Ursus Van Bemmelen (FMUrsus) - FIDE Master
Meet Ursus Van Bemmelen, a chess virtuoso whose game is as fierce as their name suggests. Awarded the prestigious title of FIDE Master, Ursus has made quite the mark with a blitz rating soaring close to 2300, showcasing a lightning-fast mind that can both dazzle and devastate.
Ursus’s journey started humbly in 2017 with a modest blitz rating of 895, but with relentless determination and a knack for rapid tactical strikes, their rating skyrocketed to a peak of 2288 by 2022. If chess were a marathon, Ursus’s sprint is legendary—especially with a record of 56 consecutive wins. Yes, you read that right: fifty-six wins in a row. It’s no wonder opponents start questioning life choices mid-game.
Ursus’s style is a curious blend of patience and aggression. While their endgame frequency hovers around 77%, they prefer battles that stretch well beyond the opening gambits—think epic clashes averaging over 70 moves on wins. Opponents beware: early resignation is rare here with a rate of only 2.55%, so giving up before reaching the final piece feels like an insult to Ursus’s fighting spirit.
The rapid variant is another arena where FMUrsus shines, boasting an impressive 73.7% win rate and wielding strategic mastery that’s no laughing matter. Even after losing a piece, their win rate remains a mythical 100%, proving that giving Ursus an inch is a very, very bad idea.
Off the board, Ursus has a unique rhythm, hitting peak win rates early in the morning and late mornings (a reliable 60%+ win rate at 9 and 10 AM) — proving that the early bear catches the chessboard. Their tilt factor is surprisingly low (just 10), indicating a cool head even when the day's battle heats up.
Ursus’s opponents are a mix from local legends to fiery online warriors, with whom they’ve shared some legendary contests. Favorite rivals include bezzy_diamonds and vahidvahedi123. And yes, Ursus tends to leave a trail of 97%+ win ratios against many of them — talk about bear dominance.
In summary, FMUrsus is not just a master of the game, but a master of turning the tables with come-from-behind victories, a seasoned combatant of the 64 squares, and an ever-fearless competitor who’ll keep you on your toes. Challenge wise: play at your own risk!
Constructive feedback for Ursus Van Bemmelen
What you are already doing well
- Dynamic opening choices such as the Bird (1 f4) and Modern setups with …g6 lead to rich middlegames that suit your tactical strengths.
- You willingly sacrifice material for activity (e.g., 17…Bxb2 in the loss to alekhine1986)—a hallmark of creative play.
- Conversion skills in rook-and-pawn endings are solid, as seen in your win versus supercar where you nursed an extra passed pawn to victory.
- Your tactical alertness in cramped positions is excellent; you often find intermediate moves such as 22.Qxd5+ that immediately simplify into favourable endgames.
Key areas for improvement
-
Time management
Three of your last five losses were on time despite playable positions.
• Adopt a checkpoint system: spend ≤ 1 minute reaching move 15, ≤ 2 minutes by move 25, keep ≥ 40 seconds for the last 10 moves.
• Play “increment drills” (e.g., 3 | 2 games) to automate your late-game technique without heavy clock cost. -
Handling opposite-wing pawn storms
In the defeat against caoug you allowed h-pawn advances while yours stalled on the kingside. When pushing flanks, apply the rule of thumb from pawn majority theory: advance only if you can open files or fix targets. -
Improving end-game precision
The lost knight ending versus Alekhine1986 reached a drawn table-base position (♞+2 pawns vs ♘+1) but you drifted. Re-study knight vs pawn endpoints—especially the basic drawing zones. Suggested drill set: 10 daily puzzles from the KvP & N endings section of your favourite trainer. -
Transition plans from middlegame to ending
In wins you often exchange into better endings; in losses (e.g., 21…R8c7 in the same Alekhine game) you traded the wrong pair of rooks and gave White the open b-file. Habit: before each exchange ask, “Who benefits from the next endgame?” If unclear, keep tension. -
Central counterplay in Modern/Pirc structures
Several setbacks began with passive …d6/…e6 shells. Study thematic breaks …e5 and …c5 in the Modern and how GMs like Rapport or Ding handle early space deficits.
Action plan for the next two weeks
| Day | Exercise | Goal |
|---|---|---|
| Mon / Thu | 30-min end-game drills (Knight vs Pawn & Rook endings) | Raise practical drawing skills |
| Tue / Fri | Review 5 blitz games focusing only on exchange decisions | Sharper transition sense |
| Sat | Play 10 bullet games with 5-second time odds against you | Clock discipline under pressure |
| Sun | Annotate one of your own defeats and compare with engine | Self-diagnosis habit |
Highlights & study references
• Re-play your clean technical finish versus fbatde:
Notice how 24.d6! fixed a passer and simplified. Try to replicate this clarity in tougher games.• Compare that with the tense but losing line in the Modern (loss to CAOUG) and note where the pawn breaks differed.
Progress tracking
Current personal bests: 2288 (2022-04-10) / 2265 (2020-04-19) Keep an eye on your performance graphs:
and to spot patterns (e.g., lower win-rate after midnight sessions).Encouragement
You already play at an FM level—tightening clock usage and refining a few endings could easily net 30-40 Elo. Stay curious, keep that fighting spirit, and remember: the best game you’ll ever play is the one you fully analyse afterwards.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| bezzy_diamonds | 41W / 1L / 0D | View Games |
| vahidvahedi123 | 18W / 12L / 3D | View Games |
| farfromperfect | 16W / 12L / 3D | View Games |
| Mr. Smith | 13W / 9L / 0D | View Games |
| quimiorreflexo | 6W / 3L / 2D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2278 | |||
| 2021 | 1579 | 2229 | ||
| 2020 | 2215 | 1955 | ||
| 2018 | 2041 | |||
| 2017 | 1801 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 372W / 269L / 46D | 345W / 284L / 39D | 73.3 |
| 2021 | 635W / 530L / 99D | 560W / 623L / 90D | 72.0 |
| 2020 | 187W / 167L / 22D | 177W / 186L / 24D | 73.8 |
| 2018 | 38W / 28L / 2D | 36W / 30L / 2D | 77.7 |
| 2017 | 12W / 2L / 1D | 13W / 1L / 0D | 61.6 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern | 372 | 168 | 183 | 21 | 45.2% |
| Australian Defense | 331 | 162 | 149 | 20 | 48.9% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 322 | 139 | 157 | 26 | 43.2% |
| Amar Gambit | 208 | 116 | 83 | 9 | 55.8% |
| Döry Defense | 177 | 87 | 73 | 17 | 49.1% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 149 | 76 | 66 | 7 | 51.0% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 138 | 68 | 60 | 10 | 49.3% |
| Barnes Defense | 137 | 61 | 65 | 11 | 44.5% |
| Modern Defense | 107 | 61 | 41 | 5 | 57.0% |
| King's Indian Attack: French Variation | 100 | 53 | 41 | 6 | 53.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philidor Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Modern | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD: 2...Bf5 3.cxd5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Mecking Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 56 | 1 |
| Losing | 10 | 0 |