Glenn Jing (aka GlennJamin5000)
Born from the digital depths of blitz battles and bullet duels, Glenn Jing has carved a niche as a fierce competitor who simultaneously inspires awe and sympathy in his opponents' time clocks. With a peak rapid rating soaring to an impressive 1627 — somewhere around the corner of Grandmaster neighborhood (give or take a few pizza slices) — Glenn has proven that perseverance and coffee-fueled stamina can sometimes trump pure talent.
Playing Style
Glenn is a tactician with a twist, displaying a remarkable comeback rate of 57.91%, meaning he often turns the tides when the chips are down — or when he's one missed mate away from disaster. He averages about 45 moves per game whether winning or losing, showing he loves a good, drawn-out drama. Beware the psychological tilt factor clocking in at 123, a reminder that even chess warriors need to keep calm and carry on.
Preferred Arenas
Whether it's the lightning-fast blitz where Glenn has logged over 5,500 games with a solid 51.07% win rate, or the nerve-wracking bullet with wins over half of his 2,200+ games, his passion for fast and furious chess is undeniable. Daily and rapid formats see him testing his mettle with equally impressive dedication, though daily games are occasionally met with the mercy of time's toll.
Openings Whisperer
When it comes to openings, a mysterious "Top Secret" repertoire dominates his play, as he reportedly prefers keeping even chess engines guessing. But we do know he occasionally tinkers with classical lines like the Sicilian Defense Taimanov Variation and the Queens Pawn Opening.
Match Highlights
Glenn's recent victories include cunning time wins in fast-paced 10-second games, proving he’s not just playing chess; he’s playing the clock. One notable triumph was secured against TrustMeImDolphin, where positional skill met tactical timing in a dazzling display. Conversely, the sting of defeat comes swiftly but never silently, often by timeouts or intense pressure from worthy adversaries.
Notable Stats & Quirks
- Longest winning streak: 27 games — a streak worthy of a movie montage.
- Longest losing streak: 123 games — proof that persistence, not perfection, defines a true player.
- Win rate against lower-rated opponents: a confident 69.54%, suggesting Glenn knows how to close out when favored.
- Peak Blitz rating: 1608 achieved in May 2024, crushing many opponents and clocks alike.
- Unabashed master of time scrambles, often deciding games on the final tick — the ultimate test of nerves and reflexes.
Behind the Pieces
Glenn seems to be active mostly from midnight to early morning, his best time to play being exactly when many of us dream of sleep. Whether this nocturnal genius status is due to caffeine or sheer passion, his games bring excitement to those chasing victory or mere survival at odd hours.
All in all, Glenn Jing is a persistent gladiator of the 64 squares. With a penchant for making every move count, a love-hate relationship with the clock, and a resolve to battle on through streaks that would make lesser mortals fold, he's a player who embodies the true spirit of chess: relentless, unpredictable, and endlessly entertaining.
Quick summary — recent blitz session
Nice session overall. You finished with several clean wins (including a tactical finish) and a couple of games where the opponent outplayed you in the endgame. Your play shows strong attacking instincts and good opening choices for blitz. At the same time a few recurring issues — time management in complex positions and some endgame technique — cost you or forced you to press for risks.
Highlight: a clean tactical win
The game where you checkmated on move 30 shows several textbook blitz strengths: fast development, a pawn storm to open lines, and decisive tactical blows that convert initiative into mate. Good job spotting the Rxf6 / Rxd7 idea and finishing with Qh8# against thatslife08.
- Key moment: you opened the kingside and traded to get a dominant attack; then used piece activity to create decisive threats.
- What to keep: aggressive but sound attacks in positions where you can open files against the enemy king.
- Recreate this one: play it through with the board to feel the timing — you can load it here:
What you’re doing well (blitz)
- Attacking sense — you consistently create threats and hunt the enemy king. That checkmate game is a great example.
- Opening selection — your best-performing openings (French, Scandinavian, Barnes) suit blitz because they give you clear plans and imbalance to play for.
- Practical conversion — you often convert small advantages into wins or into time-pressure wins (flagging). Your overall win/loss numbers and strength-adjusted win rate show solid practical results.
- Willingness to simplify when ahead — trading to a winning endgame or simplifying into a favorable pawn race is something you do often and well.
Main weaknesses to fix
- Time management in complicated endgames — several wins were on time and some losses came from allowing the opponent’s king/pawn play to dominate. Practice making safe, fast moves in those moments (see drills below).
- Tactical oversights earlier in the game — you find combinations well, but once or twice you left pieces vulnerable (loose or hanging) early on. Double-check captures and checks in the opening/middlegame for cheap tactical replies.
- Endgame technique — rook and pawn / king-and-pawn endings showed up in your recent games. Studying basic Lucena/Philidor ideas and king activity will turn close losses into wins.
- Occasional passivity — when the opponent holds a central pawn wedge or a passed pawn, you sometimes drift into passive maneuvering instead of challenging the pawn (breaks, blockades, piece activity).
Concrete next steps (what to train this week)
- Tactics (20–30 minutes/day): focus on forks, pins, and mating patterns. In blitz the fastest solvers win the race — aim for 60–80 puzzles/day with a focus on speed and accuracy.
- Endgames (3× 15-minute sessions/week): practice king-and-pawn basics, rook vs pawn, and opposition. Key goals: convert an outside passed pawn, force the winning Lucena position, and defend basic rook endings.
- Time management drill (1 session): play 3× 5+0 blitz games forcing yourself to keep a 5–10 second reserve per game for complex decisions. Practice making routine moves in 1–3s and slowing down only on critical positions.
- Review 3 recent losses (post-mortem): go through the two endgame losses and one tactical miss — identify the exact move where you became worse and write down the alternative plan you should have played.
