Overview
Giovanni Marchesich (giomar27) is a spirited Candidate Master known for a razor-sharp Blitz game and a taste for unorthodox openings. A regular on fast time controls, Giovanni mixes serious preparation with a playful streak — the kind of player who will surprise you with an Amar Gambit one game and outmaneuver you in a 40-move tactical slug the next.
- Title: Candidate Master (FIDE)
- Username: giomar27
- Preferred time control: Blitz — fast, fearless, and often decisive
Playing Style & Strengths
Giovanni thrives in chaotic positions and late middlegame scrambles. His statistics show a high endgame frequency and a remarkable knack for comebacks: if a game heads into complex material imbalances, expect him to fight until the end.
- Endgame-focused: high Endgame Frequency — loves long scrappy fights
- Tactical resilience: excellent Comeback Rate and solid WinRateAfterLosingPiece
- Clock instincts: strongest in short time controls (Blitz/Bullet), where intuition and nerves rule
Signature Openings & Repertoire
Giovanni is not afraid to enter rare lines and gambits. Opponents should be prepared for sharp, asymmetrical positions where practical chances abound.
- Fan favorites in Blitz: Amar Gambit, Amazon Attack, Australian Defense, Elephant Gambit
- Reliable mainstays: Caro-Kann and Scandinavian when a steadier fight is called for
- Often surprises with offbeat systems — be ready for creative move orders
Explore one of his adventurous repertoires: Amar Gambit
Performance Highlights & Trends
Giovanni has played heavily in Blitz events and shows steady improvement across multiple seasons. He racks up long, decisive battles and often plays his best games at mid-morning and early evening hours.
- Big sample: many games played at Blitz with hundreds of decisive encounters (wins and losses often balanced by thrilling finishes)
- Best times to face him: statistical peaks around 10:00 and late afternoon; Saturday and Friday show especially strong win rates
- Streaks: has recorded long winning runs as well as some tough stretches — a fighter to the last move
Visual trend:
Career high (Blitz): 2654 (2025-12-15)
Notable Opponents & Records
Giovanni has faced many repeat rivals online. A few of the most-played opponents appear below; these matchups capture the ebb and flow of his club and online rivalry life.
- omid-jarrahi — many tense clashes (record shows a challenging scoreboard for Giovanni)
- la_debbi — favorable results and several dramatic finishes
- kabsr64, frescodizona06, tedshi — frequent opponents who know his tricks well
Memorable Game (sample)
Here’s a short, replayable example of Giovanni’s practical opening-to-tactics approach. Use the viewer to step through the key moments.
Stats Snapshot & Fun Facts
A quick glance at quirks and trivia that make Giovanni memorable — part grinder, part gambit artist, fully entertaining.
- Blitz workload: an immense number of fast games with both spectacular wins and bitter losses — fearless on the clock
- Avg moves: long decisive games on average — Giovanni prefers to squeeze wins out of long struggles rather than quick draws
- Early resignation rate: unusually low for someone who plays so many fast games — he fights hard
- Fun: his practice includes both ultra-sharp gambits and pragmatic Caro-Kann setups — variety keeps opponents guessing
Placeholders & Extras
These interactive placeholders are included to enrich the profile in compatible viewers:
- Rating chart (Blitz):
- Peak Blitz stat: 2654 (2025-12-15)
- Sample replay:
- Opening highlight tag: Amar Gambit
Closing Note
Whether you’re preparing to face giomar27 or just enjoy watching creative blitz chess, Giovanni Marchesich brings excitement and resilience to the board. Expect sharp ideas, long fights, and a pinch of the unexpected — and maybe a cheeky gambit when you least expect it.
Quick recap
Giovanni — nice session. You won some sharp attacking games and also dropped a few where the opponent opened lines to your king or exploited tactical shots. Below are concrete things you did well, recurring mistakes to fix, and a short blitz-focused training plan you can use tonight.
Highlights — what you did well
- King‑side aggression and timing: in your win with the kingside pawn storm you pushed pawns and opened files at the right moment to create decisive threats. That kind of commitment often breaks down opponents who play too passively.
- Good tactical vision in sharp positions: you spotted captures and forcing continuations (examples: sacrificing to open the g‑file and winning with the queen). These quick pattern recognitions are a big asset in Blitz games.
- Ability to convert practical chances: you converted one game because your opponent ran out of time while under pressure — you keep generating practical problems instead of shying away.
- Repertoire that creates imbalanced positions: your openings (Amar Gambit, Elephant Gambit, Australian Defense etc.) produce dynamic play and are well suited to your tactical strengths.
See the attacking win vs a solid defender here:
Recurring mistakes — what to fix
- King safety vs pawn storms and tactical sacrifices — several losses came after you allowed enemy pieces into your kingside (examples where Bxh3 / sacrifices opened your king). Before launching counterplay, check if your king has escape squares and defenders ready.
- Underestimating opponent counterplay down open files — when you create pawn weaknesses, opponents often get a rook or queen down the file. When you push, ask: who controls the open file after the exchange?
- Passive piece placement and back‑rank issues — in slower moments you left pieces with limited mobility and missed opportunities to trade into a safer endgame. Try to avoid having rooks stuck behind pawns or knights trapped on the rim.
- Time management swings — you’re good at creating practical chances, but sometimes you rely on the clock (and once won on time). In faster time scrambles, make your earliest moves on autopilot (opening plans) and save time for critical moments.
