Johan Norberg aka "gaasten"
Johan Norberg is a FIDE Master, proudly carrying the prestigious title that many aspire to but few achieve. Known in the chess oddities world as "gaasten," Johan combines serious skill with a dash of humor, proving that even the most intense minds can enjoy the game—and life—lightheartedly.
Starting from humble beginnings, Johan’s Bullet rating skyrocketed from around 1358 in May 2015 to a staggering peak of 2629 in May 2017—a meteoric rise powered by both blistering speed and cunning tactics. Their Blitz and Daily ratings aren't far behind, with peak Blitz reaching 2599 (Dec 2021) and Daily notching 2083 (Feb 2017), demonstrating versatility across all formats. If chess were a triathlon, Johan would be on the podium for all three legs.
With a win rate north of 60% in bullet and blitz games and an impressive 80.8% in daily chess against a "top secret" opening repertoire (which we can only assume involves a secret handshake with the chess gods), Johan is clearly a force to be reckoned with. Always prepared, they've faced fierce opponents such as pallix and tipo33-hagby dozens of times—no stranger to rivalry, but often the one holding the sword in hand.
Johan's style? Oh, it’s a mix of patience, precision, and occasional lightning-fast strikes. Their remarkable comeback rate sits at almost 80%—proof that even when the pieces look grim, gaasten refuses to surrender quietly. The endgame? Johan lives for it, reaching this battlefield over 75% of their games, converting complexity into victory like a maestro.
Not just a warrior on the board, Johan has a curious relationship with time: while their best time to play is 3 AM (the owl’s hour), their tilt factor is a modest 8—meaning they take losses with a grin rather than a storm. Games often see early resignations from tired opponents, worried about facing this relentless tactician.
Highlight from the latest victory
On June 1, 2024, using the Caro-Kann Defense’s Two Knights Attack, Johan executed a beautiful checkmate, finishing with a clever queen invasion in 39 moves. The game featured some solid defensive play, a brave knight sacrifice, and tactical precision that left their opponent no room to breathe. You can relive this masterpiece here.
Whether it's beat-the-clock bullet duels or marathon daily battles, Johan Norberg remains a gladiator on the 64 squares, forever chasing excellence and occasionally chuckling at their own creative blunders. Long live gaasten, the FIDE Master with a winning smile and an iron will!
Hi Johan!
Congratulations on maintaining a very high bullet level – your current peak is . The games supplied show a confident and imaginative style. Below you’ll find a summary of strengths, the most common leaks that are costing you points, and a short-term training plan.
What already works
- Opening depth: With Black you are at home in the Caro-Kann (B10/B12) and Alekhine/Modern structures, while with White you willingly steer play into dynamic sidelines. Your opening score against strong opposition such as mizzbruk proves you often leave the first phase ahead on the clock and the board.
- Tactical alertness: Motifs like the Greek gift, mating nets on g7/g2 and the classic “rook lift + queen swing” appear frequently in your wins. Being able to spot these in <1 s is a big edge in bullet.
- Piece activity instinct: Your bishops are almost never passive; you exchange them only when a concrete benefit follows (e.g. 23…Re1+ in your most recent loss was actually made possible because you had already centralised the rook).
Recurrent issues that cost you games
- Clock management: Four of the five losses provided ended with “won on time” even from drawable or winning positions. After move 25 you are averaging <0.3 s per move while still spending >2 s on some “quiet” decisions. In bullet it’s better to keep the hand moving and trust simple plans.
- Early pawn storms with the h-pawn: In both PGNs versus
…g6/Bg7setups you pushed h2-h4/h5 before completing development. When it works you crash through; when it fails your king remains in the centre (see move 14 of the loss to mizzbruk). Consider delaying the pawn storm until the king is castled or the centre closed. - Over-pressing already won positions: In the Yakimkin_Igor game you had a completely safe ♖×f7 perpetual on move 37 but kept trying for more and flagged. Convert first, style points later.
- One-move tactics in your own camp: Several defeats stem from a single overlooked check or fork (…Qxe1+, …Re1+, …Rc1 mate threats). A ½-second “danger scan” of opponent forcing moves would eliminate most of these.
Action plan (next 2 weeks)
- Bullet time-drill: Play 20 games at 30-second hyper-bullet focusing ONLY on moving instantly after each premove chain. The goal is to train your hand/eye rhythm so that a normal 1-minute game feels spacious.
