Gavriil Andreolas: The Grandmaster of Comebacks and Checkmates
Meet Gavriil Andreolas, a chess virtuoso whose rating rollercoaster might just be the most thrilling ride on the chessboard. With a peak rapid rating flirting with the lofty 1940 mark, Gavriil isn’t just playing chess – he's redefining what it means to fight back. His impressive 84.43% comeback rate is like watching a phoenix rise from the ashes every time the odds are against him!
Playing Profile
- Rapid Rating Peak: 1940 (September 2022)
- Blitz Peak: 1854 (September 2024)
- Bullet Peak: 1772 (April 2022)
- Longest Winning Streak: 15 games (because why stop when you're on fire?)
- Current Streak: Riding a fresh win streak of 1, already plotting the next!
Strategic Arsenal
Whether wielding the Indian Game or expertly navigating the Queens Pawn Opening Accelerated London System, Gavriil’s opening repertoire is both versatile and effective. His rapid win rate with the London System is an enviable 58.18% — a testament to his crafty, positional play.
Statistics That Tell a Tale
Across thousands of rapid, blitz, and bullet games, this cunning tactician’s record is nothing short of epic:
- Rapid: 600 wins, 566 losses, 131 draws
- Blitz: 2690 wins, 2420 losses, 418 draws
- Bullet: 2470 wins, 2364 losses, 224 draws
And of course, the resignation rate stands at a humble 3.35% — yes, Gavriil is more of a fighter than a quitter (unless the cat needs feeding).
Notable Victories & Memorable Matches
His recent games read like a cinematic script. The latest checkmate victory over its_ardykyron featured a dazzling rook finish on move 33. Gavriil executed the Accelerated London System with such precision that one might suspect he’s secretly teaching bots how to do it.
But even heroes fall! A recent loss by checkmate to LashaGunia reminds us that even the best can slip—but with that stellar comeback rate, a glorious return is just around the corner.
Playtime Preferences & Psychological Quirks
Night owls rejoice! Gavriil’s best time to play is around 3 AM — perfect for nocturnal chess warriors. His tilt factor is a manageable 15, so when he says “I’m not angry,” trust him — the board's just heating up.
With an average game spanning about 68 moves when winning and a methodical style, gandreolas turns every match into a battle of wills and stamina.
Wrap-up
In the vast realm of online chess, Gavriil Andreolas stands as a beacon of resilience, strategy, and a sprinkle of good humor. Whether he's dismantling defenses at blitz speed or grinding it out in rapid, he proves that chess isn’t just a game — it’s a lifestyle. If you catch him online, be ready for a game full of surprises. Just remember: don’t underestimate the comeback kid!
Overview of your recent blitz results
You shared three recent outcomes from blitz games: a win, a loss, and a draw. Across these, there are clear strengths to build on and concrete areas to improve. Below are focused notes to help you push your results in the next sessions.
What you did well in the recent win
- Calculated for initiative: you leaned into tactical chances when your opponent overextended, which led to a decisive sequence that finished the game strongly.
- Active piece play: you kept pieces active and coordinated, with timely rook activity and central threats that kept your opponent under pressure.
- Quick king safety when needed: you used timely castling and central/queenside activity to create attacking chances, rather than passively defending.
Tip: In blitz, your willingness to calculate sharp lines is a strength. Channel it with a quick check of several forcing ideas first (a few candidate moves) to avoid getting lost in overly long lines if the opponent has counterplay.
What to improve based on the most recent loss
- King safety and back-rank awareness: in the French Defense line you reached, there were moments where the king’s safety became fragile after multiple exchanges. In blitz, prioritize keeping the king protected or choosing a plan that reduces back-rank risks (such as safer king positions or more conservative piece setups) rather than high-risk counterplay.
- Keep development steady and avoid over-committing to a single flank: the game showed how rapid shifts and heavy piece activity can create targets for your opponent. A steadier development with a clear plan (central break or solid pawn structure) helps you maintain momentum without creating exploitable gaps.
- Watch for tactical overreach: while attacks are tempting, ensure each aggressive move has a concrete follow-through and doesn’t invite quick simplifications that favor your opponent. In blitz, short-term material swings can backfire if the rest of your position collapses.
Practical steps: when you sense a tactical sequence emerging, quickly verify at least two defensive resources or safe retreat squares for your king, and consider whether a simplification would keep you in a playable, balanced position.
Notes about the draw data
The draw data you provided appears to mirror a loss scenario in some blocks. If you want precise guidance for draws, I can re-check with a fresh set of draw games and tailor a plan focused on converting slight advantages into draws or wins in blitz.
Opening tendencies and recommendations
Your openings show you frequently encounter dynamic setups (Englund-style lines as White, and French/Indian structures as Black). Here are practical tweaks for blitz:
- Consolidate a compact two-repertoire approach: pick two reliable White openings (e.g., a solid Queen’s Pawn setup) and two Black responses to 1.e4 and 1.d4 that you know well, so you have quick move-order decisions in the first 10 moves.
