Ioana Gelip - Woman FIDE Master
Meet Ioana Gelip, a fierce competitor on the 64 squares and a proud Woman FIDE Master. Brandishing a sharp tactical eye and a knack for comebacks, Ioana has thrilled opponents and spectators alike with a win rate after losing a piece a perfect 100%!
Since bursting onto the scene, Ioana's Blitz rating has soared as high as 2253, showcasing lightning-fast instincts and nerve-wracking speed chess skills. Not one to shy away from a challenge, her Rapid games have been a rollercoaster ride from 2182 in 2017 to a resilient performance climbing back towards 2046 by 2025. Daily games? She's there too, quietly plotting victories and quietly improving.
Ioana’s strategic style could be summed up as tenacious and enduring — expect battles averaging over 67 moves. With an impressive endgame frequency above 70%, Ioana loves squeezing that last drop of victory from complex positions, proving patience truly is a virtue.
Fun fact: Ioana’s longest winning streak is 6 games, and she's earned respect on nearly every day of the week, with Thursday and Friday being her lucky days (win rates north of 60%). Also, if you ever face her around 7 AM, watch out — she's undefeated at that hour!
Off the board, Ioana is known for keeping her cool (tilt factor 6 out of 100) – not too angry, just enough frustration to fuel those brilliant tactical combinations. Whether playing with the white pieces or the black, Ioana keeps the pressure up with an overall winning edge, proving that every pawn push counts.
Opponents beware: from "junipro" to "joecima," Ioana has tested a wide range of rivals, racking up wins against many and proving herself a reliable force across all time controls. More than a player, she’s an adventurer in the endless possibilities of chess, always ready for the next challenge or blunder to exploit.
In summary, Ioana Gelip is the kind of player who turns every game into a captivating story — with plot twists, tactical fireworks, and a hint of humor. A Woman FIDE Master who knows that in chess, as in life, sometimes you must lose a piece to win the game.
Hi Ioana!
You have an energetic, enterprising style that produces a lot of decisive games. Below is a quick review of recent trends, followed by focused suggestions for the next training block.
What’s already working well
- Initiative-first mindset. In several Najdorf / Scheveningen positions you willingly sacrifice pawns (e.g., 21.Nxf7⁺ and 27.Nxf7⁺) to keep Black’s king in the centre. Your conversion rate in these sharp lines is excellent.
- Piece activity in dynamic middlegames. The win vs junipro shows how quickly you mobilise rooks to open files once the opponent’s king becomes loose.
- Calculation skills under pressure. Even in blitz you spotted tactical resources such as 29.Qg6⁺ and 30.Nf7# with less than 20 s on the clock—evidence that your short-range tactics are reliable.
Recurring problems
- Time-management losses. Two of your last five defeats came on the clock while you were objectively fine (see games vs johnsaki and tchav). Good moves that never get played score 0 %. The goal in rapid is to reach move 20 with at least 40 % of the initial time.
- Handling early sidelines against 1.d4. In the loss to Axeldarkness, the …Bb4 Indian setup left you with an awkward Na4/…Na4-c5 plan and weak dark squares. You often reach middlegames where your c- and e- pawns are targets and the bishop pair is undeveloped.
- Endgame conversion accuracy. When you do not deliver a direct mating attack, technique can falter. In the long win vs Claratex the position after 30…Rc3 still had practical chances for White. Simplifying sooner (e.g., 28…e3! 29.Bxf6 Bxf6 30.Qxe3 Qd5) would have locked up the full point earlier.
Action plan for the next 4 weeks
- Clock discipline drill. Play three rapid (10 + 5) games per session with a hard rule: by move 15 you must have ≥ 6 minutes. If you drop below, force yourself to make the next two moves instantly. This builds an internal “pace alarm.”
- Plug the 1.d4 gap.
- Pick one solid system—e.g., the QGD Tarrasch or the Nimzo-Indian—and study five model games.
- Create a 20-position flashcard set covering typical pawn breaks …c5 and …e5 so you recognise them on autopilot.
- Endgame micro-work. For every session, solve two rook-and-pawn studies (<5 minutes each). Focus on outside passed pawn and Lucena position themes—these appear frequently in your Sicilians.
- Review checklist. After each game, answer three questions:
- Did I spend more than 90 seconds on one move before move 10? Why?
- Was there a moment when improving my worst-placed piece was better than calculating a forcing line?
- Which pawn became a long-term weakness (backward, isolated, doubled) and could I have prevented it?
Quick stats
Peak rapid rating: 2286 (2020-08-09)
Most active hours chart:
Weekly performance:
Motivational nugget
The gap between 2000 and 2100 is rarely about learning more opening theory—it’s about better decisions faster. Tighten the clock discipline and solidify your 1.d4 repertoire, and the next rating jump will follow naturally.
Good luck, and keep enjoying the journey!
—Your Chess Coach 🤖
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| tmacboris | 5W / 7L / 1D | View Games |
| joecima | 4W / 2L / 0D | View Games |
| amatercina | 2W / 3L / 0D | View Games |
| silverblow | 1W / 3L / 0D | View Games |
| surf64 | 4W / 0L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1855 | 2045 | 1219 | |
| 2024 | 1939 | |||
| 2023 | 1965 | |||
| 2022 | 1960 | 1937 | ||
| 2021 | 2042 | 1973 | ||
| 2020 | 2253 | 2070 | ||
| 2018 | 1981 | |||
| 2017 | 2009 | 2182 | ||
| 2016 | 1679 | |||
| 2015 | 1802 | |||
| 2014 | 1840 | 1219 | ||
| 2013 | 1814 | 1190 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2W / 1L / 0D | 2W / 3L / 0D | 73.1 |
| 2024 | 7W / 8L / 2D | 9W / 6L / 1D | 68.0 |
| 2023 | 6W / 4L / 2D | 6W / 6L / 1D | 78.1 |
| 2022 | 3W / 5L / 2D | 2W / 5L / 1D | 73.2 |
| 2021 | 18W / 16L / 3D | 12W / 22L / 3D | 70.0 |
| 2020 | 6W / 0L / 0D | 2W / 4L / 1D | 77.5 |
| 2018 | 1W / 0L / 0D | 0W / 2L / 0D | 47.7 |
| 2017 | 11W / 5L / 0D | 11W / 6L / 1D | 74.4 |
| 2016 | 3W / 3L / 0D | 2W / 4L / 0D | 91.0 |
| 2015 | 0W / 0L / 0D | 0W / 1L / 0D | 29.0 |
| 2014 | 26W / 19L / 1D | 20W / 23L / 1D | 68.3 |
| 2013 | 16W / 11L / 2D | 19W / 7L / 0D | 63.1 |
Openings: Most Played
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 33.3% |
| Döry Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Bogo-Indian Defense | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Exchange Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Sozin Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| King's Indian Attack: French Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Tiviakov Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philidor Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: O'Kelly Variation | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Ruy Lopez | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Bird Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: O'Kelly Variation | 22 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 15 | 7 | 8 | 0 | 46.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Sozin Attack | 14 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 57.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 14 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 57.1% |
| French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation | 14 | 4 | 8 | 2 | 28.6% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 11 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 63.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 10 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 60.0% |
| French Defense | 10 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Döry Defense | 9 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 44.4% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 9 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 44.4% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 6 | 3 |
| Losing | 6 | 0 |