Dmitry Andreikin: Grandmaster Extraordinaire
Dmitry Andreikin is a chess Grandmaster who treats the 64 squares like his personal playground. With a sharp mind and a deep understanding of the game, Dmitry has reached peak blitz ratings north of 3200, proving that speed and precision can coexist in the hands of a true master.
Known online as FairChess_on_YouTube, Dmitry combines a tactical frenzy with strategic depth; his games often feel like a thrilling detective novel, complete with unexpected twists and brilliant checkmates. Whether it’s blitz, bullet, or rapid, Dmitry consistently showcases a winning record, boasting over 4600 blitz wins and maintaining a bullet peak rating of 3310.
His opening repertoire is as versatile as it is deadly. From cracking the Sicilian Defense Nyezhmetdinov Rossolimo Attack with almost 90% success, to employing "Top Secret" moves that keep opponents guessing, Dmitry’s playstyle keeps everyone on their toes. His preferred times to play include the magic hour of 9 PM, when apparently even the chess gods are on his side.
Dmitry's psychological resilience is legendary – with a comeback rate of nearly 89%, he is the embodiment of “never give up.” His longest winning streak? A staggering 30 games, which by chess standards is basically superhero territory.
Recent Triumph
In a recent encounter against Chesstrix0, Dmitry demonstrated his prowess by delivering a picturesque checkmate with a bishop promotion, sealing the game in style. A fitting finale for a player who can turn any position into a masterpiece.
Fun Fact
Despite being a Grandmaster, Dmitry is not immune to the occasional hiccup—his longest losing streak clocks in at 9 games. But hey, even legends have their “off days.” Just don’t bet against him on blitz!
Recent Blitz Play: Focused Takeaways
Your recent blitz activity shows you are comfortable playing dynamic, tactical games and you can press for winning chances even in tight moments. The stronger you become at recognizing when to push and when to consolidate, the more consistent your results will be under time pressure.
- Strengths to lean on: active piece play, willingness to complicate when the position invites it, and the ability to convert pressure into tangible gains in the middlegame.
- Core improvement area: guard against over-ambitious routes that invite quick counterplay when the clock is tight. In blitz, simple, clear plans often beat speculative ideas.
- Endgame awareness: blitz endgames tend to decide many games. Strengthen rook endings and pawn endgames so you can convert favorable positions more reliably.
Openings: Practical Direction for Blitz
Your openings show strong results in several lines, especially when you reach comfortable middlegames with clear plans. A compact, confident repertoire will help you keep time and reduce risky decisions in blitz.
- Black options to anchor your repertoire: the Döry Defense and the Caro-Kann Defense both yield solid, structured positions where you can navigate to familiar middlegame plans. Döry Defense | Caro-Kann Defense
- Dynamic yet manageable White options: the Diemer-Duhm Gambit and the Amazon Attack can yield sharp chances if you know the key tactical motifs, but consider pairing them with a straightforward alternative for when you want to avoid heavy theory. Diemer-Duhm Gambit | Amazon Attack
- Other lines worth a look with caution: Sicilian Closed and the Alapin Variation have solid results, but require solid memory of typical middlegame plans. Sicilian Defense: Closed | Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation
- Avoid overly long or highly splashy lines in blitz unless you’re very comfortable with the typical middlegame plans they lead to. The London System line in your data shows moderate results; you may prefer to reduce heavy reliance on that system in blitz. London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation
Tip: build a small, dependable opening set for White and a stable Black repertoire. Focus on lines that lead to clear plans rather than only tactical skirmishes. For quick reference, you can review these named lines as a starting point: Döry Defense | Diemer-Duhm Gambit | Caro-Kann Defense
Rating Trends: What It Means and How to Respond
The short-term numbers show a dip in the last few weeks, followed by a longer-term persistence on the upswing. In blitz, this pattern often points to gambits and sharp lines that work sometimes and backfire others under clock pressure. The longer view suggests you have the capacity to recover and improve, which is a strong sign you’re adapting and learning from recent games.
Actionable steps to stabilize and improve quickly:
- Implement a simple post-game review habit. For each blitz game, note one decision that felt risky and one safer alternative you could have chosen.
- Create a quick “blunder check” routine: after every critical moment, pause on the clock and verify a safe plan before continuing.
- Integrate a small, repeatable endgame drill into your routine (rook endings, then king-and-pawn endings) to improve conversion in later stages of games.
- Time management focus: train with a routine of short, strict time targets per phase (opening phase, middle game, and endgame) to reduce flagging risk.
Two-Week Practice Plan to Accelerate Results
Use this practical schedule to build consistency without overloading your study time. Adjust the days to fit your calendar, but try to hit the core activities at least 3 times per week.
- Week 1
- Blitz practice: 2 sessions focusing on quick decision making (3+0 or 2+1 time controls). Emphasize staying calm and sticking to a simple plan in the first 15 moves.
- Tactics: 20 minutes daily of pattern-driven puzzles (forks, pins, skewers, discovered attacks) to raise pattern recognition speed.
- Openings: study 2 lines from your core repertoire in each color. Understand the typical middlegame plans that arise from those lines.
- Endgames: 15 minutes of rook endings and king-pawn endings with practical technique notes.
- Week 2
- Blitz practice: 2 sessions with a deliberate plan to reach clear middle-game positions within the first 15 moves.
