Overview
Jonathan Pagan is a National Master who has carved out a reputation as a tenacious and versatile presence on the board. Earned from the National Chess Federation, the title marks them as one of the sturdy pillars of their local chess communities. They balance club tournaments with online play and bring a calm, strategic approach to fast time controls. Their preferred time control is Rapid, where they blend patience, sharp calculation, and a healthy sense of humor about the occasional blunder.
For a quick snapshot of their trajectory, see
.Career Highlights
- National Master title conferred by the National Chess Federation.
- Blitz peak around 2714 (2025-07-01) and Bullet peak around 2792 (2025-04-20).
- Longest winning streak: 54 games; current winning streak: 1.
- Wide and flexible opening repertoire across Caro-Kann, Slav, and related defenses, reflecting a pragmatic, battle-tested approach.
Playing Style
They are known for endurance and resourcefulness, often turning small advantages into clean conversions in long battles. Endgames are a favorite battleground, with endgame frequency around 72.7% in their games. A strong comeback instinct is showcased in tactical sequences, with a comeback rate around 82.63%. This combination makes Jonathan a dangerous opponent in the later phases of a match.
Keep an eye on their profile to learn more: jonathan%20pagan.
Recent rapid games: what’s going well and what to tighten up
Jonathan, you show a strong willingness to play actively and create chances, which is a big strength in rapid chess. The recent win demonstrates your ability to push pressure and finish when you have the initiative. The loss highlights the importance of keeping a clear plan in the middlegame and staying vigilant for opposing threats, especially in complex positions. The draw indicates resilience, but there were moments where a more precise plan could have pressed for an advantage.
- You frequently look for active piece play and opportunities to attack, which helps you seize initiative in many games.
- You can spot tactical ideas and carry them into practical sequences, often generating concrete threats for your opponent.
- Endgames remain a tricky area where small missteps can swing the result, so strengthening endgame technique will help convert more advantages.
Key areas to improve: concrete steps
- Endgames: practice rook endings and simple king activity plans to convert advantages. Do short drills that end with a clear plan (activate the king, use the rook on open files, and push a passed pawn). After each drill, write one takeaway to reinforce the lesson.
- Time management: in rapid games, allocate time deliberately. Try to use roughly a third of your time on the early middlegame, reserve a portion for critical turning points, and keep a buffer for final checks. Practice with fixed time controls to build this habit.
- Tactics and pattern recognition: maintain daily tactic practice focusing on patterns like back-rank weaknesses, overloaded pieces, forks, and discoveries. Aim to identify two forcing ideas in key positions before committing a move.
- Opening discipline: refine a compact repertoire of 2–3 lines you know well and study the typical middlegame plans for them. The openings data shows you enjoy both aggressive and solid options; pick a pair that fits your style and study their standard plans and typical counterplay your opponents may use.
Opening insights: how to sharpen your choices
Your openings data suggests you’re comfortable with sharp, tactical starts as well as solid, strategic lines. Use that versatility to your advantage by pairing an aggressive choice with a clear middlegame plan, so you don’t drift into uncertain positions. For example, the Amar Gambit can lead to sharp, tactical battles when you know the typical follow‑ups and tactics; the Colle System and Ruy Lopez lines offer solid, steady development with clear middlegame themes. Keep a short written plan for each line and review it after games to reinforce correct ideas.
If you want to explore more aggressive ideas, approach them with a structured study: learn the main lines, replay sample games focusing on the middle-game transitions, and practice with shorter time controls to handle the pressure.
Practice plan for the next week
- Daily tactics drill (about 15 minutes) focusing on common motifs such as back-rank weaknesses, overloaded pieces, forks, and discovered attacks.
- Opening study (3 sessions): pick 2–3 lines you enjoy and study their typical middlegame plans and common pitfalls.
- Endgame work (2 sessions): rook endings and fundamental checkmating patterns with reduced material.
- Review two recent games with a lightweight, personal annotation to capture turning points and a single improvement for each.
- Play 5 rapid practice games using the chosen openings to test plans under time pressure.
Openings in context: quick notes
Your data shows successful results with several openings, including aggressive and solid options. Consider building a small, reliable repertoire around 2–3 lines that you actually enjoy and understand deeply. This helps maintain consistency and makes middlegame plans easier to execute in rapid games. Placeholder references for quick study: Amar Gambit, Colle System, and Ruy Lopez: Closed, Worrall Attack.
