About GEOMAX5
GEOMAX5 is a chess player who treats blitz like a fast-paced canvas where every second counts. A geometry-minded thinker with a knack for sharp tactical ideas, GEOMAX5 blends creative calculation with a healthy dose of humor. The biography unfolds move by move, with the clock always adding pressure and personality to the story.
Blitz Journey
In blitz, GEOMAX5 thrives as a fearless improviser who loves turning quick skirmishes into deep battles. The road includes a memorable 10-game winning streak and, on occasion, a 13-game losing stretch—proof that momentum swings are part of the charm. The journey through 2023–2025 shows steady growth, curiosity, and a love for fast wars on the board.
- Preferred time control: Blitz
- Longest Winning Streak: 10
- Longest Losing Streak: 13
Opening Repertoire Highlights
GEOMAX5 tests ideas in several dynamic blitz lines, favoring sharp middlegames and practical chances. Notable tested openings include:
- Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, American Attack — 609 games, win rate 42.2%
- Indian Defense: Przepiorka Variation — 585 games, win rate 45.98%
- English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System — 421 games, win rate 45.37%
Other frequently explored choices include Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation and the King’s Indian Attack, reflecting a versatile blitz toolkit.
Milestones & Mentions
A peak moment in the blitz scene arrived in early 2025, signaling the culmination of relentless practice and competitive fire. The biography reads like a collection of memorable games, where clever ideas meet rapid calculation and nerve under time pressure.
- Peak Blitz rating: 2734 (2025-01-30)
- Profile: GEOMAX5
- Snapshots:
Overview for Improvement
Nice work in your blitz games, GEOMAX5. You show strong tactical alertness and good piece activity in the wins, and you occasionally press in complex positions. In the losses and drawn games, there is a clear pattern where sharp lines and time pressure can lead to mistakes or missed defenses. The goal now is to solidify a compact, three-part blitz plan: a reliable opening setup, steady middlegame plans that stay flexible under time pressure, and disciplined endgame technique. This will help you win more of the close, tactical battles and convert more opportunities into clean results.
What you did well
- You demonstrated good tactical awareness in recent decisive moments, recognizing opportunities to create threats against the opponent’s king and to exploit weak squares.
- You maintained active piece play in several middlegame transitions, keeping pressure on key files and diagonals and converting initiative into practical chances.
- You showed resilience in dynamic positions, continuing to fight for activity even when material balance became uncertain.
Key areas to improve
- Time management in blitz: when the clock ticks down, it’s easy to drift into overly deep calculations. Practice spending a safe amount of time on the first 10–12 moves and switch to a simpler, plan-driven approach when you’re low on time.
- Opening solidity under pressure: in some games, you faced sharp responses early. Build a compact repertoire that provides clear development, king safety, and a simple plan. Prefer setups that you know well over trying unfamiliar lines in blitz.
- Endgame technique: several games reached rook-and-pawn endings or simplified positions where precise technique matters. Invest time in key endgame patterns (rook endings, king activity in simplified positions) to convert more draws into wins and losses into draws when needed.
- Avoid over-ambitious tactical sparring in unclear positions: when you’re behind on time or in a dubious position, consider a more conservative line that keeps your king safe and reduces risk of a sudden tactical collapse.
Opening performance insights
Your openings show a preference for aggressive, tactical structures. A few observations you can act on:
- Sicilian and Indian defenses offer active play, but blitz can punish overly risky choices. Consider reinforcing your go-to lines with well-trodden middlegame plans so you can transition quickly and safely when the position tightens. For instance, you’ve had good outcomes with the Indian Defense branches; you can continue refining those lines and emphasize a few standard middlegame plans you can execute quickly.
Indian Defense: Przepiorka Variation - Balanced choices in the Sicilian family can yield strong results if you keep the structure intact and avoid overcomplication. If you enjoy Sicilian ideas, pair one main line with a clear, simple middlegame plan you can rely on under time pressure.
