Emilio Cordova - Grandmaster Extraordinaire
Born to wrangle knights and bishops, Emilio Cordova has risen through the ranks to claim the prestigious title of Grandmaster bestowed by FIDE. But don’t be fooled by the solemn title — beneath the nod of respect and the calculative gaze lies a tactician who can laugh in the face of checkmate.
Rating and Performance Snapshot
Emilio’s blitz rating peaked at a blazing 2983 in February 2021, proving he’s no stranger to lightning-fast brilliance. His bullet skills are equally sharp, topping out at 2879. While daily chess isn't where he shines brightest, Emilio’s endgame frequency clocks in at a commendable 86.43%, showing he loves those nail-biting finales that keep fans on the edge of their seats.
Playing Style
A wizard with patience and cunning, Emilio averages about 81 moves per win, spending quality time unraveling the mysteries of the board. His comeback rate is a staggering 91.41%—lose a piece? No problem, this Grandmaster just scraps harder. He keeps psychological tilt to a modest 12%, suggesting resilience and a stubborn refusal to surrender (unless it’s a graceful resignation, of course).
Opening Repertoire & Signature Moves
Known to keep opponents guessing, Emilio favors some “Top Secret” openings that have netted him nearly half his wins in blitz. Among his secret weapons are the Trompowsky Attack and the Queen's Pawn Opening, where he boasts a perfect 100% win rate in the limited sample games—a hint that when Emilio pulls these out, it’s a chess-party no one wants to miss. The Owens Defense is also in his toolkit, albeit with mixed results, showing even Grandmasters have their off days.
Record & Rivals
With an all-time blitz record of 1482 wins versus 1252 losses and a clutch 307 draws, Emilio battles fiercely and often. Among his most frequent opponents is “want2lose” — a delightful irony in competitive chess — facing off 60 times. Other notable rivals include santoblue and mykola-bortnyk. Whether battling old foes or fresh challengers, Emilio’s win rates hover around 50%, a testament to his consistent top-tier play, even in the fiercest battles.
Recent Highlights
In his most recent online escapades (in the year 2025, no less), Emilio showcased his mastery in the Trompowsky Attack, forcing his opponent to throw in the towel with a resignation after a tense 38-move fight. If patience is a virtue, then Emilio’s 180-second time control wins reveal his ability to juggle rapid-fire tactics with strategic finesse.
Fun Facts
- Emilio’s best time of day to play? 3 PM — the perfect time for chess and afternoon snacks.
- He’s known to start his matches with fearless moves, rarely resigning early—only about 0.69% tend to exit prematurely.
- On Fridays, his win rate nudges above 52%, suggesting Emilio's Friday chess mojo is real.
In summary, Emilio Cordova isn’t just a Grandmaster; he’s a chess marathoner with the instincts of a sprinter, the heart of a fighter, and the occasional playful wink at fate’s board. Whether blitzing or bulleting, this chess artist paints masterpieces one move at a time.
Overall Performance & Rating Progress
Emilio, your recent games show a steady and consistent improvement in your blitz play. Your rating has increased by 4 points in the last month and 25 points over the last three months, indicating positive progress. Your strength-adjusted win rate of approximately 51% is solid, showing good competitive performance against similarly rated opponents.
The trend slopes for rating increase over the past 6 and 12 months confirm that you are maintaining an upward trajectory in your skills, with the 6-month slope particularly strong at 9.6.
Recent Blitz Game Review
From analysis of your recent wins and losses:
- Opening Choices: You frequently play openings like the Vienna Game and English Opening which suit your aggressive style. Your understanding of these lines is evident as you successfully create active play early on.
- Transition and Middlegame: Your games demonstrate good tactical awareness, such as timely piece activity and exploiting opponent weaknesses. Consider deepening your calculation skills to avoid missed opportunities and strengthen your defense when under pressure.
- Endgame Technique: In many wins, you effectively convert advantages into wins. Continue practicing basic endgames as well as more complex positions to increase confidence and efficiency.
