Elena Sedina: The Woman Grandmaster with a Strategic Genome
Meet Elena Sedina, a chess tactician who’s evolved her game with the precision of natural selection and the cunning of a queen bee in the hive. Awarded the prestigious title of Woman Grandmaster by FIDE, Elena’s gameplay is a fascinating study in strategy, resilience, and timing — a true chess organism thriving in the wild ecosystem of competitive play.
Much like a cell adapting to its environment, Elena’s rating has undergone fascinating mutations over the years. Her rapid rating peaked around 2300+ but like any biological entity, experiences ebb and flow — maintaining an impressive average of over 2100 in rapid and climbing blitz ratings that reached beyond 2300. Her blitz matches display a vibrant synapse of quick decisions and lightning moves, proving she’s as quick as a neural impulse!
Elena’s approach to openings is shrouded in mystery — fitting for a grandmaster with a "Top Secret" playbook that yields a consistent ~42% win rate both in rapid and blitz formats. It's as if she’s hiding in the forest canopy, ambushing opponents with clever traps and precise strikes.
Never one to easily concede, Elena boasts a comeback rate of over 90%, and an almost flawless 100% win rate after losing a piece — truly a cellular repair system in action, turning disadvantages into triumphs with remarkable efficiency.
When it comes to psychological resilience, Elena does experience some tilt—but with a tilt factor of 6, she’s far from the petri dish of despair. Her win rates peak on Wednesdays and Sundays, suggesting those are the days her chess neurons fire best. And beware playing her around 10 or 21 o’clock, when her win rate spikes to a perfect 100%, like a nocturnal predator on the hunt.
On average, Elena’s games are long journeys—carrying an average of 77 moves to victory, a true marathoner in the brain sport. Her endgame frequency (approximately 88%) means she thrives in the late stages, slowly dismantling her opponent’s defenses, much like a skilled predator stalking its prey.
Whether facing familiar foes or adapting to fresh opponents, Elena’s win rates vary from complete stomps to surprising upsets, but one thing’s for sure: she’s always studying, calculating, and ready to replicate chess evolution with every move. For chess enthusiasts and biology buffs alike, Elena Sedina is a grandmaster whose chess DNA continuously mutates toward excellence.
Coach feedback for Elena “elena1668” Sedina
Your current profile at a glance
- Peak rapid rating: 2324 (2021-09-02)
- Peak blitz rating: 2321 (2023-04-21)
Performance rhythm
Use these charts to identify the times of day and days of the week when you are most successful; schedule rated sessions accordingly.
What you already do well
- Tactical vision: The miniature against Arian Baradaran Tamadon shows you spot thematic sacrifices such as 17.Nxf7! that broke Black’s kingside.
- Fighting spirit: Even in severe Zeitnot you keep looking for active resources and often out-calculate higher-rated opponents.
- Opening variety: You handle both 1.e4 and 1.d4 structures confidently, giving you practical surprise value.
Main areas to improve
- Time management
Five of your last six losses (e.g. vs. Alexander Reprintsev, Konstantin Begunov, Moksh Amit Doshi) were on time in playable positions.- Adopt a “30-30 rule”: try to have ≥30 % of the starting time and ≥30 seconds increment left after move 20.
- Limit deep thinks before castling; bank time for the critical middlegame.
- Use familiar openings to reach middlegames quickly; set a visible clock reminder if necessary.
- Smoother development with Black in the French
Early piece shuffling (…Bd6–e7, …Qd8–b6–d8) costs tempos. Adopt cleaner plans:- Against the Tarrasch (3.Nd2) learn the Rubinstein setup: …dxe4, …Nf6, …Be7, short castle.
- Against the Advance (3.e5) the solid 3…c5 4.c3 Nc6 5.Nf3 Nh6 line gives clear strategy and fewer pawn breaks to calculate.
- Decision-making under pressure
In the Slav loss to Konstantin Begunov you kept the king in the centre and spent critical minutes searching for the perfect reply. When down to 2 minutes, look for the first safe move that keeps material equality. Training ideas:- Weekly 15-minute sessions of “Puzzle Rush survival” focusing on < 20 second decisions.
- Play two 15 | 10 games per day, then analyse with an engine for missed simple continuations.
- Conversion technique
Even when clearly ahead (e.g. against Alex Steinberg) you used six extra minutes in a won rook ending. Drill basic rook-and-pawn endings until they are almost automatic.
Suggested training plan for the next month
| Day | Focus | Duration |
|---|---|---|
| Mon/Wed/Fri | 15 | 10 games → self-analysis + engine check | 60 min |
| Tue/Thu | French & Slav repertoire review (model games) | 30 min |
| Sat | Endgame drills (rook, minor-piece vs. pawns) | 30 min |
| Sun | Bullet/blitz for clock handling + Puzzle Rush | 30 min |
Motivation
Your aggressive style is entertaining and effective. By tightening up the clock and streamlining the first 15 moves you will convert many of those “lost on time” results into wins. Keep the creative spark—just add a touch of pragmatism and your rating will climb rapidly.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Olga Matveeva | 0W / 2L / 1D | View Games |
| Tarasova Viktoriya | 0W / 2L / 1D | View Games |
| Aran Köhler | 2W / 0L / 0D | View Games |
| jegern1 | 1W / 1L / 0D | View Games |
| Lile Koridze | 1W / 1L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2225 | 2092 | ||
| 2023 | 2282 | 2094 | ||
| 2022 | 2225 | |||
| 2021 | 2160 | 2255 | ||
| 2020 | 2089 | 2271 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1W / 1L / 0D | 0W / 4L / 0D | 74.2 |
| 2023 | 11W / 11L / 1D | 8W / 15L / 4D | 81.9 |
| 2022 | 1W / 1L / 0D | 1W / 0L / 2D | 83.2 |
| 2021 | 9W / 3L / 4D | 3W / 10L / 2D | 76.1 |
| 2020 | 15W / 22L / 4D | 27W / 19L / 3D | 78.6 |
Openings: Most Played
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System, Main Line | 7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 28.6% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 33.3% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 75.0% |
| French Defense | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 33.3% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 33.3% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 33.3% |
| Slav Defense | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Classical System, Main Line | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 18 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 7 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 28.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation | 7 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 28.6% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 16.7% |
| French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System, Main Line | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 20.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 40.0% |
| French Defense | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 20.0% |
| Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Amsterdam Variation | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 25.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 4 | 0 |
| Losing | 6 | 3 |