Enrico Righini (Faber1993)
Known in the chess world as Faber1993, Enrico Righini is a seasoned blitz and bullet player whose dedication to the game shines as brightly as his ever-fluctuating chess rating. Starting with modest scores around 800 in 2017, Enrico took the chess battlefield by storm, peaking impressively at a blitz rating of 1612 in February 2023 and a daily rating soaring even higher, reaching 1704 by April 2025. Clearly, this player is no stranger to both rapid-fire tactics and thoughtful endurance!
A Journey Through Ratings and Time Controls
Enrico's journey through the ranks is a tale of persistence and passion. His brain ticks fastest in bullet and blitz formats but also plays seriously in daily and rapid games. His Bullet peak rating soared to 1576 in late 2021, and his rapid exploits earned him a peak near 1482 in April 2023. Even at daily games, where patience rules, Enrico manages an impressive peak of 1704, proving he is anything but a one-trick pony.
Statistics on the Battlefield
- Blitz Record: Over 10,000 wins and losses each, with a win-loss parity that screams 'I fight to the last second.'
- Bullet Record: Fast and furious — 6,689 wins to 6,495 losses. Almost like a chess-speed demon who doesn’t always mind a close call.
- Daily & Rapid: Balanced and steady, proving he can plan and execute over longer time controls.
Chess Openings – Call Me Anglo-Scandinavian Fan
Enrico has a particular fondness for the English Opening with an Anglo-Scandinavian Defense, racking up 865 games and winning more than half of them with this crafty weapon. He shows versatility too, mixing it up with Sicilian Defenses (all flavors), Old Benoni, and even the Closed Sicilian vogue, like a grandmaster on a caffeine rush experimenting in the lab.
Playing Style & Peculiarities
Endgames? That’s where Enrico shines with a 74.57% frequency; he loves to battle till the end — no quiet resignations here (only about 1% early resignations). His average moves per victory hover around 66, so the guy plays chess marathons rather than sprints, but don’t be fooled, his swift tactical sense comes out in Bullet and Blitz alike. He’s got a combatative spirit with an 84% comeback rate — losing a piece only delays the inevitable!
His psychological stats reveal he’s got a tilt factor of 14: he’s human enough to get a bit miffed but clearly resilient. The best time to challenge Enrico? Around 1 PM — that’s when his brain gears are roaring at full speed.
Recent Battles & Memorable Games
Just recently, in the year 2025, we witnessed Enrico masterfully outsmart opponents like bayernmynchen and superjoe2, closing games with both strategic expertise and brutal time management. Whether winning on time or by checkmate, this player knows how to keep the excitement alive. Losses don’t hold him back; when he gets outmatched, he takes it in stride and comes back stronger for the next fight.
Fun Facts
- He’s practically a chess machine with over 26,500 games played in blitz alone — that’s more moves than a chess computer in the 90s!
- Enrico prefers the English Opening like a morning espresso — sharp, restorative, and with just the right kick.
- When in doubt, he loves a comeback: his ability to win after losing a piece is near 46% — because sometimes, losing a pawn is just gaining experience.
In short: Enrico Righini is a chess warrior, a relentless competitor, and a fast-moving tactician who plays with passion, patience, and a pinch (or a heap) of humor.
Overview and quick take
You’re working in a very practical blitz zone, with a solid opening base and good activity in many middlegames. Short-term results show a small drop in the last month, but the longer horizon trends are positive. The key is to tighten time management, sharpen endgame technique, and pin down a simple, repeatable opening plan so you can convert more chances in blitz.
What you did well
- Consistent development and piece activity in many games, keeping pressure on your opponent in the early and middlegame phases.
- Good fight for initiative in several positions, often creating tactical chances or forcing your opponent to defend under time pressure.
- Balanced approach across a few popular openings, showing a flexible repertoire that can adapt to different opponents.
Areas to improve
- Time management in blitz: aim to reserve time for critical moments. Try to keep a small safety margin (for example, 15–20 seconds) for the endgame or last tactical decisions.
- Endgame conversion: work on rook-and-pawn endings and king activity. Blitz games frequently reach simplified endings where precise technique makes the difference.
- Calculation discipline: in complex middlegames, practice a quick three-move forcing search to identify immediate threats or winning ideas before exploring longer lines.
- Openings consistency: pick 1–2 openings you enjoy and study their standard middle-game plans. This reduces decision fatigue and helps you recognize typical structures and plans in the moment.
Opening and plan guidance
Your openings performance is broadly solid, with a balanced win rate across several systems. To convert more blitz opportunities, consider these focused tweaks:
- English Opening family: emphasize quick development and central control without creating premature pawn weaknesses. Follow a clear plan of knights to f3/d2, bishops to g2 or b2, and rooks to the open or semi-open files.
- Sicilian family: keep a straightforward plan that matches your chosen line (for example, focus on solid development, timely central breaks or pressure on the d-file, and safe king placement). Use a simple, repeatable middlegame plan rather than deep, offbeat lines in blitz.
