Grandmaster Merab Gagunashvili: A Chess Biography
Unleashing a strong evolutionary instinct on the 64 squares, GM Merab Gagunashvili, or simply Gaguna, is a true chess Grandmaster whose strategic DNA has been refined through years of high-octane battles. Earning the coveted Grandmaster title from FIDE, Merab’s chess genome codes for resilience, tactical sharpness, and a penchant for long, elaborate endgames—his average game length suggests he enjoys each winning "cell division" move by move.
Born to dominate rapid, blitz, and bullet ecosystems alike, Gaguna’s rating history shows a fascinating trajectory. From a modest rapid rating around 1989 in 2018 to peaking at a clever 2655 by 2021, he has adapted and mutated with time, hunting prey across formats with a winning rate that commands attention.
His blitz play is where the spikes truly emerge—achieving an astonishing peak of 2800 points, with a near-perfect comeback rate (92%) and a flawless 100% win record after losing a piece, Merab is a master of recovery, like a chess chameleon regenerating stronger after a setback.
Gaguna’s opening play remains a mysterious "Top Secret" in the grand evolutionary tree of chess strategies, securing wins in 48% of nearly 900 blitz games and 60% of rapid games. Clearly, he knows when to strike and when to camouflage.
His psychological resilience is notable, tilting only 7% of the time despite the intense pressure of battles that extend well beyond the average number of moves per game. Merab’s tactical awareness could rival that of a hawk’s predatory vision—he seldom resigns early and is no stranger to grinding out long wins.
Merab thrives from Saturday frost to Tuesday’s dawn—with his win rate soaring above 50% on the former and stabilizing around half on the latter, proving his adaptability through the chess week’s circadian rhythm. His best hours? Late afternoon at 16:00 where his win rate peaks at 63.64%, showing Gaguna’s brain cells fire in all their glory before the day winds down.
When it comes to rivals, Merab exhibits a remarkable kill rate against opponents like leonidsh29, dextermorgan, and puracat, boasting a perfect 100% win rate, while some adversaries remain elusive, keeping his evolutionary arms race alive.
In the wild kingdom of chess, GM Merab Gagunashvili stands tall as a fierce predator with a strategic genome encoded for longevity, recovery, and high-stakes brilliance. Beware if you find yourself across the board from Gaguna — his moves are as sharp and precise as the bite of a chess mantis!
Hi GM Gagunashvili, here is a focused performance review based on your latest streak of games.
What is working well
- Dynamic counter-play as Black. Games against the London (SergeyMelkozerov) and the Modern Classical Benoni (leonidsh29) show how comfortably you seize the initiative with early …c5/…Qb6 or …a6/…b5. The exchange-sacrifice 28…Rd1+ in the London win is vintage “Merab-style” activity.
- Tactical alertness under pressure. In the Sicilian Kramnik variation (DexterMorgan) you refuted 15.Bxe4? and converted the extra material flawlessly despite an open king.
- Opening breadth. Your repertoire currently spans 1…c5, 1…d5, 1…Nf6, the Benoni, Caro-Kann and Modern, giving you practical surprise value.
- Consistent peak form. 2655 (2021-12-05) demonstrates that your ceiling is still trending upwards. Keep nurturing that momentum.
Recurring pain points
- Time-management in critical phases. Two of the recent defeats (Alapin vs RantomOpening and QGD vs nazmiden123) were decided by either time-forfeit or severe time trouble leading to tactical blunders. Your clock drops sharply between moves 20-35 (see for the red dip around minute-15).
- Queen vs rook/rook + pawns endings. Both the Nimzo-Indian loss to shanomm and the Modern loss to morejhor feature material superiority that evaporates into passed pawns and coordination issues.
Critical snapshot: Your rook and queen lacked harmony while Black’s connected pawns rolled. This motif recurs. - Over-extension with the d-pawn as White vs …Bb4 systems. In the Nimzo loss, 21.c5?! gave Black the c5–c4 → c-file passer sequence. Similar patterns occur in earlier losses when you push c4/c5 too hastily without enough piece support.
Targeted improvement plan (next 4 weeks)
| Week | Focus | Exercises / Metrics |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Clock discipline | • Play 15 + 10 games only.
