ExceptionallyNooby: The Tale of a Chess Journey
Once upon a chessboard, ExceptionallyNooby began as your classic underdog — a player who, in 2018, barely cracked 800 bullet rating in the fierce, frantic seconds-per-move battle. From timid beginnings at 610 to a humble max of 1052, this noob was destined for more than just cafeteria chess chatter.
Fast forward to the present, and ExceptionallyNooby has blossomed into a bullet beast with a peak rating soaring above 2500 — a milestone that many aspire to but few achieve. Making 2503 in 2025 (with a brief hiccup at a min of 400 thanks to some questionable decisions), ExceptionallyNooby proves that mastery often begins with a few painfully bad moves, and a lot of stubborn resolve.
Evolution of an Unlikely Grandmaster
Bullet isn’t the only arena where ExceptionallyNooby shines. With blitz rating climbing steadily from a low 557 in 2018 to an impressive 2593 max in 2025, and rapid play steady near 2200+, it’s clear that this player knows how to juggle speed and strategy.
Curious about daily games? Not so much. Although the daily rating remains modest, hovering in the 1300s to 1400s range, it’s a playful reminder that not all battles require hyper-speed reflexes — sometimes a slow burn is just fine.
Playing Style & Characteristics
- High Endgame Frequency: ExceptionallyNooby focuses on the late-game, fighting tooth and nail in 73.88% of matches — proving that this player loves the tension and drama where every piece counts.
- Patience Personified: Averaging nearly 78 moves per win, it’s clear the battles are fought with grit, not just flashy openings.
- Tilt Factor: A modest 19 suggests resilience, but not immune to the occasional “why did I blunder that?!” moment.
- Comeback Specialist: With an incredible 87.41% comeback rate, ExceptionallyNooby deserves a medal for never giving up, especially after losing a piece — and a near-miraculous 99.97% win rate after a lost piece is just plain legendary!
The Opponents & Legacy
ExceptionallyNooby has tangled with thousands of foes, with fierce rivalries against some like raymon777 (winning nearly 97%) and thunderjay29 (also impressively high). But no matter the opponent, the player holds strong, often dominating in bullet and blitz formats.
The secret to such success? A mysterious “Top Secret” opening repertoire chosen with uncanny precision, spanning over 19,000 bullet games and yielding a balanced near 48% win rate – apparently, even nooby can keep secrets.
When Does the Magic Happen?
Late afternoon and early evening hours seem to be when ExceptionallyNooby’s brain is firing on all cylinders, with the highest win rate around 2 PM (a surprising 52.95%). Weekends, however, bring a slight dip — maybe because even chess warriors need a day off to binge-watch chess memes.
Current Status & What’s Next?
Despite the username hinting at humble beginnings, ExceptionallyNooby now holds a current winning streak of 2 games and a longest streak smashing 32 in a row — proof positive that every noob has a champion inside, just waiting for the right moment.
So, whether they’re blitzing opponents at the speed of light, grinding out bullet battles, or thriving in marathon endgames, ExceptionallyNooby is a reminder that the journey from noob to notable can be wildly entertaining and ever so rewarding.
What you did well in your recent blitz games
You showed a good willingness to fight for initiative in sharp positions and you can convert opportunities into winning material or mating nets when the tempo is right. In your recent win, you navigated a dynamic sequence where active piece play and timely pawn pushes helped you press for the win and finish decisively. In the draw and loss, you demonstrated resilience and resourcefulness in complex middlegames, keeping pressure and looking for tactical chances even when the position wasn’t straightforward. Overall, your willingness to initiate and attack when the moment is right is a strong asset for blitz play.
Key areas to improve
- Time management in blitz. In tight moments, aim to identify a clear plan within a few seconds and avoid long, speculative lines when you are short on time. A simple 2-pawn ahead plan or a safe simplifying sequence can save valuable seconds later.
- Endgame technique. Several games reach endgames where converting an advantage or holding a defensive position is critical. Practice rook endings and pawn endgames against a basic engine routine or with a teacher/coach, focusing on king activity and passer creation.
- Defensive consistency. When opponents mount a counterattack, verify safety of your king before deeper forcing lines. If the attack is strong, simplify to a known drawing or winning endgame rather than chasing complications.
- Opening discipline and plan. In blitz, having a concise, repeatable opening plan helps you reach playable middlegames more quickly. Consider committing to a small, reliable repertoire (one trusted line for White and one for Black) and study the typical middlegame plans that arise from them.
Concrete drills for the next week
- Daily tactical puzzles for 15–20 minutes, starting with forcing moves (checks, captures with tempo, and threats) to sharpen calculation under time pressure.
- Endgame practice: study and drill rook endgames and rook-vs-rook simplifications. Learn the general rule of “activate the king, activate the rook, create a passer.”
- Post-game review habit: after each blitz game, write down 2 critical moments and one alternative plan you could have chosen in each of those moments.
- Time management drill: in a practice game, set a timer to ensure you decide on a plan by move 10 and keep at least 30 seconds on the clock after each critical decision.
