FM Jose Antonio Herrera Reyes
Known in the chess world as FMJoseHerrera, Jose Antonio Herrera Reyes is a FIDE Master who dances across the 64 squares with a clever mix of composure, tactical flair, and a pinch of unpredictability. A player who has honed their blitz skills to near perfection, Jose's peak blitz rating hit an impressive 2809 in March 2024 — a number that might make even the chess engines stop and blink.
With over 11,000 blitz games under their belt, Jose Antonio has battled foes ranging from casual enthusiasts to serious rivals like titan013 and gmjoey1, boasting a nearly 48% win rate in this lightning-fast format. Armed with a pragmatic approach, Jose tends to average around 77 moves per win, showing a patient and methodical style, even when playing at breakneck speed.
Their favorite openings remain carefully guarded secrets, but you can catch a sly hint of Jose's preference for strategic flexibility when they recently triumphed with a Reti Opening – Sicilian Invitation. This crafty setup perfectly mirrors Jose’s ability to combine solid positional play with crafty tactical strikes. Just ask their opponents, who occasionally find themselves bewildered as the game slips away — often by resignation in Jose's favor.
Jose isn’t just a blitz wizard; their bullet peak clocks in at a fiery 2640, and rapid is nothing to sneeze at either at 2482. Though daily chess isn't their go-to battleground (with just a single rated game), their overall win-loss record speaks volumes about their dedication and knack for quick adjustments — boasting an 85% comeback rate and staying cool under pressure, even after losing a piece.
When not dazzling on digital boards, Jose's psychological resilience shines through a low tilt factor of 14 (translation: they rarely throw the board in frustration) and a secret magic hour to play: the wee hours around 4 AM — the perfect time to outwit the competition when everyone else is asleep.
Jose’s longest winning streak of 24 games suggests they know how to ride a hot streak like a grandmaster surfer riding the wave — but also an honest losing streak of 14 games reminds everyone even the best occasionally fall prey to the cruel whims of chess fate.
In essence, Jose Antonio Herrera Reyes is the kind of player who combines grit, grace, and guile… a true chess explorer who proves you don't need to be a Grandmaster to press fear into the hearts of your opponents. Just don’t be caught napping when FMJoseHerrera is around — on any day of the week, at any hour of the day or night.
Overview and Focus
You have shown moments of bold, practical play in blitz, especially when you open lines for an active attack. Your openings performance indicates comfort in sharp, unbalanced positions, which is a strong asset in blitz where imbalances can create practical winning chances. However, the data also shows variations in longer-term results and some recent short-term setbacks. The goal is to turn that aggressive style into consistent, winning Blitz outcomes by sharpening planning, managing time under pressure, and tightening transitions from opening into a clear middlegame plan.
What Went Well in Recent Games
- You seized initiative early and kept pressure on the opponent, especially in winning games where your pieces coordinated to create mating nets or decisive tactics.
- Your willingness to enter dynamic, double-edged positions in openings like the King’s Indian family and certain Benko structures often yielded practical chances and forced errors from opponents.
- You demonstrated resilience in complex middlegames, finding tactical resources that converted favorable imbalances into wins, which is a strong skill in blitz where time is tight.
Key Areas to Improve
- Time management and decision tempo in the early middlegame. Blitz rewards clear, purposeful choices; when you hesitate or drift into long calculations, the clock pressures your accuracy.
- Defensive discipline in sharp lines. Some losses stem from overextension or missed defensive resources after launching an attack; balance aggression with solid consolidations.
- Endgame technique in slightly better positions. When you simplify with the advantage, ensure you convert with precise technique rather than relying on tactical ambushes alone.
- Opening-to-middlegame planning. While your openings are aggressive, practice a two to three-mly plan for typical middlegame structures so you transition from opening to plan more smoothly and avoid ad-hoc moves.
Openings and Repertoire Guidance
Your openings performance suggests strength in flexible, tactical lines such as the King’s Indian Attack and related dynamic structures, as well as aggressive setups in the Benko and related Sicilian branches. Consider stabilizing a compact core repertoire around 1) a reliable King’s Indian Attack approach for White to practice a consistent middlegame plan, 2) a solid, well-understood alternative for non-KIA games to avoid being boxed into too many tactical skirmishes, and 3) a few Benko or Kan-type ideas for surprise value when you want to push the opponent into less familiar territory.
- Practice a concrete 1-2 move order for the King’s Indian Attack that leads to a clear middlegame plan (e.g., typical pawn structure, key piece placements, and target squares). This helps reduce guesswork under time pressure.
- Combine study of a few Benko and Kan variations with straight-line play in standard replies, so you can switch to a solid plan when an opponent challenges your main lines.
- Review 2-3 critical positions from recent blitz games to identify recurring missteps (time pressure, over-ambitious tactical shots, or missed defensive resources) and build corrective templates.