- Lean into your strongest performers: the data suggests you have relatively solid results with Australian Defense-type setups and certain aggressive lines. Consider prioritizing those in rapid sessions to reduce risk while keeping pressure on opponents who misstep.
- Prepare simple middlegame plans for each chosen line: e.g., in a French/Indian-type structure, have a clear idea of typical pawn breaks and piece activity (when to push c- or e-pawns, how to use rooks on open files, and how to handle common minor piece maneuvers).
Concrete drills you can do this week
- Daily tactical puzzle streak: focus on discovering at least one forcing line (a tactic or a tactical sequence) within 3-4 moves, then confirm the reduction or win with a quick calculation check.
- Endgame safety checks: after a standard middlegame, practice converting a slight material or positional edge into a win or ensuring you can hold a draw by simplifying to an equal endgame. Use 3-5 minute endings drills focusing on king activity and rook endgames.
- Opening quick-reaction drill: pick your two favored openings and drill 10-15 short games where you only study the first 10-12 moves. After each, write one line about the typical plan and one potential pitfall to avoid.
Next steps and a small plan
- Adopt a compact blitz repertoire: choose 2 White and 2 Black lines you enjoy and know well, with simple, repeatable plans.
- Focus on king safety and timing: if you’re unsure about a tactical line, default to developing and securing your king first, then look for active ideas after the first 15 moves.
- Review your losses with a quick post-game note: what was the turning point, what was the engine suggestion (if you checked), and what would you play differently next time?
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| guilleps92 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| joraljim | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| davidmontes98 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| puteraprtm | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| neonrin | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| matt_dpn | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| haider_ph | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| fourth_man | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| mauriciobascieta | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| bratislava | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| papagalisteontas | 11W / 9L / 2D | View Games |
| benlto | 11W / 8L / 1D | View Games |
| 33antonis | 10W / 5L / 0D | View Games |
| plk1471 | 7W / 6L / 0D | View Games |
| jasmin_fon | 8W / 4L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1518 | 1801 | ||
| 2024 | 1564 | 1661 | 1925 | |
| 2023 | 1426 | 1648 | 1919 | |
| 2022 | 1620 | 1695 | 1859 | |
| 2021 | 1413 | 1703 | 1887 | |
| 2020 | 1458 | 1689 | 1808 | |
| 2019 | 1133 | 1766 | 1626 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 496W / 440L / 48D | 455W / 490L / 41D | 62.4 |
| 2024 | 527W / 431L / 60D | 498W / 461L / 62D | 66.5 |
| 2023 | 354W / 286L / 41D | 324W / 326L / 35D | 67.2 |
| 2022 | 514W / 378L / 92D | 440W / 466L / 69D | 69.8 |
| 2021 | 518W / 455L / 69D | 446W / 518L / 73D | 65.0 |
| 2020 | 432W / 399L / 60D | 421W / 402L / 61D | 67.3 |
| 2019 | 276W / 210L / 46D | 241W / 256L / 31D | 69.1 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 806 | 401 | 345 | 60 | 49.8% |
| Amazon Attack | 775 | 401 | 308 | 66 | 51.7% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 570 | 274 | 241 | 55 | 48.1% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 374 | 175 | 172 | 27 | 46.8% |
| Australian Defense | 309 | 166 | 124 | 19 | 53.7% |
| French Defense | 305 | 144 | 139 | 22 | 47.2% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 255 | 132 | 111 | 12 | 51.8% |
| Dutch Defense | 172 | 84 | 77 | 11 | 48.8% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 134 | 49 | 72 | 13 | 36.6% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 118 | 55 | 51 | 12 | 46.6% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack | 883 | 434 | 398 | 51 | 49.1% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 652 | 349 | 279 | 24 | 53.5% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 542 | 275 | 239 | 28 | 50.7% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 505 | 242 | 236 | 27 | 47.9% |
| Australian Defense | 462 | 217 | 229 | 16 | 47.0% |
| French Defense | 398 | 189 | 195 | 14 | 47.5% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 231 | 120 | 97 | 14 | 52.0% |
| Dutch Defense | 131 | 65 | 61 | 5 | 49.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 98 | 44 | 52 | 2 | 44.9% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 81 | 40 | 38 | 3 | 49.4% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 180 | 92 | 70 | 18 | 51.1% |
| Amazon Attack | 158 | 85 | 64 | 9 | 53.8% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 88 | 43 | 33 | 12 | 48.9% |
| Dutch Defense | 79 | 29 | 42 | 8 | 36.7% |
| Australian Defense | 73 | 32 | 34 | 7 | 43.8% |
| French Defense | 71 | 33 | 35 | 3 | 46.5% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 69 | 28 | 33 | 8 | 40.6% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 58 | 29 | 24 | 5 | 50.0% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 48 | 20 | 18 | 10 | 41.7% |
| French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Botvinnik Variation | 34 | 15 | 13 | 6 | 44.1% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 15 | 1 |
| Losing | 15 | 0 |