Ursus Van Bemmelen (FMUrsus) - FIDE Master
Meet Ursus Van Bemmelen, a chess virtuoso whose game is as fierce as their name suggests. Awarded the prestigious title of FIDE Master, Ursus has made quite the mark with a blitz rating soaring close to 2300, showcasing a lightning-fast mind that can both dazzle and devastate.
Ursus’s journey started humbly in 2017 with a modest blitz rating of 895, but with relentless determination and a knack for rapid tactical strikes, their rating skyrocketed to a peak of 2288 by 2022. If chess were a marathon, Ursus’s sprint is legendary—especially with a record of 56 consecutive wins. Yes, you read that right: fifty-six wins in a row. It’s no wonder opponents start questioning life choices mid-game.
Ursus’s style is a curious blend of patience and aggression. While their endgame frequency hovers around 77%, they prefer battles that stretch well beyond the opening gambits—think epic clashes averaging over 70 moves on wins. Opponents beware: early resignation is rare here with a rate of only 2.55%, so giving up before reaching the final piece feels like an insult to Ursus’s fighting spirit.
The rapid variant is another arena where FMUrsus shines, boasting an impressive 73.7% win rate and wielding strategic mastery that’s no laughing matter. Even after losing a piece, their win rate remains a mythical 100%, proving that giving Ursus an inch is a very, very bad idea.
Off the board, Ursus has a unique rhythm, hitting peak win rates early in the morning and late mornings (a reliable 60%+ win rate at 9 and 10 AM) — proving that the early bear catches the chessboard. Their tilt factor is surprisingly low (just 10), indicating a cool head even when the day's battle heats up.
Ursus’s opponents are a mix from local legends to fiery online warriors, with whom they’ve shared some legendary contests. Favorite rivals include bezzy_diamonds and vahidvahedi123. And yes, Ursus tends to leave a trail of 97%+ win ratios against many of them — talk about bear dominance.
In summary, FMUrsus is not just a master of the game, but a master of turning the tables with come-from-behind victories, a seasoned combatant of the 64 squares, and an ever-fearless competitor who’ll keep you on your toes. Challenge wise: play at your own risk!
Constructive feedback for Ursus Van Bemmelen
What you are already doing well
- Dynamic opening choices such as the Bird (1 f4) and Modern setups with …g6 lead to rich middlegames that suit your tactical strengths.
- You willingly sacrifice material for activity (e.g., 17…Bxb2 in the loss to alekhine1986)—a hallmark of creative play.
- Conversion skills in rook-and-pawn endings are solid, as seen in your win versus supercar where you nursed an extra passed pawn to victory.
- Your tactical alertness in cramped positions is excellent; you often find intermediate moves such as 22.Qxd5+ that immediately simplify into favourable endgames.
Key areas for improvement
-
Time management
Three of your last five losses were on time despite playable positions.
• Adopt a checkpoint system: spend ≤ 1 minute reaching move 15, ≤ 2 minutes by move 25, keep ≥ 40 seconds for the last 10 moves.
• Play “increment drills” (e.g., 3 | 2 games) to automate your late-game technique without heavy clock cost. -
Handling opposite-wing pawn storms
In the defeat against caoug you allowed h-pawn advances while yours stalled on the kingside. When pushing flanks, apply the rule of thumb from pawn majority theory: advance only if you can open files or fix targets. -
Improving end-game precision
The lost knight ending versus Alekhine1986 reached a drawn table-base position (♞+2 pawns vs ♘+1) but you drifted. Re-study knight vs pawn endpoints—especially the basic drawing zones. Suggested drill set: 10 daily puzzles from the KvP & N endings section of your favourite trainer. -
Transition plans from middlegame to ending
In wins you often exchange into better endings; in losses (e.g., 21…R8c7 in the same Alekhine game) you traded the wrong pair of rooks and gave White the open b-file. Habit: before each exchange ask, “Who benefits from the next endgame?” If unclear, keep tension. -
Central counterplay in Modern/Pirc structures
Several setbacks began with passive …d6/…e6 shells. Study thematic breaks …e5 and …c5 in the Modern and how GMs like Rapport or Ding handle early space deficits.
Action plan for the next two weeks
| Day | Exercise | Goal |
|---|---|---|
| Mon / Thu | 30-min end-game drills (Knight vs Pawn & Rook endings) | Raise practical drawing skills |
| Tue / Fri | Review 5 blitz games focusing only on exchange decisions | Sharper transition sense |
| Sat | Play 10 bullet games with 5-second time odds against you | Clock discipline under pressure |
| Sun | Annotate one of your own defeats and compare with engine | Self-diagnosis habit |
Highlights & study references
• Re-play your clean technical finish versus fbatde:
• Compare that with the tense but losing line in the Modern (loss to CAOUG) and note where the pawn breaks differed.
Progress tracking
Current personal bests: 2288 (2022-04-10) / 2265 (2020-04-19) Keep an eye on your performance graphs:
and to spot patterns (e.g., lower win-rate after midnight sessions).Encouragement
You already play at an FM level—tightening clock usage and refining a few endings could easily net 30-40 Elo. Stay curious, keep that fighting spirit, and remember: the best game you’ll ever play is the one you fully analyse afterwards.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| bezzy_diamonds | 41W / 1L / 0D | |
| vahidvahedi123 | 18W / 12L / 3D | |
| farfromperfect | 16W / 12L / 3D | |
| Mr. Smith | 13W / 9L / 0D | |
| quimiorreflexo | 6W / 3L / 2D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2278 | |||
| 2021 | 1579 | 2229 | ||
| 2020 | 2215 | 1955 | ||
| 2018 | 2041 | |||
| 2017 | 1801 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 372W / 269L / 46D | 345W / 284L / 39D | 73.3 |
| 2021 | 635W / 530L / 99D | 560W / 623L / 90D | 72.0 |
| 2020 | 187W / 167L / 22D | 177W / 186L / 24D | 73.8 |
| 2018 | 38W / 28L / 2D | 36W / 30L / 2D | 77.7 |
| 2017 | 12W / 2L / 1D | 13W / 1L / 0D | 61.6 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern | 372 | 168 | 183 | 21 | 45.2% |
| Australian Defense | 331 | 162 | 149 | 20 | 48.9% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 322 | 139 | 157 | 26 | 43.2% |
| Amar Gambit | 208 | 116 | 83 | 9 | 55.8% |
| Döry Defense | 177 | 87 | 73 | 17 | 49.1% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 149 | 76 | 66 | 7 | 51.0% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 138 | 68 | 60 | 10 | 49.3% |
| Barnes Defense | 137 | 61 | 65 | 11 | 44.5% |
| Modern Defense | 107 | 61 | 41 | 5 | 57.0% |
| King's Indian Attack: French Variation | 100 | 53 | 41 | 6 | 53.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philidor Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Modern | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD: 2...Bf5 3.cxd5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Mecking Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 56 | 1 |
| Losing | 10 | 0 |