- Time management drill: simulate 1-2 games with two-minute practices, focusing on reading ahead and avoiding forced lines under pressure.
- Review: analyze 2 recent blitz games with emphasis on whether you chose the right plan for the opening and whether you converted the endgame cleanly.
- Openings: expand your core lines to 1-2 additional variations that you’re comfortable with, ensuring you know the typical responses and their ideas.
Quick practice reminders: stay within your planned plan, avoid overcomplicating positions when time is short, and always look for a solid, straightforward plan before chasing a tactical sequence.
Practice Aids and Quick References
To keep your study focused, consider bookmarking these ideas in your notes or coach app. These placeholders point to commonly strong lines you can explore in your own time:
- Strong, reliable Black options: Döry Defense and Caro-Kann Defense
- Flexible White choices: Queen's Gambit Declined and English Opening
- Sharp, tactical lines with caution: Diemer-Duhm Gambit and Amazon Attack
- Avoided heavy lines in blitz where you’re still building comfort: London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Amin Tabatabaei | 5W / 10L / 8D | View |
| Andrey Esipenko | 16W / 7L / 4D | View |
| Andrey Drygalov | 13W / 1L / 5D | View |
| Maciej Klekowski | 5W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Anton Korobov | 2W / 2L / 0D | View |
| Kirill Klukin | 5W / 0L / 1D | View |
| Krikor Sevag Mekhitarian | 23W / 3L / 3D | View |
| Karina Ambartsumova | 6W / 0L / 1D | View |
| magste2007 | 2W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Maximiliano Rossi | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Alireza Firouzja | 95W / 114L / 32D | View Games |
| Tuan Minh Le | 79W / 63L / 35D | View Games |
| Daniel Naroditsky | 73W / 69L / 28D | View Games |
| Hikaru Nakamura | 37W / 85L / 46D | View Games |
| Vladimir Fedoseev | 87W / 53L / 23D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 3201 | 3204 | 2704 | |
| 2024 | 3033 | 3081 | 2739 | |
| 2023 | 3004 | 3122 | 2734 | |
| 2022 | 3021 | 3051 | 2716 | |
| 2021 | 3039 | 2951 | ||
| 2020 | 3183 | 3021 | 2740 | |
| 2019 | 3153 | 2999 | 2712 | |
| 2018 | 2964 | 2940 | 2708 | |
| 2017 | 2924 | 2739 | 2727 | |
| 2016 | 2979 | 2753 | ||
| 2015 | 2901 | 2712 | ||
| 2014 | 2874 | 2708 | ||
| 2013 | 2793 | 2507 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 711W / 244L / 126D | 619W / 285L / 157D | 88.0 |
| 2024 | 592W / 147L / 118D | 525W / 166L / 140D | 86.6 |
| 2023 | 682W / 180L / 154D | 601W / 247L / 153D | 82.6 |
| 2022 | 445W / 100L / 130D | 373W / 134L / 126D | 89.9 |
| 2021 | 261W / 77L / 58D | 231W / 83L / 68D | 86.4 |
| 2020 | 228W / 74L / 62D | 200W / 93L / 71D | 86.0 |
| 2019 | 187W / 138L / 39D | 170W / 134L / 58D | 82.8 |
| 2018 | 181W / 80L / 40D | 166W / 93L / 45D | 84.9 |
| 2017 | 40W / 21L / 9D | 34W / 20L / 11D | 87.9 |
| 2016 | 62W / 8L / 13D | 44W / 23L / 16D | 91.8 |
| 2015 | 29W / 3L / 5D | 22W / 9L / 7D | 82.7 |
| 2014 | 37W / 14L / 8D | 34W / 15L / 7D | 85.3 |
| 2013 | 44W / 5L / 1D | 48W / 2L / 2D | 69.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 253 | 164 | 51 | 38 | 64.8% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 249 | 155 | 60 | 34 | 62.2% |
| Döry Defense | 204 | 147 | 25 | 32 | 72.1% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 202 | 134 | 26 | 42 | 66.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 198 | 130 | 42 | 26 | 65.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 191 | 106 | 49 | 36 | 55.5% |
| Modern | 149 | 98 | 34 | 17 | 65.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 148 | 101 | 27 | 20 | 68.2% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 145 | 86 | 32 | 27 | 59.3% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 144 | 75 | 30 | 39 | 52.1% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 101 | 63 | 27 | 11 | 62.4% |
| Amar Gambit | 80 | 54 | 19 | 7 | 67.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 69 | 40 | 22 | 7 | 58.0% |
| Döry Defense | 67 | 40 | 19 | 8 | 59.7% |
| Australian Defense | 64 | 38 | 23 | 3 | 59.4% |
| Modern | 51 | 29 | 19 | 3 | 56.9% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 50 | 24 | 21 | 5 | 48.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 49 | 22 | 22 | 5 | 44.9% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 46 | 29 | 12 | 5 | 63.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 41 | 23 | 16 | 2 | 56.1% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 23 | 11 | 4 | 8 | 47.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 19 | 5 | 5 | 9 | 26.3% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 17 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 41.2% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 15 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 66.7% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 14 | 3 | 1 | 10 | 21.4% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 13 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 38.5% |
| Bogo-Indian Defense | 13 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 53.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation | 12 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| QGD: 4.Nf3 | 12 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 33.3% |
| Gruenfeld: Exchange Variation | 11 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 63.6% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 30 | 0 |
| Losing | 9 | 1 |