Giannoulakis Lampros: The Chess Enigma
Meet Giannoulakis Lampros, a dazzling tactician of the 64 squares whose blitz prowess borders on the legendary. Since 2018, Lampros has journeyed from a respectable 1600 blitz rating rookie to a feared speed demon rocking 2580—yes, you read that right—making pawns tremble in their starting squares. His blitz games alone number over 7,500, boasting a solid winning percentage north of 50%, enough to convince your rook to behave.
Not just a speedster, our stalwart also dabbled in rapid and bullet formats, showing a cheeky 60% win-rate in bullet chess and maintaining a consistent presence in rapid battles around the 2200s. Lampros isn't your typical player who bolts after a bad move; with a comeback rate of 92.26%, he’s the phoenix rising from tactical ashes, often rescuing games after losing key pieces with a perfect 100% win rate in those dire moments.
Known for grinding out long endgames—averaging over 80 moves per win—Lampros displays patience akin to a Zen master. And just between us, he's slightly more comfortable wielding White pieces, securing a 54.19% win rate, while Black is still respectable at 46.97%. Opponents beware: Lampros averages an impressive longest winning streak of 12 games, so once you lose to him, the streak might haunt you like a chess ghost.
When he's not outmaneuvering opponents online (nicknamed "Top Secret" for his opening mysteries), Lampros' tilt factor is a mere 10, proving he doesn’t let frustration crash the party. Playing style-wise, he gracefully resigns early at about 1.83% of the time—because why waste time, right? And his battles unfold all hours, though mornings and late nights seem to bring out his best game.
Whether facing familiar foes like kingvittorio_real or new challengers, Giannoulakis Lampros is a chess force to reckon with, blending consistency, resilience, and that magic touch only true blitz aficionados possess.
Overview
Hi Giannoulakis Lampros — nice set of blitz games. You showed strong endgame technique and the ability to convert active piece play into full points. You also had a couple of very short/abandoned games that cost rating and momentum. Below is focused feedback: strengths, weaknesses, and practical drills to improve rapidly.
Recent game highlights (quick links)
- Win vs %3Ckoshkamatrioshka%3E — excellent late‑game technique and a clinical queen/knight finish.
- Win vs %3Cstupidhare%3E — you exploited king exposure and used repeated checks to force decisive material gains.
- Loss vs %3Cliamchess2005%3E — a complex middlegame where a small slip and queen infiltration decided the game.
- Short/abandoned game vs %3Cvosagm%3E — avoid quick abandons/premoves; they’re cheap rating losses and break momentum.
What you're doing well
- Active piece coordination — you repeatedly bring pieces to strong squares and create concrete threats (queen+knight/rook combinations).
- Endgame conversion — you convert passed pawns and simplify into winning endings reliably.
- Opening familiarity — your data shows strong results in many systems (King’s Indian, Slav, QGD). You know typical plans.
- Practical blitz instincts — you punish king weakness and spot short tactical motifs quickly.
Main weaknesses to fix
- Casual abandons / short defeats — games that end too quickly cost rating and confidence. Fight on or at least finish the game when possible.
- Defensive precision vs infiltration — allow fewer queen/rook invasions; identify and stop the opponent’s crown squares early.
- Time management under pressure — avoid sub‑second decisions on critical moves; a 5–8 second pause on tactical turns saves blunders.
- Tactical oversights in middlegame exchanges — practice short calculation so you don’t miss forks, skewers, or decisive checks.
Concrete drills (two‑week cycle)
- Daily tactics (15–25 puzzles, 10 minutes): focus on forks, pins, discovered checks and mating nets.
- 3×/week blitz sets (10|3 or 5|3): annotate the critical 3 moves after each loss — what you missed and candidate moves.
- Endgame practice (2×/week, 20 minutes): king+pawn vs king, basic rook endgames and queen vs pawn races.
- 1 slow game per week (15|10 or 30|10): play your blitz openings slowly to deepen understanding and reduce recurring mistakes.
Opening adjustments
- Keep the systems that score well for you (King’s Indian Averbakh, Slav variations). Reinforce the typical pawn breaks and ideal exchanges.
- Against early ...e5/Albin style replies, be cautious with automatic captures that open lines to your king. Think: can the opponent invade with a queen or rook?
