Overview
Moses Meshac Jerez Schachtler (aka electricalpants) is a high-volume, fiercely creative online chess player known for turning the quiet move b3 into a tactical battering ram. Preferred time control: Daily — where Moses blends slow-burn strategy with occasionally devastating tactical fireworks. A longtime devotee of the Nimzo‑Larsen Attack and the Amar Gambit, Moses has built a reputation for unconventional openings and relentless practical play.
Highlights: peaked in Bullet play (see peak below), massive experience across all time controls, and a propensity for starting games with b3 or Nf3.
Peak (by time class): 2739 (2025-05-17) • 1794 (2022-04-08) • 1608 (2024-12-16) • 1643 (2011-11-08)
Playing Style
Moses is the kind of player who prefers positions with room for creative imbalance. Key traits:
- Opening creativity: frequently plays the Nimzo-Larsen Attack (1.b3) and surprise gambits like the Amar Gambit.
- Tactical awareness: strong comeback rate and high win-after-losing-piece percentages; never count him out when the chips are down.
- Endurance: lengthy average decisive games — Moses often grinds opponents down in longer Daily battles (Average moves per win ~44).
- Psych profile: Best at around 13:00 (local play hour) — come for the openings, stay for the midgame fireworks.
Openings & Signature Moves
Signature repertoire and how Moses breaks opponents' hearts:
- Nimzo‑Larsen Attack (1.b3) — the most-played opening across formats and a genuine staple of Moses' identity online.
- Amar Gambit — used with surprising success to unbalance blitz and bullet opponents early.
- Colle System (Rhamphorhynchus Variation) — a solid go-to in Daily when Moses wants a quieter, technical fight.
- Other frequent choices: Australian and Barnes defenses — Moses enjoys the offbeat and the psychologically awkward.
Want to study a typical Moses opening? Try these links to terms: Nimzo-Larsen Attack • Amar Gambit • Barnes Defense
Notable Streaks & Records
- Longest winning streak: 73 games — yes, that’s not a typo; Moses once went on a tear that would make coffee nervous.
- Longest losing streak: 27 games — the universe balances itself. Moses bounced back hard afterwards.
- Overall (all-time) Bullet record: tens of thousands of games with an enormous sample size (notable wins and an equally notable work ethic).
Time-of-day edge: highest win rates cluster around midday and early afternoon — ideal for Daily play and deep thought.
Notable Opponents & Rivalries
Moses has faced many familiar names repeatedly. A tiny sampling of the top-played opponents (and a wink to the rivalries):
- robbydamast — a frequent opponent; thousands of encounters make for a long-running meta-game.
- 1random — another heavyweight in Moses' opponent list.
- dantemasks — one-sided record in Moses' favor in head-to-heads; definitely a rivalry to watch. (dantemasks)
- emilio890 — competitive scoreboard and plenty of tactical scraps. (emilio890)
Sample Game (signature Nimzo‑Larsen flavor)
Study a compact example of Moses’ opening tendencies — a typical b3 primer (viewer will derive the board from PGN):
Analytics & Extras
Selected data points that define electricalpants' chess footprint:
- Preferred time control: Daily — steady, technical, and perfect for deep plans.
- Win-rate strengths: exceptionally strong vs. lower-rated opponents; competitive but pragmatic vs. higher-rated foes.
- Termination habits: relatively low early-resignation rate and a penchant for long, decisive games.
- Fun fact: the "b3" move shows up over and over in yearly first-move statistics — Moses made a three-letter move trend into a brand.
Interactive trend:
(bullet rating trend, useful to trace the meteoric climb and stabilizations).How to Study Moses' Games
Coaching tip: if you want to learn from electricalpants, focus on:
- Handling offbeat openings and transpositions from 1.b3 / Nimzo‑Larsen setups.
- Endgame patience — many wins come from long technical squeezes.
- Tactical resilience: practice recovering after material losses — Moses converts comebacks at a high rate.
Want to follow specific opponents? Try these profiles: robbydamast • Aaron Jacobson • dantemasks
Quick Bio Snapshot (SEO-friendly)
Moses Meshac Jerez Schachtler — online chess player (electricalpants), Daily specialist, Nimzo‑Larsen enthusiast, Amar Gambit practitioner, prolific Bullet grinder. Search-friendly tags: chess profile, Nimzo‑Larsen, Amar Gambit, b3 opening, online chess, Daily chess strategy.
Hi Moses Meshac Jerez Schachtler — quick recap
Great finishing streak in your daily games — you’ve been finding concrete attacking routes and converting cleanly when the opponent’s king gets exposed. Below I’ll highlight what you did especially well in your most recent win, where you delivered a textbook finish, then give focused, actionable improvements and training drills you can use right away.