- Opening focus: pick two solid lines you are comfortable with (one for White, one for Black) and learn the main middlegame plans for each, including common pawn structures and typical piece maneuvers.
Opening choices and strategic direction
Your recent games show you are comfortable navigating dynamic Sicilian structures and other sharp lines. This is a strength, but in blitz it helps to have a reliable safety net. Consider maintaining a compact, easy-to-execute reply against 1.e4 and 1.d4 that leads to solid, active middlegames. Pair this with a couple of trusted Sicilian options for when you want dynamic play, and keep a simple plan for the middlegame so you don’t get overwhelmed in time pressure.
Progress tracking and next steps
Set a two-week plan focused on time management, endgame technique, and a small opening repertoire. If you’d like, I can annotate your upcoming games move-by-move and point out exactly where a faster decision or a safer simplification would have improved the result. When you’re ready, share the specific game(s) you want reviewed and I’ll tailor the feedback to those positions.
Reference tools you can use
- Review a recent win with a focused, annotated PGN glance to identify 2–3 key turning points. If you want, I can generate a compact annotated PGN highlight for you to study.
- Try a quick placeholder review session for any game: you can request a position-by-position breakdown of the critical moments in your next blitz game and I’ll walk you through safer alternatives and plan options. ExceptionallyNooby
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Daniel Girsh | 2W / 1L / 1D | |
| Kim Sergey | 1W / 2L / 0D | |
| Dragomirescu Robin | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Necmettin KORKMAZ | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| fastfaun | 15W / 14L / 2D | |
| kreismyr | 6W / 4L / 1D | |
| misa_savic | 0W / 1L / 1D | |
| yashasdevappa | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| tebriz_fm | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| orlandu_cidolfus | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| raymon777 | 156W / 4L / 1D | |
| campeon_de_ajedrez | 44W / 45L / 9D | |
| pawnn | 37W / 47L / 4D | |
| thunderjay29 | 71W / 0L / 2D | |
| jdpachess | 28W / 33L / 5D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2503 | 2560 | 2217 | |
| 2024 | 2458 | 2333 | 2217 | 1388 |
| 2023 | 2337 | 2303 | 2206 | 1487 |
| 2022 | 2307 | 2268 | 2147 | |
| 2021 | 2136 | 1970 | 2147 | 1469 |
| 2020 | 1925 | 1807 | 2121 | 1465 |
| 2019 | 1336 | 1464 | 1712 | |
| 2018 | 806 | 1133 | 867 | 909 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1280W / 1177L / 213D | 1109W / 1366L / 203D | 82.2 |
| 2024 | 1704W / 1631L / 267D | 1496W / 1863L / 256D | 79.0 |
| 2023 | 1934W / 1671L / 227D | 1718W / 1867L / 219D | 73.7 |
| 2022 | 2944W / 2626L / 358D | 2607W / 2923L / 332D | 76.7 |
| 2021 | 194W / 120L / 21D | 188W / 121L / 19D | 69.0 |
| 2020 | 624W / 416L / 87D | 601W / 463L / 71D | 68.8 |
| 2019 | 277W / 211L / 24D | 278W / 208L / 28D | 64.0 |
| 2018 | 372W / 382L / 36D | 381W / 392L / 36D | 57.7 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 864 | 335 | 472 | 57 | 38.8% |
| Sicilian Defense | 755 | 363 | 337 | 55 | 48.1% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 726 | 364 | 315 | 47 | 50.1% |
| Australian Defense | 546 | 268 | 248 | 30 | 49.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 494 | 227 | 235 | 32 | 46.0% |
| QGD: 4.Bg5 Nbd7 5.e3 c6 6.Nf3 | 430 | 198 | 202 | 30 | 46.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 408 | 189 | 203 | 16 | 46.3% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Classical Defense | 403 | 211 | 161 | 31 | 52.4% |
| Amar Gambit | 395 | 197 | 174 | 24 | 49.9% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 394 | 165 | 184 | 45 | 41.9% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Defense | 1340 | 717 | 551 | 72 | 53.5% |
| Amar Gambit | 969 | 465 | 445 | 59 | 48.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 681 | 330 | 318 | 33 | 48.5% |
| Sicilian Defense | 594 | 306 | 259 | 29 | 51.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 587 | 270 | 289 | 28 | 46.0% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 553 | 277 | 245 | 31 | 50.1% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 496 | 205 | 261 | 30 | 41.3% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 494 | 246 | 216 | 32 | 49.8% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 492 | 233 | 228 | 31 | 47.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 492 | 240 | 230 | 22 | 48.8% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 30 | 16 | 13 | 1 | 53.3% |
| Sicilian Defense | 17 | 12 | 5 | 0 | 70.6% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 13 | 5 | 7 | 1 | 38.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 11 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 45.5% |
| Réti Opening | 11 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 72.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Australian Defense | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 70.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 9 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 88.9% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 77.8% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 42.9% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 11 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 90.9% |
| Sicilian Defense | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 62.5% |
| Unknown Opening* | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| King's Indian Attack | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 60.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 25.0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Sozin Attack | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 32 | 2 |
| Losing | 19 | 0 |