What’s going well
You’re showing solid momentum in the shorter term. The 1‑month, 3‑month, and 6‑month rating changes indicate you’re in a good groove and converting a healthy share of your opportunities in blitz.
Your opening choices reflect a dynamic, aggressive style that suits blitz—especially in sharp lines where you can press for activity and create practical problems for your opponents. The data on your openings suggests you perform well when you choose flexible, tactical paths and when you have a plan that keeps the game in dynamic, tactical waters.
Your repertoire shows you’re comfortable with a mix of solid and sharp lines, which helps you handle a wide range of opponents in blitz where surprise and tempo matter.
Key improvement areas
- Longer-term consistency: The 12‑month trend is downward, which suggests you may drift or face more challenges over a longer horizon. Pair the current sharp play with steadier fundamentals to stabilize results across bigger sample sizes.
- Balanced handling of tougher openings: Some lines that recur in blitz (for example, certain Queen’s Gambit structures and Caro‑Kann variations) show room for improvement. Strengthening responses to these setups will help you convert more of your momentum into points when opponents steer into less familiar territory.
- Endgame and positional transitions: In blitz, prices of small inaccuracies accumulate quickly. Sharpening endgame technique and common transition plans from opening to middle game will help keep your advantage or salvage draws when the position tightens.
Opening and repertoire notes
You’re strongest in aggressive, tactical lines (for example, Amar Gambit showcases a high win rate in your openings data). This suggests you thrive when you can seize initiative and dictate the tempo early.
Solid foundations in English Opening and other flexible setups indicate you can switch tempo and structure when needed, which is ideal for blitz. You also show good results in less-traveled or “unknown” lines, which can be an advantage when opponents are surprised by your choices.
Actionable ideas:
- Lean into your sharp lines (like Amar Gambit) but prepare a crisp, trusted follow-up plan for Black’s main defenses. Know two or three reliable replies to each top defense you expect to see.
- Maintain a solid plan against typical tough openings (such as certain Queen’s Gambit and Caro‑Kann setups) by studying common middlegame themes and standard endings that arise from those structures.
- Keep your flexible repertoire (English, London–style ideas) as a reliable base for when you want to avoid heavy theoretical battles and rely on practical calculation.
Training plan for blitz
- Weekly focus: pick one opening family to improve against and build a simple, repeatable plan for the first 15 moves. Aim for 2 targeted study sessions per week (30–40 minutes each).
- Daily micro-practice: 10–15 minutes of tactical puzzles plus 2 blitz-controlled games with a specific constraint (e.g., seek a clean tactical finish or a concrete endgame conversion).
- Post-game review: after each blitz session, identify one or two recurring mistakes (time pressure, overextension, or missed defensive resource) and track progress on those points in subsequent games.
- Endgame focus: dedicate a small block each week to common blitz endgames (rook endings, king-and-pawn endings, and simplified knight vs bishop endings) to improve conversion and drawing chances under time pressure.
Practical quick wins for the next session
- Time management rule: aim to have at least a couple of minutes remaining by move 25 in blitz. If you’re under time pressure, switch to a calmer plan and simplify to a safe line you know well.
- Before each move, run a quick three-question checklist: (1) Is my king safe? (2) What is my opponent threatening? (3) What is my plan and the forcing idea I can steer toward?
- Prepare a small two‑line response bank for your top defenses. Knowing two solid replies for common Black setups reduces decision fatigue in the moment.
- Use the first 6–8 moves to set up a clear plan (initiative, piece activity, or a concrete pawn structure) and resist chasing a speculative tactical sequence if it risks a lasting positional concession.