Biography
Adrian Petrus is a titled chess player who has earned the Candidate Master title from FIDE. A natural blitz dragon, he thrives when the clock bleeps and the board turns into a fast-paced battlefield. His quick instincts and sharp tactical sense have made him a familiar name on online and local circuits alike.
Blitz is his preferred battleground, where he jokes that the main time control is simply “how fast can you think after a coffee refill?” Off the board, he’s known for a smile that appears just as the last piece lands, a reminder that chess is serious business, but not always solemn business.
adrian_petrusCareer Highlights
- Candidate Master title awarded by FIDE for strong performances across events.
- Peak Blitz rating reached 2449 on 2025-06-17, a testament to his rapid improvement over the last years. 2449 (2025-06-17)
- Notable streaks include a longest winning run of 13 games and a substantial presence in high-activity blitz tournaments.
- Regular competitor in online blitz pools and regional events, with a growing reputation for sharp, time-pressure play.
Playing Style
Adrian is known for an aggressive, tactical approach that often gleans victories from the smallest of margins. His comeback rate is high, and he enjoys complicating the position when opponents seek simplifications. He balances bold attacking ideas with precise endgame technique, especially when the clock is ticking down.
His blitz repertoire leans into dynamic openings and quick piece activity, making him a difficult opponent in fast time controls. For a flavor of his practical play, you can explore a sample line here:
.Openings and Repertoire
In Blitz, Adrian has often chosen active defenses and aggressive setups to seize initiative early. Notable choices include:
- Alekhine Defense — 166 games, robust in unbalanced positions with chances for both sides.
- Sicilian Defense — a broad and dynamic battleground with strong results in fast time controls.
- Caro-Kann Defense — solid structures that hinge on precise endgames and planning.
- Amar Gambit and various Ruy Lopez lines — used to create immediate pressure and unfold tactical battles.
Notable Insights
Adrian's growth has been steady across blitz, rapid, and daily play. His profile includes a rich set of games against many strong opponents, and his style continues to evolve with each year on the clock. For a concise glimpse into his peak performance, see his Blitz peak rating placeholder above. Blitz
Sample Quick Play
A tiny snapshot of his blitz flavor can be read through a compact PGN snippet:
Blitz feedback: what’s working and what to tighten
You’ve shown a willingness to enter dynamic, tactical positions in blitz. That creativity can win you short games when your opponents miss defensive resources. At the same time, blitz can magnify small misjudgments, especially in sharp lines and late middlegame/endgame phases. The goal is to preserve your aggressive instincts while improving consistency and time management under pressure.
Strengths you can build on
- Bold, tactical play that puts immediate pressure on your opponent’s king and king's side.
- Good ability to convert favorable tactics into material or positional gains when calculations stay within clear, forcing lines.
- Quick decision-making in familiar, sharp structures helps you seize the initiative early in the game.
- Active piece coordination, especially when you get your pieces on open files and diagonals.
Key improvement areas and actionable steps
- Time management under blitz pressure
- Practice with a simple time plan: aim to spend a consistent amount on the first 12–15 moves, then shift to quick verification in the final phase.
- When you sense a complex tactic, write down 2–3 candidate moves and quickly compare their immediate consequences instead of exploring many long lines.
- Move selection in sharp positions
- Prefer solid forcing lines that maintain material balance and clear plans. If a line looks purely tactical without a clear gain, switch to a safer, more principled continuation.
- After a tactical sequence, pause briefly to confirm you aren’t walking into a perpetual or a losing material swing.
- Opening consistency and repertoire
- Choose two reliable openings as White and two as Black, with a short, agreed plan for the middlegame (e.g., typical pawn breaks, key squares, typical piece maneuvers).
- Study typical middlegame ideas from those lines so you can recognize common patterns quickly during blitz.
- Endgame readiness
- Focus on simple rook-and-pawn endings and king activity. Practice a few standard rook endgames against a set of common pawn structures.
- When trades simplify to an unclear endgame, look for a straightforward plan (e.g., activate the king, push a passed pawn) before going into crowded exchanges.
- Tactical pattern recognition
- Daily short puzzle practice (10–15 minutes) targeting forks, pins, skewers, and discovered attacks helps convert blitz chances into wins without overextending.
Simple takeaways from your recent games
1) Maintain initiative but guard against overextension in sharp lines. If there’s no clear gain, steer toward simpler, safer continuations to avoid losing pace under time pressure.
2) After key exchanges or tactical blows, quickly re-evaluate material balance and king safety. If your king becomes exposed or you’re losing a weapons’ balance, pull back to a more solid plan.
3) Build a consistent, small opening repertoire you’re comfortable with, so you can reach a playable middlegame more quickly in blitz and avoid wasted time on early decisions.
For a quick, shareable example of a typical blitz line you might study, you can embed a short game snippet like this placeholder:
Recommended practice plan (short and focused)
- 2 weeks: solidify a compact opening repertoire (White and Black). Practice 20–30 blitz games focusing on staying within your chosen lines; review every game’s final phase for endgame chances.
