Pavel Kiselev – The FIDE Master with a Tactical Twist
Pavel Kiselev, known in the chess circles as Fore_Man, is a distinguished FIDE Master whose strategic prowess and resilient spirit have made him a formidable opponent on the 64 squares. Pavel's journey through the ranks reflects not just skill, but an impressive blend of endurance and wit – perfect for the modern chess warrior.
Rating & Style
Since bursting onto the scene in 2017 with a Bullet rating just shy of 2000, Pavel quickly climbed to a Blitz peak of 2409 in 2023. His Rapid and Daily ratings show a consistent and steady approach, emphasizing solid play and thoughtful tactics.
Behind the numbers, Pavel is the master of comebacks, boasting an incredible 85.5% comeback rate and a perfect 100% win rate after losing a piece – clearly never one to give up, even when the chips are down. His average game length hovers around 72 moves, proving that Pavel is in it for the long haul, whether he's grinding to a win or battling through a loss.
Playing Habits and Quirks
Fun fact: Pavel likes to mix up his playing times, performing best in the early morning hours (6 AM to 8 AM), where his win rate spikes above 57%, and even shows impressive stamina on Sundays with a win rate over 54%.
His psychological tilt factor is a manageable 11 – so while he might get a little ruffled when things go south, he bounces back quickly, embodying true sportsmanship.
On the Opponent Front
Pavel’s most played opponent is iron_marc, with twelve intense clashes that have both tested and sharpened his skills. While his overall win rate hovers around a pragmatic 40-45% depending on the color, he’s known to unleash surprise victories against some high-profile usernames – including a flawless 100% win record against the elusive 0ne_m0ve and a host of other challengers.
Notable Achievements
- Longest winning streak: 10 games – because sometimes, even chess gods like a hot streak.
- A rapid adaptator with a strong endgame frequency of nearly 76%, proving that Pavel really shines when the match drags on.
- His razor-sharp tactical awareness ensures he rarely resigns early, with only a 2.44% early resignation rate. This guy fights till the last pawn falls.
In summary, Pavel Kiselev is not just a FIDE Master on paper but an inspiring competitor who blends tactical brilliance with a never-say-die attitude. Whether it’s blitz, bullet, or rapid, Pavel’s games are a chess fan’s delight – where every challenge is met with grit and a subtle dash of humor (because even grandmasters need to smile).
Hi Pavel, here is your personalised training report
Your general trend
Blitz peak: 2409 (2023-12-19) • Rapid peak: 2254 (2021-11-09)
Quick summary
- Opening repertoire: As White you favour 1.d4 systems (QGD with Bf4, Slav Exchange) and occasional 1.Nf3 → King’s Indian Attack. As Black you rely on the Petroff (C42) and modern set-ups against 1.d4 (Grünfeld / Benoni / KID).
- Typical strengths: rapid piece activity, willingness to calculate concrete tactics (e.g. the …Bxh3 sacrifice in your latest Petroff win), and good conversion technique in simplified endgames when ahead.
- Main leaks: king safety in dynamic defences (Alekhine, Benoni, KID); over-optimistic pawn thrusts that leave holes; and recurring time-pressure (two of the five recent losses were caused or amplified by clock trouble).
Detailed feedback
1. Opening phase
Petroff success – You already know the typical …Qh5–…Bxh3 idea after h3/Nc3. Keep it, but add the quieter 6…Bd6/6…Be7 lines to avoid becoming too predictable.
Against 1.d4 – Your mixed choice (Benoni, Grünfeld, KID) suggests you like dynamic play, yet many of your defeats arise here. Consider building one solid alternative (e.g. the Queen’s Gambit Declined) so you can vary between “stable” and “sharp” moods.
Alekhine Defence disaster – In the 60-second loss you allowed the well-known 14.Ng5/15.Nh7 motif. Memorise the antidote: after 12…Nc6, prefer 12…f5 or 12…Qe8 to keep h7 protected.
2. Middlegame decisions
- When you have the initiative you calculate well, but when defending you often react one move late. Add a “last-move safety check” to your routine: ask “what changed?” before pressing the clock.