What you did well (concrete examples)
- You spotted and executed a decisive attacking plan: after an early queen sortie to f7 you kept up the pressure, used a rook lift (Rf6) and timely rook sacrifices to open lines to the enemy king and finish with a mating net. That sequence shows good tactical vision and bravery to sacrifice material for mate.
- You exploit king safety weaknesses quickly. In the game vs nicktuliev you punished a loose kingside and converted without letting your opponent generate counterplay.
- Your piece activity is strong — you prioritize getting rooks and the queen onto attacking files and ranks (rook on the 6th / 7th ranks, queen infiltration). That’s a high‑impact habit in daily games.
- You find forcing continuations: exchanging into lines that favor tactical motifs (pins, skewers, discovered checks) and you follow through until mate or decisive material gain.
Recurring areas to improve
- Opening clarity and consistency: you often play flexible setups (Reti / Nimzowitsch‑Larsen ideas). That’s fine — but pick one or two plans per opening and aim for consistent move orders so you don’t drift into passive structures. See Reti Opening for typical plans you can rehearse.
- Counting concrete variations more reliably before committing to sacrifices. Your sacrifices are good when correct — to make them repeatable, practice deeper calculation and the habit “what if opponent has X defensive resource?” (look for interposes, queen trades, or perpetual checks).
- Prophylaxis and slow counterplay: sometimes you win the tactical game but allow the opponent easy counterplay earlier (central pawn breaks, piece activity). Ask each turn: “What is my opponent’s threat next?”
- Endgame technique and simplification discipline: when ahead, choose trades that reduce tactical risk and steer into winning endgames. If you’re ahead in material but the opponent has activity, simplify carefully.
- Back‑rank and mating nets (both sides): keep an eye on your own king safety when you attack — active attackers can sometimes leave your own back rank weak. Brush up on basic mating patterns and defenses (see Back rank mate).
Specific notes from your most recent win
Key tactical sequence (illustrative): you played Rf6 to increase attacking options, followed by a decisive exchange sacrifice (Rdxd6) to clear blocking pieces and open the d‑ and e‑files. You then used Rf7+ and Rxd8+ cleanup to force the final mating square for the queen (Qg8#). That sequence shows strong calculation and pattern recognition — very good.
See the game position and replay the decisive sequence here:
Game vs nicktuliev — decisive finishing sequence:
Concrete training plan (next 2–4 weeks)
- Daily tactic set: 15–25 tactics per day focused on sacrifices, clearance, and discovered checks. Prioritize positions that involve rook and queen coordination (you already like these patterns).
- Opening drills (10–15 minutes, 3× per week): pick one main line for your preferred systems (e.g., a reliable Reti setup and a Nimzo‑Larsen plan). Practice 8–10 typical move orders and the resulting middlegame plans — don’t memorize only moves, memorize ideas.
- Calculation exercise: once per day, take a short tactical puzzle and write down at least three candidate moves, then calculate 2–3 responses for the opponent for each candidate before selecting the best line. This improves your pre‑sacrifice checking habit.
- Endgame basics: twice per week, review rook and queen vs rook endgames, basic pawn endgames, and simple king+rook vs king patterns. When you convert a material edge in your daily games, practice choosing simplifications that make your win straightforward.
- Post‑mortem habit: after every win/loss, spend 5–10 minutes identifying one turning point (what you did well / one mistake to avoid). Make that your only concrete takeaway for the next game.
Quick checklist to use during a game
- Before a sacrifice: list opponent’s best defensive reply (1 minute rule).
- If you attack the king: keep a lookout for counterchecks, queen trades, and escape squares for their king.
- When ahead in material: trade pieces (not pawns) to simplify into winning endgames.
- Always ask: “Is my king safe?” after any forcing sequence you play.
Small study resources and links (placeholders)
- Opening ideas: Reti Opening — build 4–5 typical middlegame plans to reuse.
- Mating / pattern practice: Back rank mate — drill common mates and defenses.
- Replay your decisive game again here: the embedded viewer above — replay the rook‑sacrifice line until it’s automatic in your head.
Final encouragement
You’ve got a strong nose for attacking chances and the calculation to back it up — that’s a huge advantage. With a little more routine around pre‑sacrifice checking, opening plan consistency, and endgame converting technique, you’ll make those attacking wins even more reliable. Keep practicing the drill list above and replay the key rook/queen coordination patterns until they’re automatic.
