Mohammad Fahad Rahman
International Master | Chess.com Alias: fahad
Meet Mohammad Fahad Rahman, a chess wizard who carries the prestigious title of International Master—a badge of honor awarded by FIDE to those who tango brilliantly with the 64 squares. With a career that defies boredom and embraces tactical adventures, Fahad’s games are a fascinating cocktail of sharp calculation, psychological warfare, and occasional bullet-speed blitzing that might just make your head spin (and your pieces tremble).
Rating Rollercoaster (or Really More of a Steady Climb)
Since dipping his toes in competitive chess around 2015, Fahad has rocketed from a humble bullet rating around 1800 to an eye-watering peak of 2849 in January 2025. If chess ratings were rollercoaster thrills, Fahad’s ride would have enough loops to wake up even the sleepiest player. His blitz peak of 2821 in April 2025 and rapid high of 2644 in 2020 further prove his versatility across all time controls.
Playing Style: The Comeback Kid
Fahad’s games are like those thrilling underdog movies—you never count him out. With an astonishing 87.5% comeback rate and the rare ability to win nearly 45% of games even after losing a piece, he’s the guy who’ll snatch victory from the jaws of defeat. Expect long, complex endgames featuring an impressive average of 82 moves per win, showing stamina and strategic depth. White pieces feel his warm embrace with almost 50% win rate, but don’t be fooled—his black side craftily wins close to 44% of the time.
Opening Toolbox
Fahad’s signature opening is intriguingly labeled “Top Secret”—because who wants all their secrets spilled? But when he does share, he’s fond of lines like the Indian Game (Spielmann Indian Variation) and the Scandinavian Defense. If it sounds like espionage, that’s probably why his opponents have a hard time predicting and countering his moves.
War Stories: Recent Battles
Just recently, Fahad delivered a dazzling checkmate against Almas Rakhmatullaev in a sharp Benko Gambit encounter that lasted 47 moves—a real testament to his attacking flair and precision. But even masters lose their share; Fahad’s latest defeat came by resignation to Achuvettan after a complex slog in the English Opening Symmetrical Anti-Benoni Variation. Every loss is just a stepping stone on his path to chess glory!
Chess Personality and Fun Facts
- Fahad has a curious habit of doing his best play around 3 AM. Night owls, assemble!
- He rarely early-resigns—only about 1% of the time—showing he's as stubborn as a mule when it comes to fighting on.
- His longest winning and losing streaks both stand impressively at 32 games—talk about emotional rollercoasters!
- He thrives in bullet and blitz arenas but isn’t shy to slow down for rapid and daily chess duels.
Summary
Mohammad Fahad Rahman is not just a chess player; he’s a tactician with a knack for dramatic comebacks and a penchant for keeping “Top Secret” strategies up his sleeve. Whether he’s blitzing at lightning speed or grinding in long endgames, his passion and skill light up the chessboard like a grandmaster fireworks display. Keep an eye on fahad, because he’s here to checkmate, charm, and occasionally confuse us all!
blitz performance and improvement focus
Short-term trends show you are capable of sharp, tactical play and converting pressure into advantage in many games. You’ve also shown the ability to fight back in complex positions. The data you shared suggests there is a clear path to stronger results by tightening openings, improving endgame technique, and managing time more consistently in blitz.
What you’re doing well
- You seize initiative in sharp positions and create concrete threats that force accurate responses from your opponent.
- When you spot tactical ideas, your pieces coordinate well and you can drive the attack effectively around the king.
- You can convert momentum into material or positional gains when your opponent overreaches, which shows good calculation when the position is dynamic.
Key improvement areas
- Opening consistency: in blitz, sticking to a compact repertoire reduces early drift and gives you clearer middlegame plans.
- Time management: several blitz sequences show you spending extra time on non-critical moves. Practice allocating a fixed quick threshold for first-idea decisions and use a plan for what you want to achieve by move 15–20.
- Endgame technique: work on common endgame patterns (king activity, rook endings, and simple queen+rook endings) so you can convert advantages or hold draws when behind.
- Calculation discipline: double-check forcing lines and plausible defensive resources to avoid overestimating tactics in unclear positions.
Targeted plan for the next 2 weeks
- Study a compact opening set: pick 2-black defenses (for example, Scandinavian Defense and Caro-Kann) and 2-white setups (e.g., English Opening and a flexible system) and learn the main ideas, typical middlegame plans, and 1–2 key traps.
- Daily tactical training: 15–20 minutes focused on motifs common in blitz (forks, pins, discovered attacks, and endgame patterns).
- Review 4 recent blitz games without engine, annotate 2 takeaways per game, and create a short “if I had more time” alternative plan for critical moments.
- Endgame practice: at least 4 short drills per week on king-and-pawn endings and rook endings; aim to simplify when ahead and seek practical wins when behind.
