Richard Russell (FMRRuss) - FIDE Master Extraordinaire
Richard Russell, better known in chess circles as FMRRuss, is a FIDE Master with a knack for turning the chessboard into a battlefield of wit, strategy, and unexpected comebacks. Over the years, Richard has dazzled opponents with a blitz rating peaking at an impressive 2448 and a rapid rating touching 2394. With centuries worth of moves behind him, his average game clocks in at a marathon 73 moves per win—because who said winning had to be quick and boring?
Whether playing blitz, bullet, rapid, or daily chess, Richard shows a remarkable resilience. His comeback rate is a staggering 90.94%, and he wins every single time after losing a piece—a magician’s flair on the 64 squares! Endgames are Richard’s playground, making up nearly 86% of his games, where his strategic finesse truly shines.
But don’t get him started on emotional rollercoasters; with a tilt factor of 10, Richard remains as calm as a well-defended king under siege. He’s also a versatile fighter, boasting over a 50% win rate whether wielding the white or black pieces. His favorite opening? Secret, of course—because if he told you, it wouldn’t be a secret anymore!
Across years and formats, Richard Russell has accumulated thousands of games, with more wins than losses (and draws sneaking in for good measure). His longest winning streak? A dizzying 19 victories in a row, reminding everyone that the phrase “streak of brilliance” was probably coined for him.
Off the board, Richard’s known for a sharp mind and a sense of humor as quick as his bullet games. Opponents beware: behind that calm facade is a player who might just sacrifice a pawn… or a little sanity… to checkmate you with style.
Hi Richard!
You have an enterprising style that has already taken you to a very respectable peak of 2448 (2021-01-19). Below is a focused review of your recent games, followed by an action-oriented training plan.
What you are doing well
- Dynamic openings. King’s Indian, Dutch and Sicilian set-ups suit your taste for double-edged play and lead to positions where you can out-calculate many opponents.
- Tactical alertness. Your recent win vs ronaldoabarcatorres featured the attractive sequence 37…Rah8 38.Qd1 Qh7 39.Bc2 hxg4 40.fxg4 Rxh3 (diagram after 40…Rxh3) that exploited every tempo on the h-file.
- Practical fighting spirit. You defend stubbornly when worse and often turn games around, especially in complications.
Patterns that keep costing you points
- Clock management. Five of your last seven losses (and your most recent one to apple_rom) were simply on time. Even several wins, such as the KID game above, ended with your clock under 5 s while still up material.
- Off-beat openings. Grob, Horwitz, early h-pawns—opponents lure you into using three tempi to “refute” them and you fall behind in development.
- Pawn over-extension. Repeated …f5/…g5 in the KID or early …c5 in Queen’s Gambit positions leave holes you must later cover in a rush.
- Technical conversion. Several won rook endings (e.g. vs Davinho123) slipped away when the cleanest plan was a simple pawn push instead of flashy checks.
4-week improvement plan
Week 1 – Time discipline
- Play 10 games with a 3 + 2 increment and force yourself to keep >30 s by move 25. Abort the game if you drop below—build the habit first.
Week 2 – Anti-system repertoire
- Create a one-page file with simple, low-maintenance set-ups versus Grob, Bird, London & 1…e6/…c5 Horwitz. Drill them in the opening explorer for 20 min each day.
Week 3 – Pawn-structure clinic
- Review 15 of your own games; whenever you advanced a wing pawn (…h5/…g5/…a5) mark the position and ask: “Could I achieve the same goal by improving a piece instead?” Aim to label at least five pushes as “unnecessary.”
Week 4 – Endgame conversion
- Daily 20-position set of basic rook endings (Lucena, Philidor, & side-pawn techniques). Solve them with a running clock: 60 s per study.
Progress tracking
Use the built-in insights tool and keep an eye on:
- – your performance late at night visibly dips after 30 games.
- – aim for ≥60 % on “training days” compared with “experiment days.”
