W / 22L / 3D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2455 | |||
| 2024 | 2517 | |||
| 2023 | 2665 | 2466 | ||
| 2022 | 2588 | |||
| 2021 | 2512 | |||
| 2020 | 2428 | 2510 | 1137 | |
| 2019 | 2399 | 2426 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 260W / 237L / 27D | 245W / 251L / 22D | 81.6 |
| 2024 | 157W / 129L / 29D | 146W / 148L / 18D | 81.6 |
| 2023 | 577W / 531L / 92D | 532W / 551L / 105D | 83.5 |
| 2022 | 798W / 720L / 149D | 761W / 757L / 142D | 82.5 |
| 2021 | 691W / 518L / 91D | 609W / 593L / 88D | 80.1 |
| 2020 | 506W / 416L / 79D | 458W / 480L / 69D | 78.8 |
| 2019 | 1005W / 867L / 173D | 969W / 924L / 178D | 81.7 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense | 623 | 287 | 291 | 45 | 46.1% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 541 | 238 | 255 | 48 | 44.0% |
| Bogo-Indian Defense | 519 | 231 | 255 | 33 | 44.5% |
| Döry Defense | 512 | 236 | 229 | 47 | 46.1% |
| Slav Defense | 499 | 272 | 192 | 35 | 54.5% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 450 | 214 | 193 | 43 | 47.6% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 437 | 231 | 185 | 21 | 52.9% |
| French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Chistyakov Defense | 419 | 210 | 174 | 35 | 50.1% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 340 | 140 | 174 | 26 | 41.2% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 325 | 164 | 133 | 28 | 50.5% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Döry Defense | 117 | 50 | 56 | 11 | 42.7% |
| Amar Gambit | 96 | 36 | 51 | 9 | 37.5% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 78 | 46 | 25 | 7 | 59.0% |
| French Defense | 74 | 37 | 30 | 7 | 50.0% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 68 | 31 | 31 | 6 | 45.6% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 67 | 27 | 31 | 9 | 40.3% |
| Australian Defense | 60 | 28 | 26 | 6 | 46.7% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 60 | 34 | 19 | 7 | 56.7% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 57 | 23 | 29 | 5 | 40.4% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 47 | 19 | 25 | 3 | 40.4% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Australian Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 14 | 0 |
| Losing | 9 | 2 |