Ivo Maris - FIDE Master Extraordinaire
Meet Ivo Maris, a chess player whose battles on the 64 squares have earned them the prestigious title of FIDE Master. Known in the digital realm as Er_is_geen_hoop_meer, Ivo has dazzled opponents across Daily, Blitz, Bullet, and Rapid formats with a style that's as tactical as it is resilient.
Rating Journey & Gameplay Highlights
Since breaking into the scene around 2013, Ivo has experienced the thrilling rollercoaster of ratings, from a solid Daily peak around 2103 to blitzing past 2600 in Blitz chess and soaring beyond 2700 in Bullet at one point — a speed demon with a thinking cap firmly on.
With over 7,400 Daily wins and a stellar 74% win rate in Bullet using their secret weapon openings, Ivo isn't just playing chess; they’re mastering the art of victory with moves others can only dream of.
Playing Style: The Curious Mind of Ivo
Ivo's games tend to be long affairs — averaging nearly 60 moves per win — proving that patience is more than a virtue; it’s a winning strategy. Their penchant for endgames is remarkable, featuring in about two-thirds of all games, leaving opponents scrambling in the final battlefield.
Early resignations are rare (only 0.67%), because Ivo battles on like a knight in a fairy tale rather than a prince conceding defeat. In fact, the comeback rate hovers around an astonishing 73%, with a mind-boggling near-perfect 99.99% win rate after losing a piece — apparently, losing pieces only sharpens their tactical cunning!
Psychological and Time Quirks
Ivo's peak performance swings with the clock — the early morning hours (around 3 AM) witness an 83% win rate, suggesting either a nocturnal genius or a caffeine-fueled chess wizard. Tilt factor is low (9 out of 100), meaning only minor frustration before snapping right back to brilliance.
Opponent Anecdotes
Some opponents must dread facing Ivo — with win rates over 80% against frequent adversaries like johanvisser and glenno9. Others, like larspilo, appear immune with a 0% win rate, which definitely keeps the game interesting!
Fun Fact
When asked about their "Top Secret" opening strategy—used in over 12,000 Daily games with a 61% win rate—Ivo winked and said, "If I told you, it wouldn't be a secret anymore." Clever and cheeky, just like their play style.
In summary, Ivo Maris is the warrior-poet of modern chess: fierce in blitz and bullet, strategic in daily battles, and a relentless endgame tactician. Opponents beware; losing a piece might just be your cue to pack up your bags!
Hi Ivo (Er_is_geen_hoop_meer)!
Congratulations on steadily keeping your Daily rating near 1700 and peaking at 2103 (2021-01-20). Your overall graph (
) shows admirable consistency, but also hints at several plateaus we can break through with targeted work.What you already do well
- Fighting spirit: In many wins you play on in messy positions (e.g. vs tinatonzky) and eventually convert in long end-games – a valuable competitive skill.
- Tactical alertness with Black: In your Sicilian & Caro-Kann games you spot motif after motif (…Nc4-e3, …Nxf4, rook lifts). Your eye for forks and discovered attacks produces a healthy tactics-per-game score.
- Handling opposite-side pawn storms: The Kings-Indian win shows good understanding of pawn lever timing and piece placement behind the pawns.
Key improvement themes
1. Opening selection & repetition
As White, over 65 % of your games begin with 1.b4.
While the Polish is a fun surprise weapon, the recent trio of losses in the same line suggests opponents at your level are ready.
• Keep 1.b4 in the repertoire, but add a mainstream system (e.g. the Queen’s Gambit or the Italian) so you rehearse classical centre and tempo concepts that the Polish often skips.
• When you do play 1.b4, study the critical …e5 and …d5 replies; your setbacks vs SlowJello and jescuderoma came after missing thematic central counter-blows.
2. Early pawn pushes & king safety
In several defeats you advanced f, g and h-pawns before castling (examples: losses vs modoahmed, AnonymousCrackhead).
This created dark-square holes and targets for opponent pieces.
Adopt a simple yard-stick: “No more than two wing-pawn moves before move 10 unless I am already castled.”
3. Piece activity over material grabbing
Twice you captured loose pawns (e.g. 9 Qxg7 vs SlowJello) only to lose tempi and fall behind in development. Before taking something, ask the 3-step check: ① What will my opponent reply? ② Is my king safe after the sequence? ③ Will the captured pawn still matter 10 moves later?
4. Converting end-game advantages
In the win vs tinatonzky you reached a technically won rook-and-pawn ending but needed 20 extra moves. Sharpen your technique by practising basic rook endings: Lucena, Philidor, and the “V-cut” method of checking from behind. A quicker conversion will free mental energy for earlier phases.
5. Chess960 awareness
Your Chess960 loss shows hesitation in unfamiliar piece layouts. Start each game with the checklist “castle rights, centre control, piece coordination.” Spend the first two moves ensuring minor pieces don’t block rooks – this alone will cut early blunders.
Training plan (6-week micro-cycle)
- Week 1–2: Choose a new main-line White opening. Watch one video & create a mini-file of 10 anchor lines – rehearse daily.
- Week 3: Tactics bootcamp – 30 mins/day on intermediate themes (zwischenzug, clearance, deflection). Track progress in .
