Profile Summary: gardencheck
Meet gardencheck, a tenacious blitz enthusiast with a penchant for strategic skirmishes and tactical flair. With a peak blitz rating soaring to an impressive 2035 back in September 2019, gardencheck has shown remarkable resilience and grit across the chessboard — battling opponents with a nearly equal number of wins and losses but always returning for more.
This player’s style is an intriguing blend of solid endgame prowess and a healthy dose of optimistic comebacks, boasting a striking 80.37% comeback rate after losing material. Gardencheck clearly believes that nothing's over until the final pawn promotes, demonstrated by an astonishing average of 65 moves per game regardless of victory or defeat. Patience? Check. Persistence? Double check.
When asked about favored openings, you’ll find gardencheck returning to trusted roads like the Vienna Game Falkbeer Vienna Gambit, where they unleash a strong 65.84% win rate, and tactically sharp defenses like the French Defense Exchange Variation, proving that versatility is key. And just for fun, they've also mastered the Sicilian Defense Bowdler Attack, going a perfect 100% in bullet games — talk about lethal surprises!
Gardencheck is not just about numbers. This player valiantly fights in every time control, with a rapid peak rating crushed through the 2000 barrier and an amusingly low daily rating hinting at some casual, leisurely games every now and then. The psychological tilt factor hovers at a modest 11 (because even chess warriors have their days), and their best time to unleash chess brilliance is early morning around 6 AM. Early risers indeed catch the mating nets!
Recent battles showcase gardencheck’s endurance and adaptability. Whether squeaking out a win on time in a tense Caro-Kann Defense or patiently coaxing resignation from their opponents in fiercely contested Sicilian lines, gardencheck doesn’t back down. Even in defeat, these fights provide valuable lessons for the next encounter.
In the relentless war of checkmates and blunders, gardencheck embodies the spirit of the game: strategic, sometimes stubborn, often daring, and always hungry for that next victory — even if it means battling through an eleven-game losing streak or savoring a dozen consecutive wins with a grin.
In short, gardencheck is the chess player who proves that in chess, persistence, style, and a dash of joie de vivre can turn every garden path into a battlefield of kings and queens.
Overview and approach
You play with clear ambition and actively seek active piece play. Your games show willingness to complicate with sharp lines and initiative. To turn that energy into consistent results, focus on maintaining solid king safety, clarifying your middlegame plans, and improving endgame conversion.
What you did well
- Active use of developing moves that place pieces on useful squares and threaten the opponent’s position.
- Willingness to enter sharply contested lines when the moment is right, creating practical chances.
- Looking for tactical chances and seeking exchanges that favor your piece activity.
Key areas to improve
- King safety in open lines: when you commit to aggressive pawn storms or open files, verify that your own king isn’t exposed to counterplay. If needed, prefer solid development and safer king positions before initiating major pawn pushes.
- Middlegame planning: in some games the attack started before a clear plan was established. Try to articulate a concrete goal after development (for example, control of a key file, target weakness in the opponent’s structure, or a specific piece maneuver) rather than chasing threats alone.
- Endgame technique: a number of losses came from transitions into endgames where the plan wasn’t evident. Build a routine to evaluate simple endgames (knight vs bishop, rook endings, passed pawns) and practice converting even small advantages.
- Time management and decision quality: in rapid, it’s easy to rush after the middle game opens. Adopt a simple routine in the first 6–8 moves to establish a plan and then budget your time for critical decisions later in the game.
- Opening consolidation: your openings generate dynamic chances but sometimes leave you with messy or uncoordinated positions. Consider refining a compact 2–3 opening repertoire with clear middlegame plans so you spend less time sorting out structure and more on execution.
Practical training plan
- Weekly tactical training: 15–20 minutes of puzzles focusing on patterns you’ve encountered (forks, skewers, discovered attacks) to improve quick pattern recognition under pressure.
- Opening study: pick 2–3 openings you enjoy (for example, a sharp Sicilian line, a solid Italian/Scotch approach, and a flexible Queen’s Pawn setup). For each, write a short plan: typical middlegame ideas, common structural plans, and typical endgames you should aim for.
- Game review routine: after each rapid game, spend 10–15 minutes noting 1–2 key decision points where a different plan could have improved the result. If possible, compare your notes with a coach or stronger game so you see alternate ideas.
