Avatar of Jonathan Pagan

Jonathan Pagan NM

Username: FabianoCarlsen

Playing Since: 2013-08-15 (Active)

Wow Factor: ♟♟♟♟♟

Chess.com

Daily: 1359
156W / 95L / 33D
Rapid: 2435
11W / 4L / 1D
Blitz: 2707
4291W / 4258L / 516D
Bullet: 2792
5181W / 5606L / 403D

Overview

Jonathan Pagan is a National Master who has carved out a reputation as a tenacious and versatile presence on the board. Earned from the National Chess Federation, the title marks them as one of the sturdy pillars of their local chess communities. They balance club tournaments with online play and bring a calm, strategic approach to fast time controls. Their preferred time control is Rapid, where they blend patience, sharp calculation, and a healthy sense of humor about the occasional blunder.

For a quick snapshot of their trajectory, see

Rapid Rating2016201719581906YearRapid Rating
.

Career Highlights

  • National Master title conferred by the National Chess Federation.
  • Blitz peak around 2714 (2025-07-01) and Bullet peak around 2792 (2025-04-20).
  • Longest winning streak: 54 games; current winning streak: 1.
  • Wide and flexible opening repertoire across Caro-Kann, Slav, and related defenses, reflecting a pragmatic, battle-tested approach.

Playing Style

They are known for endurance and resourcefulness, often turning small advantages into clean conversions in long battles. Endgames are a favorite battleground, with endgame frequency around 72.7% in their games. A strong comeback instinct is showcased in tactical sequences, with a comeback rate around 82.63%. This combination makes Jonathan a dangerous opponent in the later phases of a match.

Keep an eye on their profile to learn more: jonathan%20pagan.


Coach Chesswick's Profile Photo
Coach Chesswick

Recent rapid games: what’s going well and what to tighten up

Jonathan, you show a strong willingness to play actively and create chances, which is a big strength in rapid chess. The recent win demonstrates your ability to push pressure and finish when you have the initiative. The loss highlights the importance of keeping a clear plan in the middlegame and staying vigilant for opposing threats, especially in complex positions. The draw indicates resilience, but there were moments where a more precise plan could have pressed for an advantage.

  • You frequently look for active piece play and opportunities to attack, which helps you seize initiative in many games.
  • You can spot tactical ideas and carry them into practical sequences, often generating concrete threats for your opponent.
  • Endgames remain a tricky area where small missteps can swing the result, so strengthening endgame technique will help convert more advantages.

Key areas to improve: concrete steps

  • Endgames: practice rook endings and simple king activity plans to convert advantages. Do short drills that end with a clear plan (activate the king, use the rook on open files, and push a passed pawn). After each drill, write one takeaway to reinforce the lesson.
  • Time management: in rapid games, allocate time deliberately. Try to use roughly a third of your time on the early middlegame, reserve a portion for critical turning points, and keep a buffer for final checks. Practice with fixed time controls to build this habit.
  • Tactics and pattern recognition: maintain daily tactic practice focusing on patterns like back-rank weaknesses, overloaded pieces, forks, and discoveries. Aim to identify two forcing ideas in key positions before committing a move.
  • Opening discipline: refine a compact repertoire of 2–3 lines you know well and study the typical middlegame plans for them. The openings data shows you enjoy both aggressive and solid options; pick a pair that fits your style and study their standard plans and typical counterplay your opponents may use.

Opening insights: how to sharpen your choices

Your openings data suggests you’re comfortable with sharp, tactical starts as well as solid, strategic lines. Use that versatility to your advantage by pairing an aggressive choice with a clear middlegame plan, so you don’t drift into uncertain positions. For example, the Amar Gambit can lead to sharp, tactical battles when you know the typical follow‑ups and tactics; the Colle System and Ruy Lopez lines offer solid, steady development with clear middlegame themes. Keep a short written plan for each line and review it after games to reinforce correct ideas.

If you want to explore more aggressive ideas, approach them with a structured study: learn the main lines, replay sample games focusing on the middle-game transitions, and practice with shorter time controls to handle the pressure.

Practice plan for the next week

  • Daily tactics drill (about 15 minutes) focusing on common motifs such as back-rank weaknesses, overloaded pieces, forks, and discovered attacks.
  • Opening study (3 sessions): pick 2–3 lines you enjoy and study their typical middlegame plans and common pitfalls.
  • Endgame work (2 sessions): rook endings and fundamental checkmating patterns with reduced material.
  • Review two recent games with a lightweight, personal annotation to capture turning points and a single improvement for each.
  • Play 5 rapid practice games using the chosen openings to test plans under time pressure.