Want a short annotated recap of one of the other games from your recent list (e.g., the quick mating pattern on 2025‑01‑10)? Tell me which game and I’ll annotate 3‑5 critical moments.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| mattteeyow | 10W / 5L / 0D | View |
| oreolover27 | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| gminsight | 32W / 14L / 1D | View |
| PenguinChocolate | 36W / 13L / 0D | View |
| itskingmayfryt | 10W / 5L / 0D | View |
| wolfgang_fabre | 9W / 1L / 0D | View |
| themasteringchessbeast | 3W / 2L / 0D | View |
| Vidip Kona | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| beckys_phone_1 | 2W / 0L / 0D | View |
| b92414 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| robbydamast | 64W / 353L / 2D | View Games |
| Aaron Jacobson | 19W / 237L / 2D | View Games |
| emilio890 | 125W / 113L / 0D | View Games |
| dantemasks | 164W / 55L / 6D | View Games |
| xclevertactics | 41W / 174L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2737 | 1779 | ||
| 2024 | 2734 | 1608 | ||
| 2023 | 2377 | |||
| 2022 | 2377 | 1391 | 1729 | |
| 2021 | 1788 | 1401 | 1522 | |
| 2020 | 1604 | 1352 | 1347 | |
| 2018 | 1458 | |||
| 2017 | 1412 | 1435 | 1382 | |
| 2016 | 1598 | 1386 | 1347 | 1414 |
| 2015 | 920 | 674 | 1534 | 1054 |
| 2014 | 1123 | |||
| 2012 | 1273 | |||
| 2011 | 996 | 1278 | 1483 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 625W / 249L / 4D | 632W / 250L / 4D | 43.7 |
| 2024 | 592W / 153L / 4D | 552W / 142L / 3D | 43.2 |
| 2023 | 24W / 5L / 0D | 24W / 5L / 0D | 36.9 |
| 2022 | 2831W / 1142L / 27D | 2751W / 1116L / 31D | 40.8 |
| 2021 | 9179W / 3999L / 50D | 8137W / 3341L / 40D | 39.8 |
| 2020 | 37W / 31L / 0D | 35W / 29L / 3D | 78.4 |
| 2018 | 25W / 16L / 2D | 23W / 17L / 0D | 75.0 |
| 2017 | 307W / 314L / 11D | 309W / 319L / 15D | 73.4 |
| 2016 | 2259W / 2106L / 66D | 2150W / 2211L / 74D | 67.1 |
| 2015 | 383W / 394L / 9D | 368W / 414L / 8D | 50.0 |
| 2014 | 0W / 2L / 0D | 1W / 1L / 0D | 79.2 |
| 2012 | 1W / 0L / 0D | 0W / 1L / 0D | 64.0 |
| 2011 | 123W / 107L / 4D | 132W / 102L / 4D | 56.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 13361 | 9041 | 4250 | 70 | 67.7% |
| Amar Gambit | 10248 | 6993 | 3189 | 66 | 68.2% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 5520 | 3779 | 1711 | 30 | 68.5% |
| Modern | 4222 | 2814 | 1372 | 36 | 66.7% |
| Australian Defense | 2786 | 1772 | 984 | 30 | 63.6% |
| Barnes Defense | 1491 | 1029 | 451 | 11 | 69.0% |
| French Defense | 1313 | 890 | 410 | 13 | 67.8% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 914 | 660 | 246 | 8 | 72.2% |
| Unknown | 547 | 127 | 419 | 1 | 23.2% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 346 | 206 | 135 | 5 | 59.5% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 254 | 122 | 123 | 9 | 48.0% |
| Modern | 177 | 85 | 89 | 3 | 48.0% |
| French Defense | 131 | 73 | 57 | 1 | 55.7% |
| Amar Gambit | 96 | 57 | 35 | 4 | 59.4% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 76 | 41 | 34 | 1 | 54.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 66 | 27 | 38 | 1 | 40.9% |
| Barnes Defense | 61 | 28 | 33 | 0 | 45.9% |
| Australian Defense | 60 | 24 | 35 | 1 | 40.0% |
| KGA: Fischer, 4.Bc4 | 51 | 31 | 18 | 2 | 60.8% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 47 | 23 | 21 | 3 | 48.9% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 79 | 47 | 30 | 2 | 59.5% |
| Modern | 41 | 19 | 21 | 1 | 46.3% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 16 | 14 | 2 | 0 | 87.5% |
| Amar Gambit | 14 | 6 | 8 | 0 | 42.9% |
| Australian Defense | 11 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 54.5% |
| Sicilian Defense | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Scotch Game | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Australian Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| French Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Botvinnik Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 73 | 1 |
| Losing | 27 | 0 |