About Fagner Lima
Fagner Lima, known online as Fagner_Lima, is a Brazilian chess player and streamer who turns rapid-fire games into entertaining stories. He blends sharp tactics with a playful sense of humor, building a warm, engaged community around his channel.
Streaming and Community
On his channel, Fagner shares live games, explains tactical ideas, and keeps the chat buzzing with jokes and questions. Blitz is his playground, where his quick instincts and dynamic style really shine. While he dabbles in Rapid and Bullet from time to time, Blitz remains his preferred time control.
Chess Journey and Openings
Since his early days in 2010, Fagner has explored a broad opening repertoire. He has shown particular interest in the Sicilian Defense (Najdorf and related lines), the Amar Gambit, and the Barnes Defense, among many other systems. His streams reflect a wide, practical approach to openings, backed by consistent practice across Blitz, Rapid, and Bullet formats.
- Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation and other Sicilian lines
- Amar Gambit and Barnes Defense as notable favorites
- Extensive experience across Blitz, Rapid, and Bullet formats
Analytical snapshots and opening performance are showcased in the profile placeholders:
Highlights and Playing Style
Fagner's style blends aggressive, initiative-rich play with practical, compact handling of complications. He enjoys seizing the initiative and complicating positions, often turning fast-paced games into lively battles for his audience. One notable marker of his momentum is a longest winning streak of 18 games, illustrating peak periods of readiness and confidence.
- Longest Winning Streak: 18 games
- Peak Blitz Rating in recent years: around 2354
Time Control and Focus
Preferred time control appears to be Blitz, aligning with his streaming persona and quick, tactical mindset. He remains active across multiple formats, keeping his content varied for fans and fellow players alike.
Overview and mindset for your blitz study
From your recent blitz games, you show sharp tactical vision and good piece activity when you press the attack. You also faced positions where careful defense and simpler plans would help you convert advantages more consistently. The goal is to sharpen decision-making under time pressure while keeping your strong attacking instincts.
What you’re doing well
- You convert complex middlegames into practical chances, showing resilience and calculation depth in the winning game.
- Your rook and queen activity often creates practical threats that put opponents on the defensive.
- You recover from tense moments with solid resourcefulness, especially in endings where you maintain pressure and look for winning routes.
Key areas to tighten for faster, cleaner blitz play
- Time management: In sharp middlegames, pause briefly to prioritize threats and decide on a concrete plan rather than chasing multiple forcing lines. Short, safe moves can reduce risk when you’re low on time.
- Defensive structure and king safety: Some losses came from overextending or missing counterplay. Build a quick check-list before major decisions: secure king safety, confirm material balance, and verify immediate opponent threats.
- Endgame clarity: In rook-and-pawn endings or queen endings, aim to simplify to a known plan early or create a clear, single path to victory rather than wandering into unclear trades.
- Opening choice in blitz: Use a compact, familiar repertoire. Rely on solid development and clear plans instead of venturing into highly tactical sidelines when you’re short on time.
- Pattern recognition: Identify 2-3 recurring tactical motifs you tend to miss (back-rank ideas, overloading, or piece coordination). Practice puzzles focused on those motifs to reduce blunders in real games.
Concrete training plan for the next two weeks
- Daily quick puzzles: 15 minutes focusing on common blitz motifs (tactics around back rank, overloaded pieces, and king safety threats).
- Endgame practice: 15 minutes of rook endings and king-pawn endings; practice the fundamental methods to convert a small edge into a win.
- Game review routine: After each blitz session, spend 10 minutes reviewing your last game. Identify one moment you could have chosen a safer plan and one moment you could have pressed differently.
- Opening refinement: Pick 2-3 openings you’re comfortable with from your openings data (for example, the Scandinavian and related solid lines) and work on a simple, repeatable plan for the first 15 moves.
Opening choices and how to approach them in blitz
Your openings data suggests you have strengths in several solid lines. Consider focusing on a compact core you know well and building a clear plan around it. This reduces guesswork under time pressure and helps you keep the initiative in the early middlegame.
Options to reinforce your blitz repertoire include: - a robust, flexible defense to control the center while developing pieces smoothly, - a knight- and bishop-developing setup that supports quick king safety and piece coordination, - and a straightforward pawn break plan to seize the initiative without overcomplicating positions.
To dive deeper, you can explore resources for specific lines like Nimzowitsch-Defense-Scandinavian-Advance and Scandinavian-Defense as part of your study rotation. Nimzowitsch-Defense-Scandinavian-Advance Scandinavian-Defense
Endgames and conversion: practical tips
- When you gain a tangible edge, aim to simplify to a rook ending with a clear plan rather than keeping heavy pieces on the board if your time is tight.
- In longer blitz games, force a plan for the next 5-6 moves rather than chasing every possible improvement. A concrete plan reduces stress and errors.
- Keep an eye on potential perpetual checks or counterplay from your opponent; quickly assess whether capturing material helps your long-term plan or creates dangerous counterplay.
Progress check and next steps
After two weeks of focused practice, revisit two recent games you found challenging. Re-analyze them with a slower pace to confirm the improvements you’ve made in time management, defense, and endgame technique. If you notice recurring problems, adjust your drill priorities to target those themes more directly.
