Overview — Wilberth Sebastian Lopez Fuentes (eloficialwslf)
Wilberth Sebastian Lopez Fuentes, also known online as eloficialwslf, is a Candidate Master and a fast-moving force in online chess. Favored for Blitz play, Wilberth mixes tactical fireworks with marathon-like endgame patience — a strange combo that has earned him notable peaks such as 2504 (2026-01-02) and 2631 (2026-01-03). This short biography highlights his style, notable openings, streaks, and a sample game for fans and search engines alike: Candidate Master, Blitz specialist, tactical player, and occasional endgame marathoner.
Playing Style & Key Stats
Keywords: Candidate Master biography, Blitz chess, tactical awareness, endgame specialist.
- Preferred time control: Blitz (fast, furious, and often decisive).
- Endgame frequency: high — Wilberth finishes a lot of long fights rather than resigning early.
- Tactical resilience: strong comeback rate and solid win rate after material losses.
- Average moves: long games — Avg moves per win ~83, per loss ~94 (he loves to fight).
- Best time of day to play: mid-afternoon to early evening — peak results around 16:00.
Quick visual: recent Blitz trend →
Favorite Openings & Performance
Wilberth is eclectic: he plays solid defenses and cheeky sidelines. His Blitz results show both classical preparation and surprise weapons.
- Top Blitz successes:
- Petrov's Defense — strong record in Blitz (win rate ~71%).
- French Defense (including Svenonius) — reliable choice; mixed results but many practical wins.
- Sicilian (Alapin / Sherzer) — compact and sneaky — several 100% mini-records in Bullet/Blitz.
- Surprising pet lines: Barnes Defense — a small favorite that has paid off in short bursts (Barnes Defense).
- Opening variety: comfortable with Scotch, Caro-Kann exchanges, and the occasional Modern defense (French Defense: Classical Variation, Svenonius Variation).
Streaks, Opponents & Memorable Rivalries
Wilberth has seen both long hot streaks and brief slumps — he’s as human as any Grandmaster meme account.
- Longest winning streak: 5 games. Current winning streak: 2.
- Longest losing streak: 5 (we forgive him — everyone hits one).
- Most-played opponents:
- theredking89 — 10 games (tough rival; Wilberth trails 3–7). (Juan Carlos Obregon Rivero)
- accurify — 5 games (positive edge: 3–2).
- crackfingers — 4 games (evenly contested, some draws).
- Time-of-day tendencies: excellent in the late afternoon (16:00) and often sharp in prime evening blitz hours.
Notable Game — A Blitz Snapshot
Here’s a short, viewer-friendly excerpt of a typical Wilberth mini-battle — fast development and practical kingside play. Play along or study the tactics!
Interactive replay:
Fun Facts, SEO Keywords & Placeholders
- Title: Candidate Master (CM) — a proud badge for Wilberth that signals serious study and results.
- Preferred time control in one word: Blitz.
- Placeholders you can click or index:
- Peak Bullet: 2631 (2026-01-03)
- Peak Blitz: 2504 (2026-01-02)
- Peak Rapid: 2001 (2025-12-20)
- SEO-ready keywords included: Wilberth Sebastian Lopez Fuentes, eloficialwslf, Candidate Master, Blitz chess, chess biography, tactical endgame specialist.
Want more? Ask for a match breakdown, an opening report, or another annotated blitz game — Wilberth (and his fans) will appreciate it.
Quick summary
Nice run in blitz — steady rating climb and a healthy win rate against comparable opposition. Your recent games show good tactical vision and the ability to convert advantages, but also some recurring practical weaknesses under time pressure and in certain opening lines.
- Strength-adjusted win rate: ~0.611 — solid for blitz.
- Fast rating gain: +97 over the recent period — you’re improving quickly.
- Most reliable openings: Petrov's Defense and some French lines (Burn/Burn Variation).
What you’re doing well
Highlights from your wins and overall play:
- Finishing ability: you frequently convert tactical or material edges into wins (examples include decisive rook/queen infiltration and forcing mating nets).
- Active piece play: you use rook lifts and queen penetrations effectively to create final threats.
- Opening preparation pays off in some systems — your Petrov results are particularly good (high win rate).
- Endgame technique: you convert passed pawns and rook endgames reliably in several games.
Recurring weaknesses to fix
Patterns observed in losses and in close games:
- Time management: a few wins were on time rather than decisive play — try to avoid relying on opponents flagging. Practice keeping 10–20 seconds for critical decisions in the late middle game.
- Tunnel vision in complex positions: missed defensive resources and checks (leading to mates or big material losses). Before each move, run a quick "checks, captures, threats" checklist.
- Vulnerable king moments: in some games your king got exposed on the queenside or back rank (watch for back-rank issues and weak pawn pushes around your king).
- Inconsistent results in certain openings: English/Agincourt and Four Knights show low win rates — either refine those lines or avoid them in blitz until you feel comfortable.