Final thought
Your ability to create winning chances is already master-level; closing the deal on the clock and in the endgame is the fastest path to the next rating band. Stay disciplined, follow the weekly targets above, and I expect another peak soon. Good luck and enjoy the grind!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| sercan_bedel | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| radioriddles | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Ulysse Bottazzi | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Sabri Can Onay Yontar | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| dino_hajdarevic | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Godswill Ogodogu | 24W / 15L / 3D | View Games |
| Chesmon | 21W / 18L / 1D | View Games |
| Mark Kotliar | 18W / 13L / 3D | View Games |
| tarantajames | 21W / 11L / 2D | View Games |
| janis duinrgt | 18W / 9L / 3D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2300 | |||
| 2022 | 2271 | |||
| 2021 | 2198 | 2265 | ||
| 2020 | 2103 | 2433 | 2329 | |
| 2019 | 1608 | 2273 | ||
| 2018 | 2284 | |||
| 2017 | 2252 | |||
| 2016 | 1738 | 2209 | ||
| 2015 | 2006 | |||
| 2014 | 2143 | |||
| 2013 | 1771 | 2109 | 2285 | |
| 2012 | 1990 | 2139 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1W / 2L / 0D | 1W / 1L / 0D | 82.0 |
| 2022 | 0W / 0L / 0D | 1W / 1L / 0D | 73.5 |
| 2021 | 179W / 178L / 20D | 140W / 196L / 23D | 76.5 |
| 2020 | 320W / 167L / 27D | 282W / 184L / 28D | 76.5 |
| 2019 | 9W / 8L / 0D | 10W / 8L / 2D | 86.5 |
| 2018 | 178W / 117L / 16D | 154W / 143L / 13D | 80.0 |
| 2017 | 71W / 53L / 4D | 74W / 53L / 4D | 76.8 |
| 2016 | 328W / 239L / 29D | 307W / 266L / 27D | 75.8 |
| 2015 | 14W / 16L / 1D | 16W / 14L / 2D | 71.3 |
| 2014 | 9W / 11L / 0D | 13W / 5L / 0D | 80.6 |
| 2013 | 244W / 196L / 33D | 259W / 188L / 22D | 77.9 |
| 2012 | 231W / 169L / 28D | 241W / 153L / 30D | 79.4 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation | 302 | 182 | 108 | 12 | 60.3% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 217 | 111 | 95 | 11 | 51.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 160 | 68 | 78 | 14 | 42.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 150 | 80 | 60 | 10 | 53.3% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense | 149 | 81 | 67 | 1 | 54.4% |
| Australian Defense | 148 | 96 | 46 | 6 | 64.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 143 | 70 | 65 | 8 | 49.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Kazakh Variation | 135 | 77 | 52 | 6 | 57.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 132 | 75 | 50 | 7 | 56.8% |
| King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation | 126 | 69 | 50 | 7 | 54.8% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation | 39 | 24 | 15 | 0 | 61.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 26 | 14 | 11 | 1 | 53.9% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 23 | 15 | 6 | 2 | 65.2% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 22 | 15 | 5 | 2 | 68.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 20 | 8 | 12 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense | 20 | 16 | 3 | 1 | 80.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 18 | 12 | 6 | 0 | 66.7% |
| QGD: 2...Bf5 3.cxd5 | 17 | 10 | 6 | 1 | 58.8% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 17 | 9 | 6 | 2 | 52.9% |
| King's Indian Defense: Kazakh Variation | 15 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| East Indian Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Bobotsov-Korchnoi-Petrosian Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Petrosian Variation, Keres Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Benko Gambit Accepted: Central Storming Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Accelerated Averbakh Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Old Indian Defense: Duz-Khotimirsky Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Classical System | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| QGD: Exchange, 5.Bg5 c6 6.Qc2 g6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Modern Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 19 | 0 |
| Losing | 10 | 3 |