- Match openings to familiar middlegame themes: when you see a typical structure (c-pawn breaks, bishop pair vs. solid minor-piece setup, etc.), rely on the standard plans you’ve memorized rather than improvising on the fly.
Practice plan for the coming weeks
- Endgames: 15–20 minutes per session on rook endings and king activity to improve conversion in blitz endings.
- Tactical pattern work: 15–20 minutes daily of practical puzzles focused on motifs you’ve encountered in recent games.
- Blitz time-boxed review: after each blitz session, spend 5–10 minutes noting turning points and better alternative moves in one or two recent games (win or loss).
- Reinforce a narrow opening repertoire: select 1–2 lines for your main openings and create a concise quick-reference sheet with 3–4 typical middlegame plans for each.
Turn points to review from the latest games
Pick two recent games (one win and one loss) and identify: where you chose a forcing move, whether you had a clear plan after the initial trades, and whether you left yourself with enough time to calculate critical lines. For each, write down an alternative plan that could have produced a stronger result with less risk.
Optional enrichment
If you’d like, I can embed specific game snippets to review key moments. For example, we can annotate exact turning points in your latest win or loss and propose concrete alternative moves. Let me know and I’ll add a focused, move-by-move review.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| ahmetcanakkaya | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| powerpaes | 2W / 1L / 0D | |
| glennovri | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| lacarrera | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| oslohanna | 0W / 0L / 1D | |
| dheerajkesaraju | 2W / 1L / 0D | |
| nehan1802 | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
| chinnajambu1977 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| bulletmaxth | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| creanja | 4W / 2L / 1D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| fguarellod | 28W / 6L / 1D | |
| coyoacan13 | 18W / 13L / 1D | |
| assslapper7 | 18W / 11L / 0D | |
| julzzesto | 9W / 12L / 1D | |
| petroviy | 9W / 11L / 0D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1383 | 1443 | 1322 | 1663 |
| 2024 | 1309 | 1409 | 1363 | 1659 |
| 2023 | 1384 | 1334 | 1417 | 1497 |
| 2022 | 1419 | 1377 | 1337 | 1422 |
| 2021 | 1365 | 1337 | 1436 | 1545 |
| 2020 | 1346 | 1272 | 1374 | 1616 |
| 2019 | 1432 | 1211 | 896 | 1494 |
| 2018 | 1296 | 1129 | 841 | 1300 |
| 2017 | 931 | 806 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1394W / 1414L / 69D | 1369W / 1438L / 75D | 65.5 |
| 2024 | 922W / 861L / 81D | 853W / 939L / 69D | 69.1 |
| 2023 | 1051W / 1028L / 106D | 1017W / 1059L / 96D | 68.2 |
| 2022 | 1081W / 971L / 91D | 992W / 1082L / 100D | 70.1 |
| 2021 | 1126W / 959L / 104D | 985W / 1116L / 99D | 69.3 |
| 2020 | 893W / 902L / 115D | 874W / 961L / 102D | 69.9 |
| 2019 | 1069W / 927L / 66D | 991W / 987L / 75D | 67.0 |
| 2018 | 1930W / 1676L / 64D | 1794W / 1824L / 60D | 64.1 |
| 2017 | 0W / 2L / 0D | 1W / 0L / 0D | 53.3 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| English Opening | 1351 | 694 | 598 | 59 | 51.4% |
| Sicilian Defense | 1158 | 580 | 520 | 58 | 50.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 975 | 454 | 478 | 43 | 46.6% |
| Australian Defense | 963 | 441 | 480 | 42 | 45.8% |
| English Opening: King's English Variation | 852 | 426 | 379 | 47 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Exchange Variation | 851 | 379 | 432 | 40 | 44.5% |
| Amar Gambit | 739 | 349 | 350 | 40 | 47.2% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 688 | 294 | 366 | 28 | 42.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 654 | 307 | 323 | 24 | 46.9% |
| English Opening: Carls-Bremen System | 645 | 330 | 282 | 33 | 51.2% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 15 | 9 | 6 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Slav Defense | 11 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 72.7% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 11 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 63.6% |
| English Opening: Carls-Bremen System | 9 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 55.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 9 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 55.6% |
| QGD: 2...Bf5 3.cxd5 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Australian Defense | 9 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense | 9 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 55.6% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| King's Indian Defense: Larsen Variation | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1699 | 889 | 762 | 48 | 52.3% |
| Australian Defense | 1430 | 727 | 681 | 22 | 50.8% |
| Amar Gambit | 954 | 478 | 457 | 19 | 50.1% |
| English Opening | 839 | 415 | 403 | 21 | 49.5% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 684 | 350 | 321 | 13 | 51.2% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 482 | 252 | 218 | 12 | 52.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 458 | 214 | 236 | 8 | 46.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 390 | 183 | 197 | 10 | 46.9% |
| Slav Defense | 374 | 193 | 172 | 9 | 51.6% |
| Sicilian Defense | 333 | 155 | 168 | 10 | 46.5% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QGD: 2...Bf5 3.cxd5 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Australian Defense | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| English Opening: Drill Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Pirc Defense: Classical Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 13 | 0 |
| Losing | 14 | 1 |