Pablo Diaz Mino - FIDE Master
Known in the chess world by the clever username Estrategia_vs_Tactica, Pablo Diaz Mino is a formidable FIDE Master who combines strategic depth with tactical flair. With a rating that hovers impressively around the 2200s in Rapid and shoots up past 2500 in Blitz, Pablo is the kind of player who makes you rethink whether the clock is your friend or nemesis.
Chess Journey & Playing Style
In 2023, Pablo's rapid rating was 2236 and he consistently kept it strong with almost flawless records in subsequent years, peaking at 2239 in 2025. But where he really shines is blitz, clocking a peak rating of 2537 in 2025 amidst hundreds of high-speed clashes. Bullet enthusiasts also know Pablo's name, where quick thinking and nerve have led to impressive victories and a steady 2200+ rating.
His style? A long game strategist who loves complex endgames (76% of his games see an endgame!), and who enjoys the grind with an average of 78 moves per win. Patience and precision are Pablo's trademarks, offset by an uncanny tactical awareness reflected in a 100% win rate after losing a piece. It’s safe to say he can turn the tables on you when you least expect it.
Record & Rivalries
Pablo keeps a ruthless record with over 20 rapid wins and just a single loss, and while his blitz battles have been fierce with 245 wins to 221 losses, he always lands on his feet — boasting an 83% comeback rate. Notably, his longest winning streak is a formidable 12 games, making him a tough opponent who asks, “Is it checkmate or will there be more tricks up the sleeve?”
Among his many opponents, he enjoys a winning relationship with franrf723 (almost 86% win rate), but less so with some others — proving Pablo’s competitive spirit thrives on variety, and maybe the occasional revenge match!
Humor & Humanity
While this chess whiz can crush pieces and dreams alike, Pablo takes losses with a tilt factor of only 10 — meaning he’s about as calm as a monk who just found the perfect opening move. And if you think he’s all seriousness, know that his early resignation rate is just over 1%, so expect him to battle hard even when the chips are down.
In short: Pablo Diaz Mino is the kind of player who blends strategy and tactic with a dash of grit, speed, and a love for chess that’s contagious. Beware when you sit opposite him — it might just turn into a marathon of moves you’ll remember (or a blitzkrieg you won’t!).
Hi Pablo!
You have an aggressive, initiative-oriented style that often overwhelms lower-rated opponents. Below you will find a balanced review of your recent performance, practical advice for the next training cycle, and a few concrete study ideas.
Quick snapshot
- Peak blitz rating: 2537 (2025-01-21)
- Activity trends:
What you are doing well
- Early initiative. In your recent win against franrf723 you expanded with h-pawns and sacrificed on f3/f2 to keep Black’s king under constant fire (g7–Rxf2+–Qg5+). Your willingness to give material for activity is a real strength at fast time controls.
- Piece activity & coordination. Even in positions with material imbalance you manage to bring every piece into the attack quickly. Moves such as 22…Bd4+!! (same game) show good awareness of forcing moves and “keep-checking-until-mate”.
- Time management. Most of your decisions are made with >50 % of the clock still on the board—an asset in bullet/blitz where flagging is common.
Recurring issues & how to address them
-
Over-extension in the opening.
• Loss vs Axthoz (Owens 1…b6) shows the risk: 9.Bxh7+! and your king was mated on move 12.
• Early pawn thrusts (h4–g4 before castling) are effective vs passive defenses, but strong opponents exploit the weakened f- and g-files.
Action plan: Play 20 warm-up games in a classical structure (e.g. 1.d4 d5 2.c4 or 1.e4 e5) where you postpone pawn storms until development is finished. Review each game for the first 15 moves only. -
Defensive technique.
In the lost Najdorf (SebaGM) you allowed 12…Nexg4 followed by a double knight fork because pieces were bunched on the back rank.
Action plan: Solve 30 “Find the only defense” puzzles weekly. Focus on interpositions, back-rank resources, and the zwischenzug motif. -
Critical moment calculation.
Many of your sacrifices are sound, but a few (e.g. 8…Nxd5?? in the win, or 14…Nxd3+ in the loss) could be improved with one extra moment of verification.
Action plan: Use a “10-second blunder check” rule before every irreversible move: look for all ✔ checks, ✦ captures, and ♞ threats by the opponent.
Model example to study
Replay the critical phase of your last victory and ask yourself “What would I play as White?”.
Next steps
- Alternate every blitz session with one 15 | 10 rapid game and annotate it thoroughly.
- Create a narrow opening repertoire file; memorize the first 10 moves and typical plans.
- Track your progress monthly and celebrate each new personal best—your 2239 (2025-02-17) is within reach!
Keep combining your tactical flair with solid fundamentals and you will break the next rating barrier soon. Good luck, and enjoy the journey!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Vidit Gujrathi | 0W / 2L / 0D | |
| ganiev_artur11 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Gasan Guliev | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| r2d2pty | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| sn2022s | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Matthew Wadsworth | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| joecole92 | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| stockfish191 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| panku2014 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| grimtorkild123 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| marcelossauro | 7W / 4L / 0D | |
| franrf723 | 6W / 0L / 1D | |
| mbakkor | 0W / 6L / 1D | |
| arrakisp | 6W / 0L / 0D | |
| Daniel Lowinger | 2W / 4L / 0D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2262 | 2402 | 2239 | 1600 |
| 2024 | 2262 | 2325 | 2234 | |
| 2023 | 2301 | 2365 | 2234 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 33W / 35L / 4D | 32W / 34L / 4D | 79.2 |
| 2024 | 63W / 60L / 19D | 61W / 73L / 10D | 78.3 |
| 2023 | 63W / 37L / 5D | 62W / 41L / 3D | 78.6 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 11 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 45.5% |
| Amar Gambit | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 70.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 7 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 14.3% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 25.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| East Indian Defense | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Döry Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Czech Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Defense | 32 | 17 | 14 | 1 | 53.1% |
| Döry Defense | 22 | 13 | 8 | 1 | 59.1% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 21 | 9 | 8 | 4 | 42.9% |
| Modern | 21 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 47.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 20 | 8 | 10 | 2 | 40.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 19 | 3 | 14 | 2 | 15.8% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 15 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 46.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 15 | 5 | 9 | 1 | 33.3% |
| Australian Defense | 14 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Czech Defense | 14 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Döry Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Center Game: Berger Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| King's Indian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Old Indian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Four Knights Game | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Australian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Czech Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 12 | 1 |
| Losing | 10 | 0 |