• Verbal countdown: decide by 40 min left on your session clock if you’re under 5′. • Annotate every move where you spent >90 seconds. |
| 2 | Queen vs rook/pawn endings | • Table-base drill: win Q vs R + h-pawn & defend R vs Q + side pawn for 30 positions/day. • Review GMs Carlsen, Karpov technical wins (ChessBase filter “Q vs R”). |
| 3 | Structural awareness in Nimzo/Benoni | • Build a flashcard set of typical c-file passer races—identify when to play c4/c5. • Play 10 training games starting after 10…Bb7 (Nimzo) with opposite-side pawn storms. |
| 4 | Opening fine-tuning as White | • Add 4.e3 → Nge2 Anti-Nimzo lines to reduce early pawn breaks. • Spar vs Stockfish 12 depth 18 from move 11 of your loss and aim for +0.50 by move 25. |
Quick reference drill list
- 30 Endgames: Q vs R + 2 pawns from Lomonosov TB.
- 5 Benoni rook-lift examples (e.g. Gagunashvili—Jobava 2006) to refresh attacking themes.
- Daily tactics: 15 puzzles rated 3400-3600 on CT-ART with focus on “clearance & deflection”.
Motivation corner
“Efficiency is doing better what you already do well.” – Peter Drucker Apply this to your clock management; the rest of your game is GM-level already.
Good luck with the training cycle, and looking forward to seeing your next set of sparkling wins!
– Your Chess Coach
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| attacker2036 | 5W / 1L / 2D | View |
| donjhon | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Shaaketh Sivakumar | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Dmitry Zilberstein | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Fernando Valenzuela | 6W / 5L / 2D | View Games |
| anon132639 | 3W / 5L / 4D | View Games |
| ghost-brigade | 6W / 5L / 1D | View Games |
| Gor Airapetian | 1W / 9L / 2D | View Games |
| sleighur | 4W / 7L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2698 | 2402 | ||
| 2024 | 2743 | 2413 | ||
| 2023 | 2431 | |||
| 2022 | 2751 | 2391 | ||
| 2021 | 2664 | 2655 | ||
| 2020 | 2393 | 2700 | ||
| 2019 | 2342 | 2705 | 2572 | |
| 2018 | 2376 | 2557 | 1989 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 8W / 6L / 2D | 8W / 4L / 5D | 77.6 |
| 2024 | 31W / 19L / 15D | 31W / 20L / 13D | 93.4 |
| 2023 | 2W / 2L / 1D | 3W / 1L / 1D | 108.2 |
| 2022 | 11W / 7L / 3D | 16W / 8L / 1D | 88.1 |
| 2021 | 8W / 1L / 1D | 4W / 2L / 1D | 84.6 |
| 2020 | 75W / 49L / 29D | 71W / 51L / 32D | 83.9 |
| 2019 | 103W / 107L / 26D | 88W / 108L / 35D | 80.2 |
| 2018 | 131W / 102L / 10D | 114W / 101L / 30D | 77.3 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Czech Defense | 46 | 22 | 19 | 5 | 47.8% |
| Modern Defense | 42 | 21 | 13 | 8 | 50.0% |
| Philidor Defense | 30 | 13 | 9 | 8 | 43.3% |
| Modern | 25 | 13 | 7 | 5 | 52.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 23 | 11 | 7 | 5 | 47.8% |
| QGD: 4.Nf3 | 21 | 10 | 6 | 5 | 47.6% |
| Pirc Defense: Classical Variation | 18 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 44.4% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 16 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation | 15 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 13 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 23.1% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern Defense | 43 | 17 | 22 | 4 | 39.5% |
| Modern | 35 | 12 | 22 | 1 | 34.3% |
| Czech Defense | 33 | 14 | 17 | 2 | 42.4% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 24 | 15 | 9 | 0 | 62.5% |
| Amar Gambit | 23 | 9 | 13 | 1 | 39.1% |
| Australian Defense | 23 | 10 | 12 | 1 | 43.5% |
| Barnes Defense | 20 | 8 | 10 | 2 | 40.0% |
| Alekhine Defense | 18 | 11 | 6 | 1 | 61.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 16 | 11 | 5 | 0 | 68.8% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 13 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 30.8% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Czech Defense | 9 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 66.7% |
| Slav Defense: Alekhine Variation | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 33.3% |
| QGD: Ragozin | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 33.3% |
| Grünfeld Defense: Counterthrust Variation | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Benoni Defense: Classical Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Philidor Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD: 4.Nf3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Modern Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Bogo-Indian Defense | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Hedgehog System | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 16 | 2 |
| Losing | 7 | 0 |