- Blitz time management drill: practice a fixed thinking time per move (e.g., 10–15 seconds on easy moves, 30–60 seconds on critical moves) to build a steady pace under pressure.
Opening focus suggestions
Your openings performance shows solid results with Scandinavian Defense and several solid mainstream lines. Consider leaning into a compact repertoire around those lines and learn the typical middlegame plans you’ll encounter, so you can execute consistent transitions from opening to middlegame. If you’d like, I can provide a ready-to-study outline for a 1–2 week blitz-focused repertoire. Scandinavian-Defense
Practice resources (optional)
To review a sample line or PGN in your study flow, you can load a short practice snippet. For example, you could load a short sequence like this:
Keep up the effort. With targeted practice, you can translate these insights into steadier results and stronger growth over the next weeks.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Tahsin Tajwar Zia | 120W / 59L / 16D | |
| Sergey And. Korshunov | 1W / 2L / 0D | |
| Manon Reja Neer | 3W / 0L / 0D | |
| oganromchess | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Abu Sufian, shakil | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
| wise_guyyy | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| sajid0987654321 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| prodigy0002 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| name554590 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| psyduck08 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Tahsin Tajwar Zia | 120W / 59L / 16D | |
| Vaibhav Raut | 55W / 111L / 13D | |
| aakash-dalvi7 | 70W / 84L / 6D | |
| ZURAB AZMAIPARASHVILI | 35W / 45L / 15D | |
| humblespaceman | 35W / 38L / 6D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2803 | 2784 | 2121 | |
| 2024 | 2806 | 2715 | ||
| 2023 | 2756 | 2759 | 2090 | |
| 2022 | 2710 | 2703 | 2157 | |
| 2021 | 2762 | 2635 | 2135 | |
| 2020 | 2662 | 2635 | 2228 | 1887 |
| 2019 | 2414 | 2539 | 2608 | |
| 2018 | 2460 | 2506 | 1600 | |
| 2017 | 2297 | 2435 | 1489 | |
| 2016 | 2365 | 2312 | 1829 | |
| 2015 | 2055 | 2188 | 2043 | 1800 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 143W / 101L / 10D | 114W / 120L / 22D | 92.1 |
| 2024 | 64W / 62L / 7D | 63W / 59L / 14D | 89.8 |
| 2023 | 179W / 114L / 17D | 140W / 146L / 22D | 87.3 |
| 2022 | 477W / 173L / 29D | 464W / 194L / 25D | 81.7 |
| 2021 | 267W / 193L / 34D | 251W / 225L / 23D | 89.4 |
| 2020 | 887W / 748L / 152D | 721W / 900L / 142D | 90.0 |
| 2019 | 671W / 653L / 104D | 618W / 726L / 107D | 88.4 |
| 2018 | 506W / 513L / 87D | 472W / 567L / 63D | 84.6 |
| 2017 | 410W / 429L / 62D | 362W / 498L / 62D | 83.6 |
| 2016 | 537W / 533L / 69D | 472W / 578L / 56D | 81.4 |
| 2015 | 188W / 190L / 20D | 140W / 223L / 15D | 75.1 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 236 | 120 | 99 | 17 | 50.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 198 | 98 | 89 | 11 | 49.5% |
| Ruy Lopez: Closed | 161 | 73 | 77 | 11 | 45.3% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 155 | 71 | 76 | 8 | 45.8% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 147 | 62 | 69 | 16 | 42.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 141 | 68 | 67 | 6 | 48.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 137 | 56 | 74 | 7 | 40.9% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 135 | 75 | 49 | 11 | 55.6% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 125 | 63 | 52 | 10 | 50.4% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 123 | 57 | 51 | 15 | 46.3% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 285 | 152 | 122 | 11 | 53.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 268 | 120 | 136 | 12 | 44.8% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 258 | 138 | 102 | 18 | 53.5% |
| Sicilian Defense | 251 | 135 | 102 | 14 | 53.8% |
| Modern | 235 | 109 | 111 | 15 | 46.4% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 225 | 100 | 117 | 8 | 44.4% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 215 | 121 | 81 | 13 | 56.3% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 212 | 105 | 98 | 9 | 49.5% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 205 | 96 | 104 | 5 | 46.8% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 201 | 111 | 79 | 11 | 55.2% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ruy Lopez: Closed | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 80.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| French Defense: MacCutcheon Variation | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 60.0% |
| Modern | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Giuoco Piano: Tarrasch Variation | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Boleslavsky Variation | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0.0% |
| French Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Elephant Gambit | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Closed | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Evans Gambit Accepted, 5.c3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Czech Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD: Ragozin, Vienna, 6.e4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Brix Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 32 | 0 |
| Losing | 17 | 1 |