- Endgame practice: dedicate a session to simple endgames (knight or bishop endings, basic rook endings with pawns) to improve conversion when material is roughly even or you have a clear passed pawn.
- Time-control discipline: implement a lightweight pre-move plan for the first 8–10 moves in every game (development, king safety, and a specific middlegame aim). This reduces overthinking in critical moments.
Opening repertoire: quick guidance
- Italian Game: Two Knights Defense – continue using this when you want active piece play, but add a simple plan for handling the early knight and bishop activity and the d-pawn structure.
- Scotch Game – you’ve shown strength here when you reach clear middlegame targets. Keep refining the plan to seize the initiative and simplify toward favorable endgames.
- Sicilian defenses (varieties you’ve used) – for sharper lines, pair aggressive setups with a concrete tactical idea; for more control, develop a solid plan focusing on king safety and central control before committing to pawn storms.
- Limit novelty: avoid expanding into too many sub-variations at once. Stick to 2–3 lines you know well and study their typical middle game plans and common pitfalls.
Next steps and a simple two-week plan
- Week 1: Focus on pattern recognition. Do 15 minutes of daily tactics, plus 1 targeted endgame drill (knight vs bishop, rook endings) three times this week.
- Week 2: Deepen opening plans. Pick 2 openings you enjoy and write down a one-page plan for the typical middlegame ideas and common defensive setups you should expect.
- After Week 2: Start a lightweight review habit. After every rapid game, jot down one decision you would change and why. Share notes with a coach or a study buddy to get feedback.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Aron Pasti | 78W / 114L / 12D | View Games |
| Nhat Minh To | 64W / 101L / 22D | View Games |
| Ferenc Jr. Gombocz | 23W / 25L / 17D | View Games |
| blacklist08 | 23W / 31L / 2D | View Games |
| zakaariaa | 12W / 16L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1669 | 1766 | ||
| 2024 | 1703 | 1824 | ||
| 2023 | 1614 | 1785 | 1040 | |
| 2022 | 1562 | 1884 | ||
| 2021 | 1591 | 1622 | 2002 | |
| 2020 | 1591 | 1660 | 1829 | |
| 2019 | 1704 | |||
| 2018 | 1198 | 1121 | 1227 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 208W / 185L / 29D | 181W / 227L / 22D | 72.1 |
| 2024 | 316W / 255L / 19D | 279W / 283L / 30D | 71.1 |
| 2023 | 194W / 163L / 26D | 176W / 179L / 24D | 70.0 |
| 2022 | 261W / 203L / 27D | 211W / 247L / 29D | 69.9 |
| 2021 | 264W / 244L / 37D | 210W / 299L / 33D | 70.1 |
| 2020 | 422W / 386L / 51D | 342W / 459L / 35D | 61.7 |
| 2019 | 112W / 71L / 7D | 79W / 104L / 6D | 68.8 |
| 2018 | 58W / 43L / 3D | 55W / 44L / 1D | 49.5 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bishop's Opening: Vienna Hybrid, Hromádka Variation | 335 | 202 | 117 | 16 | 60.3% |
| Unknown | 319 | 137 | 182 | 0 | 43.0% |
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 290 | 175 | 106 | 9 | 60.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 281 | 121 | 151 | 9 | 43.1% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 276 | 127 | 136 | 13 | 46.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 210 | 105 | 93 | 12 | 50.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 164 | 72 | 83 | 9 | 43.9% |
| Scotch Game | 162 | 78 | 78 | 6 | 48.1% |
| Vienna Gambit: 3...d5 4.exd5 | 160 | 81 | 67 | 12 | 50.6% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 156 | 78 | 66 | 12 | 50.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 34 | 17 | 11 | 6 | 50.0% |
| Four Knights Game | 21 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 38.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 17 | 6 | 9 | 2 | 35.3% |
| Scotch Game | 17 | 12 | 5 | 0 | 70.6% |
| King's Indian Attack: French Variation | 17 | 3 | 14 | 0 | 17.6% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 15 | 4 | 8 | 3 | 26.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation, English Attack | 15 | 5 | 9 | 1 | 33.3% |
| Dutch Defense: Classical Variation | 15 | 4 | 10 | 1 | 26.7% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 13 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 38.5% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 12 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 33.3% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 40.0% |
| East Indian Defense | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 40.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 4 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Alekhine Defense | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Bishop's Opening | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 12 | 1 |
| Losing | 11 | 0 |