Profile and openings quick references
For quick access to your standard repertoire and recent games, you can review your profile here: Fagner Lima.
If you want to explore related opening ideas, try looking into: Barnes Defense and Scandinavian Defense as starting points for reinforcing your blitz solidity.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Alexey Ivanyuk | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| adyadyuk | 7W / 2L / 0D | |
| sibaechecs | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| gravensinho | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| sharingan832 | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| han-the-cyberpunk | 0W / 3L / 0D | |
| hongjunwang | 2W / 1L / 0D | |
| angrycatz | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| abelhamalvadona | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| allanrufus3 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Wagner Afonso da Silva | 87W / 60L / 7D | |
| Wellington Albuquerque Jr. | 48W / 91L / 4D | |
| wevertonrs | 107W / 2L / 1D | |
| jonastrindade | 69W / 11L / 5D | |
| joaoftb | 51W / 26L / 5D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1942 | 2294 | 2206 | 1747 |
| 2024 | 1993 | 2149 | 2210 | 1823 |
| 2023 | 2022 | 2162 | 2194 | 1821 |
| 2022 | 2064 | 2079 | 2184 | 1730 |
| 2021 | 2094 | 2194 | 2291 | 1749 |
| 2020 | 2070 | 2189 | 2157 | 1752 |
| 2019 | 1908 | 2104 | 1876 | 1836 |
| 2018 | 1923 | 2003 | 1774 | 1796 |
| 2017 | 1822 | 2102 | 1818 | 1757 |
| 2012 | 1378 | |||
| 2011 | 1434 | 1219 | ||
| 2010 | 1083 | 1376 | 1200 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 182W / 155L / 13D | 165W / 170L / 21D | 73.2 |
| 2024 | 708W / 572L / 60D | 645W / 635L / 65D | 74.5 |
| 2023 | 344W / 284L / 51D | 318W / 311L / 45D | 74.2 |
| 2022 | 671W / 477L / 50D | 668W / 481L / 54D | 71.3 |
| 2021 | 1120W / 784L / 86D | 1039W / 893L / 93D | 72.5 |
| 2020 | 1248W / 784L / 105D | 1154W / 855L / 106D | 69.9 |
| 2019 | 1580W / 992L / 118D | 1478W / 1117L / 120D | 69.8 |
| 2018 | 713W / 511L / 78D | 697W / 539L / 82D | 69.7 |
| 2017 | 450W / 302L / 42D | 422W / 312L / 57D | 68.6 |
| 2012 | 0W / 0L / 0D | 1W / 2L / 0D | 75.3 |
| 2011 | 15W / 9L / 1D | 14W / 12L / 0D | 61.5 |
| 2010 | 54W / 33L / 4D | 51W / 38L / 2D | 68.9 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 1200 | 626 | 529 | 45 | 52.2% |
| Sicilian Defense | 1001 | 521 | 429 | 51 | 52.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 695 | 370 | 286 | 39 | 53.2% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 604 | 335 | 237 | 32 | 55.5% |
| Barnes Defense | 574 | 361 | 195 | 18 | 62.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 572 | 343 | 211 | 18 | 60.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 555 | 250 | 265 | 40 | 45.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 461 | 261 | 180 | 20 | 56.6% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 430 | 195 | 215 | 20 | 45.4% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 394 | 191 | 184 | 19 | 48.5% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 143 | 93 | 40 | 10 | 65.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 88 | 58 | 14 | 16 | 65.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 75 | 36 | 34 | 5 | 48.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 68 | 34 | 23 | 11 | 50.0% |
| Unknown | 59 | 57 | 1 | 1 | 96.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation | 45 | 32 | 9 | 4 | 71.1% |
| Philidor Defense | 43 | 35 | 4 | 4 | 81.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation | 37 | 13 | 19 | 5 | 35.1% |
| Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense | 34 | 26 | 6 | 2 | 76.5% |
| Gruenfeld: Exchange Variation | 33 | 19 | 8 | 6 | 57.6% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 37 | 20 | 14 | 3 | 54.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 29 | 20 | 7 | 2 | 69.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 20 | 12 | 4 | 4 | 60.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 20 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 50.0% |
| Gruenfeld: Exchange Variation | 17 | 9 | 7 | 1 | 52.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 17 | 12 | 3 | 2 | 70.6% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 15 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 60.0% |
| Scotch Game | 14 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 78.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 13 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 38.5% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 13 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 53.9% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 166 | 93 | 70 | 3 | 56.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 139 | 71 | 66 | 2 | 51.1% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 130 | 80 | 45 | 5 | 61.5% |
| Sicilian Defense | 127 | 88 | 33 | 6 | 69.3% |
| French Defense | 120 | 76 | 41 | 3 | 63.3% |
| Barnes Defense | 94 | 60 | 31 | 3 | 63.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 89 | 54 | 35 | 0 | 60.7% |
| Alekhine Defense | 75 | 35 | 37 | 3 | 46.7% |
| Czech Defense | 66 | 34 | 27 | 5 | 51.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 65 | 36 | 27 | 2 | 55.4% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 18 | 1 |
| Losing | 13 | 0 |