Overview
Jason Lu (also known online as EnergeticHay) is a National Master-level chess player and prolific online competitor. A Rapid specialist by preference, Jason combines curiosity, endurance and a dash of mischief over the board — the kind of player who will play an offbeat b3 in the opening and then smile when it works.
- Title: National Master (National)
- Preferred time control: Rapid — the format where ideas meet intuition
- Online footprint: roughly 15,993 recorded games across Bullet, Blitz, Rapid and Daily play
Playing Style
Jason favorably tilts toward dynamic, tactical positions and long endgames. He has an unusually high endgame frequency and a knack for comebacks — he converts chances even after material setbacks.
- Endgame frequency: high — games often go deep (avg. decisive length is long)
- Tactical traits: strong comeback rate and solid win rate after losing a piece
- Psychology: a modest tilt factor (keeps calm after setbacks) and a tendency to press in complex positions
Openings & Repertoire
Jason is eclectic but consistent. He regularly surprises opponents with offbeat systems and sharp gambits before switching to reliable mainline weapons when the occasion calls for it.
- Favorite surprise systems: Nimzo-Larsen Attack and the quirky Amazon Attack
- Sharp choices: Amar Gambit and multiple Sicilian lines (including Najdorf)
- Reliable structures: versatile responses in the Colle and Caro‑Kann families
Career Highlights & Stats
Jason's online career is a testament to volume and improvement. He has logged thousands of wins and developed a balanced record across time controls. Notable facts you can brag about when introducing him at a tournament:
- Total recorded results: ~9,234 wins, 5,913 losses, 846 draws (across all time controls)
- Standout strengths: exceptional Rapid intuition and resilience in long games
- Notable opening success: very strong Amar Gambit results in Blitz and Daily play
Streaks, Opponents & Rivalries
Jason has experienced both streaks of domination and those humbling losing runs — the storytelling salt of any chess life.
- Longest winning streak: 31 games
- Current winning streak: 2 games
- Longest losing streak: 18 games (he recovered)
- Most-played opponent: kinghungry (146 games) — a rivalry with a very large sample size
Notable Patterns & Best Times
Jason tends to do best during early-morning hours and late nights (ideal for nocturnal study sessions and coffee-fueled tactics). He also converts well when deep into a match — long games suit him.
- Best time of day to challenge him: around 08:00 (local play peak)
- Win rates by day and hour show consistent success across the week — especially midweek and early mornings
Sample Game (short illustrative sequence)
Here is a quick sample of Jason's practical, classical play — try it in the viewer below.
Example (starter moves):
Placeholders & Visuals
Interactive details and charts (useful for deep dives or embedding in a profile page):
- Rapid rating trend chart:
- Peak Rapid rating snapshot: 2392 (2022-03-26)
- Example opening term: Amar Gambit
Personality & Anecdotes
Off the board Jason is witty and pragmatic — the type to apologize to a fallen king and then immediately analyze why it fell. He enjoys experimenting with unusual first moves (b3, anyone?) and is as likely to chat about endgame tablebases as he is to post a meme after a brilliant tactical sequence.
- Online handle: EnergeticHay
- Favorite surprise first moves: b3 and rare gambits
- Fun fact: his Amar Gambit win rates in Daily/Blitz are remarkably high — a reliable shock weapon
Summary
Jason Lu (EnergeticHay) is a National Master with a large and varied online portfolio. Rapid is his happy place, his openings range from offbeat to razor-sharp, and his games often go the distance. If you face him over the board: expect creativity, book knowledge, and a stubborn endgame fight.
Quick summary
Nice run in your recent rapid block — you won some sharp games by active piece play and tactical finishing. Your most recent win shows good use of bishops and rook activity to create decisive threats. Your loss highlights recurring endgame / king-safety issues to tidy up. Below are focused, practical suggestions you can use in the next 1–2 weeks.
Game snapshot (one to review)
Open this quick replay to revisit the key turning points from your most recent win:
Why this is useful: re-watching the sequence helps you see how you created and converted a material advantage, and where the opponent got counterplay (the g-pawn advance).
What you’re doing well
- Active piece play — you use bishops and rooks aggressively (in the win you grabbed the h8 target and invaded with a rook on the 7th/5th ranks).