- Week 4: End-game focus: solve 20 rook-and-pawn studies, then replay the final 20 moves of your win vs tinatonzky until you can mate in under 15 moves.
- Week 5: Play 10 Chess960 rapid games, applying the early-development checklist.
- Week 6: Review every loss of the month and annotate one critical decision per game – the pattern recognition exercise is more valuable than engine lines.
Quick reference cheatsheet
- Green light moves: Develop a new piece, castle, central pawn one square.
- Amber moves: Repeat an already-developed piece, side-pawn advance – need concrete reason.
- Red moves: Move same wing pawn twice, grab “free” pawn while undeveloped, leave king in centre > move 10.
Keep enjoying the game, Ivo, and remember: steady incremental tweaks beat massive overhauls. Next time we meet I’d love to see a crisp miniature starting with 1.d4 or 1.e4 and ending with a textbook zugzwang!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| backranktoaster | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| masoudiiiiiiiii | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| meili0628 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| qweert | 80W / 222L / 20D | View |
| arnoldali | 2W / 2L / 0D | View |
| z0ki | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Jorge Teixeira Jr | 22W / 0L / 1D | View |
| jensvg | 20W / 1L / 0D | View |
| na4olean | 50W / 1L / 0D | View |
| pinarman | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| qweert | 80W / 222L / 20D | View Games |
| Johan Visser | 131W / 49L / 7D | View Games |
| Glenn Ingham | 139W / 25L / 4D | View Games |
| amitdhoundiyal | 63W / 31L / 2D | View Games |
| djoosen | 94W / 0L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2607 | 1783 | ||
| 2024 | 2602 | 2617 | 1771 | |
| 2023 | 2485 | 2358 | 1763 | |
| 2022 | 2599 | 2550 | 2322 | 1674 |
| 2021 | 2556 | 2411 | 2255 | 1609 |
| 2020 | 2452 | 2460 | 1795 | |
| 2019 | 2348 | 1883 | ||
| 2018 | 2293 | 1720 | ||
| 2017 | 2419 | 1856 | ||
| 2016 | 2475 | 2262 | 1916 | |
| 2015 | 2345 | 1897 | ||
| 2014 | 2226 | 1667 | ||
| 2013 | 1997 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 152W / 43L / 11D | 147W / 55L / 9D | 57.7 |
| 2024 | 504W / 206L / 39D | 496W / 226L / 47D | 61.5 |
| 2023 | 419W / 207L / 34D | 404W / 224L / 31D | 62.1 |
| 2022 | 585W / 282L / 41D | 559W / 285L / 72D | 63.4 |
| 2021 | 571W / 269L / 52D | 544W / 287L / 52D | 63.6 |
| 2020 | 509W / 294L / 51D | 475W / 319L / 52D | 68.1 |
| 2019 | 527W / 275L / 32D | 494W / 291L / 53D | 67.6 |
| 2018 | 425W / 264L / 28D | 364W / 287L / 54D | 66.1 |
| 2017 | 280W / 136L / 16D | 261W / 151L / 16D | 64.8 |
| 2016 | 219W / 107L / 26D | 197W / 134L / 24D | 63.4 |
| 2015 | 208W / 75L / 23D | 195W / 92L / 27D | 64.5 |
| 2014 | 186W / 61L / 13D | 156W / 74L / 17D | 66.1 |
| 2013 | 6W / 0L / 1D | 7W / 1L / 0D | 75.5 |
Openings: Most Played
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 3257 | 2021 | 1101 | 135 | 62.0% |
| Australian Defense | 466 | 311 | 138 | 17 | 66.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 456 | 291 | 142 | 23 | 63.8% |
| Modern | 304 | 168 | 110 | 26 | 55.3% |
| Sicilian Defense | 259 | 168 | 79 | 12 | 64.9% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 206 | 143 | 51 | 12 | 69.4% |
| English Opening | 192 | 126 | 59 | 7 | 65.6% |
| Bird Opening | 191 | 107 | 71 | 13 | 56.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 183 | 112 | 62 | 9 | 61.2% |
| Modern Defense | 180 | 118 | 49 | 13 | 65.6% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 474 | 296 | 155 | 23 | 62.5% |
| Australian Defense | 107 | 67 | 36 | 4 | 62.6% |
| Modern | 87 | 55 | 27 | 5 | 63.2% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 41 | 30 | 9 | 2 | 73.2% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 33 | 13 | 16 | 4 | 39.4% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 33 | 23 | 9 | 1 | 69.7% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 32 | 20 | 10 | 2 | 62.5% |
| Sicilian Defense | 27 | 11 | 15 | 1 | 40.7% |
| Amazon Attack | 24 | 15 | 9 | 0 | 62.5% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 23 | 14 | 7 | 2 | 60.9% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 76 | 62 | 13 | 1 | 81.6% |
| Modern | 22 | 15 | 5 | 2 | 68.2% |
| Australian Defense | 18 | 8 | 9 | 1 | 44.4% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 15 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 86.7% |
| Modern Defense | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 71.4% |
| Czech Defense | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| East Indian Defense | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| English Opening | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 63 | 49 | 6 | 8 | 77.8% |
| Modern | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 85.7% |
| Australian Defense | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Czech Defense | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Modern Defense | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Berlin Wall | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 25 | 0 |
| Losing | 9 | 2 |