Actionable Training Plan (2 weeks)
- Daily: 15-20 minutes of tactical training focused on pattern recognition (pins, forks, skewers, back-rank motifs) to improve accuracy in blitz.
- 3 times this week: 1 focused opening/middlegame review session (30 minutes) on your King’s Indian Attack and a Benko/Kan line to reinforce the transition to middlegame plans.
- After each blitz session: spend 5-10 minutes reviewing at least 2 critical decisions (one where you chose an aggressive line, one where you opted for a safer consolidation). Note at least 1 alternative that could have been stronger.
- Time management drill: practice playing with a simple time check—if you spend more than a certain amount on a candidate move in the first 10 moves, force yourself to select a best-available alternative and continue.
Quick Access to a Recent Win
Review a recent win to reinforce positive patterns:
Notes on Your Recent Rating Trends
The short-term data shows a small month-to-month fluctuation with a recent decline in one-month change, while the longer-term trend lines suggest mixed progress. Focus on stabilizing your day-to-day performance by reinforcing a dependable opening-to-m middlegame plan and reducing unforced errors. A consistent routine and focused post-game review will help align the short-term results with the longer-term potential you’ve demonstrated in earlier periods.
Personal Reference
For a quick glance at a recent game, you can review your games via the profile entry: joseantonioherrerareyes
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Delusional_Knight | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| emelian1 | 6W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Namig Guliyev | 25W / 45L / 5D | View Games |
| Rogelio Jr Antonio | 19W / 39L / 3D | View Games |
| Alejandro Alvarado Diaz | 19W / 39L / 2D | View Games |
| Kevin Bordi | 23W / 32L / 3D | View Games |
| Jason Morefield | 32W / 22L / 2D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2707 | 2164 | ||
| 2024 | 2735 | |||
| 2023 | 2732 | |||
| 2022 | 2709 | |||
| 2021 | 2607 | 2639 | 2164 | |
| 2020 | 2606 | 2623 | 2274 | |
| 2019 | 2545 | 2593 | 2062 | |
| 2018 | 2442 | 2501 | 1725 | |
| 2017 | 2435 | 2461 | ||
| 2014 | 2238 | 2210 | 1005 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 19W / 15L / 0D | 15W / 18L / 0D | 61.0 |
| 2024 | 40W / 28L / 2D | 26W / 41L / 5D | 80.8 |
| 2023 | 86W / 92L / 14D | 78W / 91L / 16D | 79.7 |
| 2022 | 56W / 42L / 11D | 39W / 64L / 8D | 82.5 |
| 2021 | 331W / 294L / 42D | 295W / 350L / 34D | 80.4 |
| 2020 | 481W / 520L / 64D | 473W / 530L / 43D | 78.8 |
| 2019 | 1000W / 925L / 102D | 974W / 994L / 83D | 76.6 |
| 2018 | 1225W / 1001L / 92D | 1166W / 1046L / 102D | 78.1 |
| 2017 | 212W / 242L / 34D | 215W / 253L / 20D | 81.8 |
| 2014 | 292W / 349L / 29D | 296W / 343L / 34D | 78.4 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| King's Indian Attack | 1561 | 752 | 730 | 79 | 48.2% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 1486 | 726 | 660 | 100 | 48.9% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 1166 | 556 | 548 | 62 | 47.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation | 498 | 249 | 231 | 18 | 50.0% |
| Benko Gambit | 440 | 206 | 214 | 20 | 46.8% |
| Amar Gambit | 432 | 214 | 209 | 9 | 49.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 418 | 204 | 194 | 20 | 48.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 394 | 178 | 199 | 17 | 45.2% |
| Benko Gambit Accepted: Central Storming Variation | 389 | 193 | 174 | 22 | 49.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation | 328 | 136 | 176 | 16 | 41.5% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 524 | 267 | 234 | 23 | 51.0% |
| King's Indian Attack | 461 | 216 | 229 | 16 | 46.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 444 | 193 | 233 | 18 | 43.5% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 440 | 199 | 218 | 23 | 45.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation | 187 | 94 | 81 | 12 | 50.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 130 | 65 | 61 | 4 | 50.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 101 | 48 | 50 | 3 | 47.5% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 88 | 36 | 45 | 7 | 40.9% |
| Döry Defense | 85 | 44 | 37 | 4 | 51.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 83 | 41 | 37 | 5 | 49.4% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 28 | 12 | 12 | 4 | 42.9% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 14 | 5 | 9 | 0 | 35.7% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 12 | 2 | 9 | 1 | 16.7% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 77.8% |
| English Opening | 9 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 9 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 22.2% |
| King's Indian Attack | 8 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 24 | 0 |
| Losing | 14 | 1 |