- 2–4 weeks: daily tactics (10–15 minutes) focusing on visual pattern recognition: forks, pins, skewers, discovered attacks. Finish with 5–10 minutes of endgame practice (rook endings and king activity).
- 1–2 months: periodic review of your opening plans against common responses. Add one or two chess.com style quick tests per week to simulate blitz decision pressure.
Openings: suggested compact repertoire
- As White: pick a straightforward 1.e4 path (for example, Italian Game or Scotch Game) and a solid 1.d4 path (like Queen’s Pawn Game) to develop solid middlegame plans quickly.
- As Black against 1.e4: Caro-Kann or Scandinavian for clear development and fewer early tactical disputes.
- Against 1.d4: Queen’s Gambit Declined or Modern defenses that keep the position solid and reduce first-moppage mistakes in blitz.
- General idea: know the typical break ideas and typical piece maneuvers in each chosen line so you’re not stuck in unhelpful moves under time pressure.
Blitz-ready checklists
- On every move, quickly check: is my king safe? Is material balanced? Do I have a concrete plan?
- Limit speculative captures unless you gain a tangible advantage in return (material or positional).
- If you’re low on time, revert to solid development, simple threats, and obvious checks to keep the position playable.
- After a game, briefly replay the decisive moment and identify a better alternative, then note it for the next session.
Want more tailored guidance?
If you’d like, I can tailor this plan to a specific 4–8 week window or target your next event. I can also create a personalized set of practice tasks (puzzles, opening drills, endgame drills) based on the exact openings you prefer.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ashok Ramadoss | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| Adriano Nunes Cavalcante | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| bekbekus | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| mihael819 | 36W / 1L / 0D | View |
| petarm1975 | 0W / 1L / 1D | View |
| whitelion09 | 9W / 0L / 2D | View |
| francetic41 | 2W / 0L / 0D | View |
| ewen2010 | 0W / 0L / 1D | View |
| crossb0w888 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| theovicma | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| mladepetrus | 42W / 12L / 3D | View Games |
| jakicc | 35W / 11L / 2D | View Games |
| mihael819 | 36W / 1L / 0D | View Games |
| mandarina_11 | 14W / 18L / 4D | View Games |
| desoloist | 17W / 0L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2363 | 2405 | 2310 | |
| 2024 | 2305 | 2296 | 2301 | 1808 |
| 2023 | 2103 | 1979 | 2202 | 1533 |
| 2022 | 1692 | 1887 | 1368 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 173W / 184L / 32D | 162W / 197L / 30D | 83.4 |
| 2024 | 487W / 474L / 68D | 446W / 499L / 84D | 80.2 |
| 2023 | 447W / 373L / 45D | 449W / 374L / 35D | 73.0 |
| 2022 | 47W / 31L / 6D | 48W / 32L / 3D | 65.5 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 264 | 129 | 129 | 6 | 48.9% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 129 | 55 | 66 | 8 | 42.6% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 116 | 56 | 55 | 5 | 48.3% |
| Czech Defense | 112 | 54 | 55 | 3 | 48.2% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 84 | 37 | 45 | 2 | 44.0% |
| Modern | 84 | 38 | 41 | 5 | 45.2% |
| Barnes Defense | 73 | 39 | 30 | 4 | 53.4% |
| Australian Defense | 67 | 26 | 36 | 5 | 38.8% |
| Amazon Attack | 63 | 20 | 38 | 5 | 31.8% |
| Alekhine Defense | 63 | 35 | 27 | 1 | 55.6% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alekhine Defense | 166 | 82 | 72 | 12 | 49.4% |
| Sicilian Defense | 126 | 60 | 57 | 9 | 47.6% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 108 | 51 | 49 | 8 | 47.2% |
| Scotch Game | 101 | 45 | 43 | 13 | 44.5% |
| Ruy Lopez: Schliemann Defense | 95 | 46 | 41 | 8 | 48.4% |
| Czech Defense | 59 | 24 | 29 | 6 | 40.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 59 | 23 | 31 | 5 | 39.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 55 | 22 | 30 | 3 | 40.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 55 | 36 | 18 | 1 | 65.5% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 53 | 33 | 19 | 1 | 62.3% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scotch Game | 8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Alekhine Defense | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| QGD: Ragozin | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alekhine Defense | 56 | 37 | 15 | 4 | 66.1% |
| Sicilian Defense | 23 | 14 | 9 | 0 | 60.9% |
| Scotch Game | 16 | 9 | 5 | 2 | 56.2% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 15 | 9 | 6 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 14 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 57.1% |
| Giuoco Piano: Tarrasch Variation | 13 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 92.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Haag Gambit | 12 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 75.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 11 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 63.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 11 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 36.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation | 11 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 63.6% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 28 | 0 |
| Losing | 9 | 1 |