FabrizioD: The Relentless Chess Battler
Meet FabrizioD, a seasoned chess competitor whose journey reads like a thrilling chess novel. Starting out in 2012 with a humble daily rating of about 1100, FabrizioD soared over the years to a peak rating of 1807 in August 2024—a testament to patience, persistence, and an uncanny ability to recover from the occasional, shall we say, "learning moments."
FabrizioD is no stranger to the battlefield of 64 squares, having played hundreds of daily games with a fighting spirit that never quits—even if the scoreboard sometimes says otherwise (171 wins to 427 losses, plus 51 draws). This player’s style? A curious mix of stubborn defense and tactical comebacks. In fact, with an impressive comeback rate of 82%, FabrizioD proves it's never over until the final rook falls.
When it comes to openings, FabrizioD favors complex classical lines, often marching into the King's Indian Defense Neo Classical Line and navigating the tricky waters of the Caro-Kann's Two Knights Mindeno Retreat. While the win rates in these lines hover modestly—ranging from about 4% in the stubborn Caro-Kann Exchange to roughly 17% in the King's Indian—it only adds to the drama of FabrizioD’s games. After all, chess isn't just about winning; it's about fighting through the trenches and living to tell the tale.
Psychologically, FabrizioD might be prone to a bit of tilt here and there (a tilt factor of 20), but there's also a silver lining: the absolute best time to challenge FabrizioD is at the magical hour of 3 AM, when their win rate peaks spectacularly at 100%! Night owls and insomniacs, beware.
Noteworthy too is FabrizioD’s methodical approach to endings, with an endgame frequency topping 67%, and matches often extending to over 60 moves on average—proof of a gritty tenacity and deep strategic thought that keeps opponents sweating till the very end.
Recent Matches Highlight
In a recent jewel of a victory, FabrizioD orchestrated a beautiful checkmate against the steadfast opponent eulero78 (ELO 1765 vs 1731), showcasing mastery of the Caro-Kann Defense Two Knights Mindeno Retreat Line. This win was sealed with a clever rook maneuver delivering checkmate after a complex tactical dance lasting 24 moves—chess artistry in motion!
Study the game here if your heart beats for suspenseful endgames.
Final Thoughts
Whether grinding through long daily games or sprinting in blitz bouts, FabrizioD embodies the indomitable spirit of a chess warrior who knows that sometimes experience weighs more than trophies. Expect unrelenting pressure, unexpected comebacks, and a game rich in stubborn determination. If chess were a soap opera, FabrizioD would be a fan favorite for the thrill of the fight!
Quick summary of the game
You were Black vs Renzo Ramondino in a Caro‑Kann line (ECO B11). The game ended early when White won a decisive knight on c6 after a pawn chase (the sequence g4 / Ne5 / Nxc6). I’ve embedded the game below so you can replay it quickly.
Replay (tap to open):
What you did well
- You chose a solid, well-known setup (the Caro‑Kann). That's a good foundation to build on.
- You played actively in the opening ( ...Bg4 is an aggressive idea — trying to pin/pressure early can unbalance White).
- You got into familiar positions quickly — that helps practical play in daily games.
Key things to improve (from this game)
- Be alert to simple tactical shots when the opponent pushes pawns to attack your bishop (here White used g4 followed by Ne5 to exploit the Nc6 jump). Always check whether a piece you just developed can become a tactical target.
- Move-order awareness: after White’s Bb5+ + g4 ideas, the knight on c6 becomes a target. Before playing ...Nc6 (or ...e6), verify tactical consequences like a knight jumping to e5 and then capturing on c6.
- When your bishop or knight is chased (Bh5/Bg6, g4, h3), consider safe squares and counterplay rather than passive retreats that allow a fork. In some lines ...Nd7 or ...Nbd7 can be a safer block than ...Nc6.
Concrete opening & move‑order advice
- Study the main Mindeno/Two‑Knights Caro‑Kann motifs: the sequence exd5 cxd5 often leaves a hole on c6 or d5 that tactics can exploit. Review common responses after White plays Bb5+ and g4.
- Typical alternative to 6...Nc6 in these positions: consider 6...Nd7 or delaying the knight jump until you’ve answered the g4 / h3 idea. That keeps c6 free from being a tactical target.
- Before playing ...e6 (or any pawn move that blocks a diagonal), double-check forks and captures — ask yourself: can White play Ne5 and then capture on c6 or d7 with tempo?
- Read up briefly on Caro-Kann Defense lines that include Bb5+ from White — common traps exist and are worth memorizing so you can avoid them rather than calculating from scratch every time.
Tactical training plan (next 2–4 weeks)
- Daily: 10–15 tactics puzzles focused on forks and knight tactics (15 minutes). Those motifs appeared in this loss.
