Daniel Rangel: The FIDE Master with a Blitz Flair
Meet Daniel Rangel, a chess maestro who proudly holds the title of FIDE Master. While Daniel's gender remains a mystery worthy of a chess puzzle, their skill over the board is crystal clear. Known for their lightning-fast blitz games and impressive winning streaks, Daniel has dazzled opponents with rapid tactical awareness and resilience.
Starting from humble beginnings with a modest blitz rating hovering around 1580 in 2012, Daniel soared over the years to an impressive peak rating surpassing 2600 in blitz around 2023-2025—a feat many grandmasters would tip their hat to. This rapid ascent is matched by a winning mentality, boasting a staggering longest winning streak of 31 games, and a comeback rate that's among the fiercest at 83.73%.
In the realm of time controls, Daniel is a true all-rounder but shines brightest in blitz. They’ve played over 35,000 blitz games with close to 17,000 wins and a win rate hovering near 49%. Rapid chess sees Daniel pushing win rates even higher, often cracking a notable 59–60% win rate. And if you think bullet chess is just chaos, Daniel commands it skillfully too, maintaining over a 55% win rate with hundreds of games logged.
When it comes to style, Daniel is a patient strategist. They don’t rush to resign early—they only throw in the towel about 10% of the time, preferring to battle through long, complex endgames where they truly excel, appearing there more than three-quarters of the time. With average games stretching around 74 moves regardless of outcome, these matches are battles of wits and endurance. And with White, Daniel manages an edge at 51.3% wins, showing that the first move advantage is well utilized in their playbook.
Opponents beware: Daniel’s psychological grit is legendary. Their tilt factor—chess speak for frustration level—remains relatively low at 14, and they refuse to be rattled, bouncing back with a 91% win rate after losing a piece. Basically, if you snag a piece off Daniel, don't get too comfortable; the comeback is nigh inevitable.
Off the board, Daniel’s record speaks volumes about dedication and passion. Thousands of games across multiple platforms and time controls, an ever-climbing rating, and a huge repertoire that would give any opening book a complex identity crisis. Whether you cross swords with Daniel in a bullet bout or a rapid duel, expect a thrilling contest filled with surprises, strategy, and the occasional cheeky trap.
In short: Daniel Rangel is not just a FIDE Master; they’re a chess force—fast, fierce, and full of finesse. Ready to test your mettle against the blitz titan? Just don’t say you weren’t warned!
Hi Daniel!
You are an ambitious, tactical-minded player who is already flirting with 2688 (2025-01-27) strength in the mid-2400s. Your recent games show great fighting spirit and a willingness to enter sharp positions. Below are a few observations and concrete study ideas.
What you’re doing well
- Dynamic piece play – In your latest victory against Kartaca87 (Semi-Slav) you sacrificed material to keep Black’s king in the centre and converted smoothly.
- Practical time handling – You rarely drop below 20-30 seconds, so your moves stay reasonably accurate even in scrambles.
- Opening variety – With White you alternate between 1.d4 and 1.e4; as Black you have tried French, Caro-Kann, King’s Indian and Sicilian setups. This flexibility will pay off later.
Recurring trouble spots
- Loose knight jumps in the middlegame – In the loss to chesswarrior991 your pieces landed on e5 and d5 without enough support; Black’s …Nf4–Nd5–Nf3 sequence forced concessions.
- Counter-intuitive retreats – Positions demanding restraint (e.g. your French-Rubinstein and Panov games) often see you push forward instead of playing a quiet improving move. Adding some prophylaxis to your thinking cycle will help.
- Over-extended kingside pawn storms – Two recent Sicilian losses featured early g-pawns and h-pawns rushing ahead before your king was fully safe. Opponents exploited the weakening squares.
Targeted improvement plan
- Weekly “quiet move” drill
Take 20 recent rapid games, pause at your own move 15-25, and ask “what if I passed?” Look for stealthy consolidating ideas instead of forcing lines. - Structure-based opening repair
• Review the Caro-Kann B14 Panov: focus on 10.Qe2 & 11.dxc5 lines to minimise Black’s …Nf4 ideas.
• Against the King’s Indian as Black, practise plans in the “Donner” variation you used vs dr-frankenstien – the g-pawn push is fine, but study model games so you know when to switch to central breaks with …f5 or …b5. - Endgame conversion
Several wins came by opponent flagging rather than technical conversion. Spend 15-20 minutes per day on rook-and-pawn endings; the Dvoretsky “100 Endgames” app or studies in Lichess will serve. - Tactical vision sharpening
Despite your tactics strength, the Nf4–Nf3 motif that hurt you is basic. Add 25 “easy” puzzles to each session to keep tactical awareness sharp under 10 seconds per puzzle.