Concrete, actionable improvements
Short drills and habits you can use immediately.
- Tactics every day: 15–30 minutes of mixed tactics — focus on forks, pins, discovered attacks, and back-rank tactics. Blitz outcomes are decided by tactics.
- 5-minute practice with deliberate pauses: play rapid training games (5+3) where you force yourself to take 2–3 extra seconds on each critical move to build better calculation under pressure.
- Pre-move safety check: develop a habit — before you premove or play fast, run three fast checks: (1) are you leaving the king in check? (2) did you hang a piece? (3) is there an opponent check/capture you missed?
- Opening triage: keep the lines where you score well (Petrov's Defense, French Defense: Burn Variation) and prune the low-performing ones (English, Four Knights) until you have clearer plans in them.
- Postgame routine: after every loss, note the exact moment things turned (tactical miss, time trouble, opening mishap). Two lessons per game is a good cap — be specific (e.g., “missed knight fork on move 23”).
Study & training plan (4-week blitz focus)
Simple weekly plan to keep momentum while fixing leaks.
- Week 1 — Tactics + Time control: 20–30 min tactics per day + 10 blitz games at 3+2 focusing on the checks/captures/threats checklist.
- Week 2 — Openings consolidation: 3 sessions of targeted study (30–40 min) on your best openings (Petrov's Defense, French Defense): common plans, one tidy line each to use in blitz.
- Week 3 — Endgames & technique: 3 short endgame sessions (rook pawns, passed pawns, basic king + pawn vs king) + 10 rapid games (10+5) to practice converting advantages with more time.
- Week 4 — Mixed: mix tactics, 5 rapid games, analyze two recent losses (identify exact move where evaluation flips) and add one small opening novelty or anti-line to your repertoire.
Practical blitz tips
In-game habits that help immediately:
- When ahead on the clock and position, simplify: trade pieces (not pawns) — simplicity wins in blitz.
- Use checks/captures/threats filter before each move — it takes 2–3 seconds but avoids many blunders.
- Prefer safe active moves over speculative sacrifices in time trouble. If you must calculate a long combination, spend a chunk of time early rather than in zero seconds later.
- If your opponent has mating threats, first ask "Can I interpose? Can I trade queens? Can I escape?" — repeating this saved several of your past games.
Openings: what to keep and what to fix
Your opening performance shows clear winners and weaker lines:
- Keep: Petrov's Defense (strong score), French Defense: Burn Variation (100% in small sample).
- Refine or temporarily avoid in blitz: English Opening: Agincourt Defense and Four Knights Game — work on concrete plans, not just moves.
- Tip: prepare one "trouble-free" anti-line per weak opening (a simple sideline that avoids deep theory and leads to playable middlegames).
Example: a clean finish to review
Here’s a recent win with a strong final tactic — study the buildup and the Rh3→h8 idea. Replay it to see how activity and pressure forced resignation.
- Game snippet (you as White):
- Key moment: you created a direct mating threat by lifting the rook and concentrating pieces against the king — good demonstration of converting initiative into decisive tactics.
Suggested immediate checklist before each game
- Warm-up: 5–10 tactics to wake up pattern recognition.
- Decide opening pair for the session (one main, one safe backup).
- Set a simple rule: in time trouble, prioritize king safety and trade pieces if ahead.
Follow-up
If you want, I can:
- Analyze one loss move-by-move (post the game you want reviewed).
- Create a 4-week personalized training schedule with daily drills.
- Generate 100 tactics targeted to the motifs you miss most (forks, back-rank, discovered attacks).
Also feel free to review specific opponent games: bembemskei, repeat repeat.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Lile Koridze | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| thegeniuscrap | 1W / 2L / 0D | View |
| Corey Acor | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| brownchairsaregood | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| athanatos2004 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Sriram Jha | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| potpiedude | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| mate_needed | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| lagwagon87 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| yabbadabbadoooooooo | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Juan Carlos Obregon Rivero | 3W / 7L / 0D | View Games |
| Accurify | 3W / 2L / 0D | View Games |
| crackfingers | 0W / 2L / 2D | View Games |
| archerforever123 | 0W / 3L / 0D | View Games |
| thegeniuscrap | 1W / 2L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2631 | 2504 | ||
| 2025 | 2621 | 2407 | 1972 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 19W / 18L / 0D | 20W / 16L / 1D | 90.8 |
| 2025 | 6W / 6L / 1D | 6W / 9L / 2D | 78.8 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense: Classical Variation, Svenonius Variation | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Scotch Game | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| French Defense | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Petrov's Defense | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Maróczy Bind | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Modern | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Petrov's Defense | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 71.4% |
| French Defense: Classical Variation, Svenonius Variation | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 40.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 25.0% |
| Four Knights Game | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 25.0% |
| French Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| French Defense: Classical Variation, Svenonius Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Scotch Game | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Modern | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Four Knights Game | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 5 | 2 |
| Losing | 5 | 0 |