- The pawn storm …g5/…h5 in several KID/Benoni games left dark-squared weaknesses. Try playing practice games where you ban yourself from pushing flank pawns before move 15 unless it gains material. This will develop patience.
3. Endgame & conversion
Your rook endings are generally sound, but you lost one totally drawn R + P vs R + P by running out of time. The position was technically equal; the only enemy was the clock. Drill a few 5-minute “rook-and-pawn only” sparring games to automate technique and save time later.
4. Clock management
Blitz is unforgiving. Aim to keep at least 40 % of your initial time by move 20. Concrete tip: if the opponent is thinking, physically move your eyes away from the board and do a quick scan of your half for loose pieces/weak back rank – productive thinking that doesn’t burn clock later.
Action plan for the next 2 weeks
- Study 3 annotated Petroff wins by strong GMs focusing on quiet positional lines.
- Solve 20 defensive puzzles (rating 2400–2600) filtering for “king attack vs you”.
- Play 10 rapid games (15 + 10) switching to the classical QGD as Black – annotate them to identify strategic misunderstandings.
- Every session finish with a 5-minute rook-and-pawn endgame drill vs engine on depth-limited mode.
Motivational snapshot
Your last five decisive games were +3 =0 -2. Clean up the defensive errors and that turns into +5! Small tweaks – big rating gains.
Keep me posted
When you feel the new openings or time routine settle in, send me 3 fresh games and we’ll refine the plan. Good luck, Pavel!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| iron_marc | 6W / 5L / 1D | View Games |
| hitman07 | 6W / 3L / 0D | View Games |
| apz011 | 6W / 2L / 0D | View Games |
| Maria Larina | 4W / 4L / 0D | View Games |
| noam_vitenberg | 4W / 1L / 3D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2223 | 2332 | 2053 | |
| 2023 | 2178 | 2372 | 2053 | 2000 |
| 2022 | 2305 | 2147 | ||
| 2021 | 2034 | 2360 | 2195 | |
| 2020 | 2287 | |||
| 2019 | 2096 | 2289 | ||
| 2018 | 1848 | 2178 | ||
| 2017 | 1933 | 2185 | 1800 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 136W / 191L / 15D | 118W / 198L / 22D | 76.9 |
| 2023 | 99W / 144L / 7D | 77W / 161L / 11D | 80.8 |
| 2022 | 1W / 2L / 0D | 1W / 2L / 0D | 51.5 |
| 2021 | 8W / 9L / 3D | 8W / 13L / 1D | 77.1 |
| 2020 | 2W / 1L / 0D | 3W / 1L / 0D | 81.6 |
| 2019 | 10W / 11L / 1D | 15W / 6L / 2D | 77.7 |
| 2018 | 101W / 71L / 10D | 96W / 81L / 5D | 65.6 |
| 2017 | 74W / 41L / 7D | 60W / 53L / 8D | 70.6 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 54 | 18 | 33 | 3 | 33.3% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 44 | 16 | 28 | 0 | 36.4% |
| King's Indian Attack | 41 | 16 | 23 | 2 | 39.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 22 | 8 | 14 | 0 | 36.4% |
| Alekhine Defense | 20 | 5 | 14 | 1 | 25.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 12 | 2 | 9 | 1 | 16.7% |
| Czech Defense | 11 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 36.4% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 60.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 60.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 8 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 0.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 44 | 16 | 27 | 1 | 36.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 40 | 13 | 24 | 3 | 32.5% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 36 | 16 | 18 | 2 | 44.4% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 35 | 14 | 20 | 1 | 40.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 34 | 16 | 15 | 3 | 47.1% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 30 | 14 | 15 | 1 | 46.7% |
| French Defense | 30 | 13 | 14 | 3 | 43.3% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 30 | 16 | 11 | 3 | 53.3% |
| Petrov's Defense | 29 | 19 | 9 | 1 | 65.5% |
| QGD: 4.Nf3 | 28 | 18 | 10 | 0 | 64.3% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| QGD: Chigorin, 3.cxd5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Petrov's Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Philidor Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Bishop's Opening: 3.d3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation, Duchamp Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Gruenfeld: Exchange Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 10 | 0 |
| Losing | 11 | 2 |