Example opponent profiles to review for patterns you missed: hanzoo_hasashi (sacrifice motifs), thecrusher444 (central tactics).
Concrete blitz training plan (30–45 minutes)
- 10 minutes — Tactics warmup: 3‑4 puzzle runs (focus: mating nets, forks, discovered checks). Keep puzzles at a 10–20 second solve time to simulate blitz pressure.
- 10 minutes — Mini‑opening review: pick 2 lines you play (one for White, one for Black). Drill the typical pawn breaks and a one‑page plan each (what to do if the center is closed vs open).
- 10 minutes — 3 rapid practice games (3+0 or 5+1) focusing on: king safety before attacking, and asking one question before every pawn push: "What lines open?"
- 5–15 minutes — Postmortem: annotate one win and one loss quickly — identify the turning point and one move you would change. Keep notes in one short bullet each.
Opening & repertoire advice
- Your unbalanced openings suit your style — keep them, but standardize move orders. That lowers the chance of early surprises and saves clock time.
- For the lines that give you the pawn storm positions, memorize one defensive resource against the common sacrificial idea (for example, where Bxh3 appears, practice the defensive move that neutralizes the attack).
- If you meet a position with open files toward your king, prioritize exchanging queens or rerouting a knight to block checks before chasing material.
Consider adding a 1‑page cheat sheet for each opening you play with 3 typical plans and 2 tactical motifs to watch for.
Quick blitz checklist (use during the game)
- Before a pawn storm: am I opening files toward my king? If yes, do I have enough defenders?
- Before every capture that opens a file: who controls the file afterward?
- If you see a sacrifice heading your way, look for the forcing reply (check, capture, counter‑sacrifice) — don’t instinctively accept if it exposes your king.
- Two‑minute rule: after move 10, if you have < 1:30 on the clock, switch to simplified plans (avoid long forcing variations unless winning).
Next steps & actions for your next session
- Tonight: do the 30–45 minute training above, then play a 10‑game blitz set and apply the checklist.
- Weekly: 1 longer rated game (15+10) and one engine review per week — focus on the turning points, not the whole game.
- Keep a short log: after each loss, write one sentence: "Why I lost" (king safety / tactical miss / time). Over 10 games you’ll see patterns fast.
Parting note
You’re trending up: your recent gains and positive long‑term win rate show your approach works. Tightening king safety and a little faster pattern recognition in defensive tactics will convert many of those close losses into wins. Keep the aggressive style — just add a safety checklist before you push pawns.
Want I to annotate your last loss vs hanzoo_hasashi move‑by‑move or produce a short puzzle from your winning game? Reply which one and I’ll prepare it.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| morozevichbobr | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| harvixxxxxx | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| winirmoves | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Erwin-Ivar-Tyrion | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| mismaly | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Alexander Gelman | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| gobiquanvo | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Rick GC | 2W / 1L / 0D | View |
| zhansayachampion | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Jval Saurin Patel | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| omid-jarrahi | 3W / 13L / 2D | View Games |
| la_debbi | 5W / 1L / 5D | View Games |
| kabsr64 | 7W / 4L / 0D | View Games |
| frescodizona06 | 6W / 3L / 0D | View Games |
| Ted Shi | 5W / 3L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2521 | |||
| 2025 | 2525 | 2572 | ||
| 2024 | 2485 | 2012 | 2000 | |
| 2023 | 2312 | 2370 | 2010 | |
| 2022 | 2312 | 2281 | 2172 | |
| 2021 | 2349 | 2190 | 1998 | |
| 2020 | 2202 | 2164 | 2048 | |
| 2019 | 2103 | 2118 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 7W / 10L / 1D | 6W / 10L / 0D | 84.0 |
| 2025 | 145W / 166L / 24D | 139W / 168L / 23D | 83.9 |
| 2024 | 97W / 92L / 23D | 91W / 110L / 15D | 78.4 |
| 2023 | 100W / 113L / 16D | 95W / 122L / 14D | 79.5 |
| 2022 | 42W / 40L / 5D | 33W / 46L / 10D | 79.7 |
| 2021 | 32W / 19L / 3D | 27W / 30L / 5D | 81.0 |
| 2020 | 68W / 42L / 9D | 55W / 55L / 11D | 72.6 |
| 2019 | 7W / 4L / 0D | 7W / 2L / 0D | 86.8 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack | 192 | 84 | 97 | 11 | 43.8% |
| Modern | 132 | 50 | 68 | 14 | 37.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 123 | 63 | 50 | 10 | 51.2% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 99 | 43 | 49 | 7 | 43.4% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 88 | 36 | 43 | 9 | 40.9% |
| Australian Defense | 80 | 39 | 35 | 6 | 48.8% |
| Barnes Defense | 58 | 29 | 29 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Elephant Gambit | 55 | 28 | 23 | 4 | 50.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 54 | 24 | 28 | 2 | 44.4% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 41 | 18 | 21 | 2 | 43.9% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 16.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Australian Defense | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Elephant Gambit | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Modern | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Barnes Defense | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 33.3% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Czech Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 14 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 57.1% |
| Amar Gambit | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 42.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Main Line | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Bird's Defense Deferred | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 33.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, American Attack | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Ruy Lopez: Marshall Attack | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 11 | 0 |
| Losing | 8 | 2 |