- Loss Patterns: Most losses came from early inaccuracies in opening or losing control of the center. Focus on solidifying your opening repertoire to reduce early mistakes.
Areas for Improvement
- Review your responses in sharp Sicilian lines, especially in positions arising after moves like pawn advances to b4 or unusual counters by the opponent.
- Work on defensive techniques in tactical and complex positions, avoiding rapid concessions of material early in the game.
- Study game transitions from opening to middlegame in your preferred openings to maintain initiative and control.
- Practice faster decision-making to manage the time pressure in blitz without sacrificing position quality.
Positive Highlights
- You effectively utilize aggressive opening choices to create pressure on your opponents.
- Your midgame awareness allows you to capitalize on opponent errors and create winning chances.
- Good time management overall, often finishing games with sufficient time for precise moves.
- Ability to win complex endgames, showing solid understanding of positional concepts.
Next Steps & Recommendations
To continue your progress, I recommend:
- Deepening knowledge of your main opening systems to avoid early mistakes and gain comfortable positions.
- Regularly analyzing your own blitz games to identify recurring mistakes and missed opportunities.
- Practicing tactical exercises to sharpen calculation and pattern recognition under time constraints.
- Studying endgame fundamentals to confidently convert advantages.
Keep up the consistent work, and you will continue to see positive rating trends!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| pc9070 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Safal Bora | 31W / 18L / 11D | |
| Vahap Sanal | 21W / 28L / 5D | |
| Mykola Bortnyk | 14W / 31L / 6D | |
| Brandon Jacobson | 24W / 15L / 5D | |
| Daniel Naroditsky | 9W / 30L / 4D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2890 | 1818 | ||
| 2024 | 2868 | |||
| 2023 | 2791 | 2897 | 2458 | 1813 |
| 2022 | 2879 | 2458 | ||
| 2021 | 2756 | 2875 | 2458 | 1813 |
| 2020 | 2733 | 2918 | 2284 | |
| 2019 | 2509 | 2945 | 2609 | |
| 2018 | 2799 | |||
| 2017 | 2106 | 2732 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 11W / 5L / 1D | 6W / 11L / 3D | 74.2 |
| 2024 | 32W / 20L / 2D | 22W / 20L / 8D | 93.3 |
| 2023 | 76W / 45L / 14D | 81W / 41L / 13D | 89.0 |
| 2022 | 23W / 15L / 8D | 18W / 25L / 3D | 84.5 |
| 2021 | 82W / 83L / 24D | 91W / 85L / 15D | 86.1 |
| 2020 | 215W / 174L / 52D | 203W / 187L / 55D | 82.0 |
| 2019 | 107W / 92L / 14D | 112W / 91L / 18D | 84.5 |
| 2018 | 20W / 22L / 5D | 22W / 16L / 7D | 83.5 |
| 2017 | 239W / 185L / 41D | 227W / 201L / 36D | 83.1 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 172 | 77 | 74 | 21 | 44.8% |
| Döry Defense | 143 | 73 | 56 | 14 | 51.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 104 | 46 | 50 | 8 | 44.2% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 95 | 42 | 44 | 9 | 44.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 94 | 48 | 37 | 9 | 51.1% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation | 86 | 39 | 35 | 12 | 45.4% |
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 62 | 33 | 24 | 5 | 53.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 60 | 32 | 19 | 9 | 53.3% |
| Australian Defense | 55 | 25 | 24 | 6 | 45.5% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 55 | 29 | 20 | 6 | 52.7% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Czech Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| KGD: Classical, 3.Bc4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Dutch Defense: Blackmar's Second Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| KGA: Bishop's Gambit, Bledow, 4.Bxd5 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0.0% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation, Duchamp Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Scotch Game | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 13 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 69.2% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Czech Defense | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 33.3% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 6 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 16.7% |
| King's Indian Attack | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Australian Defense | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Indian Defense: Przepiorka Variation | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 80.0% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 40.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 13 | 1 |
| Losing | 12 | 0 |