Strength and rating trend: practical takeaways
Your overall performance statistics suggest room to stabilize and push forward. Focus on turning short-term gains into consistent long-term progress by following the practice plan above, keeping a tight opening repertoire, and committing to clean endgame technique. Small, steady improvements in these areas tend to compound well in rapid play over time.
Placeholder note
If you’d like, I can tailor this plan to your preferred openings or generate a personalized training schedule that aligns with your upcoming tournament dates. [Optional: profile placeholder] jonathanpagan
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Aaron Jacobson | 165W / 214L / 25D | View Games |
| AlexCn1 | 54W / 39L / 17D | View Games |
| Safal Bora | 26W / 60L / 5D | View Games |
| anthonyp97 | 72W / 10L / 5D | View Games |
| pawnstormm | 76W / 7L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2792 | 2707 | 1359 | |
| 2024 | 2792 | 2561 | 1277 | |
| 2023 | 2789 | 1277 | ||
| 2022 | 1277 | |||
| 2021 | 2789 | 2435 | 1277 | |
| 2020 | 2789 | 2435 | 1263 | |
| 2019 | 2639 | 2435 | 1669 | |
| 2018 | 2639 | |||
| 2017 | 2639 | 1643 | 1906 | 1668 |
| 2016 | 2429 | 2342 | 1958 | 1436 |
| 2015 | 2248 | 2033 | 1552 | |
| 2014 | 2192 | 1937 | 1590 | 1773 |
| 2013 | 1966 | 1873 | 1918 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 303W / 253L / 53D | 278W / 277L / 52D | 77.1 |
| 2024 | 143W / 12L / 5D | 167W / 14L / 2D | 68.2 |
| 2023 | 5W / 1L / 0D | 3W / 3L / 0D | 77.8 |
| 2022 | 3W / 0L / 0D | 2W / 0L / 0D | 35.0 |
| 2021 | 170W / 22L / 4D | 165W / 27L / 7D | 68.6 |
| 2020 | 59W / 12L / 4D | 57W / 17L / 4D | 62.3 |
| 2019 | 3W / 0L / 0D | 2W / 0L / 0D | 36.2 |
| 2018 | 22W / 6L / 0D | 25W / 5L / 0D | 55.6 |
| 2017 | 915W / 793L / 90D | 875W / 830L / 100D | 76.1 |
| 2016 | 1644W / 1450L / 161D | 1463W / 1571L / 147D | 72.3 |
| 2015 | 917W / 827L / 68D | 811W / 928L / 75D | 68.6 |
| 2014 | 1150W / 1126L / 77D | 1017W / 1194L / 90D | 67.3 |
| 2013 | 394W / 370L / 15D | 309W / 430L / 30D | 67.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 495 | 216 | 246 | 33 | 43.6% |
| Unknown | 400 | 231 | 167 | 2 | 57.8% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 208 | 117 | 78 | 13 | 56.2% |
| Australian Defense | 196 | 110 | 79 | 7 | 56.1% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation | 183 | 75 | 99 | 9 | 41.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 173 | 81 | 81 | 11 | 46.8% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 170 | 70 | 85 | 15 | 41.2% |
| Grünfeld Defense: Counterthrust Variation | 146 | 69 | 73 | 4 | 47.3% |
| Slav Defense: Alekhine Variation | 133 | 71 | 58 | 4 | 53.4% |
| Catalan Opening | 133 | 75 | 52 | 6 | 56.4% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 779 | 371 | 382 | 26 | 47.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 713 | 379 | 312 | 22 | 53.2% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 635 | 340 | 271 | 24 | 53.5% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 433 | 277 | 139 | 17 | 64.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 317 | 148 | 160 | 9 | 46.7% |
| Australian Defense | 300 | 155 | 136 | 9 | 51.7% |
| Czech Defense | 277 | 145 | 122 | 10 | 52.4% |
| Barnes Defense | 237 | 126 | 104 | 7 | 53.2% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 211 | 105 | 98 | 8 | 49.8% |
| Modern | 200 | 97 | 91 | 12 | 48.5% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ruy Lopez: Marshall Attack | 17 | 11 | 6 | 0 | 64.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 10 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Slav Defense | 10 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 40.0% |
| QGD: 2...Bf5 3.cxd5 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 88.9% |
| Australian Defense | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Catalan Opening: Open Defense | 8 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 25.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 57.1% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 28.6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 57.1% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD: Exchange, 5.Bg5 c6 6.Qc2 g6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bird Opening | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation, Rare Line | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Dutch Defense: Stonewall Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Slav Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Closed, Worrall Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Queen's Indian Defense: Kasparov Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 54 | 2 |
| Losing | 21 | 0 |