Progress trackers
Keep an eye on your performance curves:
Quick reference themes to revisit
- Playing against an isolated queen’s pawn once you win it – convert with piece exchanges and active king.
- Typical breaks in the Semi-Slav: …c5 and …e5 timing.
- Trading into favourable rook endings instead of keeping messy tactical positions when ahead.
Closing thought
You already demonstrate the courage and creativity of a master-level player. Blend those strengths with a dash of restraint and endgame polish, and 2688 (2025-01-27) 2500+ is well within reach.
Good luck in your next games, and feel free to reach out after a new batch of 20-30 games for another review!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| alreaow | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| azchessgurus | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| RAVI KUMAR | 8W / 6L / 1D | |
| skendroni34 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Scatman 5000 | 10W / 10L / 3D | |
| stephenajwhatley | 0W / 0L / 1D | |
| ivcha2620 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| aboomar0-0 | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
| ashrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| thekidwiz | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| rafael_ventura | 119W / 119L / 14D | |
| mfwagnerpeixoto | 110W / 117L / 3D | |
| Lucas Do Valle Cardoso | 29W / 106L / 8D | |
| Daniel Teidi Awoki | 79W / 41L / 16D | |
| Bernardo Vainzoff Sztokbant | 47W / 64L / 10D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2471 | 2476 | 1096 | |
| 2024 | 2226 | 2452 | 2459 | 1128 |
| 2023 | 2213 | 2507 | 2519 | 1368 |
| 2022 | 2427 | |||
| 2021 | 2287 | 2450 | 2436 | |
| 2020 | 2370 | 2397 | 1974 | |
| 2019 | 2420 | 2002 | ||
| 2018 | 2305 | |||
| 2017 | 2315 | |||
| 2016 | 2157 | |||
| 2014 | 1426 | 2027 | ||
| 2013 | 2039 | 1200 | ||
| 2012 | 2052 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 525W / 415L / 79D | 497W / 437L / 78D | 85.9 |
| 2024 | 1593W / 1181L / 240D | 1431W / 1365L / 230D | 85.4 |
| 2023 | 1435W / 1123L / 228D | 1349W / 1212L / 244D | 85.1 |
| 2022 | 1381W / 1186L / 172D | 1264W / 1306L / 186D | 66.1 |
| 2021 | 797W / 690L / 137D | 786W / 736L / 120D | 78.1 |
| 2020 | 1749W / 1423L / 225D | 1624W / 1522L / 210D | 63.4 |
| 2019 | 398W / 315L / 78D | 380W / 359L / 64D | 81.2 |
| 2018 | 536W / 446L / 79D | 487W / 487L / 68D | 80.8 |
| 2017 | 532W / 399L / 79D | 467W / 463L / 92D | 81.2 |
| 2016 | 317W / 259L / 55D | 278W / 291L / 43D | 80.8 |
| 2014 | 10W / 5L / 1D | 14W / 5L / 0D | 68.1 |
| 2013 | 1W / 1L / 0D | 0W / 1L / 0D | 62.7 |
| 2012 | 8W / 5L / 1D | 8W / 3L / 0D | 78.5 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2969 | 1545 | 1410 | 14 | 52.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 2207 | 1190 | 842 | 175 | 53.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1407 | 677 | 609 | 121 | 48.1% |
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 1234 | 592 | 531 | 111 | 48.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 980 | 485 | 425 | 70 | 49.5% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 872 | 407 | 389 | 76 | 46.7% |
| Döry Defense | 768 | 373 | 327 | 68 | 48.6% |
| Sicilian Defense | 765 | 386 | 312 | 67 | 50.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 730 | 345 | 339 | 46 | 47.3% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 719 | 372 | 281 | 66 | 51.7% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 24 | 14 | 8 | 2 | 58.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 21 | 13 | 5 | 3 | 61.9% |
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 17 | 7 | 8 | 2 | 41.2% |
| Sicilian Defense | 15 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 14 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 57.1% |
| Catalan Opening: Closed | 14 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 50.0% |
| English Opening: Drill Variation | 12 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 66.7% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 11 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 72.7% |
| Döry Defense | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 70.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 10 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 90.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| QGD: 2...Bf5 3.cxd5 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Slav Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Four Knights Game | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 112 | 63 | 41 | 8 | 56.2% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 48 | 20 | 25 | 3 | 41.7% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 18 | 13 | 4 | 1 | 72.2% |
| Döry Defense | 16 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 50.0% |
| East Indian Defense | 16 | 7 | 6 | 3 | 43.8% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 50.0% |
| French Defense | 12 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 11 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 63.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 77.8% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 9 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 31 | 0 |
| Losing | 14 | 1 |