- Opening variety — you’re comfortable playing offbeat systems (e.g., the Nimzo‑Larsen style lines) and heavy theory lines like the Najdorf — your openings win rates show real strength there (Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation).
- Converting advantages — when you get material or positional superiority you usually find a clean route to simplify and win rather than get greedy.
Main areas to improve
- King safety on opposite-side castling / pawn storms — when you castle long or the opponent pushes pawns on your wing (g5/g4 etc.) you gave them counterplay. Be ready to meet pawn storms with timely exchanges or king relocation.
- Endgame technique and coordination — your loss shows a theme of passive king and rook coordination leading to a decisive mating net or material swing. Focus on basic rook + king endgames and avoiding back‑rank weaknesses.
- Cleaning up tactical sequences — in messy middlegames there were moments where a one‑move inaccuracy let the opponent get counterplay. Calm calculation (two-step checks) will reduce risky blunders.
Concrete drills and next steps (actionable)
Do these over the next 7–14 days. Short, focused practice beats long unfocused sessions.
- Daily tactics: 15–20 minutes of focused puzzles (pins, skewers, forks, discovered attacks). Emphasize patterns that occur after captures on the kingside and along open files.
- Rook endgames: 3 sessions (30–45 minutes each). Study Lucena and Philidor building blocks, plus simple winning technique vs lone rook. Drill 6–10 positions each session and play them out from both sides.
- Opening refresh: review the main middlegame plans for your preferred systems (example: the Nimzo‑Larsen style—where to place knights and when to trade bishops). If you play opposite-side castling often, add one themed game/day at 15+10 to practice the typical pawn storms and defensive resources (Nimzo-Larsen Attack / Pirc Defense).
- Short game reviews: after each session/game, annotate 2–3 critical moves (what you planned and what you missed). Limit this to 10 minutes — consistency > depth.
- Time management drill: play 3 rapid games at 15+10 where you force yourself to spend at least 30–45 seconds on every critical decision (captures, king moves, pawn breaks).
Practical checklist to use in games
- Before any capture: ask “What’s my opponent’s best reply?” (avoid simplifications that open files toward your king).
- Watch the back rank — if heavy pieces are off your 1st/8th rank, create luft or activate your king before a final simplification.
- If castling opposite sides: evaluate pawn storm speed — if your opponent’s pawns are faster, trade pieces or keep a blockade on the advancing files.
- In endgames, prioritize king activity and rook behind passed pawns; trade only when the resulting pawn structure is winning or clearly drawn.
Study micro‑plan (2 weeks)
- Week 1: Tactics (daily), 2 rook‑endgame drills, 3 annotated rapid games.
- Week 2: Opening plans (one hour reviewing typical middlegames), apply in 5 rapid games (15+10) and 2 post‑game annotations.
- Review: after two weeks, replay the PGN above and your loss to confirm you’ve stopped repeating the same mistakes.
One last tip & encouragement
You already have a strong opening repertoire and the tactical vision to finish games. Tightening endgame technique and a small adjustment in king safety awareness will turn several close wins into comfortable wins. Keep the practice short and concrete — you’ll see measurable improvement fast.
If you want, I can: (a) generate a 2‑week training schedule tailored to the openings you play, or (b) produce 12 practice positions (tactics + rook endgames) drawn from your recent games. Which would you like?