- Train one short defensive resource for each opening — a rule of thumb to parry common tactical shots and trade when necessary.
Practical at‑board checklist (use every game)
- Count hanging pieces (quickly scan all undefended pieces).
- Ask: does this move allow enemy infiltration or checks? If yes, pause and recalculate.
- Prefer a simplifying trade when you’re under attack or short on time.
- Keep a 5–8 second habit on every move that changes the pawn structure or opens lines to kings.
Study items from your recent games
- Replay the final phase of your win vs %3Ckoshkamatrioshka%3E and mark the moment you forced the king out — extract similar positions to practise mating nets.
- From the loss vs %3Cliamchess2005%3E, identify the critical exchange that allowed queen penetration; convert that into a tactical pattern to drill.
- For the very short/abandoned game vs %3Cvosagm%3E, review the opening trap possibilities and commit to a default plan (no premoves) when the position is opened early.
Small habits that pay off
- After each session: 5‑minute review of the worst loss and best win — one sentence each: what won, what lost.
- Keep a short opening cheat sheet (3–4 moves + main plan) for your top 4 openings and review before each session.
- When ahead in material, trade queens if your endgame technique is stronger; if behind, simplify only if it reduces opponent threats.
Closing / Next steps
- Run the 2‑week cycle above and reassess after 50 blitz games — the small drop in the last month (−30) should reverse with fewer blunders.
- If you want, send 2–3 critical positions from your recent losses/wins and I’ll annotate candidate moves and short plans.
Good work — you have the skills. Remove the avoidable blunders and your strong endgame play will carry you back up. GL!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| vosagm | 0W / 3L / 0D | View |
| liamchess2005 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Peter Williams | 0W / 0L / 1D | View |
| stupidhare | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Svyatoslav Korneev Leskova | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| HandyClover | 2W / 1L / 1D | View |
| galladem | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| dispenser000 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| 23 yrs old | 2W / 1L / 0D | View |
| gidel33 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| billgeorge86 | 17W / 16L / 4D | View Games |
| Alexey Ivanyuk | 11W / 10L / 2D | View Games |
| Filkun | 9W / 9L / 2D | View Games |
| libertatea | 9W / 10L / 0D | View Games |
| ufish | 4W / 13L / 2D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2584 | |||
| 2024 | 2395 | |||
| 2023 | 2457 | |||
| 2022 | 2477 | 2211 | ||
| 2021 | 2338 | 2256 | ||
| 2020 | 1327 | 2371 | 2368 | |
| 2019 | 2319 | |||
| 2018 | 1463 | 2245 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 242W / 206L / 26D | 257W / 193L / 23D | 78.8 |
| 2024 | 197W / 129L / 20D | 171W / 153L / 19D | 76.4 |
| 2023 | 305W / 239L / 34D | 275W / 280L / 30D | 77.8 |
| 2022 | 516W / 366L / 50D | 454W / 432L / 73D | 79.4 |
| 2021 | 496W / 320L / 70D | 404W / 451L / 55D | 78.8 |
| 2020 | 502W / 382L / 63D | 438W / 443L / 61D | 79.4 |
| 2019 | 360W / 255L / 34D | 289W / 311L / 47D | 78.4 |
| 2018 | 234W / 196L / 35D | 226W / 218L / 30D | 77.8 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation | 379 | 213 | 144 | 22 | 56.2% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 280 | 139 | 123 | 18 | 49.6% |
| Australian Defense | 258 | 135 | 109 | 14 | 52.3% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 257 | 118 | 123 | 16 | 45.9% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 253 | 119 | 119 | 15 | 47.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 206 | 93 | 97 | 16 | 45.1% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 205 | 108 | 74 | 23 | 52.7% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 204 | 106 | 87 | 11 | 52.0% |
| Modern Defense | 172 | 94 | 69 | 9 | 54.6% |
| Benoni Defense: Modern Variation | 171 | 88 | 69 | 14 | 51.5% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Ruy Lopez: Closed | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Budapest: 3...Ng4 4.e3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 33.3% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Botvinnik System | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| King's Indian Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Benko Gambit | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| QGD: Exchange, 5.Bg5 c6 6.Qc2 g6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| KGD: Classical, 3.Bc4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| QGD: Chigorin, 3.cxd5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Australian Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 13 | 0 |
| Losing | 10 | 2 |