- 3× per week: review 5 Caro‑Kann model games (Two‑Knights / Mindeno lines). Make a short note of move‑orders that avoid the knight‑forging tactics.
- Weekly: one short slow game (15|10 or daily) where you deliberately practice the specific line — aim to play the opening twice with different move orders to see patterns.
- Monthly: run through 20 positions where a chased bishop/knight leads to a tactic — this builds pattern recognition so you spot Nxe5/Nxc6 type shots quickly.
Practical in‑game checklist
- Before a quiet developing move (like ...Nc6 or ...e6), ask: does this create a tactical target that the opponent can exploit immediately?
- If the opponent starts pawns storming at your bishop (h3 / g4), pause and calculate Ne5 possibilities and responses to Nxc6.
- Keep king safety & piece coordination first — don’t rush a knight to c6 if it will be the only defender of a key square.
- If in doubt, choose conservative moves that maintain flexibility (e.g., ...Nd7 / ...Nbd7) rather than committing pawns/knights to squares that can be attacked.
Next steps
- Replay the exact game vs Renzo Ramondino and pause after White’s g4 and Ne5 — try to find a better reply from Black. That practical analysis will stick faster than passive study.
- Do short tactic sets each day (forks, pins, discovered attacks). You’ll reduce “loose piece” moments quickly.
- Pick one Caro‑Kann subvariation to make your “go‑to” line and learn the key move orders and traps; repetition wins in openings.
- When you feel ready, post one of your follow-up games and I’ll give a targeted review (you can include the PGN and I’ll point out exact turn‑by‑turn improvements).
Final note — encouragement
Your recent games show you play solid openings and get into rich positions. The losses here are fixable with targeted tactics practice and a little move‑order study in the Caro‑Kann. Small, focused improvements (10–20 minutes daily) will stop simple losses like Nxc6 and turn them into draws or wins.
When you want, paste another recent game (PGN) and I’ll give line‑by‑line coaching. Good work getting into these games — keep at it.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Renzo Ramondino | 124W / 408L / 41D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Renzo Ramondino | 124W / 408L / 41D | View Games |
| fullpoker70 | 26W / 31L / 7D | View Games |
| sapply | 10W / 0L / 0D | View Games |
| christope | 3W / 0L / 0D | View Games |
| weintraube | 2W / 0L / 1D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1611 | |||
| 2024 | 1753 | |||
| 2023 | 1706 | |||
| 2022 | 1704 | |||
| 2021 | 1660 | |||
| 2020 | 1677 | |||
| 2019 | 1661 | |||
| 2018 | 1142 | 1639 | ||
| 2017 | 1669 | |||
| 2016 | 1659 | |||
| 2015 | 1569 | |||
| 2013 | 814 | 1463 | ||
| 2012 | 1091 | 1499 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2W / 12L / 3D | 5W / 11L / 0D | 57.3 |
| 2024 | 11W / 25L / 1D | 19W / 14L / 4D | 64.4 |
| 2023 | 6W / 19L / 1D | 7W / 17L / 2D | 62.9 |
| 2022 | 10W / 23L / 2D | 9W / 26L / 0D | 63.1 |
| 2021 | 12W / 40L / 5D | 14W / 39L / 5D | 63.3 |
| 2020 | 14W / 35L / 5D | 10W / 36L / 7D | 62.0 |
| 2019 | 4W / 18L / 1D | 7W / 17L / 2D | 61.4 |
| 2018 | 14W / 20L / 2D | 10W / 21L / 2D | 63.3 |
| 2017 | 7W / 19L / 5D | 4W / 28L / 1D | 61.6 |
| 2016 | 4W / 2L / 2D | 0W / 9L / 1D | 62.5 |
| 2015 | 1W / 1L / 0D | 0W / 1L / 0D | 64.7 |
| 2013 | 0W / 1L / 0D | 1W / 4L / 0D | 36.0 |
| 2012 | 2W / 2L / 0D | 2W / 4L / 0D | 41.2 |
Openings: Most Played
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Classical System, Benko Attack | 76 | 15 | 53 | 8 | 19.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation | 65 | 10 | 48 | 7 | 15.4% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 42 | 7 | 33 | 2 | 16.7% |
| Benoni Defense: Modern Variation | 38 | 9 | 24 | 5 | 23.7% |
| Pirc Defense: Classical Variation | 38 | 10 | 25 | 3 | 26.3% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 37 | 8 | 26 | 3 | 21.6% |
| English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System | 33 | 11 | 20 | 2 | 33.3% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 29 | 5 | 21 | 3 | 17.2% |
| King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Aronin-Taimanov Defense | 28 | 5 | 21 | 2 | 17.9% |
| Amazon Attack | 21 | 10 | 11 | 0 | 47.6% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Dutch Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Australian Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 5 | 0 |
| Losing | 20 | 7 |