— Coach
Useful links
- Profile: Jason Lu
- Openings to review: Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Pirc Defense, Nimzo-Larsen Attack
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| moneta_attack | 2W / 0L / 0D | View |
| u827883 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| overschat | 0W / 1L / 1D | View |
| Denis Shurakov | 1W / 4L / 2D | View |
| Braeden Hart | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| lucky_3105 | 2W / 2L / 0D | View |
| microtron | 0W / 0L / 1D | View |
| umbrazero | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| thechessbird975 | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| gmjjbyrd | 14W / 5L / 1D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| kinghungry | 107W / 38L / 1D | View Games |
| senhor-do-tempo | 19W / 18L / 0D | View Games |
| betochess777 | 31W / 3L / 0D | View Games |
| itsdantheman123 | 17W / 10L / 2D | View Games |
| Khoa Bui | 19W / 9L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2568 | 2422 | 2251 | |
| 2024 | 2512 | 2400 | 2251 | 1669 |
| 2023 | 2547 | 2362 | 2262 | 1697 |
| 2022 | 2450 | 2293 | 2303 | 1682 |
| 2021 | 2407 | 2385 | 2300 | 1651 |
| 2020 | 2349 | 2262 | 2312 | 1545 |
| 2019 | 1937 | 1713 | 1596 | |
| 2018 | 1760 | 1958 | 1844 | 1399 |
| 2017 | 1803 | 1512 | 1869 | 1356 |
| 2016 | 1517 | 1794 | 1682 | 1533 |
| 2015 | 1292 | 1329 | 1534 | 1591 |
| 2014 | 997 | 985 | 1622 | 1123 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 487W / 356L / 76D | 453W / 393L / 70D | 81.5 |
| 2024 | 521W / 362L / 51D | 474W / 414L / 50D | 77.8 |
| 2023 | 349W / 209L / 26D | 364W / 195L / 16D | 69.3 |
| 2022 | 488W / 235L / 41D | 501W / 234L / 34D | 77.6 |
| 2021 | 986W / 366L / 71D | 988W / 381L / 67D | 69.1 |
| 2020 | 672W / 449L / 100D | 647W / 491L / 89D | 76.3 |
| 2019 | 86W / 45L / 9D | 90W / 51L / 6D | 66.6 |
| 2018 | 183W / 101L / 12D | 164W / 124L / 9D | 58.8 |
| 2017 | 169W / 110L / 9D | 145W / 127L / 9D | 50.6 |
| 2016 | 509W / 376L / 25D | 472W / 417L / 21D | 56.0 |
| 2015 | 244W / 202L / 25D | 195W / 230L / 23D | 60.5 |
| 2014 | 23W / 22L / 5D | 24W / 23L / 2D | 68.1 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 977 | 555 | 365 | 57 | 56.8% |
| Amar Gambit | 718 | 430 | 258 | 30 | 59.9% |
| Sicilian Defense | 571 | 324 | 222 | 25 | 56.7% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 560 | 343 | 185 | 32 | 61.2% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 513 | 287 | 184 | 42 | 56.0% |
| East Indian Defense | 398 | 209 | 163 | 26 | 52.5% |
| Australian Defense | 297 | 171 | 115 | 11 | 57.6% |
| Amazon Attack | 259 | 142 | 106 | 11 | 54.8% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 257 | 152 | 98 | 7 | 59.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 218 | 125 | 85 | 8 | 57.3% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack | 69 | 36 | 27 | 6 | 52.2% |
| Sicilian Defense | 45 | 27 | 13 | 5 | 60.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 31 | 21 | 8 | 2 | 67.7% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 24 | 10 | 11 | 3 | 41.7% |
| Amar Gambit | 17 | 10 | 7 | 0 | 58.8% |
| French Defense | 16 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 62.5% |
| Australian Defense | 16 | 14 | 2 | 0 | 87.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation | 14 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 64.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 14 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 42.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 13 | 5 | 7 | 1 | 38.5% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 424 | 217 | 204 | 3 | 51.2% |
| Sicilian Defense | 276 | 147 | 118 | 11 | 53.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 208 | 115 | 78 | 15 | 55.3% |
| Amar Gambit | 200 | 137 | 60 | 3 | 68.5% |
| Amazon Attack | 165 | 100 | 60 | 5 | 60.6% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 116 | 59 | 49 | 8 | 50.9% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 111 | 66 | 38 | 7 | 59.5% |
| Barnes Defense | 83 | 59 | 24 | 0 | 71.1% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 80 | 42 | 35 | 3 | 52.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 76 | 40 | 35 | 1 | 52.6% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 113 | 85 | 22 | 6 | 75.2% |
| Amazon Attack | 92 | 50 | 38 | 4 | 54.4% |
| Amar Gambit | 59 | 46 | 13 | 0 | 78.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 52 | 39 | 11 | 2 | 75.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 50 | 43 | 7 | 0 | 86.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 44 | 37 | 6 | 1 | 84.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 42 | 24 | 15 | 3 | 57.1% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 39 | 33 | 3 | 3 | 84.6% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 39 | 22 | 16 | 1 | 56.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 37 | 18 | 16 | 3 | 48.6% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 31 | 2 |
| Losing | 18 | 0 |