Openings in context: quick notes

Your data shows successful results with several openings, including aggressive and solid options. Consider building a small, reliable repertoire around 2–3 lines that you actually enjoy and understand deeply. This helps maintain consistency and makes middlegame plans easier to execute in rapid games. Placeholder references for quick study: Amar Gambit, Colle System, and Ruy Lopez: Closed, Worrall Attack.

Strength and rating trend: practical takeaways

Your overall performance statistics suggest room to stabilize and push forward. Focus on turning short-term gains into consistent long-term progress by following the practice plan above, keeping a tight opening repertoire, and committing to clean endgame technique. Small, steady improvements in these areas tend to compound well in rapid play over time.

Placeholder note

If you’d like, I can tailor this plan to your preferred openings or generate a personalized training schedule that aligns with your upcoming tournament dates. [Optional: profile placeholder] jonathanpagan



🆚 Opponent Insights

Most Played Opponents
Aaron Jacobson 165W / 214L / 25D View Games
AlexCn1 54W / 39L / 17D View Games
Safal Bora 26W / 60L / 5D View Games
anthonyp97 72W / 10L / 5D View Games
pawnstormm 76W / 7L / 0D View Games

Rating

Year Bullet Blitz Rapid Daily
2025 2792 2707 1359
2024 2792 2561 1277
2023 2789 1277
2022 1277
2021 2789 2435 1277
2020 2789 2435 1263
2019 2639 2435 1669
2018 2639
2017 2639 1643 1906 1668
2016 2429 2342 1958 1436
2015 2248 2033 1552
2014 2192 1937 1590 1773
2013 1966 1873 1918
Rating by Year201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024202527921263YearRatingBulletBlitzRapidDaily

Stats by Year

Year White Black Moves
2025 303W / 253L / 53D 278W / 277L / 52D 77.1
2024 143W / 12L / 5D 167W / 14L / 2D 68.2
2023 5W / 1L / 0D 3W / 3L / 0D 77.8
2022 3W / 0L / 0D 2W / 0L / 0D 35.0
2021 170W / 22L / 4D 165W / 27L / 7D 68.6
2020 59W / 12L / 4D 57W / 17L / 4D 62.3
2019 3W / 0L / 0D 2W / 0L / 0D 36.2
2018 22W / 6L / 0D 25W / 5L / 0D 55.6
2017 915W / 793L / 90D 875W / 830L / 100D 76.1
2016 1644W / 1450L / 161D 1463W / 1571L / 147D 72.3
2015 917W / 827L / 68D 811W / 928L / 75D 68.6
2014 1150W / 1126L / 77D 1017W / 1194L / 90D 67.3
2013 394W / 370L / 15D 309W / 430L / 30D 67.0

Openings: Most Played

Blitz Opening Games Wins Losses Draws Win Rate
Caro-Kann Defense 495 216 246 33 43.6%
Unknown 400 231 167 2 57.8%
Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit 208 117 78 13 56.2%
Australian Defense 196 110 79 7 56.1%
Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation 183 75 99 9 41.0%
Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation 173 81 81 11 46.8%
Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack 170 70 85 15 41.2%
Grünfeld Defense: Counterthrust Variation 146 69 73 4 47.3%
Slav Defense: Alekhine Variation 133 71 58 4 53.4%
Catalan Opening 133 75 52 6 56.4%
Bullet Opening Games Wins Losses Draws Win Rate
Caro-Kann Defense 779 371 382 26 47.6%
Amar Gambit 713 379 312 22 53.2%
Nimzo-Larsen Attack 635 340 271 24 53.5%
Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation 433 277 139 17 64.0%
Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation 317 148 160 9 46.7%
Australian Defense 300 155 136 9 51.7%
Czech Defense 277 145 122 10 52.4%
Barnes Defense 237 126 104 7 53.2%
Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack 211 105 98 8 49.8%
Modern 200 97 91 12 48.5%
Daily Opening Games Wins Losses Draws Win Rate
Ruy Lopez: Marshall Attack 17 11 6 0 64.7%
Caro-Kann Defense 10 6 4 0 60.0%
Slav Defense 10 5 4 1 50.0%
Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation 10 4 4 2 40.0%
QGD: 2...Bf5 3.cxd5 9 8 1 0 88.9%
Australian Defense 9 9 0 0 100.0%
Catalan Opening: Open Defense 8 2 4 2 25.0%
Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation 7 4 2 1 57.1%
Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit 7 2 2 3 28.6%
Unknown 7 4 3 0 57.1%

🔥 Streaks

Streak Longest Current
Winning 54 2
Losing 21 0
🐞 Report a Problem