- Repertoire tune-up (1–2 study sessions): pick 2 reliable blitz openings (one as White, one as Black) you score well with (French and Scandinavian are good candidates). Learn 5–6 typical plans and 2 move-order tricks to save time during the game.
Short-term practice plan (7 days)
- Day 1–3: 30 min tactics + 15 min rook endgames + 2× 5+0 blitz focusing on speed.
- Day 4–5: 20 min opening review (mainlines you play) + 30 min tactics + one long 10|0 rapid to practice deeper calculation.
- Day 6: Analyze 3 recent games (one win, two losses). Write a one-line improvement for each critical error.
- Day 7: Play a mini-tournament of 4 blitz games; apply time-management rule (reserve 10s). Post-mortem the worst game immediately.
Practical tips for your next 10 blitz games
- In open positions, prioritize piece activity over pawn grabs. Active pieces win in blitz.
- When ahead, swap into the simplest winning endgame you can convert: trade down to an easy rook+king vs king/pawn structure rather than hunting speculative mates.
- Before every capture check: "Does my opponent have a forcing reply?" — this stops unnecessary loose pieces and forks.
- If you’re low on time, choose the safe plan that maintains the advantage rather than the flashy continuation that requires long calculation.
Follow-up & reminders
If you want, I can:
- Annotate one lost game in detail and suggest move-by-move improvements.
- Build a 2-line blitz opening repertoire with model games and traps to memorize.
- Generate a week-by-week training schedule tuned to your available time.
Which of the three would you like first?
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Andrew Jing | 55W / 199L / 10D | View Games |
| championac2 | 22W / 13L / 4D | View Games |
| damjan1989 | 10W / 24L / 0D | View Games |
| lukaka122333 | 11W / 4L / 6D | View Games |
| whease | 11W / 9L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1514 | 1506 | 1652 | 756 |
| 2024 | 1555 | 1600 | 860 | |
| 2023 | 1512 | 1507 | 1545 | 830 |
| 2022 | 1470 | 1501 | 1459 | 1025 |
| 2021 | 1358 | 1366 | 1407 | 861 |
| 2020 | 1204 | 1157 | 1311 | 990 |
| 2019 | 1158 | 984 | 955 | 792 |
| 2018 | 732 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 142W / 187L / 15D | 150W / 176L / 16D | 48.6 |
| 2024 | 134W / 109L / 18D | 125W / 116L / 9D | 53.3 |
| 2023 | 322W / 425L / 40D | 357W / 391L / 37D | 51.8 |
| 2022 | 528W / 384L / 44D | 390W / 505L / 43D | 54.2 |
| 2021 | 472W / 444L / 27D | 488W / 432L / 32D | 45.3 |
| 2020 | 715W / 696L / 46D | 682W / 692L / 58D | 43.8 |
| 2019 | 349W / 265L / 44D | 306W / 305L / 39D | 49.0 |
| 2018 | 0W / 1L / 0D | 0W / 1L / 0D | 39.5 |
Openings: Most Played
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 268 | 116 | 152 | 0 | 43.3% |
| Unknown Opening* | 193 | 100 | 92 | 1 | 51.8% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 179 | 52 | 126 | 1 | 29.1% |
| Barnes Defense | 126 | 80 | 46 | 0 | 63.5% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 79 | 20 | 58 | 1 | 25.3% |
| Amar Gambit | 73 | 29 | 43 | 1 | 39.7% |
| French Defense | 68 | 28 | 39 | 1 | 41.2% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 63 | 13 | 49 | 1 | 20.6% |
| Giuoco Piano: Tarrasch Variation | 57 | 17 | 38 | 2 | 29.8% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 52 | 22 | 29 | 1 | 42.3% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 152 | 81 | 62 | 9 | 53.3% |
| French Defense | 65 | 40 | 20 | 5 | 61.5% |
| Giuoco Piano: Tarrasch Variation | 57 | 34 | 23 | 0 | 59.6% |
| Philidor Defense | 56 | 28 | 25 | 3 | 50.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 54 | 20 | 32 | 2 | 37.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 50 | 31 | 17 | 2 | 62.0% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 48 | 20 | 23 | 5 | 41.7% |
| Scotch Game | 42 | 25 | 14 | 3 | 59.5% |
| Amazon Attack | 37 | 12 | 22 | 3 | 32.4% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 35 | 22 | 11 | 2 | 62.9% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 936 | 498 | 430 | 8 | 53.2% |
| French Defense | 374 | 210 | 148 | 16 | 56.1% |
| Amar Gambit | 332 | 170 | 147 | 15 | 51.2% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 299 | 152 | 137 | 10 | 50.8% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 200 | 96 | 96 | 8 | 48.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 194 | 110 | 69 | 15 | 56.7% |
| Philidor Defense | 180 | 84 | 80 | 16 | 46.7% |
| Amazon Attack | 166 | 86 | 69 | 11 | 51.8% |
| Barnes Defense | 152 | 90 | 54 | 8 | 59.2% |
| Elephant Gambit | 130 | 75 | 45 | 10 | 57.7% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense | 359 | 199 | 149 | 11 | 55.4% |
| Amar Gambit | 333 | 182 | 137 | 14 | 54.6% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 123 | 70 | 46 | 7 | 56.9% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 108 | 45 | 56 | 7 | 41.7% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 90 | 43 | 41 | 6 | 47.8% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 83 | 36 | 40 | 7 | 43.4% |
| Barnes Defense | 83 | 48 | 31 | 4 | 57.8% |
| Amazon Attack | 63 | 38 | 20 | 5 | 60.3% |
| French Defense: Classical Variation, Svenonius Variation | 54 | 25 | 27 | 2 | 46.3% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 46 | 25 | 21 | 0 | 54.4% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 27 | 0 |
| Losing | 123 | 2 |