Sicilian Defense: Przepiorka Variation - Other solid options like the Colle System or Queen's Gambit family can offer easier, steady equalization in blitz. Consider adding one flexible, low-risk setup to your repertoire as a fallback when you’re short on time or facing unfamiliar responses.
Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation
Tip: for quick reference, you can review openings by name and study the typical middlegame plans that arise from them. If you want a quick starter reference, see openings like the Sicilian Defense: Przepiorka Variation and the Indian Defense: Przepiorka Variation as current focal points.
Practical training plan for the next session
- Daily blitz practice focused on three parts: tactics, openings, and endgames. Spend 15–20 minutes on tactics with a mix of motifs likely to appear in blitz (forks, skewers, traps, back-rank ideas).
- Study 1-2 selected openings (for example, Sicilian Defense: Przepiorka Variation and Indian Defense: Przepiorka Variation) and write down 3-to-4 standard middlegame plans for each. Use placeholders like Sicilian Defense: Przepiorka Variation for quick reference.
- Endgame practice: 2 sessions per week focusing on rook endings and king activity with pawns. Learn the essential rook endgame techniques and common pawn endgames you’re likely to encounter in blitz.
- Review your last 5 blitz games after you finish playing and note one concrete improvement for the next session (e.g., “avoid over-ambitious knight leaps in a specific setup” or “seek a simplifying exchange when ahead”).
- Time management drills: simulate 3-minute games with a fixed 10-move plan to build a rhythm. Then shift to 1.5–2 minute games to practice skating through middlegames efficiently.
One-week goals
- Lock in 1–2 reliable openings and practice 20 focused middlegame plans derived from them.
- Improve endgame conversion by practicing rook endings and king-centralization patterns.
- Develop a consistent time-management habit for blitz: allocate the first third of the game to development and safety, then switch to a plan-driven approach as time remains.
Encouraging note
Keep up the steady practice, and use each blitz session as a chance to reinforce a compact, reliable plan. If you want, I can tailor a 2-week training calendar focused on your preferred openings and common blitz motifs. You can also try the placeholder references to openings during study to quickly access notes and examples, for example: GEOMAX5 and Sicilian Defense: Przepiorka Variation.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| aerodromobile | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Chesstrueno | 3W / 1L / 0D | |
| akarumbi | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| noquiierootablas | 0W / 3L / 0D | |
| king_of_premoves | 1W / 1L / 2D | |
| tavrik | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| 69360420obama | 1W / 2L / 0D | |
| legionnare | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| sayaswan | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| pratham1111111111 | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sudhanshu Ranjan | 13W / 10L / 3D | |
| purehorses | 6W / 16L / 3D | |
| Nebojsa Djordjevic | 11W / 10L / 2D | |
| lipauska3 | 2W / 16L / 4D | |
| Rogelio Jr Antonio | 8W / 13L / 0D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2529 | |||
| 2024 | 2601 | |||
| 2023 | 2412 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1084W / 1127L / 213D | 909W / 1293L / 205D | 85.3 |
| 2024 | 826W / 873L / 190D | 724W / 978L / 184D | 90.5 |
| 2023 | 166W / 103L / 32D | 147W / 127L / 35D | 87.8 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, American Attack | 749 | 313 | 354 | 82 | 41.8% |
| Indian Defense: Przepiorka Variation | 702 | 316 | 314 | 72 | 45.0% |
| English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System | 502 | 228 | 228 | 46 | 45.4% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 461 | 195 | 221 | 45 | 42.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 389 | 144 | 209 | 36 | 37.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 341 | 163 | 153 | 25 | 47.8% |
| King's Indian Attack | 318 | 140 | 156 | 22 | 44.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 313 | 125 | 164 | 24 | 39.9% |
| QGD Tarrasch: 4.cxd5 | 304 | 123 | 151 | 30 | 40.5% |
| Catalan Opening: Closed | 257 | 136 | 99 | 22 | 52.9% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 10 | 0 |
| Losing | 13 | 2 |