- Forced-move warm-up: Before every session spend 5 minutes on a puzzle rush set filtered for checks, captures and threats. This will sharpen the “danger scan” reflex so you don’t miss cheap shots.
- Safer “anti-tilt” line with White vs Caro-Kann: Replace 5.Ng3, 6.Nh3 (time-consuming) with 3.Nd2/4.Ng3 Classical or the mainline Advance. Fewer knight sidesteps = more clock.
- Endgame premove library: Work out premove sequences for the ten most common K+P, R+P endgames you reach. Knowing, for example, the automatic technique in the Philidor / Lucena rook endings means you can finish the game while keeping 2-3 seconds for safety.
Progress tracker
Use the charts below to see when you are scoring best and schedule your serious sessions accordingly.
Key concepts to keep revisiting
Premove, Conversion, Danger square, Zeitnot
Keep the pieces active, keep the hand moving, and you’ll break the next rating ceiling soon. Good luck, and enjoy your games!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| mineralfellow | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| pallix | 106W / 39L / 22D | View Games |
| tipo33-hagby | 112W / 3L / 0D | View Games |
| azcor | 66W / 2L / 0D | View Games |
| Candidate_Master | 10W / 7L / 0D | View Games |
| idontknowwhatiamdoing12 | 10W / 0L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2507 | 2312 | ||
| 2024 | 2508 | 1991 | ||
| 2023 | 2504 | 1991 | ||
| 2022 | 2451 | 2451 | ||
| 2021 | 2526 | 2451 | ||
| 2020 | 2391 | |||
| 2019 | 2356 | 1991 | ||
| 2018 | 2566 | 2338 | 1966 | |
| 2017 | 2510 | 2417 | 1983 | |
| 2016 | 2534 | 2356 | 2045 | |
| 2015 | 2222 | 2272 | 1992 | |
| 2010 | 1421 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 3W / 1L / 0D | 2W / 1L / 0D | 72.3 |
| 2024 | 7W / 1L / 0D | 7W / 0L / 1D | 55.6 |
| 2023 | 6W / 4L / 0D | 7W / 1L / 0D | 67.1 |
| 2022 | 2W / 0L / 0D | 2W / 1L / 0D | 58.2 |
| 2021 | 6W / 6L / 2D | 7W / 5L / 2D | 69.7 |
| 2020 | 0W / 0L / 0D | 1W / 0L / 0D | 98.0 |
| 2019 | 33W / 5L / 3D | 38W / 2L / 0D | 59.2 |
| 2018 | 81W / 8L / 4D | 86W / 8L / 3D | 59.9 |
| 2017 | 50W / 31L / 5D | 44W / 33L / 8D | 79.6 |
| 2016 | 91W / 40L / 8D | 70W / 44L / 16D | 78.0 |
| 2015 | 82W / 29L / 8D | 82W / 34L / 3D | 71.3 |
| 2010 | 1W / 0L / 0D | 1W / 0L / 0D | 64.5 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern | 46 | 28 | 14 | 4 | 60.9% |
| Australian Defense | 22 | 14 | 6 | 2 | 63.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 19 | 14 | 4 | 1 | 73.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 17 | 13 | 3 | 1 | 76.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 17 | 9 | 6 | 2 | 52.9% |
| Modern Defense | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Czech Defense | 14 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 57.1% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 14 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 71.4% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 11 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 54.5% |
| Sicilian Defense | 11 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 27.3% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 60 | 41 | 13 | 6 | 68.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 27 | 24 | 2 | 1 | 88.9% |
| Alekhine Defense | 18 | 16 | 0 | 2 | 88.9% |
| Sicilian Defense | 15 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 86.7% |
| English Opening | 15 | 9 | 5 | 1 | 60.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 15 | 14 | 0 | 1 | 93.3% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 13 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 92.3% |
| Barnes Defense | 11 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 45.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 9 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern | 46 | 25 | 17 | 4 | 54.4% |
| Modern Defense | 23 | 11 | 10 | 2 | 47.8% |
| Sicilian Defense | 17 | 13 | 4 | 0 | 76.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 15 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 73.3% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 14 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 64.3% |
| Australian Defense | 13 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 53.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 13 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 61.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 12 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 58.3% |
| Czech Defense | 9 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 71.4% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 56 | 0 |
| Losing | 8 | 2 |